Emit them instead with the linkage of the VTT.
I'm actually really ambivalent about this; it's what GCC does, but outside
of improving code size (if the linkage is coalescing), I'm not sure it's
at all relevant. Construction vtables are naturally referenced only by the
VTT, which is itself only referenced by complete-object constructors and
destructors; giving the construction vtables possibly-external linkage is
important if you have an optimization that drills through the VTT to a
reference to a particular construction vtable which it cannot just emit
itself.
llvm-svn: 128374
platform implies default visibility. To achieve these, refactor our
lookup of explicit visibility so that we search for both an explicit
VisibilityAttr and an appropriate AvailabilityAttr, favoring the
VisibilityAttr if it is present.
llvm-svn: 128336
simplify the logic of initializing function parameters so that we don't need
both a variable declaration and a type in FunctionArgList. This also means
that we need to propagate the CGFunctionInfo down in a lot of places rather
than recalculating it from the FAL. There's more we can do to eliminate
redundancy here, and I've left FIXMEs behind to do it.
llvm-svn: 127314
is not defined in the current translation unit. Doing so lead to compile errors
such as PR9114.
Instead, when CodeGen is building the vtable, don't try to emit a definition
for functions that aren't marked used in the current translation unit.
Fixes PR9114.
llvm-svn: 124768
current translation unit as available_externally.
This helps devirtualize the second example in PR3100, comment 18:
struct S { S() {}; virtual void xyzzy(); };
inline void foo(S *s) { s->xyzzy(); }
void bar() { S s; foo(&s); }
This involved four major changes:
1. In DefineUsedVTables, always mark virtual member functions as referenced for
non-template classes and class template specializations.
2. In CodeGenVTables::ShouldEmitVTableInThisTU return true if optimizations are
enabled, even if the key function is not implemented in this translation
unit. We don't ever do this for code compiled with -fapple-kext, because we
don't ever want to devirtualize virtual member function calls in that case.
3. Give the correct linkage for vtables where the key function is not defined.
4. Update the linkage for RTTI structures when necessary.
llvm-svn: 124565
there's no return adjustment from the overridden to the overrider doesn't
mean there isn't a return adjustment from the overrider to the final
overrider. This matters if we're emitting a virtual this-adjustment thunk
because the overrider virtually inherits from the class providing the
nearest overridden method. Do the appropriate return adjustment in this case.
Fixes PR7611.
llvm-svn: 118466
independently of whether they're definitions, then teach IR generation to
ignore non-explicit visibility when emitting declarations. Use this to
make sure that RTTI, vtables, and VTTs get the right visibility.
More of rdar://problem/8613093
llvm-svn: 117781
a -cc1 option. The Darwin linker complains about mixed visibility when linking
gcc-built objects with clang-built objects, and the optimization isn't really
that valuable. Platforms with less ornery linkers can feel free to enable this.
llvm-svn: 110979
do the right thing with mixed-visibility symbols, so disable the visibility
optimization where that's possible, i.e. with template classes (since it's
possible that an arbitrary template might be subject to an explicit
instantiation elsewhere). 447.dealII actually does this.
I've put the code under an option that's currently not hooked up to anything.
llvm-svn: 110374
functions with in-line definitions, since such thunks will be emitted at any
use of the function.
Completes the feature work for rdar://problem/7523229.
llvm-svn: 110285
Apply hidden visibility to most RTTI; libstdc++ does not rely on exact
pointer equality for the type info (just the type info names). Apply
the same optimization to RTTI that we do to vtables.
Fixes PR5962.
llvm-svn: 110192
variables should have that linkage. Otherwise, its static local
variables should have internal linkage. To avoid computing this excessively,
set a function's linkage before we emit code for it.
Previously we were assigning weak linkage to the static variables of
static inline functions in C++, with predictably terrible results. This
fixes that and also gives better linkage than 'weak' when merging is required.
llvm-svn: 104581
not make copies non-POD arguments or arguments passed by reference:
just copy the pointers directly. This eliminates another source of the
dreaded memcpy-of-non-PODs. Fixes PR7188.
llvm-svn: 104327
class type (that uses a return slot), pass the return slot to the
callee directly rather than allocating new storage and trying to copy
the object. This appears to have been the cause of the remaining two
Boost.Interprocess failures.
llvm-svn: 104215
"used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and
when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function
definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential
definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting
vtables for classes without key functions.
The new scheme:
- For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate
the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member
function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type,
dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting
to/through a virtual base class, etc.
- For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to
indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation
unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can
delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also
occur with explicit template instantiation definitions.
- For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member
functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key
function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual
member functions when needed.
- At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the
ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define
them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the
vtables lazily).
From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are
permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions
whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers
were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance
issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke
Boost test cases, which now pass).
Notes:
(1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which
vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of
the larger tests from these issues.
(2) Some diagnostics related to
implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions
have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this
way.
(3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to
see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a
vtable.
Fixes PR7114 and PR6564.
llvm-svn: 103718
function attributes like byval get applied to the function
definition. This fixes PR7058 and makes i386 llvm/clang bootstrap
pass all the same tests as x86-64 bootstrap for me (the llvmc
tests still fail in both).
llvm-svn: 103131
Ken Dyck