Currently we can't use unique suffixes in section names to describe
stack sizes sections. E.g. '.stack_sizes [1]' will be treated as a regular section.
This happens because we recognize stack sizes section by name and
do not yet drop the suffix before the check.
The patch fixes it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68018
llvm-svn: 372853
It is a follow-up requested in the review comment
for D67757. Allows to use Content + Size or just Size
when describing .stack_sizes sections in YAML document
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67958
llvm-svn: 372845
During legalisation we can end up with some pretty strange nodes, like shifts
of 0. We need to make sure we don't try to make long shifts of these, ending up
with invalid assembly instructions. A long shift with a zero immediate actually
encodes a shift by 32.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67664
llvm-svn: 372839
I think we should be able to use shl instead of sshl and ushl for
positive constant shift values, unless I am missing something.
We already have the machinery in place to ensure we only replace
nodes, if the shift value is positive and <= the element width.
This is a generalization of an earlier patch rL372565.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, samparker, dmgreen, anemet
Reviewed By: anemet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67955
llvm-svn: 372824
Summary:
Instead of having different v128.load and v128.store instructions for
each MVT, just have one of each that is reused in all the
patterns. Also removes the HasSIMD128 predicate where accompanied by
HasUnimplementedSIMD128, since the latter implies the former.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67930
llvm-svn: 372792
Currently, if an array element type size is 0, the number of
array elements will be set to 0, regardless of what user
specified. This implementation is done in the beginning where
BTF is mostly used to calculate the member offset.
For example,
struct s {};
struct s1 {
int b;
struct s a[2];
};
struct s1 s1;
The BTF will have struct "s1" member "a" with element count 0.
Now BTF types are used for compile-once and run-everywhere
relocations and we need more precise type representation
for type comparison. Andrii reported the issue as there
are differences between original structure and BTF-generated
structure.
This patch made the change to correctly assign "2"
as the number elements of member "a".
Some dead codes related to ElemSize compuation are also removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67979
llvm-svn: 372785
If we generate the gc.relocate, and then later prove two arguments to the statepoint are equivalent, we should canonicalize the gc.relocate to the form we would have produced if this had been known before rewriting.
llvm-svn: 372771
Summary:
This is again motivated by D67122 sanitizer check enhancement.
That patch seemingly worsens `-fsanitize=pointer-overflow`
overhead from 25% to 50%, which strongly implies missing folds.
For
```
#include <cassert>
char* test(char& base, signed long offset) {
__builtin_assume(offset < 0);
return &base + offset;
}
```
We produce
https://godbolt.org/z/r40U47
and again those two icmp's can be merged:
```
Name: 0
Pre: C != 0
%adjusted = add i8 %base, C
%not_null = icmp ne i8 %adjusted, 0
%no_underflow = icmp ult i8 %adjusted, %base
%r = and i1 %not_null, %no_underflow
=>
%neg_offset = sub i8 0, C
%r = icmp ugt i8 %base, %neg_offset
```
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ALaphttps://rise4fun.com/Alive/slnN
There are 3 other variants of this pattern,
i believe they all will go into InstSimplify.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43259
Reviewers: spatel, xbolva00, nikic
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: efriedma, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67849
llvm-svn: 372768
Summary:
This is again motivated by D67122 sanitizer check enhancement.
That patch seemingly worsens `-fsanitize=pointer-overflow`
overhead from 25% to 50%, which strongly implies missing folds.
This pattern isn't exactly what we get there
(strict vs. non-strict predicate), but this pattern does not
require known-bits analysis, so it is best to handle it first.
```
Name: 0
%adjusted = add i8 %base, %offset
%not_null = icmp ne i8 %adjusted, 0
%no_underflow = icmp ule i8 %adjusted, %base
%r = and i1 %not_null, %no_underflow
=>
%neg_offset = sub i8 0, %offset
%r = icmp ugt i8 %base, %neg_offset
```
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/knp
There are 3 other variants of this pattern,
they all will go into InstSimplify:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/bIDZhttps://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43259
Reviewers: spatel, xbolva00, nikic
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, majnemer, vsk, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67846
llvm-svn: 372767
Summary:
The Regex "match" and "sub" member functions were previously not "const"
because they wrote to the "error" member variable. This commit removes
those assignments, and instead assumes that the validity of the regex
is already known after the initial compilation of the regular
expression. As a result, these member functions were possible to make
"const". This makes it easier to do things like pre-compile Regexes
up-front, and makes "match" and "sub" thread-safe. The error status is
now returned as an optional output, which also makes the API of "match"
and "sub" more consistent with each other.
Also, some uses of Regex that could be refactored to be const were made const.
Patch by Nicolas Guillemot
Reviewers: jankratochvil, thopre
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67241
llvm-svn: 372764
.stack_sizes is a SHT_PROGBITS section that contains pairs of
<address (4/8 bytes), stack size (uleb128)>.
