This means that the DEBUG_TYPE cannot take a comma anymore. All existing passes
conform to this rule.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15645
llvm-svn: 257466
Apparently the preferred version is the incredibly complicated
VerifyVersionInfoW function.
Rename the function to avoid potential future name clashes.
llvm-svn: 257415
This reverts commit r254363.
load64BitDebugHelp() has the side effect of loading dbghelp and setting
globals. It should be called in no-asserts builds as well as debug
builds.
llvm_unreachable is also not appropriate here, since we actually want to
return if dbghelp couldn't be loaded in a non-asserts build.
llvm-svn: 257384
This removes ifdefs and fixes the build for users of the Win8.0 SDK,
which I happen to be. Upgrading is not hard, but executing the same code
everywhere seems better.
llvm-svn: 257379
The new leader is known anyway so we can return it for some micro
optimization in code where it is easy to pass along the result to the
next join().
llvm-svn: 257130
Change Triple::get32BitArchVariant to return arm/armeb as the 32bit
variant of aarch64/aarch64_be and do the same change for the oppoiste
direction in Triple::get64BitArchVariant.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15529
llvm-svn: 257048
confused with what version of mingw is actually installed on the buildbot, and
for now I will just assume this is an unknown version which does not ship with
VersionHelpers.h.
llvm-svn: 256902
This patch is similar to the Python issue#11395. We need to cap the output
size to 32767 on Windows to work around the size limit of WriteConsole().
Reference: https://bugs.python.org/issue11395
Writing a test for this bug turns out to be harder than I thought. I am
still working on it (see phabricator review D15705).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15553
llvm-svn: 256892
Summary:
Hi Rafael,
Would you be able to review this patch, please?
(Clang part of the patch is D15832).
When clang runs an external tool, e.g. a linker, it may create a command line that exceeds the length limit.
Clang uses the llvm::sys::argumentsFitWithinSystemLimits function to check if command line length fits the OS
limitation. There are two problems in this function that may cause exceeding of the limit:
1. It ignores the length of the program path in its calculations. On the other hand, clang adds the program
path to the command line when it runs the program.
2. It assumes no space character is inserted after the last argument, which is not true for Windows. The flattenArgs function adds the trailing space for *each* argument. The result of this is that the terminating NULL character is not counted and may be placed beyond the length limit if the command line is exactly 32768 characters long. The WinAPI's CreateProcess does not find the NULL character and fails.
Reviewers: rafael, ygao, probinson
Subscribers: asl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15831
llvm-svn: 256866
InitMCObjectFileInfo was trying to override the triple in awkward ways.
For example, a triple specifying COFF but not Windows was forced as ELF.
This makes it easy for internal invariants to get violated, such as
those which triggered PR25912.
This fixes PR25912.
llvm-svn: 256226
Type specific declarations have been moved to Type.h and error handling
routines have been moved to ErrorHandling.h. Both are included in Core.h
so nothing should change for projects directly including the headers,
but transitive dependencies may be affected.
llvm-svn: 255965
This creates the initial infrastructure for writing ELF output files. It
doesn't yet have any implementation for encoding instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15555
llvm-svn: 255869
It looks like the code this patch deletes is based on a misunderstanding of
what guarantees writev provides. In particular, writev with 1 iovec is
not "more atomic" than a write.
Testing on OS X shows that both write and writev from multiple processes
can be intermixed.
llvm-svn: 255837
Summary: On Windows, the allocation granularity can be significantly
larger than a page (64K), so with many small objects, just clearing
the FreeMem list rapidly leaks quite a bit of virtual memory space
(if not rss). Fix that by only removing those parts of the FreeMem
blocks that overlap pages for which we are applying memory permissions,
rather than dropping the FreeMem blocks entirely.
Reviewers: lhames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15202
llvm-svn: 255760
the feature flag is essential for RDPKRU and WRPKRU instruction
more about the instruction can be found in the SDM rev 56, vol 2 from http://www.intel.com/sdm
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15491
llvm-svn: 255644
This is a very simple implementation of a thread pool using C++11
thread. It accepts any std::function<void()> for asynchronous
execution. Individual task can be synchronize using the returned
future, or the client can block on the full queue completion.
In case LLVM is configured with Threading disabled, it falls back
to sequential execution using std::async with launch:deferred.
This is intended to support parallelism for ThinLTO processing in
linker plugin, but is generic enough for any other uses.
This is a recommit of r255444 ; trying to workaround a bug in the
MSVC 2013 standard library. I think I was hit by:
http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedbackdetail/view/791185/std-packaged-task-t-where-t-is-void-or-a-reference-class-are-not-movable
Recommit of r255589, trying to please g++ as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15464
From: mehdi_amini <mehdi_amini@91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8>
llvm-svn: 255593
This is a very simple implementation of a thread pool using C++11
thread. It accepts any std::function<void()> for asynchronous
execution. Individual task can be synchronize using the returned
future, or the client can block on the full queue completion.
In case LLVM is configured with Threading disabled, it falls back
to sequential execution using std::async with launch:deferred.
This is intended to support parallelism for ThinLTO processing in
linker plugin, but is generic enough for any other uses.
This is a recommit of r255444 ; trying to workaround a bug in the
MSVC 2013 standard library. I think I was hit by:
http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedbackdetail/view/791185/std-packaged-task-t-where-t-is-void-or-a-reference-class-are-not-movable
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15464
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 255589
This is a very simple implementation of a thread pool using C++11
thread. It accepts any std::function<void()> for asynchronous
execution. Individual task can be synchronize using the returned
future, or the client can block on the full queue completion.
In case LLVM is configured with Threading disabled, it falls back
to sequential execution using std::async with launch:deferred.
This is intended to support parallelism for ThinLTO processing in
linker plugin, but is generic enough for any other uses.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15464
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 255444
I am seeing disappointing clang performance on a large PowerPC64
Linux box. GetRandomNumberSeed() does a buffered read from
/dev/urandom to seed its PRNG. As a result we read an entire page
even though we only need 4 bytes.
With every clang task reading a page worth of /dev/urandom we
end up spending a large amount of time stuck on kernel spinlock.
Patch by Anton Blanchard!
llvm-svn: 255386
Introduced DIMacro and DIMacroFile debug info metadata in the LLVM IR to support macros.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14687
llvm-svn: 255245
Add ARMv8.2-A to TargetParser, so that it can be used by the clang
command-line options and the .arch directive.
Most testing of this will be done in clang, checking that the
command-line options that this enables work.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15037
llvm-svn: 254400
(This is the second attempt to submit this patch. The first caused two assertion
failures and was reverted. See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25687)
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254377
and the follow-up r254356: "Fix a bug in MachineBlockPlacement that may cause assertion failure during BranchProbability construction."
Asserts were firing in Chromium builds. See PR25687.
llvm-svn: 254366
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254348
Summary:
This follows D14577 to treat ARMv6-J as an alias for ARMv6,
instead of an architecture in its own right.
The functional change is that the default CPU when targeting ARMv6-J
changes from arm1136j-s to arm1136jf-s, which is currently used as
the default CPU for ARMv6; both are, in fact, ARMv6-J CPUs.
The J-bit (Jazelle support) is irrelevant to LLVM, and it doesn't
affect code generation, attributes, optimizations, or anything else,
apart from selecting the default CPU.
Reviewers: rengolin, logan, compnerd
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14755
llvm-svn: 253675
Reid Kleckner