Referring back to the original commit (r115090) which was a frontend only test
I adjusted this test to verify the frontend change that was made, to emit the
protected access value in the flags metadata field.
llvm-svn: 171604
the body of a functions. The problem was that hasBody looks at the entire chain
and causes problems to -fvisibility-inlines-hidden if the cache was not
invalidated.
Original message:
Cache visibility of decls.
This unifies the linkage and visibility caching. I first implemented this when
working on pr13844, but the previous fixes removed the performance advantage of
this one.
This is still a step in the right direction for making linkage and visibility
cheap to use.
llvm-svn: 171053
of a member function with parenthesized declarator.
Like this test case:
class Foo {
const char *(baz)() {
return __PRETTY_FUNCTION__;
}
};
llvm-svn: 170233
I wasn't sure where to put the test case for this, but this seemed like as good
a place as any. I had to reorder the tests here to make them legible while
still matching the order of metadata output in the IR file (for some reason
making it virtual changed the ordering).
Relevant commit to fix up LLVM to actually respect 'artificial' member
variables is coming once I write up a test case for it.
llvm-svn: 170154
both LE and BE targets.
AFAICT, Clang get's this correct for PPC64. I've compared it to GCC 4.8
output for PPC64 (thanks Roman!) and to my limited ability to read power
assembly, it looks functionally equivalent. It would be really good to
fill in the assertions on this test case for x86-32, PPC32, ARM, etc.,
but I've reached the limit of my time and energy... Hopefully other
folks can chip in as it would be good to have this in place to test any
subsequent changes.
To those who care about PPC64 performance, a side note: there is some
*obnoxiously* bad code generated for these test cases. It would be worth
someone's time to sit down and teach the PPC backend to pattern match
these IR constructs better. It appears that things like '(shr %foo,
<imm>)' turn into 'rldicl R, R, 64-<imm>, <imm>' or some such. They
don't even get combined with other 'rldicl' instructions *immediately
adjacent*. I'll add a couple of these patterns to the README, but
I think it would be better to look at all the patterns produced by this
and other bitfield access code, and systematically build up a collection
of patterns that efficiently reduce them to the minimal code.
llvm-svn: 169693
This was an egregious bug due to the several iterations of refactorings
that took place. Size no longer meant what it original did by the time
I finished, but this line of code never got updated. Unfortunately we
had essentially zero tests for this in the regression test suite. =[
I've added a PPC64 run over the bitfield test case I've been primarily
using. I'm still looking at adding more tests and making sure this is
the *correct* bitfield access code on PPC64 linux, but it looks pretty
close to me, and it is *worlds* better than before this patch as it no
longer asserts! =] More commits to follow with at least additional tests
and maybe more fixes.
Sorry for the long breakage due to this....
llvm-svn: 169691
generally support the C++11 memory model requirements for bitfield
accesses by relying more heavily on LLVM's memory model.
The primary change this introduces is to move from a manually aligned
and strided access pattern across the bits of the bitfield to a much
simpler lump access of all bits in the bitfield followed by math to
extract the bits relevant for the particular field.
This simplifies the code significantly, but relies on LLVM to
intelligently lowering these integers.
I have tested LLVM's lowering both synthetically and in benchmarks. The
lowering appears to be functional, and there are no really significant
performance regressions. Different code patterns accessing bitfields
will vary in how this impacts them. The only real regressions I'm seeing
are a few patterns where the LLVM code generation for loads that feed
directly into a mask operation don't take advantage of the x86 ability
to do a smaller load and a cheap zero-extension. This doesn't regress
any benchmark in the nightly test suite on my box past the noise
threshold, but my box is quite noisy. I'll be watching the LNT numbers,
and will look into further improvements to the LLVM lowering as needed.
llvm-svn: 169489
The count attribute is more accurate with regards to the size of an array. It
also obviates the upper bound attribute in the subrange. We can also better
handle an unbound array by setting the count to -1 instead of the lower bound to
1 and upper bound to 0.
llvm-svn: 169311
The count field is necessary because there isn't a difference between the 'lo'
and 'hi' attributes for a one-element array and a zero-element array. When the
count is '0', we know that this is a zero-element array. When it's >=1, then
it's a normal constant sized array. When it's -1, then the array is unbounded.
llvm-svn: 169219
non-trivial if they would not call a move operation, even if they would in fact
call a trivial copy operation. A proper fix is to follow, but this small
directed fix is intended for porting to the 3.2 release branch.
llvm-svn: 167920
This corrects the mangling and linkage of classes (& their member functions) in
cases like this:
struct foo {
struct {
void func() { ... }
} x;
};
we were accidentally giving this nested unnamed struct 'no' linkage where it
should've had the linkage of the outer class. The mangling was incorrecty too,
mangling as TU-wide unnamed type mangling of $_X rather than class-scoped
mangling of UtX_.
