Summary:
swift-lldb currently has to patch the ExpressionKind enum to add support for Swift expressions. If we implement LLVM's RTTI
with a static ID variable instead of a centralised enum we can drop that patch.
Reviewers: labath, davide
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #upstreaming_lldb_s_downstream_patches, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70070
This patch removes the size_t return value and the append parameter
from the remainder of the Find.* functions in LLDB's internal API. As
in the previous patches, this is motivated by the fact that these
parameters aren't really used, and in the case of the append parameter
were frequently implemented incorrectly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69119
llvm-svn: 375160
The DWARFExpression is parsing the location lists in about five places.
Of those, only one actually had proper support for base address
selection entries.
Since r374600, llvm has started to produce location expressions with
base address selection entries more aggresively, which caused some tests
to fail.
This patch adds support for these entries to the places which had it
missing, fixing the failing tests. It also adds a targeted test for the
two of the three fixes, which should continue testing this functionality
even if the llvm output changes. I am not aware of a way to write a
targeted test for the third fix (DWARFExpression::Evaluate).
llvm-svn: 374769
Summary:
There a a few call sites that use FILE* which are easy to
fix without disrupting anything else.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68444
llvm-svn: 374239
Testing whether a name is mangled or not is extremely cheap and can be
done by looking at the first two characters. Mangled knows how to do
it. On the flip side, many call sites that currently pass in an
is_mangled determination do not know how to correctly do it (for
example, they leave out Swift mangling prefixes).
This patch removes this entry point and just forced Mangled to
determine the mangledness of a string itself.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68674
llvm-svn: 374180
Summary:
It uses the new ability of ABI plugins to vend llvm::MCRegisterInfo
structs (which is what is needed to turn dwarf register numbers into
strings).
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, jasonmolenda
Subscribers: tatyana-krasnukha, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67966
llvm-svn: 373208
Summary:
This patch removes File::SetStream() and File::SetDescriptor(),
and replaces most direct uses of File with pointers to File.
Instead of calling SetStream() on a file, we make a new file and
replace it.
My ultimate goal here is to introduce a new API class SBFile, which
has full support for python io.IOStream file objects. These can
redirect read() and write() to python code, so lldb::Files will
need a way to dispatch those methods. Additionally it will need some
form of sharing and assigning files, as a SBFile will be passed in and
assigned to the main IO streams of the debugger.
In my prototype patch queue, I make File itself copyable and add a
secondary class FileOps to manage the sharing and dispatch. In that
case SBFile was a unique_ptr<File>.
(here: https://github.com/smoofra/llvm-project/tree/files)
However in review, Pavel Labath suggested that it be shared_ptr instead.
(here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67793)
In order for SBFile to use shared_ptr<File>, everything else should
as well.
If this patch is accepted, I will make SBFile use a shared_ptr
I will remove FileOps from future patches and use subclasses of File
instead.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, zturner, jingham, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67891
llvm-svn: 373090
Summary:
This patch converts FileSystem::Open from this prototype:
Status
Open(File &File, const FileSpec &file_spec, ...);
to this one:
llvm::Expected<std::unique_ptr<File>>
Open(const FileSpec &file_spec, ...);
This is beneficial on its own, as llvm::Expected is a more modern
and recommended error type than Status. It is also a necessary step
towards https://reviews.llvm.org/D67891, and further developments
for lldb_private::File.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67996
llvm-svn: 373003
They both return the same result as another function (GetCursorArgumentPrefix
and GetRawLine). They were only added because the old API allowed to look
(in theory) behind the cursor position which is no longer possible.
llvm-svn: 372861
Add support for evaluating DW_OP_entry_value. This involves parsing
DW_TAG_call_site_parameter and wiring the information through to the expression
evaluator.
rdar://54496008
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67376
llvm-svn: 371668
This patch adds basic support for DW_OP_convert[1] for integer
types. Recent versions of LLVM's optimizer may insert this opcode into
DWARF expressions. DW_OP_convert is effectively a type cast operation
that takes a reference to a base type DIE (or zero) and then casts the
value at the top of the DWARF stack to that type. Internally this
works by changing the bit size of the APInt that is used as backing
storage for LLDB's DWARF stack.
I managed to write a unit test for this by implementing a mock YAML
object file / module that takes debug info sections in yaml2obj
format.
[1] Typed DWARF stack. http://www.dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=140425.1
<rdar://problem/48167864>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67369
llvm-svn: 371532
LLVMUserExpression doesn't use these variables and they are all specific to Clang.
Also removes m_const_object as this was actually never used by anyone (and Clang
didn't report it as we assigned it in the constructor which seems to count as use).
llvm-svn: 370440
Summary:
The only reason for this function's existance is so that we could pass
the correct size into the DWARFExpression constructor. However, there is
no harm in passing the entire data extractor into the DWARFExpression,
since the same code is performing the size determination as well as the
subsequent parse. So, if we get malformed input or there's a bug in the
parser, we'd compute the wrong size anyway.
Additionally, reducing the number of entry points into the location list
parsing machinery makes it easier to switch the llvm debug_loc(lists)
parsers.
