normal expression, and change Evaluate and IRGen to evaluate it like a
normal expression. This simplifies the code significantly, and fixes
PR3396.
llvm-svn: 65622
is a rather big change, but I think this is the direction we want to go;
the code is significantly shorter now, and it doesn't duplicate Evaluate
code. There shouldn't be any visible changes as far as I know.
There has been some movement towards putting ICE handling into
Evaluate (for example, VerifyIntegerConstantExpression uses Evaluate
instead of isICE). This patch is sort of the opposite of the approach,
making ICE handling work without Evaluate being aware of it. I think
this approach is better because it separates the code that does the
constant evaluation from code that's calculating a rather
arbitrary predicate.
The one thing I don't really like about this patch is that
the handling of commas in C99 complicates it signficantly. (Seriously,
what was the standards committee thinking when they wrote that
part?) I think I've come up with a decent approach, but it doesn't feel
ideal. I might add some way to check for evaluated commas from Evaluate
in a subsequent patch; that said, it might not be worth bothering.
llvm-svn: 65524
the various PPTokens that are pasted together to make it. In the course
of working on this, I discovered ParseObjCStringLiteral which needs some
work. I'll tackle it next.
llvm-svn: 64892
- This idiom ensures that the result will have the right width and
type.
- Tested on most of x86_64/llvm-test to satisfy my paranoia.
- This fixes at least the following bugs:
o UnaryTypeTraitExpr wasn't setting the width correctly.
o Arithmetic on _Bool wasn't setting the width correctly.
And probably a number more.
llvm-svn: 64864
Doug: please verify that it is expected that LastIdx can be less that
NumInits. And perhaps add a comment so that Chris doesn't break your
code. :)
llvm-svn: 64688
about, whether they are builtins or not. Use this to add the
appropriate "format" attribute to NSLog, NSLogv, asprintf, and
vasprintf, and to translate builtin attributes (from Builtins.def)
into actual attributes on the function declaration.
Use the "printf" format attribute on function declarations to
determine whether we should do format string checking, rather than
looking at an ad hoc list of builtins and "known" function names.
Be a bit more careful about when we consider a function a "builtin" in
C++.
llvm-svn: 64561
1) implement parser and sema support for reading and verifying attribute(warnunusedresult).
2) rename hasLocalSideEffect to isUnusedResultAWarning, inverting the sense
of its result.
3) extend isUnusedResultAWarning to directly return the loc and range
info that should be reported to the user. Make it substantially more
precise in some cases than what was previously reported.
4) teach isUnusedResultAWarning about CallExpr to decls that are
pure/const/warnunusedresult, fixing a fixme.
5) change warn_attribute_wrong_decl_type to not pass in english strings, instead,
pass in integers and use %select.
llvm-svn: 64543
etc.) when we perform name lookup on them. This ensures that we
produce the correct signature for these functions, which has two
practical impacts:
1) When we're supporting the "implicit function declaration" feature
of C99, these functions will be implicitly declared with the right
signature rather than as a function returning "int" with no
prototype. See PR3541 for the reason why this is important (hint:
GCC always predeclares these functions).
2) If users attempt to redeclare one of these library functions with
an incompatible signature, we produce a hard error.
This patch does a little bit of work to give reasonable error
messages. For example, when we hit case #1 we complain that we're
implicitly declaring this function with a specific signature, and then
we give a note that asks the user to include the appropriate header
(e.g., "please include <stdlib.h> or explicitly declare 'malloc'"). In
case #2, we show the type of the implicit builtin that was incorrectly
declared, so the user can see the problem. We could do better here:
for example, when displaying this latter error message we say
something like:
'strcpy' was implicitly declared here with type 'char *(char *, char
const *)'
but we should really print out a fake code line showing the
declaration, like this:
'strcpy' was implicitly declared here as:
char *strcpy(char *, char const *)
This would also be good for printing built-in candidates with C++
operator overloading.
The set of C library functions supported by this patch includes all
functions from the C99 specification's <stdlib.h> and <string.h> that
(a) are predefined by GCC and (b) have signatures that could cause
codegen issues if they are treated as functions with no prototype
returning and int. Future work could extend this set of functions to
other C library functions that we know about.
llvm-svn: 64504
- Made allocation of Stmt objects using vanilla new/delete a *compiler
error* by making this new/delete "protected" within class Stmt.
- Now the only way to allocate Stmt objects is by using the new
operator that takes ASTContext& as an argument. This ensures that
all Stmt nodes are allocated from the same (pool) allocator.
- Naturally, these two changes required that *all* creation sites for
AST nodes use new (ASTContext&). This is a large patch, but the
majority of the changes are just this mechanical adjustment.
