Rework the TTI cache and software prefetching APIs to prepare for the
introduction of a general system model. Changes include:
- Marking existing interfaces const and/or override as appropriate
- Adding comments
- Adding BasicTTIImpl interfaces that delegate to a subtarget
implementation
- Adding a default "no information" subtarget implementation
Only a handful of targets use these interfaces currently: AArch64,
Hexagon, PPC and SystemZ. AArch64 already has a custom subtarget
implementation, so its custom TTI implementation is migrated to use
the new facilities in BasicTTIImpl to invoke its custom subtarget
implementation. The custom TTI implementations continue to exist for
the other targets with this change. They are not moved over to
subtarget-based implementations.
The end goal is to have the default subtarget implementation defer to
the system model defined by the target. With this change, the default
subtarget implementation essentially returns "no information" for
these interfaces. None of the existing users of TTI will hit that
implementation because they define their own custom TTI
implementations and won't use the BasicTTIImpl implementations.
Once system models are in place for the targets that use these
interfaces, their custom TTI implementations can be removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63614
llvm-svn: 365676
This patch allows clang users to print out a list of supported CPU models using
clang [--target=<target triple>] --print-supported-cpus
Then, users can select the CPU model to compile to using
clang --target=<triple> -mcpu=<model> a.c
It is a handy feature to help cross compilation.
llvm-svn: 363464
Those two subtarget features were awkward because their semantics are
reversed: each one indicates the _lack_ of support for something in
the architecture, rather than the presence. As a consequence, you
don't get the behavior you want if you combine two sets of feature
bits.
Each SubtargetFeature for an FP architecture version now comes in four
versions, one for each combination of those options. So you can still
say (for example) '+vfp2' in a feature string and it will mean what
it's always meant, but there's a new string '+vfp2d16sp' meaning the
version without those extra options.
A lot of this change is just mechanically replacing positive checks
for the old features with negative checks for the new ones. But one
more interesting change is that I've rearranged getFPUFeatures() so
that the main FPU feature is appended to the output list *before*
rather than after the features derived from the Restriction field, so
that -fp64 and -d32 can override defaults added by the main feature.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: srhines, javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, zzheng, Petar.Avramovic, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60691
llvm-svn: 361845
These arrays are both keyed by CPU name and go into the same tablegenerated file. Merge them so we only need to store keys once.
This also removes a weird space saving quirk where we used the ProcDesc.size() to create to build an ArrayRef for ProcSched.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58939
llvm-svn: 355431
The description for CPUs was just the CPU name wrapped with "Select the " and " processor". We can just do that directly in the help printer instead of making a separate version in the binary for each CPU.
Also remove the Value field that isn't needed and was always 0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58938
llvm-svn: 355429
The SubtargetFeature class managed a list of features as strings. And it also had functions for setting bits in a FeatureBitset.
The methods that operated on the Feature list as strings are used in other parts of the backend. But the parts that operate on FeatureBitset are very tightly coupled to MCSubtargetInfo and requires passing in the arrays that MCSubtargetInfo owns. And the same struct type is used for ProcFeatures and ProcDesc.
This has led to MCSubtargetInfo having 2 arrays keyed by CPU name. One containing a mapping from a CPU name to its features. And one containing a mapping from CPU name to its scheduler model.
I would like to make a single CPU array containing all CPU information and remove some unneeded fields the ProcDesc array currently has. But I don't want to make SubtargetFeatures.h have to know about the scheduler model type and have to forward declare or pull in the header file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58937
llvm-svn: 355428
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
SubtargetFeatures::ApplyFeatureFlag to be static, so that
MCSubtargetInfo doesn't need to instantiate SubtargetFeatures
for nothing. Also change the return type to void, as it
wasn't ever used.
This is a partial commit of http://reviews.llvm.org/D15746
llvm-svn: 256823
This allows for accurate architecture targeting as well as removing
duplicate information (hardcoded feature strings) from MCTargetDesc.
llvm-svn: 253196
Summary:
This is the first patch in the series to migrate Triple's (which are ambiguous)
to TargetTuple's (which aren't).
For the moment, TargetTuple simply passes all requests to the Triple object it
holds. Once it has replaced Triple, it will start to implement the interface in
a more suitable way.
This change makes some changes to the public C++ API. In particular,
InitMCSubtargetInfo(), createMCRelocationInfo(), and createMCSymbolizer()
now take TargetTuples instead of Triples. The other public C++ API's have
been left as-is for the moment to reduce patch size.
This commit also contains a trivial patch to clang to account for the C++ API
change. Thanks go to Pavel Labath for fixing LLDB for me.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: jyknight, dschuff, arsenm, rampitec, danalbert, srhines, javed.absar, dsanders, echristo, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, ted, jfb, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10969
llvm-svn: 247692
Summary:
This is the first patch in the series to migrate Triple's (which are ambiguous)
to TargetTuple's (which aren't).