This also fixes -Wunused-member-function which would incorrectly diagnose
'func' as unused due to it having no linkage & thus appearing to be TU-local
when in fact it might be correctly used in another TU.
Similar mangling should be applied to function local classes in similar cases
but I've deferred that for a subsequent patch.
Review/discussion by Richard Smith, John McCall, & especially Eli Friedman.
llvm-svn: 167906
If we have a type 'int a[1]' and a type 'int b[0]', the generated DWARF is the
same for both of them because we use the 'upper_bound' attribute. Instead use
the 'count' attrbute, which gives the correct number of elements in the array.
<rdar://problem/12566646>
llvm-svn: 167807
- In C++11, perform overload resolution over all assignment operators, rather than just looking for copy/move assignment operators.
- Clean up after temporaries produced by operator= immediately, rather than accumulating them until the end of the function.
llvm-svn: 167798
Do this by making the mangleNumber(APSInt) overload look like
the int64_t version. (The latter should probably just delegate
to the former).
Test from Evgeny Eltsin!
llvm-svn: 167599
at whether the *selected* constructor would be trivial rather than considering
whether the array's element type has *any* non-trivial constructors of the
relevant kind.
llvm-svn: 167562
checks to enable. Remove frontend support for -fcatch-undefined-behavior,
-faddress-sanitizer and -fthread-sanitizer now that they don't do anything.
llvm-svn: 167413
test/CodeGenCXX/member-alignment.cpp. The test succeeds for
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu. If other flavors of powerpc are
shown by buildbots to still be broken, we can adjust the test
at that time.
llvm-svn: 167143
doesn't include padding up to the alignment of the record, take this
as a cue that the alignment of the record should (conservatively) be
set to 1. This is similar to other the other cues we use to determine
that the record has a lower alignment, e.g., that the
externally-supplied layout places fields at lower offsets than we
would. Fixes <rdar://problem/12582052>; test case in LLDB.
llvm-svn: 166824
will be represented in the IR as a plain "i32" type. This causes the
tests to spuriously fail on platforms where int is not a 32-bit type,
or where the ABI requires attributes like "signext" or "zeroext" to
be used.
This patch adds -triple or -target parameters to force those tests
to use the i386-unknown-unknown target.
llvm-svn: 166551
initialized by a reference constant expression.
Our odr-use modeling still needs work here: we don't yet implement the 'set of
potential results of an expression' DR.
llvm-svn: 166361
constructors.
When I first moved regparm support to TargetInfo.cpp I tried to isolate it
in classifyArgumentTypeWithReg, but it is actually a lot easier to flip the
code around and check for regparm at the end of the decision tree.
Without this refactoring classifyArgumentTypeWithReg would have to duplicate
the logic about when to use non-byval indirect arguments.
llvm-svn: 166266
are no known current users of column info. Robustify and fix up
a few tests in the process. Reduces the size of debug information
by a small amount.
Part of PR14106
llvm-svn: 166236
This is consistent/interoperable with GCC 4.7 (& __cxa_deleted_function isn't
present in 4.4 - not sure when it got added, but you'll need something with
that function available for this to work).
llvm-svn: 166069
AAPCS ABI Section 7.1.4 [1] specifies that va_list
should be defined as struct __va_list { void *__ap;};
And in C++, it is defined in namespace std.
[1] http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic
/com.arm.doc.ihi0042d/IHI0042D_aapcs.pdf
Patch by Weiming Zhao.
llvm-svn: 165609
- outside C++, return undef (behavior is not undefined unless the value is used)
- in C++, with -fcatch-undefined-behavior, perform an appropriate trap
- in C++, produce an 'unreachable' (behavior is undefined immediately)
llvm-svn: 165273
This fixes a regression from r162254, the optimizer has problems reasoning
about the smaller memcpy as it's often not safe to widen a store but making it
smaller is.
llvm-svn: 164917
typeid (and a couple other non-standard places where we can transform an
unevaluated expression into an evaluated expression) is special
because it introduces an an expression evaluation context,
which conflicts with the mechanism to compute the current
lambda mangling context. PR12123.
I would appreciate if someone would double-check that we get the mangling
correct with this patch.
llvm-svn: 164658
enough information so we can mangle them correctly in cases involving
dependent parameter types. (This specifically impacts cases involving
null pointers and cases involving parameters of reference type.)
Fix the mangler to use this information instead of trying to scavenge
it out of the parameter declaration.
