This reverts commit r250592.
It has issues around unevaluated contexts, like this:
template <class T> struct A { T i; };
template <class T>
struct B : A<T> {
using A<T>::i;
typedef decltype(i) U;
};
template struct B<int>;
llvm-svn: 250774
During the initial template parse for this code, 'member' is unresolved
and we don't know anything about it:
struct A { int member };
template <typename T>
struct B : public T {
using T::member;
static void f() {
(void)member; // Could be static or non-static.
}
};
template class B<A>;
The pattern declaration contains an UnresolvedLookupExpr rather than an
UnresolvedMemberExpr because `f` is static, and `member` should never be
a field. However, if the code is invalid, it may become a field, in
which case we should diagnose it.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6700
llvm-svn: 250592
Previously, our logic when taking the address of an overloaded function
would not consider enable_if attributes, so long as all of the enable_if
conditions on a given candidate were true. So, two functions with
identical signatures (one with enable_if attributes, the other without),
would be considered equally good overloads. If we were calling the
function instead of taking its address, then the function with enable_if
attributes would be preferred.
This patch makes us prefer the candidate with enable_if regardless of if
we're calling or taking the address of an overloaded function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13795
llvm-svn: 250486
context (but otherwise at the top level) to be disabled, to support use of C++
standard library implementations that (legitimately) mark their <blah.h>
headers as being C++ headers from C libraries that wrap things in 'extern "C"'
a bit too enthusiastically.
llvm-svn: 250137
This fixes a bug where one can take the address of a conditionally
enabled function to drop its enable_if guards. For example:
int foo(int a) __attribute__((enable_if(a > 0, "")));
int (*p)(int) = &foo;
int result = p(-1); // compilation succeeds; calls foo(-1)
Overloading logic has been updated to reflect this change, as well.
Functions with enable_if attributes that are always true are still
allowed to have their address taken.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13607
llvm-svn: 250090
Fixed a bug where we'd emit multiple diagnostics if there was a problem
taking the address of an overloaded template function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13664
llvm-svn: 250078
C allows for some implicit conversions that C++ does not, e.g. void* ->
char*. This patch teaches clang that these conversions are okay when
dealing with overloads in C.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13604
llvm-svn: 249995
The inference of _Nullable for weak Objective-C properties was broken
in several ways:
* It was back-patching the type information very late in the process
of checking the attributes for an Objective-C property, which is
just wrong.
* It was using ad hoc checks to try to suppress the warning about
missing nullability specifiers (-Wnullability-completeness), which
didn't actual work in all cases (rdar://problem/22985457)
* It was inferring _Nullable even outside of assumes-nonnull regions,
which is wrong.
Putting the inference of _Nullable for weak Objective-C properties in
the same place as all of the other inference logic fixes all of these
ills.
llvm-svn: 249896
Summary:
Currently when a function annotated with __attribute__((nonnull)) is called in an unevaluated context with a null argument a -Wnonnull warning is emitted.
This warning seems like a false positive unless the call expression is potentially evaluated. Change this behavior so that the non-null warnings use DiagRuntimeBehavior so they wont emit when they won't be evaluated.
Reviewers: majnemer, rsmith
Subscribers: mclow.lists, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13408
llvm-svn: 249787
consider the following:
enum E *p;
enum E { e };
The above snippet is not ANSI C because 'enum E' has not bee defined
when we are processing the declaration of 'p'; however, it is a popular
extension to make the above work. This would fail using the Microsoft
enum semantics because the definition of 'E' would implicitly have a
fixed underlying type of 'int' which would trigger diagnostic messages
about a mismatch between the declaration and the definition.
Instead, treat fixed underlying types as not fixed for the purposes of
the diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 249674
Enums without an explicit, fixed, underlying type are implicitly given a
fixed 'int' type for ABI compatibility with MSVC. However, we can
enforce the standard-mandated rules on these types as-if we didn't know
this fact if the tag is not part of a definition.
llvm-svn: 249667
No ABI for C++ currently makes it possible to implement the standard
100% perfectly. We wrongly hid some of our compatible behavior behind
-fms-compatibility instead of tying it to the compiler ABI.
llvm-svn: 249656
that change turns out to not be reasonable: mutating the AST of a parsed
template during instantiation is not a sound thing to do, does not work across
chained PCH / modules builds, and is in any case a special-case workaround to a
more general problem that should be solved centrally.
llvm-svn: 249342
Diagnose when a pointer to const T is used as the first argument in at atomic
builtin unless that builtin is a load operation. This is already checked for
C11 atomics builtins but not for __atomic ones.
