alive proofs:
a,b: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/4zsf
c,d,e,f: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/RC49
Indeed, not all of these patterns are canonical.
But since this fold will only produce a single instruction
i'm really interested in handling even uncanonical patterns.
Other than these 6 patterns, i can't think of any other
reasonable variants right now, although i'm sure they exist.
For now let's start with patterns where both shift amounts are variable,
with trivial constant "offset" between them, since i believe this is
both simplest to handle and i think this is most common.
But again, there are likely other variants where we could use
ValueTracking/ConstantRange to handle more cases.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42563
llvm-svn: 365641
Summary:
D59191 added support for these modifiers in the assembler and
disassembler. This patch just teaches instruction selection that it can
use them.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64497
llvm-svn: 365640
Summary:
Add user documentation page. This is an empty page atm, later patches will add
the specific user documentatoins.
Reviewers: dkrupp
Subscribers: whisperity, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, rnkovacs, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, gamesh411, Charusso, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64494
llvm-svn: 365639
They were added over 10 years ago in r66575 and have never been used as
far as I can tell.
(r67087 added similar fields to Compilation, and those are used.)
llvm-svn: 365638
Summary:
Transform
pow(C,x)
To
exp2(log2(C)*x)
if C > 0, C != inf, C != NaN (and C is not power of 2, since we have some fold for such case already).
log(C) is folded by the compiler and exp2 is much faster to compute than pow.
Reviewers: spatel, efriedma, evandro
Reviewed By: evandro
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64099
llvm-svn: 365637
D64130 introduced a bug described in the following message:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64130#1571560
The problem can happen with the following script:
SECTIONS {
.out : {
...
FILL(0x10101010)
*(.aaa)
...
}
The current code tries to read (0x10101010) as an expression and
does not break when meets *, what results in a script parsing error.
In this patch, I verify that FILL command's expression always wrapped in ().
And at the same time =<fillexp> expression can be both wrapped or unwrapped.
I checked it matches to bfd/gold.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64476
llvm-svn: 365635
Summary:
This would allow clangd embedders to use the ClangdServer::rename for other
purposes (highlighting all the occurrences of the symbol in prepare
stage).
Reviewers: sammccall, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64481
llvm-svn: 365631
I would like to add some pragma handling here, but couldn't resist a little NFC
and tidy up first.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64471
llvm-svn: 365629
Summary:
This patch simplifies 2 aspects in the FileCheckNumericVariable code.
First, setValue() method is turned into a void function since being
called only on undefined variable is an invariant and is now asserted
rather than returned. This remove the assert from the callers.
Second, clearValue() method is also turned into a void function since
the only caller does not check its return value since it may be trying
to clear the value of variable that is already cleared without this
being noteworthy.
Reviewers: jhenderson, chandlerc, jdenny, probinson, grimar, arichardson, rnk
Subscribers: JonChesterfield, rogfer01, hfinkel, kristina, rnk, tra, arichardson, grimar, dblaikie, probinson, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64231
> llvm-svn: 365249
llvm-svn: 365625
Summary:
The value of the FileCheckNumericVariable class instance representing
the @LINE numeric variable is set and cleared respectively before and
after substitutions are made, if any. However, when a substitution
fails, the value is not cleared. This causes the next substitution of
@LINE later on to give the wrong value since setValue is a nop if the
value is already set. This is what caused failures after commit r365249.
Reviewers: jhenderson, chandlerc, jdenny, probinson, grimar, arichardson, rnk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, probinson, dblaikie, grimar, arichardson, tra, rnk, kristina, hfinkel, rogfer01, JonChesterfield
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64449
llvm-svn: 365624
Cache the LoadSDNode nodes so we can easily map to/from the element index instead of packing them together - this will be useful for future patches for PR16739 etc.
llvm-svn: 365620
Deleted code was introduced as a work around for a bug in the gold linker
(http://sourceware.org/PR16794). Test case that was given as a reason for
this part of code, the one on previous link, now works for the gold.
This condition is too strict and when a code is compiled with debug info
it forces generation of numerous relocations with symbol for architectures
that do not have relocation addend.