- The above changes also mean that AST nodes can no longer be
deallocated using 'delete'. Instead, one most do
StmtObject->Destroy(ASTContext&) or do
ASTContextObject.Deallocate(StmtObject) (the latter not running the
'Destroy' method).
Along the way I also...
- Made CompoundStmt allocate its array of Stmt* using the allocator in
ASTContext (previously it used std::vector). There are a whole
bunch of other Stmt classes that need to be similarly changed to
ensure that all memory allocated for ASTs comes from the allocator
in ASTContext.
- Added a new smart pointer ExprOwningPtr to Sema.h. This replaces
the uses of llvm::OwningPtr within Sema, as llvm::OwningPtr used
'delete' to free memory instead of a Stmt's 'Destroy' method.
Big thanks to Doug Gregor for helping with the acrobatics of making
'new/delete' private and the new smart pointer ExprOwningPtr!
llvm-svn: 63997
ASTContext. This required changing all clients to pass in the ASTContext& to the
constructor of StringLiteral. I also changed all allocations of StringLiteral to
use new(ASTContext&).
Along the way, I updated a bunch of new()'s in StmtSerialization.cpp to use the
allocator from ASTContext& (not complete).
llvm-svn: 63958
represents an implicit value-initialization of a subobject of a
particular type. This replaces the (ab)use of CXXZeroValueInitExpr
within initializer lists for the "holes" that occur due to the use of
C99 designated initializers.
The new test case is currently XFAIL'd, because CodeGen's
ConstExprEmitter (in lib/CodeGen/CGExprConstant.cpp) needs to be
taught to value-initialize when it sees ImplicitValueInitExprs.
llvm-svn: 63317
The approach I've taken in this patch is relatively straightforward,
although the code itself is non-trivial. Essentially, as we process
an initializer list we build up a fully-explicit representation of the
initializer list, where each of the subobject initializations occurs
in order. Designators serve to "fill in" subobject initializations in
a non-linear way. The fully-explicit representation makes initializer
lists (both with and without designators) easy to grok for codegen and
later semantic analyses. We keep the syntactic form of the initializer
list linked into the AST for those clients interested in exactly what
the user wrote.
Known limitations:
- Designating a member of a union that isn't the first member may
result in bogus initialization (we warn about this)
- GNU array-range designators are not supported (we warn about this)
llvm-svn: 63242
accurately states what the function is trying to do and how it is
different from Expr::isEvaluatable. Also get rid of a parameter that is both
unused and inaccurate.
llvm-svn: 62951
designated initializers. This implementation should cover all of the
constraints in C99 6.7.8, including long, complex designations and
computing the size of incomplete array types initialized with a
designated initializer. Please see the new test-case and holler if you
find cases where this doesn't work.
There are still some wrinkles with GNU's anonymous structs and
anonymous unions (it isn't clear how these should work; we'll just
follow GCC's lead) and with designated initializers for the members of a
union. I'll tackle those very soon.
CodeGen is still nonexistent, and there's some leftover code in the
parser's representation of designators that I'll also need to clean up.
llvm-svn: 62737
information for declarations that were referenced via a qualified-id,
e.g., N::C::value. We keep track of the location of the start of the
nested-name-specifier. Note that the difference between
QualifiedDeclRefExpr and DeclRefExpr does have an effect on the
semantics of function calls in two ways:
1) The use of a qualified-id instead of an unqualified-id suppresses
argument-dependent lookup
2) If the name refers to a virtual function, the qualified-id
version will call the function determined statically while the
unqualified-id version will call the function determined dynamically
(by looking up the appropriate function in the vtable).
Neither of these features is implemented yet, but we do print out
qualified names for QualifiedDeclRefExprs as part of the AST printing.
llvm-svn: 61789
Make C++ classes track the POD property (C++ [class]p4)
Track the existence of a copy assignment operator.
Implicitly declare the copy assignment operator if none is provided.
Implement most of the parsing job for the G++ type traits extension.
Fully implement the low-hanging fruit of the type traits:
__is_pod: Whether a type is a POD.
__is_class: Whether a type is a (non-union) class.
__is_union: Whether a type is a union.
__is_enum: Whether a type is an enum.
__is_polymorphic: Whether a type is polymorphic (C++ [class.virtual]p1).
llvm-svn: 61746
- Overloading has to cope with having both static and non-static
member functions in the overload set.
- The call may or may not have an implicit object argument,
depending on the syntax (x.f() vs. f()) and the context (static
vs. non-static member function).
- We now generate MemberExprs for implicit member access expression.
- We now cope with mutable whenever we're building MemberExprs.
llvm-svn: 61329
which can refer to static data members, enumerators, and member
functions as well as to non-static data members.
Implement correct lvalue computation for member references in C++.
Compute the result type of non-static data members of reference type properly.
llvm-svn: 61294
Eli Friedman