This patch teach tools to parse and dump it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67757
llvm-svn: 372762
The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<Instruction> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 372758
The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 372733
The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<CmpInst> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 372732
The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<LandingPadInst> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 372727
The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<Instruction> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 372726
Similar to rL372717, we can force the splitting of extends of vector loads in
MVE, in order to use the better widening loads as opposed to going through
expensive extends. This adds a combine to early-on detect extends of loads and
split the load in two, from where normal legalisation will kick in and we get a
series of widening loads.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67909
llvm-svn: 372721
The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<CallInst> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 372720
MVE does not have a simple sign extend instruction that can move elements
across lanes. We currently often end up moving each lane into and out of a GPR,
in order to get elements into the correct places. When we have a store of a
trunc (or a extend of a load), we can instead just split the store/load in two,
using the narrowing/widening load/store instructions from each half of the
vector.
This does that for stores. It happens very early in a store combine, so as to
easily detect the truncates. (It would be possible to do this later, but that
would involve looking through a buildvector of extract elements. Not impossible
but this way seemed simpler).
By enabling store combines we also get a vmovdrr combine for free, helping some
other tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67828
llvm-svn: 372717
Summary:
The functions different in two ways:
- getLLVMRegNum could return both "eh" and "other" dwarf register
numbers, while getLLVMRegNumFromEH only returned the "eh" number.
- getLLVMRegNum asserted if the register was not found, while the second
function returned -1.
The second distinction was pretty important, but it was very hard to
infer that from the function name. Aditionally, for the use case of
dumping dwarf expressions, we needed a function which can work with both
kinds of number, but does not assert.
This patch solves both of these issues by merging the two functions into
one, returning an Optional<unsigned> value. While the same thing could
be achieved by adding an "IsEH" argument to the (renamed)
getLLVMRegNumFromEH function, it seemed better to avoid the confusion of
two functions and put the choice of asserting into the hands of the
caller -- if he checks the Optional value, he can safely process
"untrusted" input, and if he blindly dereferences the Optional, he gets
the assertion.
I've updated all call sites to the new API, choosing between the two
options according to the function they were calling originally, except
that I've updated the usage in DWARFExpression.cpp to use the "safe"
method instead, and added a test case which would have previously
triggered an assertion failure when processing (incorrect?) dwarf
expressions.
Reviewers: dsanders, arsenm, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: wdng, aprantl, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67154
llvm-svn: 372710
When vectorisation is forced with a pragma, we optimise for min size, and we
need to emit runtime memory checks, then allow this code growth and don't run
in an assert like we currently do.
This is the result of D65197 and D66803, and was a use-case not really
considered before. If this now happens, we emit an optimisation remark warning
about the code-size expansion, which can be avoided by not forcing
vectorisation or possibly source-code modifications.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67764
llvm-svn: 372694
Summary:
Fold
or(ashr(subNSW(Y, X), ScalarSizeInBits(Y)-1), X)
into
X s> Y ? -1 : X
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/d8Ab
clamp255 is a common operator in image processing, can be implemented
in a shifty way "(255 - X) >> 31 | X & 255". Fold shift into select
enables more optimization, e.g., vmin generation for ARM target.
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, efriedma, spatel, kparzysz, bcahoon
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67800
llvm-svn: 372678
We were miscompiling switch value comparisons with the wrong signedness, which
shows up when we have things like switch case values with i1 types, which end up
being legalized incorrectly.
Fixes PR43383
llvm-svn: 372675
Summary:
MemoryPhis may be needed following a Def insertion inthe IDF of all the
new accesses added (phis + potentially a def). Ensure this also occurs when
only the new MemoryPhis are the defining accesses.
Note: The need for computing IDF here is because of new Phis added with
edges incoming from unreachable code, Phis that had previously been
simplified. The preferred solution is to not reintroduce such Phis.
This patch is the needed fix while working on the preferred solution.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: Prazek, sanjoy.google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67927
llvm-svn: 372673
When a cold path is outlined, the value tracking in the assumption cache may be
invalidated due to the code motion. We would previously trip an assertion in
subsequent passes (but required the passes to happen in a single run as the
assumption cache is shared across the passes). Invalidating the cache ensures
that we get the correct information when needed with the legacy pass manager as
well.
llvm-svn: 372667
is available
In rL372232, we treated names showing up in profile as not cold when
profile-sample-accurate is enabled. This caused 70k size regression in
Chrome/Android. The patch put a guard and only enable the change when
profile symbol list is available, i.e., keep the old behavior when profile
symbol list is not available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67931
llvm-svn: 372665
Summary:
Adds the new load_splat instructions as specified at
https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/blob/master/proposals/simd/SIMD.md#load-and-splat.
DAGISel does not allow matching multiple copies of the same load in a
single pattern, so we use a new node in WebAssemblyISD to wrap loads
that should be splatted.
Depends on D67783.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67784
llvm-svn: 372655
Summary:
Removes duplicated SIMD loads and store instructions and removes
patterns involving GlobalAddresses that were not used in any tests.
Reviewers: aheejin, sunfish
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67783
llvm-svn: 372648
Simon Pilgrim