compiler identification lines in test-cases.
(Doing so only because it's then easier to search for references which
are actually important and need fixing.)
llvm-svn: 351200
The current statement domain derivation algorithm does not (always)
consider that different exit blocks of a loop can have different
conditions to be reached.
From the code
for (int i = n; ; i-=2) {
if (i <= 0) goto even;
if (i <= 1) goto odd;
A[i] = i;
}
even:
A[0] = 42;
return;
odd:
A[1] = 21;
return;
Polly currently derives the following domains:
Stmt_even_critedge
Domain :=
[n] -> { Stmt_even_critedge[] };
Stmt_odd
Domain :=
[n] -> { Stmt_odd[] : (1 + n) mod 2 = 0 and n > 0 };
while the domain for the odd case is correct, Stmt_even is assumed to be
executed unconditionally, which is obviously wrong. While projecting out
the loop dimension in `adjustDomainDimensions`, it does not consider
that there are other exit condition that have matched before.
I don't know a how to fix this without changing a lot of code. Therefore
This patch rejects loops with multiple exist blocks to fix the
miscompile of test-suite's uuencode.
The odd condition is transformed by LLVM to
%cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv, 1
such that the project_out in adjustDomainDimensions() indeed only
matches for odd n (using this condition only, we'd have an infinite loop
otherwise).
The even condition manifests as
%cmp = icmp slt i64 %indvars.iv, 3
Because buildDomainsWithBranchConstraints() does not consider other exit
conditions, it has to assume that the induction variable will eventually
be lower than 3 and taking this exit.
IMHO we need to reuse the algorithm that determines the number of
iterations (addLoopBoundsToHeaderDomain) to determine which exit
condition applies first. It has to happen in
buildDomainsWithBranchConstraints() because the result will need to
propagate to successor BBs. Currently addLoopBoundsToHeaderDomain() just
look for union of all backedge conditions (which means leaving not the
loop here). The patch in llvm.org/PR35465 changes it to look for exit
conditions instead. This is required because there might be other exit
conditions that do not alternatively go back to the loop header.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45649
llvm-svn: 330858
Summary:
ScopDetection used to check if a loop withing a region was infinite and emitted a diagnostic in such cases. After r310940 there's no point checking against that situation, as infinite loops don't appear in regions anymore.
The test failure was observed on these two polly buildbots:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/polly-arm-linux/builds/8368http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/polly-amd64-linux/builds/10310
This patch XFAILs `ReportLoopHasNoExit.ll` and turns infinite loop detection into an assert.
Reviewers: grosser, sanjoy, bollu
Reviewed By: grosser
Subscribers: efriedma, aemerson, kristof.beyls, dberlin, llvm-commits
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36776
llvm-svn: 311503
ReportLoopHasNoExit started failing after r310940 that added
infinite loops to postdominators. The change made regions not
contain infinite loops anymore.
This patch unbreaks the polly tree by XFAILING the
ReportLoopHasNoExit test. Full fix is under review in D36776.
llvm-svn: 310980
Utilizing newer LLVM diagnostic remark API in order to enable use of
opt-viewer tool. Polly Diagnostic Remarks also now appear in YAML
remark file.
In this patch, I've added the OptimizationRemarkEmitter into certain
classes where remarks are being emitted and update the remark emit calls
itself. I also provide each remark a BasicBlock or Instruction from where
it is being called, in order to compute the hotness of the remark.
Patch by Tarun Rajendran!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35399
llvm-svn: 308233
This patch makes sure that in case a loop is not fully contained within a region
that later forms a SCoP, none of the loop backedges are allowed to be part of
the region. We currently do not support the situation where only some of a loops
backedges are part of a scop. Today, this can break both scop modeling and code
generation. One such breaking test case is for example
test/ScopDetectionDiagnostics/loop_partially_in_scop-2.ll, where we totally
forgot to code generate some of the backedges. Fortunately, it is commonly not
necessary to support these partial loops, it is way more common that either
no backedge is included in a region or all loop backedge are included.
This fixes a recent miscompile in
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset which was exposed after
r306477.
llvm-svn: 308113
Only when load-hoisted we can be sure the base pointer is invariant
during the SCoP's execution. Most of the time it would be added to
the required hoists for the alias checks anyway, except with
-polly-ignore-aliasing, -polly-use-runtime-alias-checks=0 or if
AliasAnalysis is already sure it doesn't alias with anything
(for instance if there is no other pointer to alias with).
Two more parts in Polly assume that this load-hoisting took place:
- setNewAccessRelation() which contains an assert which tests this.
- BlockGenerator which would use to the base ptr from the original
code if not load-hoisted (if the access expression is regenerated)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30694
llvm-svn: 297195
Scops that exit with an unreachable are today still permitted, but make little
sense to optimize. We therefore can already skip them during scop detection.
