Committed in r209178 then reverted in r209251 due to LTO breakage,
here's a proper fix for the case of the missing subprogram DIE. The DIEs
were there, just in other compile units. Using the SPMap we can find the
right compile unit to search for and produce cross-unit references to
describe this kind of inlining.
One existing test case needed to be updated because it had a function
that wasn't in the CU's subprogram list, so it didn't appear in the
SPMap.
llvm-svn: 209335
We are going to drop debug info without a version number or with a different
version number, to make sure we don't crash when we see bitcode files with
different debug info metadata format.
llvm-svn: 195504
DICompositeType will have an identifier field at position 14. For now, the
field is set to null in DIBuilder.
For DICompositeTypes where the template argument field (the 13th field)
was optional, modify DIBuilder to make sure the template argument field is set.
Now DICompositeType has 15 fields.
Update DIBuilder to use NULL instead of "i32 0" for null value of a MDNode.
Update verifier to check that DICompositeType has 15 fields and the last
field is null or a MDString.
Update testing cases to include an extra field for DICompositeType.
The identifier field will be used by type uniquing so a front end can
genearte a DICompositeType with a unique identifer.
llvm-svn: 189282
This reverts commit 342d92c7a0adeabc9ab00f3f0d88d739fe7da4c7.
Turns out we're going with a different schema design to represent
DW_TAG_imported_modules so we won't need this extra field.
llvm-svn: 178215
This is just the basic groundwork for supporting DW_TAG_imported_module but I
wanted to commit this before pushing support further into Clang or LLVM so that
this rather churny change is isolated from the rest of the work. The major
churn here is obviously adding another field (within the common DIScope prefix)
to all DIScopes (files, classes, namespaces, lexical scopes, etc). This should
be the last big churny change needed for DW_TAG_imported_module/using directive
support/PR14606.
llvm-svn: 178099
The count attribute is more accurate with regards to the size of an array. It
also obviates the upper bound attribute in the subrange. We can also better
handle an unbound array by setting the count to -1 instead of the lower bound to
1 and upper bound to 0.
llvm-svn: 169312
The count field is necessary because there isn't a difference between the 'lo'
and 'hi' attributes for a one-element array and a zero-element array. When the
count is '0', we know that this is a zero-element array. When it's >=1, then
it's a normal constant sized array. When it's -1, then the array is unbounded.
llvm-svn: 169218
This reverts revision 114633. It was breaking llvm-gcc-i386-linux-selfhost.
It seems there is a downstream bug that is exposed by
-cgp-critical-edge-splitting=0. When that bug is fixed, this patch can go back
in.
Note that the changes to tailcallfp2.ll are not reverted. They were good are
required.
llvm-svn: 114859
occasions, caused code to be generated in a different order.
All cases I've seen involved float softening in the type
legalizer, and this could be perhaps be fixed there, but
it's better not to generate things differently in the first
place. 7797940 (6/29/2010..7/15/2010).
llvm-svn: 108484
David Blaikie