<rdar://problem/12296776>.
llvm-svn: 164656
be sure to delete the complete object pointer, not the original
pointer. This is necessary if the base being deleted is at a
non-zero offset in the complete object. This is only required
for objects with virtual destructors because deleting an object
via a base-class subobject when the base does not have a virtual
destructor is undefined behavior.
Noticed while reviewing the last four years of cxx-abi-dev
activity.
llvm-svn: 164597
into the enclosing scope; this is a more accurate model but is
(I believe) unnecessary in my test case due to other flaws.
However, one of those flaws is now intentional: blocks which
appear in return statements can be trivially observed to not
extend in lifetime past the return, and so we can allow a jump
past them. Do the necessary magic in IR-generation to make
this work.
llvm-svn: 164589
Make clang emit a flag for DW_AT_object_pointer for the artificial
args where it should (implicit first arguments). FileCheck-ize a
test as well and update tests to take into account the object
pointer flag.
rdar://9797999
llvm-svn: 163755
args where it should (implicit first arguments). FileCheck-ize a
test as well and update tests to take into account the object
pointer flag.
rdar://9797999
llvm-svn: 163668
(__builtin_* etc.) so that it isn't possible to take their address.
Specifically, introduce a new type to represent a reference to a builtin
function, and a new cast kind to convert it to a function pointer in the
operand of a call. Fixes PR13195.
llvm-svn: 162962
by this mode, and also check for signed left shift overflow. The rules for the
latter are a little subtle:
* neither C89 nor C++98 specify the behavior of a signed left shift at all
* in C99 and C11, shifting a 1 bit into the sign bit has undefined behavior
* in C++11, with core issue 1457, shifting a 1 bit *out* of the sign bit has
undefined behavior
As of this change, we use the C99 rules for all C language variants, and the
C++11 rules for all C++ language variants. Once we have individual
-fcatch-undefined-behavior= flags, this should be revisited.
llvm-svn: 162634
* when checking that a pointer or reference refers to appropriate storage for a type, also check the alignment and perform a null check
* check that references are bound to appropriate storage
* check that 'this' has appropriate storage in member accesses and member function calls
llvm-svn: 162523
update implementation to match. An elidable, non-trivial constructor call is a
side-effect under this definition, but wasn't under the old one, because we are
not required to evaluate it even though it may have an effect.
Also rationalize checking for volatile reads: just look for lvalue-to-rvalue
conversions on volatile glvalues, and ignore whether a DeclRefExpr etc is for
a volatile variable.
llvm-svn: 161393
was mistakenly classifying dynamic_casts which might throw as having no side
effects.
Switch it from a visitor to a switch, so it is kept up-to-date as future Expr
nodes are added. Move it from ExprConstant.cpp to Expr.cpp, since it's not
really related to constant expression evaluation.
Since we use HasSideEffect to determine whether to emit an unused global with
internal linkage, this has the effect of suppressing emission of globals in
some cases.
I've left many of the Objective-C cases conservatively assuming that the
expression has side-effects. I'll leave it to someone with better knowledge
of Objective-C than mine to improve them.
llvm-svn: 161388
By C++ standard, the vtable should be generated if the first non-inline
virtual function is defined in the TU. Current version of clang doesn't
generate vtable if the first virtual function is defaulted, because the
key function is regarded as the defaulted function.
Patch by Li Kan!
llvm-svn: 161236
don't explode if the offset we get is zero. This can happen if
you have an empty virtual base class.
While I'm at it, remove an unnecessary block from the IR-generation
of the null-check, mark the eventual GEP as inbounds, and generally
prettify.
llvm-svn: 161100
attribute. It is a variation of the x86_64 ABI:
* A struct returned indirectly uses the first register argument to pass the
pointer.
* Floats, Doubles and structs containing only one of them are not passed in
registers.
* Other structs are split into registers if they fit on the remaining ones.
Otherwise they are passed in memory.
* When a struct doesn't fit it still consumes the registers.
llvm-svn: 161022
type and then propagated to the function. This was failing for destructors,
constructors and constructors templates since they don't have a return type.
Fix that by directly calling processTypeAttrs on the dummy type we use as the
return type in these cases.
llvm-svn: 161020
sure to update the exception specification on the declaration as well as the
definition. If we're building in -fno-exceptions mode, nothing else will
trigger it to be updated.
llvm-svn: 161008
a defaulted special member function until the exception specification is needed
(using the same criteria used for the delayed instantiation of exception
specifications for function temploids).
EST_Delayed is now EST_Unevaluated (using 1330's terminology), and, like
EST_Uninstantiated, carries a pointer to the FunctionDecl which will be used to
resolve the exception specification.
This is enabled for all C++ modes: it's a little faster in the case where the
exception specification isn't used, allows our C++11-in-C++98 extensions to
work, and is still correct for C++98, since in that mode the computation of the
exception specification can't fail.