For the moment, TargetTuple simply passes all requests to the Triple object it
holds. Once it has replaced Triple, it will start to implement the interface in
a more suitable way.
This change makes some changes to the public C++ API. In particular,
InitMCSubtargetInfo(), createMCRelocationInfo(), and createMCSymbolizer()
now take TargetTuples instead of Triples. The other public C++ API's have
been left as-is for the moment to reduce patch size.
This commit also contains a trivial patch to clang to account for the C++ API
change.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: jyknight, dschuff, arsenm, rampitec, danalbert, srhines, javed.absar, dsanders, echristo, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, ted, jfb, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10969
llvm-svn: 247683
Disallow all mutation of `MCSubtargetInfo` expect the feature bits.
Besides deleting the assignment operators -- which were dead "code" --
this restricts `InitMCProcessorInfo()` to subclass initialization
sequences, and exposes a new more limited function called
`setDefaultFeatures()` for use by the ARMAsmParser `.cpu` directive.
There's a small functional change here: ARMAsmParser used to adjust
`MCSubtargetInfo::CPUSchedModel` as a side effect of calling
`InitMCProcessorInfo()`, but I've removed that suspicious behaviour.
Since the AsmParser shouldn't be doing any scheduling, there shouldn't
be any observable change...
llvm-svn: 241961
Force all creators of `MCSubtargetInfo` to immediately initialize it,
merging the default constructor and the initializer into an initializing
constructor. Besides cleaning up the code a little, this makes it clear
that the initializer is never called again later.
Out-of-tree backends need a trivial change: instead of calling:
auto *X = new MCSubtargetInfo();
InitXYZMCSubtargetInfo(X, ...);
return X;
they should call:
return createXYZMCSubtargetInfoImpl(...);
There's no real functionality change here.
llvm-svn: 241957
Remove all calls to `MCSubtargetInfo::InitCPUSched()` and merge its body
into the only relevant caller, `MCSubtargetInfo::InitMCProcessorInfo()`.
We were only calling the former after explicitly calling the latter with
the same CPU; it's confusing to have both methods exposed.
Besides a minor (surely unmeasurable) speedup in ARM and X86 from
avoiding running the logic twice, no functionality change.
llvm-svn: 241956
`MCSchedModel` is large. Make `MCSchedModel::GetDefaultSchedModel()`
return by-reference instead of by-value, so we can store a pointer in
`MCSubtargetInfo::CPUSchedModel` instead of a copy.
Note: since `MCSchedModel` is POD, this doesn't create a static
constructor.
llvm-svn: 241947
Summary:
This continues the patch series to eliminate StringRef forms of GNU triples
from the internals of LLVM that began in r239036.
Reviewers: rafael
Reviewed By: rafael
Subscribers: rafael, ted, jfb, llvm-commits, rengolin, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10311
llvm-svn: 239467
Add getFPUFeatures to TargetParser, which gets the list of subtarget features
that are enabled/disabled for each FPU, and use it when handling the .fpu
directive.
No functional change in this commit, though clang will start behaving
differently once it starts using this.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10237
llvm-svn: 239150
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first several times this was committed (e.g. r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
Apparently the reason for most failures was both clang and gcc's inability to deal with large numbers (> 10K) of bitset constructor calls in tablegen-generated initializers of instruction info tables.
This should now be fixed.
llvm-svn: 238192
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first two times this was committed (r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
At least some of the ARM and MIPS ones were due to gcc/binutils issues, and should now be fixed.
llvm-svn: 237234
This reverts commit r233055.
It still causes buildbot failures (gcc running out of memory on several platforms, and a self-host failure on arm), although less than the previous time.
llvm-svn: 233068
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first time this was committed (r229831), it caused several buildbot failures.
At least some of the ARM ones were due to gcc/binutils issues, and should now be fixed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8542
llvm-svn: 233055
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7065
llvm-svn: 229831
This removes static initializers from the backends which generate this data, and also makes this struct match the other Tablegen generated structs in behaviour
Reviewed by Andy Trick and Chandler C
llvm-svn: 216919
This can happen when processing command line arguments, which
are often stored as std::string's and later turned into
StringRef's via std::string::data(). Unfortunately this
is not guaranteed to return a null-terminated string
until C++11, causing breakage on platforms that don't do this.
llvm-svn: 192558
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
Now where we used to call ReInitMCSubtargetInfo, we actually recompute
the same information as InitMCSubtargetInfo instead of only setting
the feature bits.
llvm-svn: 164105
David Greene