In RWPI code, globals that are not read-only are accessed relative to
the SB register (R9). This is achieved by explicitly generating an ADD
instruction between SB and an offset that we either load from a constant
pool or movw + movt into a register.
llvm-svn: 312521
This is possible if C1 and C2 are both powers of 2. Or if binop is 'and' then ~C2 needs to be a power of 2.
We already support this for 'or', but we should be able to support 'and' and 'xor'. This will be enhanced by D37274.
llvm-svn: 312519
If multiple conditional branches are executed based on the same comparison, we can execute multiple conditional branches based on the result of one comparison on PPC. For example,
if (a == 0) { ... }
else if (a < 0) { ... }
can be executed by one compare and two conditional branches instead of two pairs of a compare and a conditional branch.
This patch identifies a code sequence of the two pairs of a compare and a conditional branch and merge the compares if possible.
To maximize the opportunity, we do canonicalization of code sequence before merging compares.
For the above example, the input for this pass looks like:
cmplwi r3, 0
beq 0, .LBB0_3
cmpwi r3, -1
bgt 0, .LBB0_4
So, before merging two compares, we canonicalize it as
cmpwi r3, 0 ; cmplwi and cmpwi yield same result for beq
beq 0, .LBB0_3
cmpwi r3, 0 ; greather than -1 means greater or equal to 0
bge 0, .LBB0_4
The generated code should be
cmpwi r3, 0
beq 0, .LBB0_3
bge 0, .LBB0_4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37211
llvm-svn: 312514
As noted in PR11210:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210
...fixing this should allow us to eliminate x86-specific masked store intrinsics in IR.
(Although more testing will be needed to confirm that.)
llvm-svn: 312496
It solves issue of wrong section index evaluating for ranges when
base address is used.
Based on David Blaikie's patch D36097.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37214
llvm-svn: 312477
Summary:
Improve how MaxVF is computed while taking into account that MaxVF should not be larger than the loop's trip count.
Other than saving on compile-time by pruning the possible MaxVF candidates, this patch fixes pr34438 which exposed the following flow:
1. Short trip count identified -> Don't bail out, set OptForSize:=True to avoid tail-loop and runtime checks.
2. Compute MaxVF returned 16 on a target supporting AVX512.
3. OptForSize -> choose VF:=MaxVF.
4. Bail out because TripCount = 8, VF = 16, TripCount % VF !=0 means we need a tail loop.
With this patch step 2. will choose MaxVF=8 based on TripCount.
Reviewers: Ayal, dorit, mkuper, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: hfinkel, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37425
llvm-svn: 312472
Debug information can be, and was, corrupted when the runtime
remainder loop was fully unrolled. This is because a !null node can
be created instead of a unique one describing the loop. In this case,
the original node gets incorrectly updated with the NewLoopID
metadata.
In the case when the remainder loop is going to be quickly fully
unrolled, there isn't the need to add loop metadata for it anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37338
llvm-svn: 312471
Summary:
This is a re-roll of D36615 which uses PLT relocations in the back-end
to the call to __xray_CustomEvent() when building in -fPIC and
-fxray-instrument mode.
Reviewers: pcc, djasper, bkramer
Subscribers: sdardis, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37373
llvm-svn: 312466
Ideally we'd be able to emit the SUBREG_TO_REG without the explicit register->register move, but we'd need to be sure the producing operation would select something that guaranteed the upper bits were already zeroed.
llvm-svn: 312450
In a future patch, I plan to teach isel to use a small vector move with implicit zeroing of the upper elements when it sees the (insert_subvector zero, X, 0) pattern.
llvm-svn: 312448
Throughout an effort to strongly check the behavior of CodeGen with the IR shufflevector instruction we generated many tests while predicting the best X86 sequence that may be generated.
This is a subset of the generated tests that we think may add value to our X86 set of tests.
Some of the checks are not optimal and will be changed after fixing:
1. PR34394
2. PR34382
3. PR34380
4. PR34359
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37329
llvm-svn: 312442
The function combineShuffleToVectorExtend in DAGCombine might generate an illegal typed node after "legalize types" phase, causing assertion on non-simple type to fail afterwards.
Adding a type check in case the combine is running after the type legalize pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37330
llvm-svn: 312438
This change introduces a subcommand to the llvm-xray tool called
"stacks" which allows for analysing XRay traces provided as inputs and
accounting time to stacks instead of just individual functions. This
gives us a more precise view of where in a program the latency is
actually attributed.
The tool uses a trie data structure to keep track of the caller-callee
relationships as we process the XRay traces. In particular, we keep
track of the function call stack as we enter functions. While we're
doing this we're adding nodes in a trie and indicating a "calls"
relatinship between the caller (current top of the stack) and the callee
(the new top of the stack). When we push function ids onto the stack, we
keep track of the timestamp (TSC) for the enter event.
When exiting functions, we are able to account the duration by getting
the difference between the timestamp of the exit event and the
corresponding entry event in the stack. This works even if we somehow
miss the exit events for intermediary functions (i.e. if the exit event
is not cleanly associated with the enter event at the top of the stack).
The output of the tool currently provides just the top N leaf functions
that contribute the most latency, and the top N stacks that have the
most frequency. In the future we can provide more sophisticated query
mechanisms and potentially an export to database feature to make offline
analysis of the stack traces possible with existing tools.
llvm-svn: 312426
Summary:
ZExt and SExt from i8 to i16 aren't implemented in the autogenerated fast isel table because normal isel does a zext/sext to 32-bits and a subreg extract to avoid a partial register write or false dependency on the upper bits of the destination. This means without handling in fast isel we end up triggering a fast isel abort.
We had no custom sign extend handling at all so while I was there I went ahead and implemented sext i1->i8/i16/i32/i64 which was also missing. This generates an i1->i8 sign extend using a mask with 1, then an 8-bit negate, then continues with a sext from i8. A better sequence would be a wider and/negate, but would require more custom code.
Fast isel tests are a mess and I couldn't find a good home for the tests so I created a new one.
The test pr34381.ll had to have fast-isel removed because it was relying on a fast isel abort to hit the bug. The test case still seems valid with fast-isel disabled though some of the instructions changed.
Reviewers: spatel, zvi, igorb, guyblank, RKSimon
Reviewed By: guyblank
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37320
llvm-svn: 312422
Matt Arsenault