The diagnostics here aren't great (in particular, we should include implicit
evaluation of exception specifications for defaulted special members in the
template instantiation backtraces), but they're not much worse than before.
Our approach to the problem of cycles between in-class initializers and the
exception specification for a defaulted default constructor is modified a
little by this change -- we now reject any odr-use of a defaulted default
constructor if that constructor uses an in-class initializer and the use is in
an in-class initialzer which is declared lexically earlier. This is a closer
approximation to the current draft solution in core issue 1351, but isn't an
exact match (but the current draft wording isn't reasonable, so that's to be
expected).
llvm-svn: 160847
variables that have static storage duration, it removes debug info on the
emitted initializer function but not all debug info about this variable.
llvm-svn: 160659
change once it's been assigned. It can change in two ways:
1) In a template instantiation, the context declaration should be the
instantiated declaration, not the declaration in the template.
2) If a lambda appears in the pattern of a variadic pack expansion, the
mangling number will depend on the pack length.
llvm-svn: 160614
multidimensional array of class type. Also, preserve zero-initialization when
evaluating an initializer list for an array, in case the initializers refer to
later elements (which have preceding zero-initialization).
llvm-svn: 159904
which will appear in the vtable as used, not just those ones which were
declared within the class itself. Fixes an issue reported as comment#3 in
PR12763 -- we sometimes assert in codegen if we try to emit a reference to a
function declaration which we've not marked as referenced. This also matches
gcc's observed behavior.
llvm-svn: 159895
actually perform value initialization rather than trying to fake it with a call
to the default constructor. Fixes various bugs related to the previously-missing
zero-initialization in this case.
I've also moved this and the other list initialization 'special case' from
TryConstructorInitialization into TryListInitialization where they belong.
llvm-svn: 159733
handy. It can be done, but we would have to build a derived-to-base cast
during codegen to compute the correct this pointer.
I will handle covariant returns next.
llvm-svn: 159350
the correct this pointer. There is some potential for sharing a bit more
code with canDevirtualizeMemberFunctionCalls, but that can be done in an
independent patch.
llvm-svn: 159326
I've added an extra FileCheck pass for that with an extra "CURRENT" prefix.
I've carefully chosed the CURRENT/CORRECT prefixes so they
a) are self-descriptive
b) have the same length so the mangling between the current and the correct version is obvious
Feel free to ask me to change the prefixes if you know a better alternative.
llvm-svn: 159250
to see if we had an underlying final class or method, but we would then
use the cast type to do the call, resulting in a direct call to the wrong
method.
llvm-svn: 159212
literal helper functions. All helper functions (global
and locals) use block_invoke as their prefix. Local literal
helper names are prefixed by their enclosing mangled function
names. Blocks in non-local initializers (e.g. a global variable
or a C++11 field) are prefixed by their mangled variable name.
The descriminator number added to end of the name starts off
with blank (for first block) and _<N> (for the N+2-th block).
llvm-svn: 159206
semantics of a ctor/dtor function-try-block catch handler
by pushing a normal cleanup is not just overkill but actually
actively wrong when the handler contains an explicit return
(which is only legal in a dtor). Just emit the rethrow as
ordinary code at the fallthrough point. Fixes PR13102.
llvm-svn: 158488
- Support mangling virtual function tables (base tables need work on the
ManglerContext interface).
- Correct mangling of local scopes (i.e. functions and C++ methods).
- Replace every llvm_unreachable() for actually-reachable code with a
diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 158376
only using the linkage.
Use and test both, documenting that considering the visibility and linkage
of template parameters is a difference from gcc.
llvm-svn: 158309
struct HIDDEN foo {
};
template <class P>
struct bar {
};
template <>
struct HIDDEN bar<foo> {
DEFAULT static void zed();
};
void bar<foo>::zed() {
}
Before we would produce a hidden symbol in
struct HIDDEN foo {
};
template <class P>
struct bar {
};
template <>
struct bar<foo> {
DEFAULT static void zed();
};
void bar<foo>::zed() {
}
But adding HIDDEN to the specialization would cause us to produce a default
symbol.
llvm-svn: 157206
I'm pretty sure we are in fact doing the right thing here, but someone who knows the standard better should double-check that we are in fact supposed to zero out the member in the given testcase.
llvm-svn: 157138
* Don't copy the visibility attribute during instantiations. We have to be able
to distinguish
struct HIDDEN foo {};
template<class T>
DEFAULT void bar() {}
template DEFAULT void bar<foo>();
from
struct HIDDEN foo {};
template<class T>
DEFAULT void bar() {}
template void bar<foo>();
* If an instantiation has an attribute, it takes precedence over an attribute
in the template.
