Requesting metadata for a global is a relatively expensive operation as it
involves a map lookup, but it's one that we need to do relatively frequently in
this pass to collect the list of type metadata nodes associated with a global.
This change improves the performance of type metadata queries by prebuilding
data structures that keep the global together with its list of type metadata,
and changing the pass to use that data structure wherever we were previously
passing global references around.
This change also eliminates some O(N^2) behavior by collecting the list of
globals associated with each type identifier during the first pass over the
list of globals rather than visiting each global to compute that list every
time we add a new type identifier.
Reduces pass runtime on a module containing Chrome's vtables from over 60s
to 0.9s.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27484
llvm-svn: 288859
On some platforms (like MSP430) the second element of the result
structure for SMULO/UMULO may have a shorter type than the one
returned by SetCC. We need to truncate it to the right type, or
else some incorrect code may be generated later on.
This fixes issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37829
Patch by Vadzim Dambrouski!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27154
llvm-svn: 288857
As Eli noted in the post-commit thread for r288833, the use of
swapOperands() may not be allowed in InstSimplify, so I'm
removing those calls here pending further review.
The swap mutates the icmp, and there doesn't appear to be precedent
for instruction mutation in InstSimplify.
I didn't actually have any tests for those cases, so I'm adding
a few here.
llvm-svn: 288855
BDCE has two phases:
1. It asks SimplifyDemandedBits if all the bits of an instruction are dead, and if so,
replaces all its uses with the constant zero.
2. Then, it asks SimplifyDemandedBits again if the instruction is really dead
(no side effects etc..) and if so, eliminates it.
Now, in 1) if all the bits of an instruction are dead, we may end up replacing a dbg use:
%call = tail call i32 (...) @g() #4, !dbg !15
tail call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %call, i64 0, metadata !8, metadata !16), !dbg !17
->
%call = tail call i32 (...) @g() #4, !dbg !15
tail call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, i64 0, metadata !8, metadata !16), !dbg !17
but not eliminating the call because it may have arbitrary side effects.
In other words, we lose some debug informations.
This patch fixes the problem making sure that BDCE does nothing with the instruction if
it has side effects and no non-dbg uses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27471
llvm-svn: 288851
Summary:
If we write an immediate to a VGPR and then copy the VGPR to an
SGPR, we can replace the copy with a S_MOV_B32 sgpr, imm, rather than
moving the copy to the SALU.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, llvm-commits, tony-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27272
llvm-svn: 288849
We were rounding size in bits down rather than up, leading to 0-sized slots for
i1 (assert!) and bugs for other types not byte-aligned.
llvm-svn: 288848
Summary:
Prefer expansions such as: pmullw,pmulhw,unpacklwd,unpackhwd over pmulld.
On Silvermont [source: Optimization Reference Manual]:
PMULLD has a throughput of 1/11 [instruction/cycles].
PMULHUW/PMULHW/PMULLW have a throughput of 1/2 [instruction/cycles].
Fixes pr31202.
Analysis of this issue was done by Fahana Aleen.
Reviewers: wmi, delena, mkuper
Subscribers: RKSimon, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27203
llvm-svn: 288844
Handle the case where a sign extension has ended up being split into separate stages (typically to get around vector legal ops) and a zext + sext_in_reg gets inserted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27461
llvm-svn: 288842
All of these (and a few more) are already handled by InstCombine,
but we shouldn't have to wait until then to simplify these because
they're cheap to deal with here in InstSimplify.
This is the 'and' sibling of the earlier 'or' patch:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL288833
llvm-svn: 288841
There were two problems:
+ AArch64 was reusing random data from its binary op tables, which is
complete nonsense for G_SEQUENCE.
+ Even when AArch64 gave up and said it couldn't handle G_SEQUENCE,
the generic code asserted.
llvm-svn: 288836
It'll almost immediately fail because it always tries to half/double the size
until it finds a legal one. Unfortunately, this triggers an assertion
preventing the DAG fallback from being possible.
llvm-svn: 288834
All of these (and a few more) are already handled by InstCombine,
but we shouldn't have to wait until then to simplify these because
they're cheap to deal with here in InstSimplify.
llvm-svn: 288833
These are OpenBSD specific program headers.
OpenBSD commit:
d39116912b
It is required for fixing PR31288.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27456
llvm-svn: 288831
Summary:
This is NFC but prevents assertions when PartialMappingIdx is tablegen-erated.
The assumptions were:
1) FirstGPR is 0
2) FirstGPR is the first of the First* enumerators.
GPR32 is changed to 1 to demonstrate that assumption #1 is fixed. #2 will
be covered by a subsequent patch that tablegen-erates information and swaps
the order of GPR and FPR as a side effect.
Depends on D27336
Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, vkalintiris, dberris, rovka, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27337
llvm-svn: 288812
When we see a non flag-setting instruction for which only the flag-setting
version is available in Thumb1, we should give a better error message than
"invalid instruction".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27414
llvm-svn: 288805
Check if a build_vector node includes a repeated constant pattern and replace it with a broadcast of that pattern.
For example:
"build_vector <0, 1, 2, 3, 0, 1, 2, 3>" would be replaced by "broadcast <0, 1, 2, 3>"
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26802
llvm-svn: 288804
This is the final patch in the series of patches that improves
BUILD_VECTOR handling on PowerPC. This adds a few peephole optimizations
to remove redundant instructions. It also adds a large test case which
encompasses a large set of code patterns that build vectors - this test
case was the motivator for this series of patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26066
llvm-svn: 288800
a hilarious bug and fix it.
We somehow were never verifying the RefSCCs newly formed when
splitting an existing one apart, and when verifying them we weren't
really checking the SCC indices mapping effectively.
If we had been, it would have been blindingly obvious that right after
putting something int `RC.SCCs` we should update `RC.SCCIndices` instead
of `SCCIndices` which we were about to clear and rebuild anyways. =[
Anyways, this is thoroughly covered by existing tests now that we
actually verify things properly.
llvm-svn: 288795
Summary: This patch makes sure FirstCSPop and MBBI never point to DBG_VALUE instructions, which affected the code generated.
Reviewers: mkuper, aprantl, MatzeB
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27343
llvm-svn: 288794
This pattern turned a vector sqrt/rcp/rsqrt operation of sse_load_f32/f64 into the the scalar instruction for the operation and put undef into the upper bits. For correctness, the resulting code should still perform the sqrt/rcp/rsqrt on the upper bits after the load is extended since that's what the operation asked for. Particularly in the case where the upper bits are 0, in that case we need calculate the sqrt/rcp/rsqrt of the zeroes and keep the result in the upper-bits. This implies we should be using the packed instruction still.
The only test case for this pattern is one I just added so there was no coverage of this.
llvm-svn: 288784
This occurs due to a pattern that uses sse_load_f32/f64 with vector sqrt/rcp/rsqrt operations and turns them into scalar instructions. Perhaps for the case were the upper bits come from undef this is ok. I believe a (vzmovl load64) would do the same thing but those seems to become vzload instead and selectScalarSSELoad doesn't handle that today. In that case we should be performing the vector operation on the zeros in the upper bits which is not equivalent to using a scalar instruction.
I will remove this pattern in a follow up patch. There appears to be no other test content for it.
llvm-svn: 288783
The intrinsics are supposed to pass the upper bits straight through to their output register. This means we need to make sure we still perform the 128-bit load to get those upper bits to pass to give to the instruction since the memory form of the instruction only reads 32 or 64 bits.
llvm-svn: 288781
Davide Italiano