The `rewrite` statement allows for rewriting a given root
operation with a block of nested rewriters. The root operation is
not implicitly erased or replaced, and any transformations to it
must be expressed within the nested rewrite block. The inner body
may contain any number of other rewrite statements, variables, or
expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115299
This statement acts as a companion to the existing `erase`
statement, and is the corresponding PDLL construct for the
`PatternRewriter::replaceOp` C++ API. This statement replaces a
given operation with a set of values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115298
Tuples are used to group multiple elements into a single
compound value. The values in a tuple can be of any type, and
do not need to be of the same type. There is also no limit to
the number of elements held by a tuple.
Tuples will be used to support multiple results from
Constraints and Rewrites (added in a followup), and will also
make it easier to support more complex primitives (such as
range based maps that can operate on multiple values).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115297
An operation expression in PDLL represents an MLIR operation. In
the match section of a pattern, this expression models one of
the input operations to the pattern. In the rewrite section of
a pattern, this expression models one of the operations to
create. The general structure of the operation expression is very
similar to that of the "generic form" of textual MLIR assembly:
```
let root = op<my_dialect.foo>(operands: ValueRange) {attr = attr: Attr} -> (resultTypes: TypeRange);
```
For now we only model the components that are within PDL, as PDL
gains support for blocks and regions so will this expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115296
This allows for using literal attributes and types within PDLL,
which simplifies building both constraints and rewriters. For
example, checking if an attribute is true is as simple as
`attr<"true">`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115295
This allows for overriding the metadata of a pattern and
providing information such as the benefit, bounded recursion,
and more in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115294
This is a new pattern rewrite frontend designed from the ground
up to support MLIR constructs, and to target PDL. This frontend
language was proposed in https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-pdll-a-new-declarative-rewrite-frontend-for-mlir/4798
This commit starts sketching out the base structure of the
frontend, and is intended to be a minimal starting point for
building up the language. It essentially contains support for
defining a pattern, variables, and erasing an operation. The
features mentioned in the proposal RFC (including IDE support)
will be added incrementally in followup commits.
I intend to upstream the documentation for the language in a
followup when a bit more of the pieces have been landed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115093
This struct was added and was intended to be used, but it was missed in the original patch.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114041
[NFC] This patch fixes URLs containing "master". Old URLs were either broken or
redirecting to the new URL.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113186
A text file may be comprised of many different "chunks", when
the input file contains the `// -----` split markers. We don't
need to use a unique MLIRContext per chunk, as having
separate contexts is intended to allow for easy unloading of
unused data and all chunks have the same lifetime (tied to the
input file). This commit uses one context for the entire file,
greatly reducing memory consumption in certain situations (up
to 70%).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107488
This prevents an explosion of threads, given that each file gets its own context and thus its own thread pool. We don't really need a thread pool for the LSP contexts anyways, so it's better to just disable threading.
C++23 will make these conversions ambiguous - so fix them to make the
codebase forward-compatible with C++23 (& a follow-up change I've made
will make this ambiguous/invalid even in <C++23 so we don't regress
this & it generally improves the code anyway)
This allows for building an outline of the symbols and symbol tables within the IR. This allows for easy navigations to functions/modules and other symbol/symbol table operations within the IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103729
For now the hover simply shows the same information as hovering on the operation
name. If necessary this can be tweaked to something symbol specific later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103728
This revision adds support for hover on region operations, by temporarily removing the regions during printing. This revision also tweaks the hover format for operations to include symbol information, now that FuncOp can be shown in the hover.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103727
This revision adds assembly state tracking for uses of symbols, allowing for go-to-definition and references support for SymbolRefAttrs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103585
Move the core reducer algorithm into a library so that it'll be easier
for porting to different projects.
Depends On D101046
Reviewed By: jpienaar, rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101607
Currently the diagnostics reports the file:line:col, but some LSP
frontends require a non-empty range. Report either the range of an
identifier that starts at location, or a range of 1. Expose the id
location to range helper and reuse here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103482
MLIR tools very commonly use `// -----` to split a file into distinct sub documents, that are processed separately. This revision adds support to mlir-lsp-server for splitting MLIR files based on this sigil, and processing them separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102660
I noticed while packaging mlir that most mlir library names start
with `libMLIR`. The only different libary was `libMlirLspServerLib.a`.
That's why I changed the library to be similarly named to the others.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102881
The version is used by LSP clients to ignore stale diagnostics, and can be used in a followup to help verify incremental changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102644
This allows for diagnostics emitted during parsing/verification to be surfaced to the user by the language client, as opposed to just being emitted to the logs like they are now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102293
This provides information when the user hovers over a part of the source .mlir file. This revision adds the following hover behavior:
* Operation:
- Shows the generic form.
* Operation Result:
- Shows the parent operation name, result number(s), and type(s).
* Block:
- Shows the parent operation name, block number, predecessors, and successors.
* Block Argument:
- Shows the parent operation name, parent block, argument number, and type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101113
This commits adds a basic LSP server for MLIR that supports resolving references and definitions. Several components of the setup are simplified to keep the size of this commit down, and will be built out in later commits. A followup commit will add a vscode language client that communicates with this server, paving the way for better IDE experience when interfacing with MLIR files.
The structure of this tool is similar to mlir-opt and mlir-translate, i.e. the implementation is structured as a library that users can call into to implement entry points that contain the dialects/passes that they are interested in.
Note: This commit contains several files, namely those in `mlir-lsp-server/lsp`, that have been copied from the LSP code in clangd and adapted for use in MLIR. This copying was decided as the best initial path forward (discussed offline by several stake holders in MLIR and clangd) given the different needs of our MLIR server, and the one for clangd. If a strong desire/need for unification arises in the future, the existence of these files in mlir-lsp-server can be reconsidered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100439
Mehdi Amini