* With instantiation attributes handled with the above logic, we can now
select the minimum visibility when looking at template arguments.
llvm-svn: 156821
it is placed in a position which is never ambiguous with a
reference-to-function type. This follows some recent discussion
and ensuing proposal on cxx-abi-dev. It is not necessary to
change the mangling of CV-qualifiers because you cannot
apply CV-qualification in the normal sense to a function type.
It is not necessary to change the mangling of ref-qualifiers on
method declarations because they appear in an unambiguous
location.
In addition, mangle CV-qualifiers and ref-qualifiers on function
types when they occur in positions other than member pointers
(that is, when they appear as template arguments).
This is a minor ABI break with previous releases of clang. It
is not considered critical because (1) ref-qualifiers are
relatively rare, since AFAIK we're the only implementing compiler,
and (2) they're particularly likely to come up in contexts that
do not rely on the ODR for correctness. We apologize for any
inconvenience; this is the right thing to do.
llvm-svn: 156794
in-class initializer for one of its fields. Value-initialization of such
a type should use the in-class initializer!
The former was just a bug, the latter is a (reported) standard defect.
llvm-svn: 156274
It reduces the amount of emitted debug information:
1) DIEs in .debug_info have types DW_TAG_compile_unit, DW_TAG_subprogram,
DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine (for opt builds) and DW_TAG_lexical_block only.
2) .debug_str contains only function names.
3) No debug data for types/namespaces/variables is emitted.
4) The data in .debug_line is enough to produce valid stack traces with
function names and line numbers.
Reviewed by Eric Christopher.
llvm-svn: 156160
of templates by using the newly introduce FoldingSetVector. This
preserves insertion order for all iteration of specializations.
I've also included a somewhat terrifying testcase that rapidly builds up
a large number of functions. This is enough that any system with ASLR
will have non-deterministic debug information generated for the test
case without the fix here as the debug information is generated in part
by walking these specializations.
llvm-svn: 156133
x86_64-arguments.cpp test file and be sure to test the coerced
case as well. Thanks to Wei-Ren Chen for bringing this test
to my attention.
llvm-svn: 156047
and only consider using __cxa_atexit in the Itanium logic. The
default logic is to use atexit().
Emit "guarded" initializers in Microsoft mode unconditionally.
This is definitely not correct, but it's closer to correct than
just not emitting the initializer.
Based on a patch by Timur Iskhodzhanov!
llvm-svn: 155894
I broke this in r155838 by not actually instantiating non-dependent default arg
expressions. The motivation for that change was to avoid producing duplicate
conversion warnings for such default args (we produce them once when we parse
the template - there's no need to produce them at each instantiation) but
without actually instantiating the default arg, things break in weird ways.
Technically, I think we could still get the right diagnostic experience without
the bugs if we instantiated the non-dependent args (for non-dependent params
only) immediately, rather than lazily. But I'm not sure if such a refactoring/
change would be desirable so here's the conservative fix for now.
llvm-svn: 155893
what I'm going to treat as basically universal properties of
array-cookie code. Implement MS array cookies on top of that.
Based on a patch by Timur Iskhodzhanov!
llvm-svn: 155886
the tempale arguments in deciding the visibility.
This agrees with gcc 4.7.
Found by trying to build chrome with component=shared_library with 155314
reverted.
llvm-svn: 155316
type llvm::ArrayType -- sometimes we emit them as packed structs. Don't assert
if such a global array has an element type with a non-trivial destructor.
llvm-svn: 155305
This fixes the included testcase and lets us simplify the code a bit. It
does require using mergeWithMin when merging class information to its
members. Expand the comments to explain why that works.
llvm-svn: 155103
an explicit default one. This means that with -fvisibility hidden we
now produce a hidden symbol for
template <typename T>
class DEFAULT foo {
void bar() {}
};
class zed {};
template class foo<zed>;
This matches the behaviour of gcc 4.7.
llvm-svn: 155102
specifications on member function templates of class templates and other such
nested beasties. Store the function template from which we are to instantiate
an exception specification rather than trying to deduce it. Plus some
additional test cases.
llvm-svn: 155076
We have a new flavor of exception specification, EST_Uninstantiated. A function
type with this exception specification carries a pointer to a FunctionDecl, and
the exception specification for that FunctionDecl is instantiated (if needed)
and used in the place of the function type's exception specification.
When a function template declaration with a non-trivial exception specification
is instantiated, the specialization's exception specification is set to this
new 'uninstantiated' kind rather than being instantiated immediately.
Expr::CanThrow has migrated onto Sema, so it can instantiate exception specs
on-demand. Also, any odr-use of a function triggers the instantiation of its
exception specification (the exception specification could be needed by IRGen).
