Add a utility function to convert the Windows path separator to Unix style path
separators. This is used by a subsequent change in clang to enable the use of
Windows SDK headers on Linux.
llvm-svn: 203611
Before this patch the unix code for creating hardlinks was unused. The code
for creating symbolic links was implemented in lib/Support/LockFileManager.cpp
and the code for creating hard links in lib/Support/*/Path.inc.
The only use we have for these is in LockFileManager.cpp and it can use both
soft and hard links. Just have a create_link function that creates one or the
other depending on the platform.
llvm-svn: 203596
This reverts commits r203136, r203137, and r203138.
This code doesn't build on Windows. Even on Vista+, Windows requires
elevated privileges to create a symlink. Therefore we can't use
symlinks in the compiler. We'll have to find another approach.
llvm-svn: 203143
Before this patch they would take an boolean argument to say if the path
already existed. This was redundant with the returned error_code which is able
to represent that. This allowed for callers to incorrectly check only the
existed flag instead of first checking the error code.
Instead, pass in a boolean flag to say if the previous (non-)existence should be
an error or not.
Callers of the of the old simple versions are not affected. They still ignore
the previous (non-)existence as they did before.
llvm-svn: 201979
This will be used by the line editor library to derive a default path to
the history file.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2199
llvm-svn: 200594
Summary:
When clang is used under GNU/Linux in a chroot without /proc mount, it falls
back on the BSD method. However, since the buf variable is used twice
and fails with snprintf to produce the correct path.
When called as relatived (ie ./clang), it was failing with:
"" -cc1 [...] -x c++ x.cc
error: unable to execute command: Executable "" doesn't exist!
I also took the opportunity to simply the code (the first arg of test_dir
was useless).
Reviewers: rafael
Reviewed By: rafael
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2361
llvm-svn: 196791
On Windows, this improves clean cmake configuration time on my
workstation from 1m58s to 1m32s, which is pretty significant. There's
probably more that can be done here, but this is the low hanging fruit.
Eric volunteered to regenerate ./configure for me.
llvm-svn: 187209
This has some advantages:
* Lets us use native, utf16 windows functions.
* Easy to produce good errors on windows about trying to use a
directory when we want a file.
* Simplifies the unix version a bit.
llvm-svn: 186511
Rename's documentation says "Files are renamed as if by POSIX rename()". and it
is used for atomically updating output files from a temporary. Having rename
fallback to a non atomic copy has the potential to hide bugs, like using
a temporary file in /tmp instead of a unique name next to the final destination.
llvm-svn: 186483
The status function is already using a syscall that returns the file size.
Remember it and implement file_size as a simple wrapper.
No functionally change, but clients that already use status now can avoid
calling file_size.
llvm-svn: 186016
* Don't try to create parent directories in unique_file. It had two problem:
* It violates the contract that it is atomic. If the directory creation
success and the file creation fails, we would return an error but the
file system was modified.
* When creating a temporary file clang would have to first check if the
parent directory existed or not to avoid creating one when it was not
supposed to.
* More efficient implementations of createUniqueDirectory and the unique_file
that produces only the file name. Now all 3 just call into a static
function passing what they want (name, file or directory).
Clang also has to be updated, so tests might fail if a bot picks up this commit
and not the corresponding clang one.
llvm-svn: 185126
It looks like clang-tools-extra/unittests/cpp11-migrate/TransformTest.cpp
depends on the behaviour of the old one on Windows. Maybe a difference
between GetCurrentDirectoryA and GetCurrentDirectoryW?
llvm-svn: 184009
Saleem Abdulrasool