which many Mips 64 ABIs use than for O64 which many
if not all other target ABIs use.
Most architectures have the following 64 bit relocation record format:
typedef struct
{
Elf64_Addr r_offset; /* Address of reference */
Elf64_Xword r_info; /* Symbol index and type of relocation */
} Elf64_Rel;
typedef struct
{
Elf64_Addr r_offset;
Elf64_Xword r_info;
Elf64_Sxword r_addend;
} Elf64_Rela;
Whereas N64 has the following format:
typedef struct
{
Elf64_Addr r_offset;/* Address of reference */
Elf64_Word r_sym; /* Symbol index */
Elf64_Byte r_ssym; /* Special symbol */
Elf64_Byte r_type3; /* Relocation type */
Elf64_Byte r_type2; /* Relocation type */
Elf64_Byte r_type; /* Relocation type */
} Elf64_Rel;
typedef struct
{
Elf64_Addr r_offset;/* Address of reference */
Elf64_Word r_sym; /* Symbol index */
Elf64_Byte r_ssym; /* Special symbol */
Elf64_Byte r_type3; /* Relocation type */
Elf64_Byte r_type2; /* Relocation type */
Elf64_Byte r_type; /* Relocation type */
Elf64_Sxword r_addend;
} Elf64_Rela;
The structure is the same size, but the r_info data element
is now 5 separate elements. Besides the content aspects,
endian byte reordering will be different for the area with
each element being endianized separately.
I treat this as generic and continue to pass r_type as
an integer masking and unmasking the byte sized N64
values for N64 mode. I've implemented this and it causes no
affect on other current targets.
This passes make check.
Jack
llvm-svn: 159299
test cases where there were a lot of relocations applied relative to a large
rodata section. Gas would create a symbol for each of these whereas we would
be relative to the beginning of the rodata section. This change mimics what
gas does.
Patch by Jack Carter.
llvm-svn: 146468
This is meant to be overriden by backends. Implement an override on PowerPC
which adjusts the offset by 2 for ha16/lo16 relocation kinds. This removes
a commented out hack and enables hello world to be compiled on PowerPC.
llvm-svn: 136905
VK_GOTOFF reloc. This matches as' behavior, but it is not clear why the linker
might need this, so I added a FIXME.
I could test this by duplicating test/MC/ELF/got.s, but it doesn't look
worthwhile.
llvm-svn: 132655
("T is 1 if the target symbol S has type STT_FUNC and the
symbol addresses a Thumb instruction ;it is 0 otherwise."
from "ELF for the ARM Architecture" 4.7.1.2)
Patch by Koan-Sin Tan!
llvm-svn: 131406
LLVM and binutils.
With this patch, there are no functional differences between the .o
produced directly from LLVM versus the .s to .o via GNU as, for relocation tags
at least, for both PIC and non-PIC modes.
Because some non-PIC reloc tags are used (legally) on PIC, so IsPCRel flag is
necessary but not sufficient to determine whether the overall codegen mode is
PIC or not. Why is this necessary? There is an incompatibility of how relocs
are emitted in the .rodata section. Binutils PIC likes to emit certain relocs
as section relative offsets. Non-PIC does not do this.
So I added a hidden switch on the ELFObjectwriter "-arm-elf-force-pic" which
forces the objectwriter to pretend that all relocs are for PIC mode.
Todo: Activate ForceARMElfPIC to true if -relocation-model=pic is selected
on llc.
Todo: There are probably more issues for PIC mode on ARM/MC/ELF...
Todo: Existing tests in MC/ARM/elf-reloc*.ll need to be converted over to .s
tests as well as expanded to cover the gamut.
llvm-svn: 131205
for all symbol differences and can drop the old EmitPCRelSymbolValue
method.
This also make getExprForFDESymbol on ELF equal to the one on MachO, and it
can be made non-virtual.
llvm-svn: 130634
for calls to weak symbols with a definition has the appearance of working
with LLVM-generated code because weak symbol definitions are put in their
own sections.
llvm-svn: 126933
failures with relocations.
The code committed is a first cut at compatibility for emitted relocations in
ELF .o.
Why do this? because existing ARM tools like emitting relocs symbols as
explicit relocations, not as section-offset relocs.