This speeds up scop detection in certain cases and also ensures that bugpoint
does not introduce unreachables when reducing test cases.
In practice this change should have little impact, as the performance of
unreachable code is unlikely to matter.
This commit is part of a series that makes Polly more robust in the presence
of unreachables.
llvm-svn: 297151
Summary:
Both `canUseISLTripCount()` and `addOverApproximatedRegion()` contained checks
to reject endless loops which are now removed and replaced by a single check
in `isValidLoop()`.
For reporting such loops the `ReportLoopOverlapWithNonAffineSubRegion` is
renamed to `ReportLoopHasNoExit`. The test case
`ReportLoopOverlapWithNonAffineSubRegion.ll` is adapted and renamed as well.
The schedule generation in `buildSchedule()` is based on the following
assumption:
Given some block B that is contained in a loop L and a SESE region R,
we assume that L is contained in R or the other way around.
However, this assumption is broken in the presence of endless loops that are
nested inside other loops. Therefore, in order to prevent erroneous behavior
in `buildSchedule()`, r265280 introduced a corresponding check in
`canUseISLTripCount()` to reject endless loops. Unfortunately, it was possible
to bypass this check with -polly-allow-nonaffine-loops which was fixed by adding
another check to reject endless loops in `allowOverApproximatedRegion()` in
r273905. Hence there existed two separate locations that handled this case.
Thank you Johannes Doerfert for helping to provide the above background
information.
Reviewers: Meinersbur, grosser
Subscribers: _jdoerfert, pollydev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24560
Contributed-by: Matthias Reisinger <d412vv1n@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 281987
Reject and report regions that contains loops overlapping nonaffine region.
This situation typically happens in the presence of inifinite loops.
This addresses bug llvm.org/PR28071.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21312
Contributed-by: Huihui Zhang <huihuiz@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 273905
This patch cleans up the rejection log handling during the
ScopDetection. It consists of two interconnected parts:
- We keep all detection contexts for a function in order to provide
more information to the user, e.g., about the rejection of
extended/intermediate regions.
- We remove the mutable "RejectLogs" member as the information is
available through the detection contexts.
llvm-svn: 269323
This allows code such as:
void multiple_types(char *Short, char *Float, char *Double) {
for (long i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
Short[i] = *(short *)&Short[2 * i];
Float[i] = *(float *)&Float[4 * i];
Double[i] = *(double *)&Double[8 * i];
}
}
To model such code we use as canonical element type of the modeled array the
smallest element type of all original array accesses, if type allocation sizes
are multiples of each other. Otherwise, we use a newly created iN type, where N
is the gcd of the allocation size of the types used in the accesses to this
array. Accesses with types larger as the canonical element type are modeled as
multiple accesses with the smaller type.
For example the second load access is modeled as:
{ Stmt_bb2[i0] -> MemRef_Float[o0] : 4i0 <= o0 <= 3 + 4i0 }
To support code-generating these memory accesses, we introduce a new method
getAccessAddressFunction that assigns each statement instance a single memory
location, the address we load from/store to. Currently we obtain this address by
taking the lexmin of the access function. We may consider keeping track of the
memory location more explicitly in the future.
We currently do _not_ handle multi-dimensional arrays and also keep the
restriction of not supporting accesses where the offset expression is not a
multiple of the access element type size. This patch adds tests that ensure
we correctly invalidate a scop in case these accesses are found. Both types of
accesses can be handled using the very same model, but are left to be added in
the future.
We also move the initialization of the scop-context into the constructor to
ensure it is already available when invalidating the scop.
Finally, we add this as a new item to the 2.9 release notes
Reviewers: jdoerfert, Meinersbur
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16878
llvm-svn: 259784
We support now code such as:
void multiple_types(char *Short, char *Float, char *Double) {
for (long i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
Short[i] = *(short *)&Short[2 * i];
Float[i] = *(float *)&Float[4 * i];
Double[i] = *(double *)&Double[8 * i];
}
}
To support such code we use as element type of the modeled array the smallest
element type of all original array accesses. Accesses with larger types are
modeled as multiple accesses with the smaller type.
For example the second load access is modeled as:
{ Stmt_bb2[i0] -> MemRef_Float[o0] : 4i0 <= o0 <= 3 + 4i0 }
To support jscop-rewritable memory accesses we need each statement instance to
only be assigned a single memory location, which will be the address at which
we load the value. Currently we obtain this address by taking the lexmin of
the access function. We may consider keeping track of the memory location more
explicitly in the future.
llvm-svn: 259587
Polly currently does not support irreducible control and it is probably not
worth supporting. This patch adds code that checks for irreducible control
and refuses regions containing irreducible control.