While inside, I added a couple of tests for invalid location list
handling.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg
Subscribers: aprantl, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66789
llvm-svn: 370373
This reverts commit r367842 since it wasn't quite as NFC as advertised
and broke Swift support. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D46083 for the
rationale behind the original functionality.
rdar://problem/54619322
llvm-svn: 370126
Summary:
The DWARFExpression methods have a lot of arguments. This removes two of
them by removing the ability to slice the expression via two offset+size
parameters. This is a functionality that it is not always needed, and
when it is, we already have a different handy way of slicing a data
extractor which we can use instead.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg
Subscribers: aprantl, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66745
llvm-svn: 370027
Summary:
We still have some leftovers of the old completion API in the internals of
LLDB that haven't been replaced by the new CompletionRequest. These leftovers
are:
* The return values (int/size_t) in all completion functions.
* Our result array that starts indexing at 1.
* `WordComplete` mode.
I didn't replace them back then because it's tricky to figure out what exactly they
are used for and the completion code is relatively untested. I finally got around
to writing more tests for the API and understanding the semantics, so I think it's
a good time to get rid of them.
A few words why those things should be removed/replaced:
* The return values are really cryptic, partly redundant and rarely documented.
They are also completely ignored by Xcode, so whatever information they contain will end up
breaking Xcode's completion mechanism. They are also partly impossible to even implement
as we assign negative values special meaning and our completion API sometimes returns size_t.
Completion functions are supposed to return -2 to rewrite the current line. We seem to use this
in some untested code path to expand the history repeat character to the full command, but
I haven't figured out why that doesn't work at the moment.
Completion functions return -1 to 'insert the completion character', but that isn't implemented
(even though we seem to activate this feature in LLDB sometimes).
All positive values have to match the number of results. This is obviously just redundant information
as the user can just look at the result list to get that information (which is what Xcode does).
* The result array that starts indexing at 1 is obviously unexpected. The first element of the array is
reserved for the common prefix of all completions (e.g. "foobar" and "footar" -> "foo"). The idea is
that we calculate this to make the life of the API caller easier, but obviously forcing people to have
1-based indices is not helpful (or even worse, forces them to manually copy the results to make it
0-based like Xcode has to do).
* The `WordComplete` mode indicates that LLDB should enter a space behind the completion. The
idea is that we let the top-level API know that we just provided a full completion. Interestingly we
`WordComplete` is just a single bool that somehow represents all N completions. And we always
provide full completions in LLDB, so in theory it should always be true.
The only use it currently serves is providing redundant information about whether we have a single
definitive completion or not (which we already know from the number of results we get).
This patch essentially removes `WordComplete` mode and makes the result array indexed from 0.
It also removes all return values from all internal completion functions. The only non-redundant information
they contain is about rewriting the current line (which is broken), so that functionality was moved
to the CompletionRequest API. So you can now do `addCompletion("blub", "description", CompletionMode::RewriteLine)`
to do the same.
For the SB API we emulate the old behaviour by making the array indexed from 1 again with the common
prefix at index 0. I didn't keep the special negative return codes as we either never sent them before (e.g. -2) or we
didn't even implement them in the Editline handler (e.g. -1).
I tried to keep this patch minimal and I'm aware we can probably now even further simplify a bunch of related code,
but I would prefer doing this in follow-up NFC commits
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66536
llvm-svn: 369624
This patch moves the remaining completion functions from the
old completion API (that used several variables) to just
passing a single CompletionRequest.
This is for the most part a simple change as we just replace
the old arguments with a single CompletionRequest argument.
There are a few places where I had to create new CompletionRequests
in the called functions as CompletionRequests itself are immutable
and don't expose their internal match list anymore. This means that
if a function wanted to change the CompletionRequest or directly
access the result list, we need to work around this by creating
a new CompletionRequest and a temporary match/description list.
Preparation work for rdar://53769355
llvm-svn: 369000
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368933
Summary:
And not `zero`. This is the last API needed to be converted to
an Optional<T>.
Reviewers: xiaobai, compnerd
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66093
llvm-svn: 368614
The returned value is currently unused. It also seems to imply that
it somehow represents 'printf-style' the number of characters/bytes
written to some output stream (which is incorrect, as we only know
the actual size of the written message when we have rendered it,
e.g. via GetString and DiagnosticManagers have no associated
output stream).
llvm-svn: 368577
This function is unused. It's also wrong, because it computes
the size and the alignment of the type without asking the runtime,
so it doesn't work for any language that has one (e.g. swift).
One could consider re-implementing this passing an execution scope
context, and modifying GetTypeBitAlign() to do the right thing,
but given there are no uses, it's not really useful.
llvm-svn: 368249
Summary:
After rL368069 I noticed that HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H is not defined in
Platform.h, or anywhere else in lldb. This change fixes that.
Reviewers: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65822
llvm-svn: 368125
Currently Target::m_next_persistent_variable_index is counting up
for our persistent variables ($0, $1, ...) but we also have a
unused counter that is supposed to do this in
ClangPersistentVariables but that stays always at 0 (because
we currently increase the target counter when we should increase
that unused counter).
This patch removes the counter in Target and lets the documented
counter in ClangPersistentVariables do the variable counting.