Result is that with these changes,
1) relocs are now substantially identical what to gcc outputs.
2) larger apps (including many spec2k tests) compile, cross-link, and pass
Added reminder fixme to tests for future conversion to .s form.
llvm-svn: 124996
(yes, this is different from R_ARM_CALL)
- Adds a new method getARMBranchTargetOpValue() which handles the
necessary distinction between the conditional and unconditional br/bl
needed for ARM/ELF
At least for ARM mode, the needed fixup for conditional versus unconditional
br/bl is identical, but the ARM docs and existing ARM tools expect this
reloc type...
Added a few FIXME's for future naming fixups in ARMInstrInfo.td
llvm-svn: 124895
- Fixed :upper16: fix up routine. It should be shifting down the top 16 bits first.
- Added support for Thumb2 :lower16: and :upper16: fix up.
- Added :upper16: and :lower16: relocation support to mach-o object writer.
llvm-svn: 123424
R_ARM_MOVT_PREL and R_ARM_MOVW_PREL_NC.
2. Fix minor bug in ARMAsmPrinter - treat bitfield flag as a bitfield, not an enum.
3. Add support for 3 new elf section types (no-ops)
llvm-svn: 123294
Added test to check bl __aeabi_read_tp gets emitted properly for ELF/ASM
as well as ELF/OBJ (including fixup)
Also added support for ELF::R_ARM_TLS_IE32
llvm-svn: 121312
actuall addresses in a .o file, so it is better to let the MachO writer compute
it.
This is good for two reasons. First, areas that shouldn't care about
addresses now don't have access to it. Second, the layout of each section
is independent. I should use this in a subsequent commit to speed it up.
Most of the patch is just removing the section address computation. The two
interesting parts are the change on how we handle padding in the end
of sections and how MachO can get the address of a-b when a and b are in
different sections.
Since now the expression evaluation normally doesn't know the section address,
it will think that a-b needs relocation and let the MachO writer know. Once
it has computed the section addresses, it calls back the expression evaluation
with the section addresses to resolve these expressions.
The remaining problem is the handling of padding. Currently it will create
a special alignment fragment at the end. Since that fragment doesn't update
the alignment of the section, it needs the real address to be computed.
Since now the layout will not compute a-b with a and b in different sections,
the only effect that the special alignment fragment has is update the
address size of the section. This can also be done by the MachO writer.
llvm-svn: 121076
contain only data. Handle them specially instead of using AddSectionToTheEnd.
This moves a hack from the generic assembler to the elf writer. It is also
a bit faster and should make other improvements easier.
llvm-svn: 120683
Lifted adjustFixupValue() from Darwin for sharing w ELF.
Test added
TODO:
refactor ELFObjectWriter::RecordRelocation more.
Possibly share more code with Darwin?
Lots more relocations...
llvm-svn: 120534
Next step is to rationally break apart the RecordRelocation()
Probably the step will be to have 1 member function for ech slot of the ELFRelocationEntry()
llvm-svn: 119978
variable if recursing fails to simplify it.
Factor AliasedSymbol to be a method of MCSymbol.
Update MCAssembler::EvaluateFixup to match the change in
EvaluateAsRelocatableImpl.
Remove the WeakRefExpr hack, as the object writer now sees the weakref with
no extra effort needed.
Nothing else is using MCTargetExpr, but keep it for now.
Now that the ELF writer sees relocations with aliases, handle
.weak foo2
foo2:
.weak bar2
.set bar2,foo2
.quad bar2
the same way gas does and produce a relocation with bar2.
llvm-svn: 119152
Added 2 new subclasses - X86ELFObjectWriter and ARMELFObectWriter.
ARM and X86 require different code for RecordRelocation(), possibly others.
llvm-svn: 119149
just
.type foo,@object
will produce an undefined reference to foo. On the other hand, a file with
just
.weakref bar, foo
will not. It is somewhat hard to support both in MC since both statements
should create the symbols. It should be possible if we really need to by
adding to the flags, but hopefully that is not necessary.
With this patch we do not produce a undefined reference in any of those cases.
The assembly file needs an actual use for the undefined reference to be
present.
This is in preparation for a patch implementing .weakref.
llvm-svn: 117735
Jack Carter