In passing, fix two places where a DeclRefExpr was created but the corresponding
function was not actually marked odr-used. We used to get away with this, but
don't any more.
Also fix a bug where instantiating an exception specification which refers to
function parameters resulted in a crash. We still have the same bug in default
arguments, which I'll be looking into next.
This, plus a tiny patch to fix libstdc++'s common_type, is enough for clang to
parse (and, in very limited testing, support) all of libstdc++4.7's standard
headers.
llvm-svn: 154886
in the declaration of a non-static member function after the
(optional) cv-qualifier-seq, which in practice means in the exception
specification and late-specified return type.
The new scheme here used to manage 'this' outside of a member function
scope is more general than the Scope-based mechanism previously used
for non-static data member initializers and late-parsesd attributes,
because it can also handle the cv-qualifiers on the member
function. Note, however, that a separate pass is required for static
member functions to determine whether 'this' was used, because we
might not know that we have a static function until after declaration
matching.
Finally, this introduces name mangling for 'this' and for the implicit
'this', which is intended to match GCC's mangling. Independent
verification for the new mangling test case would be appreciated.
Fixes PR10036 and PR12450.
llvm-svn: 154799
initialize an array of unsigned char. Outside C++11 mode, this bug was benign,
and just resulted in us emitting a constant which was double the required
length, padded with 0s. In C++11, it resulted in us generating an array whose
first element was something like i8 ptrtoint ([n x i8]* @str to i8).
llvm-svn: 154756
jump into these scopes, and the cleanup-entering code sometimes wants
to do some operations first (e.g. a GEP), which can leave us with
unparented IR.
llvm-svn: 154684
in general (such an atomic has boolean representation) and
specifically for IR generation of __c11_atomic_init. The latter also
means actually using initialization semantics for this initialization,
rather than just creating a store.
On a related note, make sure we actually put in non-atomic-to-atomic
conversions when performing an implicit conversion sequence. IR
generation is far too kind here, but we still want the ASTs to make
sense.
llvm-svn: 154612
global destructor entry. For some reason this isn't enabled for
apple-kexts; it'd be good to have documentation for that.
Based on a patch by Nakamura Takumi!
llvm-svn: 154191
number + context) to the point where we initially start defining the
lambda, so that the linkage won't change when that information is made
available. Fixes the assertion in <rdar://problem/11182962>.
Plus, actually mangle the context of lambdas properly.
llvm-svn: 154029
This was caused by the code deciding the number of fields in the byref structure using a different test to the part of the code creating the GEPs into said structure.
llvm-svn: 154013
property file/line rather than the @synthesize file/line. Avoids
some nasty confusing-ness with conflating the file from the scope
and the line from the original declaration. Use the current scope
location as a separate parameter so that we can match it up
better in the line table with the beginning of the scope.
Update a couple of testcases accordingly since I had to change
that we actually use the passed in location in EmitFunctionStart
and for the new metadata parameter and add a new testcase to
make sure we've got the right line numbers for synthesized
properties.
Part of rdar://11026482
llvm-svn: 153917
the function body, but do so in a way that doesn't make any assumptions
about the static local actually having a proper, unique mangling,
since apparently we don't do that correctly at all.
llvm-svn: 153776
These patches cause us to miscompile and/or reject code with static
function-local variables in an extern-C context. Previously, we were
papering over this as long as the variables are within the same
translation unit, and had not seen any failures in the wild. We still
need a proper fix, which involves mangling static locals inside of an
extern-C block (as GCC already does), but this patch causes pretty
widespread regressions. Firefox, and many other applications no longer
build.
Lots of test cases have been posted to the list in response to this
commit, so there should be no problem reproducing the issues.
llvm-svn: 153768
the case that the variable already exists. Partly this is just
protection against people making crazy declarations with custom
asm labels or extern "C" names that intentionally collide with
the manglings of such variables, but the main reason is that we
can actually emit a static local variable twice with the
requirement that it match up. There may be other cases with
(e.g.) the various nested functions, but the main exemplar is
with constructor variants, where we can be forced into
double-emitting the function body under certain circumstances
like (currently) the presence of virtual bases.
llvm-svn: 153723
flag as GCC uses: -fstrict-enums). There is a *lot* of code making
unwarranted assumptions about the underlying type of enums, and it
doesn't seem entirely reasonable to eagerly break all of it.
Much more importantly, the current state of affairs is *very* good at
optimizing based upon this information, which causes failures that are
very distant from the actual enum. Before we push for enabling this by
default, I think we need to implement -fcatch-undefined-behavior support
for instrumenting and trapping whenever we store or load a value outside
of the range. That way we can track down the misbehaving code very
quickly.
