This matches what we already do for AVX512. The peephole pass makes up for this in most if not all cases. But this makes isel behavior for these consistent with every other instruction.
llvm-svn: 312613
Summary:
Most instructions in AVX work “in-lane”, that is, each source element is applied only to other
elements of the same lane, thus a cross lane permutation is costly and needs more than one instrution.
AVX2 includes instructions to perform any-to-any permutation of words over a 256-bit register
and vectorized table lookup.
This should also Fix PR34369
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37388
llvm-svn: 312608
Summary:
Previous would throw warning whenever libxml2 is not installed. Now
only give this warning if merging manifest fails.
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37240
llvm-svn: 312604
Without this we would have multiple relocations pointing to symbols
with the same name: the empty string. There was no way for yaml2obj to
be able to handle that.
A more general solution would be to unique symbol names in a similar
way to how we unique section names. In practice I think this covers
all common cases and is a bit more user friendly than using names like
sym1, sym2, sym3, etc.
llvm-svn: 312603
When packet size equals packet align and is power of 2, transform
__read_pipe* and __write_pipe* to specialized library function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36831
llvm-svn: 312598
This is a preliminary step towards solving the remaining part of PR27145 - IR for isfinite():
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27145
In order to solve that one more generally, we need to add matching for and/or of fcmp ord/uno
with a constant operand.
But while looking at those patterns, I realized we were missing a canonicalization for nonzero
constants. Rather than limiting to just folds for constants, we're adding a general value
tracking method for this based on an existing DAG helper.
By transforming everything to 0.0, we can simplify the existing code in foldLogicOfFCmps()
and pick up missing vector folds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37427
llvm-svn: 312591
Missing these could potentially screw up post-ra scheduling.
Issue found by inspection, so I don't have a real testcase. Included
test just verifies the expected operands after expansion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35156
llvm-svn: 312589
Without this patch passing a .o file with multiple sections with the
same name to obj2yaml produces a yaml file that yaml2obj cannot
handle. This is pr34162.
The problem is that when specifying, for example, the section of a
symbol, we get only
Section: foo
and don't know which of the sections whose name is foo we have to use.
One alternative would be to use section numbers. This would work, but
the output from obj2yaml would be very inconvenient to edit as
deleting a section would invalidate all indexes.
Another alternative would be to invent a unique section id that would
exist only on yaml. This would work, but seems a bit heavy handed. We
could make the id optional and default it to the section name.
Since in the last alternative the id is basically what this patch uses
as a name, it can be implemented as a followup patch if needed.
llvm-svn: 312585
The existing code created a JITSymbol with an invalid materializer instead,
guaranteeing a 'missing symbol' error when someone tried to materialize the
symbol.
llvm-svn: 312584
S_UDT records are basically the "bridge" between the debugger's
expression evaluator and the type information. If you type
(Foo*)nullptr into the watch window, the debugger looks for an
S_UDT record named Foo. If it can find one, it displays your type.
Otherwise you get an error.
We have always understood this to mean that if you have code like
this:
struct A {
int X;
};
struct B {
typedef A AT;
AT Member;
};
that you will get 3 S_UDT records. "A", "B", and "B::AT". Because
if you were to type (B::AT*)nullptr into the debugger, it would
need to find an S_UDT record named "B::AT".
But "B::AT" is actually the S_UDT record that would be generated
if B were a namespace, not a struct. So the debugger needs to be
able to distinguish this case. So what it does is:
1. Look for an S_UDT named "B::AT". If it finds one, it knows
that AT is in a namespace.
2. If it doesn't find one, split at the scope resolution operator,
and look for an S_UDT named B. If it finds one, look up the type
for B, and then look for AT as one of its members.
With this algorithm, S_UDT records for nested typedefs are not just
unnecessary, but actually wrong!
The results of implementing this in clang are dramatic. It cuts
our /DEBUG:FASTLINK PDB sizes by more than 50%, and we go from
being ~20% larger than MSVC PDBs on average, to ~40% smaller.
It also slightly speeds up link time. We get about 10% faster
links than without this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37410
llvm-svn: 312583
Summary:
This intrinsic represents a label with a list of associated metadata
strings. It is modelled as reading and writing inaccessible memory so
that it won't be removed as dead code. I think the intention is that the
annotation strings should appear at most once in the debug info, so I
marked it noduplicate. We are allowed to inline code with annotations as
long as we strip the annotation, but that can be done later.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36904
llvm-svn: 312569
Summary:
When constructing the predicate P1 in ScalarEvolution::createAddRecFromPHIWithCastsImpl() it is possible
for the PHISCEV from which the predicate is constructed to be a SCEVConstant instead of a SCEVAddRec. If
this happens, then the cast<SCEVAddRec>(PHISCEV) in the code will assert.
