- Added `FixItHint` comments to Check files for the script to mark those checks as offering fix-its when the fix-its are generated in another file.
- Case insensitive file searching when looking for the file a checker code resides in.
Also regenerated the list, sphinx had no issue generating the docs after this.
Reviewed By: sylvestre.ledru
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81932
Summary:
This check finds macro expansions of `DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(Type)` and
replaces them with a deleted copy constructor and a deleted assignment operator.
Before the `delete` keyword was introduced in C++11 it was common practice to
declare a copy constructor and an assignment operator as a private members. This
effectively makes them unusable to the public API of a class.
With the advent of the `delete` keyword in C++11 we can abandon the
`private` access of the copy constructor and the assignment operator and
delete the methods entirely.
Migration example:
```
lang=dif
class Foo {
private:
- DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(Foo);
+ Foo(const Foo &) = delete;
+ const Foo &operator=(const Foo &) = delete;
};
```
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman, njames93
Reviewed By: njames93
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80531
Summary:
Finds range-based for loops that can be replaced by a call to ``std::any_of`` or
``std::all_of``. In C++ 20 mode, suggests ``std::ranges::any_of`` or
``std::ranges::all_of``.
For now, no fixits are produced.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein
Subscribers: mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77572
Updates the docs to include `MacroDefinition` documentation. The docs are still missing `ObjCIVar` however I don't have a clue about how that looks in code. If someone wants to show the code block needed for the example I'll add that in too.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80877
Revert "clang-tidy doc: add a note for checkers with an autofix"
This reverts commit dc0f79ea5b.
Revert "add_new_check.py: Update of the template to add an autofix section"
This reverts commit f97f92e5b0.
Summary:
Currently, when looking at a checker documentation, we have to go back
to the whole list or look at the sources to figure out if an autofix
is available or not.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: wuzish, Eugene.Zelenko, nemanjai, kbarton, arphaman, Charusso, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77983
Summary:
Sometimes in templated code Member references are reported as `DependentScopeMemberExpr` because that's what the standard dictates, however in many trivial cases it is easy to resolve the reference to its actual Member.
Take this code:
```
template<typename T>
class A{
int value;
A& operator=(const A& Other){
value = Other.value;
this->value = Other.value;
return *this;
}
};
```
When ran with `clang-tidy file.cpp -checks=readability-identifier-naming --config="{CheckOptions: [{key: readability-identifier-naming.MemberPrefix, value: m_}]}" -fix`
Current behaviour:
```
template<typename T>
class A{
int m_value;
A& operator=(const A& Other){
m_value = Other.value;
this->value = Other.value;
return *this;
}
};
```
As `this->value` and `Other.value` are Dependent they are ignored when creating the fix-its, however this can easily be resolved.
Proposed behaviour:
```
template<typename T>
class A{
int m_value;
A& operator=(const A& Other){
m_value = Other.m_value;
this->m_value = Other.m_value;
return *this;
}
};
```
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, JonasToth, alexfh, hokein, gribozavr2
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73052
Summary:
Added `DiagnoseSignedUnsignedCharComparisons` option to
filter out unrelated use cases. The SEI cert catches explicit
integer casts (two use cases), while in the case of
`signed char` \ `unsigned char` comparison, we have implicit
conversions.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79334
Summary:
To cover STR34-C rule's second use case, where ``signed char`` is
used for array subscript after an integer conversion. In the case
of non-ASCII character this conversion will result in a value
in excess of UCHAR_MAX.
There is another clang-tidy check which catches these cases.
cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-constant-array-index catches any
indexing which is not integer constant. I think this check is
very strict about the index (e.g. constant), so it's still useful
to cover the ``signed char`` use case in this check, so we
can provide a way to catch the SEI cert rule's use cases on a
codebase, where this CPP guideline is not used.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, njames93
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78904
Summary:
This check will ensure that all calls to functions resolve to one inside the `__llvm_libc` namespace.
This is done to ensure that if we include a public header then we don't accidentally call into the a function within the global namespace.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, njames93
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits, sivachandra
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #libc-project, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78890
Summary:
Without this patch clang-tidy stops finding file configs on the nearest
.clang-tidy file. In some cases it is not very convenient because it
results in common parts duplication into every child .clang-tidy file.
This diff adds optional config inheritance from the parent directories
config files.
Test Plan:
Added test cases in existing config test.
Reviewers: alexfh, gribozavr2, klimek, hokein
Subscribers: njames93, arphaman, xazax.hun, aheejin, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75184
Summary: This check is similar to an ARC Migration check that warned about this incorrect usage under ARC, but most projects are no longer undergoing migration from pre-ARC code. The documentation for NSInvocation is not explicit about these requirements and incorrect usage has been found in many of our projects.