Polly traditionally had rather restrictive checks on the control flow structure
which would have refused irregular control, but within the last couple of months
most of the control flow restrictions have been removed. As part of this
generalization we accidentally allowed irregular control flow.
Contributed-by: Karthik Senthil and Ajith Pandel
llvm-svn: 258497
This patch allows invariant loads to be used in the SCoP description,
e.g., as loop bounds, conditions or in memory access functions.
First we collect "required invariant loads" during SCoP detection that
would otherwise make an expression we care about non-affine. To this
end a new level of abstraction was introduced before
SCEVValidator::isAffineExpr() namely ScopDetection::isAffine() and
ScopDetection::onlyValidRequiredInvariantLoads(). Here we can decide
if we want a load inside the region to be optimistically assumed
invariant or not. If we do, it will be marked as required and in the
SCoP generation we bail if it is actually not invariant. If we don't
it will be a non-affine expression as before. At the moment we
optimistically assume all "hoistable" (namely non-loop-carried) loads
to be invariant. This causes us to expand some SCoPs and dismiss them
later but it also allows us to detect a lot we would dismiss directly
if we would ask e.g., AliasAnalysis::canBasicBlockModify(). We also
allow potential aliases between optimistically assumed invariant loads
and other pointers as our runtime alias checks are sound in case the
loads are actually invariant. Together with the invariant checks this
combination allows to handle a lot more than LICM can.
The code generation of the invariant loads had to be extended as we
can now have dependences between parameters and invariant (hoisted)
loads as well as the other way around, e.g.,
test/Isl/CodeGen/invariant_load_parameters_cyclic_dependence.ll
First, it is important to note that we cannot have real cycles but
only dependences from a hoisted load to a parameter and from another
parameter to that hoisted load (and so on). To handle such cases we
materialize llvm::Values for parameters that are referred by a hoisted
load on demand and then materialize the remaining parameters. Second,
there are new kinds of dependences between hoisted loads caused by the
constraints on their execution. If a hoisted load is conditionally
executed it might depend on the value of another hoisted load. To deal
with such situations we sort them already in the ScopInfo such that
they can be generated in the order they are listed in the
Scop::InvariantAccesses list (see compareInvariantAccesses). The
dependences between hoisted loads caused by indirect accesses are
handled the same way as before.
llvm-svn: 249607
This single option replaces -polly-detect-unprofitable and -polly-no-early-exit
and is supposed to be the only option that disables compile-time heuristics that
aim to bail out early on scops that are believed to not benefit from Polly
optimizations.
Suggested-by: Johannes Doerfert
llvm-svn: 249426
These flags are now always passed to all tests and need to be disabled if
not needed. Disabling these flags, rather than passing them to almost all
tests, significantly simplfies our RUN: lines.
llvm-svn: 249422
Polly's profitability heuristic saves compile time by skipping trivial scops or
scops were we know no good optimization can be applied. For almost all our tests
this heuristic makes little sense as we aim for minimal test cases when testing
functionality. Hence, in almost all cases this heuristic is better be disabled.
In preparation of disabling Polly's compile time heuristic by default in the
test suite we first explicitly enable it in the couple of test cases that really
use it (or run with/without heuristic side-by-side).
llvm-svn: 249418
Instead of having two separate options
-polly-detect-scops-in-functions-without-loops and
-polly-detect-scops-in-regions-without-loops we now just use
-polly-detect-unprofitable to force the detection of scops ignoring any compile
time saving bailout heuristics.
llvm-svn: 247057
I ran the script from r246327 and it touched all the right files;
committing now to hopefully right the bots, but if my check-polly
doesn't come back clean I'll keep looking.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/polly-amd64-linux/builds/33648
llvm-svn: 246341
I just learned that target triples prevent test cases to be run on other
architectures. Polly test cases are until now sufficiently target independent
to not require any target triples. Hence, we drop them.
llvm-svn: 235384
This will allow the ScopDetection to detect non-affine regions that
contain loops. All loops contained will be collected and are
accessible to later passes in order to adjust the access functions.
As the loops are non-affine and will not be part of the polyhedral
representation later, all accesses that are variant in these loops
have to be over approximated as non-affine accesses. They are
therefore handled the same way as other non-affine accesses.
Additionally, we do not count non-affine loops for the profitability
heuristic, thus a region with only a non-affine loop will only be
detected if the general detection of loop free regions is enabled.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8152
llvm-svn: 234711
Scops that only read seem generally uninteresting and scops that only write are
most likely initializations where there is also little to optimize. To not
waste compile time we bail early.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7735
llvm-svn: 229820
Arthur Eubanks