I discussed this with Rafael, and currently the only important cases he
is aware of are the bool range-based optimizations which are staying
hard enabled. We've not seen any issue with those either, and they are
much more important for performance.
llvm-svn: 153550
For i686 targets (eg. cygwin), I saw "Range must not be empty!" in verifier.
It produces (i32)[0x80000000:0x80000000) from (uint64_t)[0xFFFFFFFF80000000ULL:0x0000000080000000ULL), for signed i32 on MDNode::Range.
llvm-svn: 153382
relied on an artifact of how the inliner and subsequent passes in
clang's -O3 mode happen to treat basic blocks and the labels for the
basic blocks. In my work on the inliner, and changed this fundamental
assumption, and the label that was being checked on the entry basic
block will no longer appear in opt builds. There was no reason to expect
the label to always be present anyways, much to my regret.
I've changed the test to just ensure that we return an immediate
constant. If there are intervening instructions, that's bad, but not
really that relevant to the test.
I'd love it if others have a better way of checking that a function body
contains only a 'ret' instruction that isn't dependent on whether or not
the entry block receives a label...
llvm-svn: 153243
in vtable layout where virtual methods inherited from virtual bases
could be assigned the same vcall adjustment slot if they shared
a name and parameter signature but differed in their
cv-qualification. The code was already trying to handle this
case, but unfortunately used the ordinary type qualifiers
(which are always empty here) instead of the method qualifiers.
This seems like something that the API should discourage, but
I don't know how to carry that principle out in this instance.
Eliminate this function's need for an ASTContext while we're at it.
This bug affects the ABI, and fixing it brings us into accord with
the Itanium ABI (and GCC's implementation of it), but, obviously,
technically breaks full compatibility with previous releases of Clang.
Just letting you know.
llvm-svn: 153168
store to 1. This allows code-gen to select a more appropriate alignment. If left
to zero, an alignment greater than the alignment of the pointer may be selected,
causing code-gen to use instructions which require an alignment greater than the
pointer guarantees.
<rdar://problem/11043589>
llvm-svn: 152951
function templates as well.
A future commit will mangle the added name with the template args
like classes are mangled.
Fixes rdar://10986010
llvm-svn: 152683
we correctly emit loads of BlockDeclRefExprs even when they
don't qualify as ODR-uses. I think I'm adequately convinced
that BlockDeclRefExpr can die.
llvm-svn: 152479
analysis to make the AST representation testable. They are represented by a
new UserDefinedLiteral AST node, which is a sugared CallExpr. All semantic
properties, including full CodeGen support, are achieved for free by this
representation.
UserDefinedLiterals can never be dependent, so no custom instantiation
behavior is required. They are mangled as if they were direct calls to the
underlying literal operator. This matches g++'s apparent behavior (but not its
actual mangling, which is broken for literal-operator-ids).
User-defined *string* literals are now fully-operational, but the semantic
analysis is quite hacky and needs more work. No other forms of user-defined
literal are created yet, but the AST support for them is present.
This patch committed after midnight because we had already hit the quota for
new kinds of literal yesterday.
llvm-svn: 152211
In the included testcase, soma thinks that we already have a definition after we
see the out of line decl. Codegen puts it in a deferred list, to be output if
a use is seen. This would break when we saw an explicit template instantiation
definition, since codegen would not be notified.
This patch adds a method to the consumer interface so that soma can notify
codegen that this decl is now required.
llvm-svn: 152024
scalar emission of DeclRefExprs to const bools: emit scalar bools as i1,
not as i8.
In addition to the extra unit testing, this has successfully bootstrapped.
llvm-svn: 151955
shouldn't be relying on assembly emission.
For the record we should check the metadata output from the front
end and then check in the backend that such a thing emits a pubtypes
entry.
llvm-svn: 151851
This currently doesn't handle capturing the 'this' pointer for any
enclosing class.
Steal the lambda-expressions.cpp testcase and debugify it and try
to use more variables to proof it against random changes.
Part of rdar://10900684
llvm-svn: 151702
trivial if the implicit declaration would be. Don't forget to set the Trivial
flag on the special member as well as on the class. It doesn't seem ideal that
we have two separate mechanisms for storing this information, but this patch
does not attempt to address that.
This leaves us in an interesting position where the has_trivial_X trait for a
class says 'yes' for a deleted but trivial X, but is_trivially_Xable says 'no'.
This seems to be what the standard requires.
llvm-svn: 151465
This emits a backing array with internal linkage and fills it with data,
then has the initializer_list point at the array. Dynamic initialization
and global destructors are correctly supported.
What doesn't work is nested initializer_lists. I have no idea how to
get them to work, either. However, these should be very rare, and so
I'll just call it a known bug and declare generalized initializers
DONE!
llvm-svn: 151457
- Make sure that the block expression is instantiation-dependent if the
block is in a dependent context
- Make sure that the C++ 'this' expression gets captured even if we
don't rebuild the AST node during template instantiation. This would
also have manifested as a bug for lambdas.