Patch *should* be NFC, but it might unexpectedly bring LLDB to
new code paths that could contain exciting new bugs to fix.
llvm-svn: 367842
Summary:
This is the next step in avoiding funneling all SymbolFile calls through
the SymbolVendor. Right now, it is just a convenience function, but it
allows us to update all calls to SymbolVendor functions to access the
SymbolFile directly. Once all call sites have been updated, we can
remove the GetSymbolVendor member function.
This patch just updates the calls to GetSymbolVendor, which were calling
it just so they could fetch the underlying symbol file. Other calls will
be done in follow-ups.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65435
llvm-svn: 367664
Completion requests have two fields that are essentially unimplemented:
`m_match_start_point` and `m_max_return_elements`. This would've been
okay, if it wasn't for the fact that this caused a bunch of useless
parameters to be passed around. Occasionally there would be a comment or
assert saying that they are not supported. This patch removes them.
llvm-svn: 367385
Summary:
This commit achieves the following:
- Functions used to return a `TypeSystem *` return an
`llvm::Expected<TypeSystem *>` now. This means that the result of a call
is always checked, forcing clients to move more carefully.
- `TypeSystemMap::GetTypeSystemForLanguage` will either return an Error or a
non-null pointer to a TypeSystem.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, compnerd
Subscribers: jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65122
llvm-svn: 367360
The Diagnostic class in LLDB is suppossed to be inherited from,
so just copying the diagnostics like this is wrong. The function
is also unused, so lets just get rid of it instead of creating
some cloning facility for it.
llvm-svn: 367201
This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF
macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style format
strings, instead of formatv-style format strings.
So instead of writing:
if (log)
log->Printf("%s\n", str);
You'd write:
LLDB_LOG(log, "%s\n", str);
This change was done mechanically with the command below. I replaced the
spurious if-checks with vim, since I know how to do multi-line
replacements with it.
find . -type f -name '*.cpp' -exec \
sed -i '' -E 's/log->Printf\(/LLDB_LOGF\(log, /g' "{}" +
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65128
llvm-svn: 366936
Summary:
IRDynamicChecks in its current form is specific to Clang since it deals
with the C language family. It is possible that we may want to
instrument code generated for other languages, but we can factor in a
more general mechanism to do so at a later time.
This decouples ObCLanguageRuntime from Expression!
Reviewers: compnerd, clayborg, jingham, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64591
llvm-svn: 365853
Right now, IR Instrumenters take a DynamicCheckerFunctions object which
has all the UtilityFunctions used to instrument IR for expressions.
However, each Instrumenter (in practice) uses exactly one
UtilityFunction, so let's change the abstraction.
llvm-svn: 365696
Summary:
Move checking pointer code block before accessing the pointer
This caused lldb to crash when testing on Android
Patch by Wanyi Ye!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64434
llvm-svn: 365567
This was set in a std::function, but I was shadowing a
variable that I thought I was capturing. Even with this bug
we were correctly not raising an error and returning an address
of 0x0. We were not marking the symbol as weak, but apparently
the JIT didn't need that, so the test still passed.
llvm-svn: 364980
Previously it was storing a *pointer*, which left open the possibility
of this pointer being null. We never made use of that possibility (it
does not make sense), and most of the code was already assuming that.
However, there were a couple of null-checks scattered around the code.
This patch replaces the reference with a pointer, making the
non-null-ness explicit, and removes the remaining null-checks.
llvm-svn: 363381
Summary:
In an effort to make Process more language agnostic, I removed
GetCPPLanguageRuntime from Process. I'm following up now with an equivalent
change for ObjC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63052
llvm-svn: 362981
Summary:
LookupRuntimeSymbol seems like a general LanguageRuntime method.
Although no other language runtime currently implements this, there's no
reason another language runtime couldn't use this.
Additionally, this breaks IRExecutionUnit's dependency on
ObjCLanguageRuntime.
Reviewers: compnerd, labath, JDevlieghere, davide
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62795
llvm-svn: 362458
Like many of our DWARF classes, the DWARFExpression can be initialized
in several ways. One such way was through a constructor that takes just
the compile unit. This constructor is used to initialize both empty
DWARFExpressions, and DWARFExpression that will be populated later.
To make the distinction more clear, I changed the constructor to a
default constructor and updated its call sites. Where the
DWARFExpression was being populated later, I replaced that with a call
to the copy assignment constructor.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62425
llvm-svn: 361849
Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]
This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using
`nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html
for more information.
This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base:
```
run-clang-tidy.py \
-header-filter='.*' \
-checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \
-fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \
-format \
-style LLVM \
-p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc
```
NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not
include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in
isolation somehow.
NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most
parts.
Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847
llvm-svn: 361484
The Windows Code Generation model cannot generation code with the PIC relocation
model - all code is implicitly position independent due to the DLL load slide
that occurs if it is not loaded at the preferred base address. Invert the
condition and inline the single use of the variable. This should also aid the
WASM target. This significantly improves the state of the (swift) repl on
Windows (and should aid in expression evaluation on Windows).
llvm-svn: 361443
Raphael Isemann