This patch was given the LGTM by rsmith when it was part
of a larger review. (See http://reviews.llvm.org/D10407)
llvm-svn: 249252
All global variables that are not enclosed in a declare target region
must be captured in the target region as local variables do. Currently,
there is no support for declare target, so this patch adds support for
capturing all the global variables used in a the target region.
llvm-svn: 249154
partial specialization can perform conversions on the argument. Be sure we
start again from the original argument when checking each possible template.
llvm-svn: 249114
With -fms-extensions it is possible to have a non-class record that is a
template specialization cause an assertion failure via the call to
Type::getAsCXXRecordDecl. Fixes PR 24246.
llvm-svn: 249090
Objective-C ARC lifetime qualifiers are dropped when canonicalizing
function types. Perform the same adjustment before comparing the
deduced result types of lambdas. Fixes rdar://problem/22344904.
llvm-svn: 249065
Unqualified templated constructors cannot be friended and our lack of a
diagnostic led to violated invariants. Instead, raise a diagnostic when
processing the friend declaration.
This fixes PR20251.
llvm-svn: 248953
When an Objective-C method implements a protocol requirement, do not
inherit any availability information from the protocol
requirement. Rather, check that the implementation is not less
available than the protocol requirement, as we do when overriding a
method that has availability. Fixes rdar://problem/22734745.
llvm-svn: 248949
We get into this bad state when someone defines a new member function
for a class but forgets to add the declaration to the class body.
Calling the new member function from a member function template of the
class will crash during instantiation.
llvm-svn: 248925
- Remove virtual SC_OpenCLWorkGroupLocal storage type specifier
as it conflicts with static local variables now and prevents
diagnosing static local address space variables correctly.
- Allow static local and global variables (OpenCL2.0 s6.8 and s6.5.1).
- Improve diagnostics of allowed ASes for variables in different scopes:
(i) Global or static local variables have to be in global
or constant ASes (OpenCL1.2 s6.5, OpenCL2.0 s6.5.1);
(ii) Non-kernel function variables can't be declared in local
or constant ASes (OpenCL1.1 s6.5.2 and s6.5.3).
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13105
llvm-svn: 248906
FunctionParmPackExpr actually stores an array of ParmVarDecl* (and
accessors return that). But, the FunctionParmPackExpr::Create()
constructor accepted an array of Decl *s instead.
It was easy for this mismatch to occur without any obvious sign of
something wrong, since both the store and the access used independent
'reinterpet_cast<XX>(this+1)' calls.
llvm-svn: 248905
Applied restrictions from OpenCL v2.0 s6.13.11.8
that mainly disallow operations on atomic types (except for taking their address - &).
The patch is taken from SPIR2.0 provisional branch, contributed by Guy Benyei!
llvm-svn: 248896
specification) to an error. No compiler other than Clang seems to allow this,
and it doesn't seem like a useful thing to accept as an extension in general.
The current behavior was added for PR5957, where the problem was specifically
related to mismatches of the exception specification on the implicitly-declared
global operator new and delete. To retain that workaround, we downgrade the
error to an ExtWarn when the declaration is of a replaceable global allocation
function.
Now that this is an error, stop trying (and failing) to recover from a missing
computed noexcept specification. That recovery didn't work, and led to crashes
in code like the added testcase.
llvm-svn: 248867
LookupResult should not be copyable, it's not readily copyable and can
only be copied when it's in specific states (in a query state, without
any results, basically). Instead, just extract the /query/ state and
pass that across the copy boundary, then build a new LookupResult on the
other side.
I wonder if a better API (one in which the query state is separate from
the result state - essentialyl making QueryState a first class part of
the Lookup API - pass a QueryState, get a LookupResult, rather than
mutating the LookupResult in place (LookupResult could contain a
QueryState if it's particularly helpful to be able to observe the query
parameters while also examining the result)) might be a good idea here.
Future patches will probably make LookupResult actually non-copyable
(transition the CXXBasePaths to unique_ptr, for example) and hopefully
we'll enable -Wdeprecated in LLVM soon to avoid issues like this.
llvm-svn: 248761
Parsing and sema analysis for 'simd' clause in 'ordered' directive.
Description
If the simd clause is specified, the ordered regions encountered by any thread will use only a single SIMD lane to execute the ordered
regions in the order of the loop iterations.
Restrictions
An ordered construct with the simd clause is the only OpenMP construct that can appear in the simd region
llvm-svn: 248696
Angel Garcia Gomez