operand being factorized (and erased) could occur several times in Ops,
resulting in freed memory being used when the next occurrence in Ops was
analyzed.
llvm-svn: 124287
with BasicAA's DecomposeGEPExpression, which recently began
using a TargetData. This fixes PR8968, though the testcase
is awkward to reduce.
Also, update several off GetUnderlyingObject's users
which happen to have a TargetData handy to pass it in.
llvm-svn: 124134
occurs because instcombine sinks loads and inserts phis. This kicks in
on such apps as 175.vpr, eon, 403.gcc, xalancbmk and a bunch of times in
spec2006 in some app that uses std::deque.
This resolves the last of rdar://7339113.
llvm-svn: 124090
common cases. This triggers a surprising number of times in SPEC2K6
because min/max idioms end up doing this. For example, code from the
STL ends up looking like this to SRoA:
%202 = load i64* %__old_size, align 8, !tbaa !3
%203 = load i64* %__old_size, align 8, !tbaa !3
%204 = load i64* %__n, align 8, !tbaa !3
%205 = icmp ult i64 %203, %204
%storemerge.i = select i1 %205, i64* %__n, i64* %__old_size
%206 = load i64* %storemerge.i, align 8, !tbaa !3
We can now promote both the __n and the __old_size allocas.
This addresses another chunk of rdar://7339113, poor codegen on
stringswitch.
llvm-svn: 124088
that have PHI or select uses of their element pointers. This can often happen
when instcombine sinks two loads into a successor, inserting a phi or select.
With this patch, we can scalarize the alloca, but the pinned elements are not
yet promoted. This is still a win for large aggregates where only one element
is used. This fixes rdar://8904039 and part of rdar://7339113 (poor codegen
on stringswitch).
llvm-svn: 124070
handle the "Transformation preventing inst" printing,
so that -scalarrepl -debug will always print the rejected
instruction. No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 124066
without whatever this was trying to do. When/if someone has the time to do some empirical
evaluations, it might be worth it to figure out what this code was trying to do and see if
it's worth resurrecting/fixing.
llvm-svn: 123684
checks enabled:
1) Use '<' to compare integers in a comparison function rather than '<='.
2) Use the uniqued set DefBlocks rather than Info.DefiningBlocks to initialize
the priority queue.
The speedup of scalarrepl on test-suite + SPEC2000 + SPEC2006 is a bit less, at
just under 16% rather than 17%.
llvm-svn: 123662
eliminating a potentially quadratic data structure, this also gives a 17%
speedup when running -scalarrepl on test-suite + SPEC2000 + SPEC2006. My initial
experiment gave a greater speedup around 25%, but I moved the dominator tree
level computation from dominator tree construction to PromoteMemToReg.
Since this approach to computing IDFs has a much lower overhead than the old
code using precomputed DFs, it is worth looking at using this new code for the
second scalarrepl pass as well.
llvm-svn: 123609
then don't try to decimate it into its individual pieces. This will just make a mess of the
IR and is pointless if none of the elements are individually accessed. This was generating
really terrible code for std::bitset (PR8980) because it happens to be lowered by clang
as an {[8 x i8]} structure instead of {i64}.
The testcase now is optimized to:
define i64 @test2(i64 %X) {
br label %L2
L2: ; preds = %0
ret i64 %X
}
before we generated:
define i64 @test2(i64 %X) {
%sroa.store.elt = lshr i64 %X, 56
%1 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt to i8
%sroa.store.elt8 = lshr i64 %X, 48
%2 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt8 to i8
%sroa.store.elt9 = lshr i64 %X, 40
%3 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt9 to i8
%sroa.store.elt10 = lshr i64 %X, 32
%4 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt10 to i8
%sroa.store.elt11 = lshr i64 %X, 24
%5 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt11 to i8
%sroa.store.elt12 = lshr i64 %X, 16
%6 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt12 to i8
%sroa.store.elt13 = lshr i64 %X, 8
%7 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt13 to i8
%8 = trunc i64 %X to i8
br label %L2
L2: ; preds = %0
%9 = zext i8 %1 to i64
%10 = shl i64 %9, 56
%11 = zext i8 %2 to i64
%12 = shl i64 %11, 48
%13 = or i64 %12, %10
%14 = zext i8 %3 to i64
%15 = shl i64 %14, 40
%16 = or i64 %15, %13
%17 = zext i8 %4 to i64
%18 = shl i64 %17, 32
%19 = or i64 %18, %16
%20 = zext i8 %5 to i64
%21 = shl i64 %20, 24
%22 = or i64 %21, %19
%23 = zext i8 %6 to i64
%24 = shl i64 %23, 16
%25 = or i64 %24, %22
%26 = zext i8 %7 to i64
%27 = shl i64 %26, 8
%28 = or i64 %27, %25
%29 = zext i8 %8 to i64
%30 = or i64 %29, %28
ret i64 %30
}
In this case, instcombine was able to eliminate the nonsense, but in PR8980 enough
PHIs are in play that instcombine backs off. It's better to not generate this stuff
in the first place.
llvm-svn: 123571
multiple uses. In some cases, all the uses are the same operation,
so instcombine can go ahead and promote the phi. In the testcase
this pushes an add out of the loop.
llvm-svn: 123568
The basic issue is that isel (very reasonably!) expects conditional branches
to be folded, so CGP leaving around a bunch dead computation feeding
conditional branches isn't such a good idea. Just fold branches on constants
into unconditional branches.
llvm-svn: 123526
have objectsize folding recursively simplify away their result when it
folds. It is important to catch this here, because otherwise we won't
eliminate the cross-block values at isel and other times.
llvm-svn: 123524
instead of DomTree/DomFrontier. This may be interesting for reducing compile
time. This is currently disabled, but seems to work just fine.
When this is enabled, we eliminate two runs of dominator frontier, one in the
"early per-function" optimizations and one in the "interlaced with inliner"
function passes.
llvm-svn: 123434
This is a minor extension of SROA to handle a special case that is
important for some ARM NEON operations. Some of the NEON intrinsics
return multiple values, which are handled as struct types containing
multiple elements of the same vector type. The corresponding return
types declared in the arm_neon.h header have equivalent arrays. We
need SROA to recognize that it can split up those arrays and structs
into separate vectors, even though they are not always accessed with
the same type. SROA already handles loads and stores of an entire
alloca by using insertvalue/extractvalue to access the individual
pieces, and that code works the same regardless of whether the type
is a struct or an array. So, all that needs to be done is to check
for compatible arrays and homogeneous structs.
llvm-svn: 123381
SROA only split up structs and arrays one level at a time, so padding can
only cause trouble if it is located in between the struct or array elements.
llvm-svn: 123380
phi nodes. It is called from MergeBlockIntoPredecessor which is
called from GVN, which claims to preserve these.
I'm skeptical that this is the actual problem behind PR8954, but
this is a stab in the right direction.
llvm-svn: 123222
without informing memdep. This could cause nondeterminstic weirdness
based on where instructions happen to get allocated, and will hopefully
breath some life into some broken testers.
llvm-svn: 123124
Duncan Sands