This test passes locally but was disabled due to pexpect issues on the
FreeBSD buildbot. That buildbot has been retired as it was overloaded,
and we will investigate again if this fails once a new buildbot is in
place. Noted by John Wolfe.
llvm.org/pr22784
llvm-svn: 247013
instruction used the ReturnValue as pointer operand or value operand. This
led to wrong code gen - in later stages (load-store elision code) the found
store and its operand would be erased, causing ReturnValue to become a <badref>.
The patch adds a check that makes sure that ReturnValue is a pointer operand of
store instruction. Regression test is also added.
This fixes PR24386.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12400
llvm-svn: 247003
Do not add "-*" to the list of checks. Make consistent the list of enabled
checks and the checks in use. Moreover, removing "-*" makes the behaviour
consistent with clang-tidy and allows user to use .clang-tidy configuration...
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12687
Patch by Marek Kurdej!
llvm-svn: 247002
Summary:
- Bug 24457 can now be tested for inferiors compiled
by clang compiler also.
- A generic test case for GCC and Clang inferiors:
-- Works even when Clang and GCC produce different
assembly for the same inferior.
- Refer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12677
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Aggarwal <abhishek.a.aggarwal@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 247000
Currently, the documentation for numSelectorArgs includes an incorrect
example. It shows a case where an argument of 1 will match a property
getter, but a getter will be matched only when N == 0.
This diff corrects the documentation and adds a test for numSelectorArgs(0).
Patch by Dave Lee.
llvm-svn: 246998
removes cast by performing the lshr on smaller types. However, currently there
is no trunc(lshr (sext A), Cst) variant.
This patch add such optimization by transforming trunc(lshr (sext A), Cst)
to ashr A, Cst.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12520
llvm-svn: 246997
separately from building the instruction so that it's
preserved even in -Asserts builds.
Employ C++'s mystical "comment" feature to discourage
breaking this in the future.
llvm-svn: 246991
Summary: And define them to have noop casts with address spaces 0-255.
Reviewers: pekka.jaaskelainen
Subscribers: pekka.jaaskelainen, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12678
llvm-svn: 246990
Summary:
When the dereference operator returns a value that is trivially
copyable (like a pointer), copy it. After this change, modernize-loop-convert
check can be applied to the whole llvm source code without breaking any build
or test.
Reviewers: alexfh, klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12675
llvm-svn: 246989
Introduce an Address type to bundle a pointer value with an
alignment. Introduce APIs on CGBuilderTy to work with Address
values. Change core APIs on CGF/CGM to traffic in Address where
appropriate. Require alignments to be non-zero. Update a ton
of code to compute and propagate alignment information.
As part of this, I've promoted CGBuiltin's EmitPointerWithAlignment
helper function to CGF and made use of it in a number of places in
the expression emitter.
The end result is that we should now be significantly more correct
when performing operations on objects that are locally known to
be under-aligned. Since alignment is not reliably tracked in the
type system, there are inherent limits to this, but at least we
are no longer confused by standard operations like derived-to-base
conversions and array-to-pointer decay. I've also fixed a large
number of bugs where we were applying the complete-object alignment
to a pointer instead of the non-virtual alignment, although most of
these were hidden by the very conservative approach we took with
member alignment.
Also, because IRGen now reliably asserts on zero alignments, we
should no longer be subject to an absurd but frustrating recurring
bug where an incomplete type would report a zero alignment and then
we'd naively do a alignmentAtOffset on it and emit code using an
alignment equal to the largest power-of-two factor of the offset.
We should also now be emitting much more aggressive alignment
attributes in the presence of over-alignment. In particular,
field access now uses alignmentAtOffset instead of min.
Several times in this patch, I had to change the existing
code-generation pattern in order to more effectively use
the Address APIs. For the most part, this seems to be a strict
improvement, like doing pointer arithmetic with GEPs instead of
ptrtoint. That said, I've tried very hard to not change semantics,
but it is likely that I've failed in a few places, for which I
apologize.
ABIArgInfo now always carries the assumed alignment of indirect and
indirect byval arguments. In order to cut down on what was already
a dauntingly large patch, I changed the code to never set align
attributes in the IR on non-byval indirect arguments. That is,
we still generate code which assumes that indirect arguments have
the given alignment, but we don't express this information to the
backend except where it's semantically required (i.e. on byvals).
This is likely a minor regression for those targets that did provide
this information, but it'll be trivial to add it back in a later
patch.
I partially punted on applying this work to CGBuiltin. Please
do not add more uses of the CreateDefaultAligned{Load,Store}
APIs; they will be going away eventually.
llvm-svn: 246985
Certain backends, e.g. NVPTX, do not support '.' in function names. Hence,
we ensure all '.' are replaced by '_' when generating function names for
subfunctions. For the current OpenMP code generation, this is not strictly
necessary, but future uses cases (e.g. GPU offloading) need this issue to be
fixed.
llvm-svn: 246980
Summary:
This should be a mandatory build process going forward, if Python
is enabled. The longer term desire is to remove the old shell
scripts entirely.
Reviewers: zturner, clayborg, labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12667
llvm-svn: 246979
Summary:
For an array declared like "blk[2][3]", this command was showing:
-data-evaluate-expression blk
^done,value="{[0] = [3], [1] = [3]}"
After this fix, it shows:
-data-evaluate-expression blk
^done,value="{[0] = {[0] = 1, [1] = 2, [2] = 3}, [1] = {[0] = 4, [1] = 5, [2] = 6}}"
The code to do the right thing was already available and used by other commands.
So I have just used that and removed the half-baked previous implementation.
Reviewers: ki.stfu
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12634
llvm-svn: 246965
Ed Maste