Reviewers: stephanemoore, benhamilton, dmaclach, alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein, njames93
Reviewed By: stephanemoore, benhamilton, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77571
Summary:
Made llvmlibc::RestrictSystemLibcHeadersCheck a subclass of protability::RestrictSystemIncludesCheck to re-use common code between the two.
This also adds the ability to white list linux development headers.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: mgorny, xazax.hun, MaskRay, cfe-commits, sivachandra
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76395
Summary:
Cover a new use case when using a 'signed char' as an integer
might lead to issue with non-ASCII characters. Comparing
a 'signed char' with an 'unsigned char' using equality / unequality
operator produces an unexpected result for non-ASCII characters.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, njames93
Reviewed By: njames93
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75749
Summary: This adds a new module to enforce standards specific to the llvm-libc project. This change also adds the first check which restricts user from including system libc headers accidentally which can lead to subtle bugs that would be a challenge to detect.
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: juliehockett, arphaman, jfb, abrachet, sivachandra, Eugene.Zelenko, njames93, mgorny, xazax.hun, MaskRay, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #libc-project, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75332
Summary:
Created a general check for restrict-system-includes under portability as recommend in the comments under D75332. I also fleshed out the user facing documentation to show examples for common use-cases such as allow-list, block-list, and wild carding.
Removed fuchsia's check as per phosek sugguestion.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, phosek, alexfh, hokein, njames93
Reviewed By: phosek
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, phosek, cfe-commits, MaskRay
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75786
Summary:
Also use //check// in add_new_check.py for terminology consistency.
PS
My GitHub ID is [[ https://github.com/EugeneZelenko | EugeneZelenko ]], if it's necessary for attribution.
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman, njames93, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: njames93
Subscribers: Andi, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73580
Added FixItHint comments to ReservedIdentifierCheck and IdentifierNamingCheck to trick the python scripts into detecting a fix it is provided as it can't see the FixItHints in RenamerClangTidyCheck.cpp
Summary:
Recursion is a powerful tool, but like any tool
without care it can be dangerous. For example,
if the recursion is unbounded, you will
eventually run out of stack and crash.
You can of course track the recursion depth
but if it is hardcoded, there can always be some
other environment when that depth is too large,
so said magic number would need to be env-dependent.
But then your program's behavior is suddenly more env-dependent.
Also, recursion, while it does not outright stop optimization,
recursive calls are less great than normal calls,
for example they hinder inlining.
Recursion is banned in some coding guidelines:
* SEI CERT DCL56-CPP. Avoid cycles during initialization of static objects
* JPL 2.4 Do not use direct or indirect recursion.
* I'd say it is frowned upon in LLVM, although not banned
And is plain unsupported in some cases:
* OpenCL 1.2, 6.9 Restrictions: i. Recursion is not supported.
So there's clearly a lot of reasons why one might want to
avoid recursion, and replace it with worklist handling.
It would be great to have a enforcement for it though.
This implements such a check.
Here we detect both direct and indirect recursive calls,
although since clang-tidy (unlike clang static analyzer)
is CTU-unaware, if the recursion transcends a single standalone TU,
we will naturally not find it :/
The algorithm is pretty straight-forward:
1. Build call-graph for the entire TU.
For that, the existing `clang::CallGraph` is re-used,
although it had to be modified to also track the location of the call.
2. Then, the hard problem: how do we detect recursion?
Since we have a graph, let's just do the sane thing,
and look for Strongly Connected Function Declarations - widely known as `SCC`.
For that LLVM provides `llvm::scc_iterator`,
which is internally an Tarjan's DFS algorithm, and is used throught LLVM,
so this should be as performant as possible.
3. Now that we've got SCC's, we discard those that don't contain loops.
Note that there may be more than one loop in SCC!
4. For each loopy SCC, we call out each function, and print a single example
call graph that shows recursion -- it didn't seem worthwhile enumerating
every possible loop in SCC, although i suppose it could be implemented.
* To come up with that call graph cycle example, we start at first SCC node,
see which callee of the node is within SCC (and is thus known to be in cycle),
and recurse into it until we hit the callee that is already in call stack.
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman, ffrankies, Eugene.Zelenko, erichkeane, NoQ
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Charusso, Naghasan, bader, riccibruno, mgorny, Anastasia, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72362
Summary: Such implementations may override the class's own implementation, and even be a danger in case someone later comes and adds one to the class itself. Most times this has been encountered have been a mistake.
Reviewers: stephanemoore, benhamilton, dmaclach
Reviewed By: stephanemoore, benhamilton, dmaclach
Subscribers: dmaclach, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72876
Nathan James