Fixes <rdar://problem/10832617>.
llvm-svn: 151372
* Handle some situations where we should never make a decl more visible,
even when merging in an explicit visibility.
* Handle attributes in members of classes that are explicitly specialized.
Thanks Nico for the report and testing, Eric for the initial review, and dgregor
for the awesome test27 :-)
llvm-svn: 151236
stable mangling, since these lambdas can end up in multiple
translation units. Sema is responsible for deciding when this is the
case, because it's already responsible for choosing the mangling
number.
llvm-svn: 151029
default arguments of function parameters. This simple-sounding task is
complicated greatly by two issues:
(1) Default arguments aren't actually a real context, so we need to
maintain extra state within lambda expressions to track when a
lambda was actually in a default argument.
(2) At the time that we parse a default argument, the FunctionDecl
doesn't exist yet, so lambda closure types end up in the enclosing
context. It's not clear that we ever want to change that, so instead
we introduce the notion of the "effective" context of a declaration
for the purposes of name mangling.
llvm-svn: 151011
and introducing the lambda closure type and its function call
operator. Previously, we assumed that the lambda closure type would
land directly in the current context, and not some parent context (as
occurs with linkage specifications). Thanks to Richard for the test case.
llvm-svn: 150987
name mangling in the Itanium C++ ABI for lambda expressions is so
dependent on context, we encode the number used to encode each lambda
as part of the lambda closure type, and maintain this value within
Sema.
Note that there are a several pieces still missing:
- We still get the linkage of lambda expressions wrong
- We aren't properly numbering or mangling lambda expressions that
occur in default function arguments or in data member initializers.
- We aren't (de-)serializing the lambda numbering tables
llvm-svn: 150982
handled by the caching and rauw. Also fix one cache that wasn't
being added to highlighted by this patch. Update all testcases
accordingly.
This should fix the deall failure.
llvm-svn: 150977
We now generate temporary arrays to back std::initializer_list objects
initialized with braces. The initializer_list is then made to point at
the array. We support both ptr+size and start+end forms, although
the latter is untested.
Array lifetime is correct for temporary std::initializer_lists (e.g.
call arguments) and local variables. It is untested for new expressions
and member initializers.
Things left to do:
Massively increase the amount of testing. I need to write tests for
start+end init lists, temporary objects created as a side effect of
initializing init list objects, new expressions, member initialization,
creation of temporary objects (e.g. std::vector) for initializer lists,
and probably more.
Get lifetime "right" for member initializers and new expressions. Not
that either are very useful.
Implement list-initialization of array new expressions.
llvm-svn: 150803
variable ends, if the variable has a trivial destructor and no mutable
subobjects then emit an llvm.invariant.start call for it. globalopt knows to
make the variable const when evaluating this.
llvm-svn: 150798
1) It has a const-qualified type, and
2) It has no mutable members, and
3) It has no dynamic initialization, and
4) It has trivial destruction.
Remove the unnecessary requirement that the type be POD. This allows us to
mark all constexpr objects with no mutable members as 'constant'.
llvm-svn: 150792
conversion to function pointer. Rather than having IRgen synthesize
the body of this function, we instead introduce a static member
function "__invoke" with the same signature as the lambda's
operator() in the AST. Sema then generates a body for the conversion
to function pointer which simply returns the address of __invoke. This
approach makes it easier to evaluate a call to the conversion function
as a constant, makes the linkage of the __invoke function follow the
normal rules for member functions, and may make life easier down the
road if we ever want to constexpr'ify some of lambdas.
Note that IR generation is responsible for filling in the body of
__invoke (Sema just adds a dummy body), because the body can't
generally be expressed in C++.
Eli, please review!
llvm-svn: 150783
"Add a completed/incomplete type difference. This allows us to have
partial types for contexts and forward decls while allowing us to
complete types later on for debug purposes.
This piggy-backs on the metadata replacement and rauw changes
for temporary nodes and takes advantage of the incremental
support I added in earlier. This allows us to, if we decide,
to limit adding methods and variables to structures in order
to limit the amount of debug information output into a .o file.
The caching is a bit complicated though so any thoughts on
untangling that are welcome."
with a fix:
- Remove all RAUW during type construction by adding stub versions
of types that we later complete.
and some TODOs:
- Add an RAUW cache for forward declared types so that we can replace
them at the end of compilation.
- Remove the code that updates on completed types because we no
longer need to have that happen. We emit incomplete types on
purpose and only want to know when we want to complete them.
llvm-svn: 150752
David Blaikie