Such a PHISCEV is possible if either the start value or the accumulator value is a constant value
that not equal to its truncated value, and if the truncated value is zero.
This patch adds tests that demonstrate the cast<> assertion, and fixes this problem by checking
whether the PHISCEV is a constant before constructing the P1 predicate; if it is, then P1 is
equivalent to one of P2 or P3. Additionally, if we know that the start value or accumulator
value are constants then we check whether the P2 and/or P3 predicates are known false at compile
time; if either is, then we bail out of constructing the AddRec.
Reviewers: sanjoy, mkazantsev, silviu.baranga
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Subscribers: mkazantsev, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37265
llvm-svn: 312568
We had already disabled the pattern for SSE4.1 and SSE4.2. But it got re-enabled for AVX and AVX512.
With SSE41 we rely on a separate (v4f32 (X86vzmovl VR128)) pattern to select blendps with a xorps to create zeroess. And a separate (v4f32 (scalar_to_vector FR32X)) to select a COPY_TO_REG_CLASS to move FR32 to VR128
The same thing can happen for AVX with vblendps and those separate patterns already exist.
For AVX512, (v4f32 (X86vzmov VR128)) will select a VMOVSS instruction instead of VBLENDPS due to their not being a EVEX VBLENDPS. This is what we were getting out of the larger pattern anyway. So the larger pattern is unneeded for AVX512 too.
For SSE1-SSSE3 we can rely on (v4f32 (X86vzmov VR128)) selecting a MOVSS similar to AVX512. Again this is what the larger pattern did too.
So the only real change here is that AVX1/2 now properly outputs a VBLENDPS during isel instead of a VMOVSS to match SSE41. Most tests didn't notice because the two address instruction pass knows how to turn VMOVSS into VBLENDPS to get an independent destination register.
llvm-svn: 312564
- Make SIMemOpInfo a class
- Add accessor methods to SIMemOpInfo
- Move get*Info methods to SIMemOpInfo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37395
llvm-svn: 312541
- Rename MemOpInfo -> SIMemOpInfo
- Move SIMemOpInfo class out of SIMemoryLegalizer class
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37394
llvm-svn: 312540
Use the STI member of ARMInstructionSelector instead of
TII.getSubtarget() and also make use of STI's methods instead of
checking the object format manually.
llvm-svn: 312522
In RWPI code, globals that are not read-only are accessed relative to
the SB register (R9). This is achieved by explicitly generating an ADD
instruction between SB and an offset that we either load from a constant
pool or movw + movt into a register.
llvm-svn: 312521
This is possible if C1 and C2 are both powers of 2. Or if binop is 'and' then ~C2 needs to be a power of 2.
We already support this for 'or', but we should be able to support 'and' and 'xor'. This will be enhanced by D37274.
llvm-svn: 312519
Instead of creating a Constant and then calling m_APInt with it (which will always return true). Just create an APInt initially, and use that for the checks in isSelect01 function. If it turns out we do need the Constant, create it from the APInt.
This is a refactor for a future patch that will do some more checks of the constant values here.
llvm-svn: 312517
builds seem to be having trouble with it.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules-2/builds/11401
When trying to link lli-child-target, the linker reports missing symbols for
the 'Name' members of 'rpc::Function<OrcRPCNegotiate, FunctionIdT(std::string)>'
(base class for OrcRPCNegotiate) and 'rpc::Function<OrcRPCResponse, void()>'
(base class for OrcRPCResponse), despite there being definitions for these
immediately below the rpc::Function class template.
This looks like the same bug that bit OrcRemoteTargetClient/Server in r286920.
<rdar://problem/34249745>
llvm-svn: 312515
If multiple conditional branches are executed based on the same comparison, we can execute multiple conditional branches based on the result of one comparison on PPC. For example,
if (a == 0) { ... }
else if (a < 0) { ... }
can be executed by one compare and two conditional branches instead of two pairs of a compare and a conditional branch.
This patch identifies a code sequence of the two pairs of a compare and a conditional branch and merge the compares if possible.
To maximize the opportunity, we do canonicalization of code sequence before merging compares.
For the above example, the input for this pass looks like:
cmplwi r3, 0
beq 0, .LBB0_3
cmpwi r3, -1
bgt 0, .LBB0_4
So, before merging two compares, we canonicalize it as
cmpwi r3, 0 ; cmplwi and cmpwi yield same result for beq
beq 0, .LBB0_3
cmpwi r3, 0 ; greather than -1 means greater or equal to 0
bge 0, .LBB0_4
The generated code should be
cmpwi r3, 0
beq 0, .LBB0_3
bge 0, .LBB0_4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37211
llvm-svn: 312514
Jatin Bhateja