Reviewers: arsenm, espindola
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64327
llvm-svn: 365618
Summary:
There's a number of requirements for installing LLDB on macOS that are untypical for LLVM projects: use special install-prefix for LLDB.framework, ship headers and tools as framework resources, patch RPATHs, externalize debug-info to dSYM's and strip binaries with `-ST`. For some of it we could use `llvm_externalize_debuginfo()` in the past and just add special cases. However, this complicates the code for all projects and comes with the major drawback, that it adds all these actions at build-time, i.e. dSYM creation and stripping take a lot of time and don't make sense at build-time.
LLVM's distribution mechanism (https://llvm.org/docs/BuildingADistribution.html) appears to be the natural candidate to install LLDB. Based on D64399 (enable in standalone builds), this patch integrates framework installation with the distribution mechanism and adds custom stripping flags and dSYM creation at install-time. Unlike the abandoned D61952, it leaves build-tree binaries untouched, so there's no side-effects on testing. Potential install-order issues must be handled externally.
Please let me know what you think, while I run a few more tests and add remarks+documentation.
Reviewers: xiaobai, compnerd, JDevlieghere, davide, labath, mgorny
Reviewed By: xiaobai, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits, #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64408
llvm-svn: 365617
Summary: The custom lldb-framework target was meant to encapsulate all build steps that LLDB.framework needs on top of the ordinaly liblldb. In the end all of it happens in post-build steps, so we can do the same with liblldb and cut down another source of confusion.
Reviewers: xiaobai, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: xiaobai, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits, #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64397
llvm-svn: 365615
This patch checks to see if the vector element loads are based off a dereferenceable pointer that covers the entire vector width, in which case we don't need to have element loads at both extremes of the vector width - just the start (base pointer) of it.
Another step towards partial vector loads......
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64205
llvm-svn: 365614
Only instructions with two or more unique successors should be considered for unswitching.
Patch Author: Daniil Suchkov.
Reviewers: reames, asbirlea, skatkov
Reviewed By: skatkov
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64404
llvm-svn: 365611
modernize-trailing-return-type runs the preprocessor, breaking the token
collection logic.
This lead to a crash before, see the new test for a repro.
llvm-svn: 365607
When we fail to calculate #include insertion for a completion item.
Note that this change does not add a test, although that would be good.
llvm-svn: 365606
Summary:
Use the same predicates as VSTMDB/VLDMIA since VPUSH/VPOP alias to
these.
Patch by Momchil Velikov.
Reviewers: ostannard, simon_tatham, SjoerdMeijer, samparker, t.p.northover, dmgreen
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, dmgreen, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64413
llvm-svn: 365604
This converts 5 precompiled binaries to YAMLs,
removes 4 from inputs and performs a cleanup.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64246
llvm-svn: 365601
This test exposes a bug in SimpleLoopUnswitch that leads to a crash on
assert(SuccessorsCount > 1 && "Cannot unswitch a condition without multiple distinct successors!");
when SimpleLoopUnswitch considers unswitching of a loop by a switch with one successor.
Fix will be submitted soon.
Patch Author: Daniil Suchkov.
Reviewers: reames, asbirlea, skatkov
Reviewed By: skatkov
Subscribers: zzheng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64403
llvm-svn: 365600
Without this gcc 7.4.0 complains with
../include/llvm/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizationArtifactCombiner.h:457:54: error: suggest parentheses around '&&' within '||' [-Werror=parentheses]
isArtifactCast(TmpDef->getOpcode()) &&
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~
"Expecting copy or artifact cast here");
~
llvm-svn: 365597
This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote
using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the
source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual
post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against
lld's code base.
Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html
In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable
naming scheme change, and this patch does that.
I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that
is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter.
Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld
repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts
because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But
there's a remedy.
clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your
downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to
a commit after the mass renaming:
1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming,
2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and
3. rebase again to the head.
Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and
for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and
disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by
hand, but that shouldn't be too many.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121
llvm-svn: 365595
Consolidate llvm::BWH_* statics into an enum to fix
module build issues. This fixes the LLVM_Bitcode module,
getting rid of -Wmodules-ambiguous-internal-linkage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64469
llvm-svn: 365594
Roman Lebedev