Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Hans Wennborg 8c1eb106bd Revert r313009 "[ARM] Use ADDCARRY / SUBCARRY"
This was causing PR34045 to fire again.

> This is a preparatory step for D34515 and also is being recommitted as its
> first version caused PR34045.
>
> This change:
>  - makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
>  - lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
>    using (_, C) ← (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
>    using (R, _) ← (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
>    operations does the actual addition.
>  - for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
>    borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
>    and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
>    ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
>  - given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
>    ISD::SUBCARRYinto ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
>    as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
>    updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
>  - add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
>    to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) → C
>  - fixes PR34045
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192

Also revert follow-up r313010:

> [ARM] Fix typo when creating ISD::SUB nodes
>
> In D35192, I accidentally introduced a typo when creating ISD::SUB nodes,
> giving them two values instead of one.
>
> This fails when the merge_values combiner finds one of these nodes.
>
> This change fixes PR34564.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37690

llvm-svn: 313044
2017-09-12 16:24:17 +00:00
Roger Ferrer Ibanez 4f92b4162f [ARM] Use ADDCARRY / SUBCARRY
This is a preparatory step for D34515 and also is being recommitted as its
first version caused PR34045.

This change:
 - makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
 - lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
   using (_, C) ← (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
   using (R, _) ← (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
   operations does the actual addition.
 - for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
   borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
   and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
   ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
 - given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
   ISD::SUBCARRYinto ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
   as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
   updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
 - add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
   to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) → C
 - fixes PR34045

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192

llvm-svn: 313009
2017-09-12 07:40:09 +00:00
Hans Wennborg 075e5a2e2b Revert r312898 "[ARM] Use ADDCARRY / SUBCARRY"
It caused PR34564.

> This is a preparatory step for D34515 and also is being recommitted as its
> first version caused PR34045.
>
> This change:
>  - makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
>  - lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
>    using (_, C) ← (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
>    using (R, _) ← (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
>    operations does the actual addition.
>  - for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
>    borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
>    and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
>    ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
>  - given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
>    ISD::SUBCARRYinto ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
>    as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
>    updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
>  - add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
>    to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) → C
>  - fixes PR34045
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192

llvm-svn: 312980
2017-09-11 23:52:02 +00:00
Roger Ferrer Ibanez 12b20f2307 [ARM] Use ADDCARRY / SUBCARRY
This is a preparatory step for D34515 and also is being recommitted as its
first version caused PR34045.

This change:
 - makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
 - lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
   using (_, C) ← (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
   using (R, _) ← (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
   operations does the actual addition.
 - for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
   borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
   and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
   ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
 - given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
   ISD::SUBCARRYinto ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
   as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
   updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
 - add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
   to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) → C
 - fixes PR34045

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192

llvm-svn: 312898
2017-09-11 07:38:05 +00:00
Nico Weber bfde70b097 Revert r309923, it caused PR34045.
llvm-svn: 309950
2017-08-03 15:41:26 +00:00
Roger Ferrer Ibanez 854980341b [ARM] Use ADDCARRY / SUBCARRY
This patch:

- makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
- lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
  using (_, C) <- (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
  using (R, _) <- (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
  operations does the actual addition.
- for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
  borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
  and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
  ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
- given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
  ISD::SUBCARRY into ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
  as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
  updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
- add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
  to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) -> C

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192

llvm-svn: 309923
2017-08-03 07:45:10 +00:00
Reid Kleckner d0eda92845 Fix ARM intrinsics-overflow.ll test on Windows
Windows on ARM only supports thumb mode execution, so we have to
explicitly pick some non-Windows OS to test ARM mode codegen.

llvm-svn: 208448
2014-05-09 21:52:48 +00:00
Louis Gerbarg 3342bf1451 Add custom lowering for add/sub with overflow intrinsics to ARM
This patch adds support to ARM for custom lowering of the
llvm.{u|s}add.with.overflow.i32 intrinsics for i32/i64. This is particularly useful
for handling idiomatic saturating math functions as generated by
InstCombineCompare.

Test cases included.

rdar://14853450

llvm-svn: 208435
2014-05-09 17:02:49 +00:00