This reverts part of commit 240aff80e0.
It reverts cc802ea67b.
We currently run LLVM tests in environments where python3 exists on
PATH, but it is broken. I don't think PATH discovery is a strong enough
signal that a working Python 3 installation exists.
If this will be the way forward, IMO we should follow the direction of
debug-info-tests, and use CMake's PYTHON_EXECUTABLE, which in the near
future will be a known-to-work Python 3 executable. If it's not Python
3, then we don't have to run this test.
The enumeration EntryType is used as a bit field of DebugMacroEntry:
```
EntryType m_type : 3
```
Since underlying type of enumeration is implementation-dependent, a signed integer is
converted to the 3-bit value by some compilers (MSVC).
That's why a DebugMacroEntry instance that was created with EntryType value > 3 (END_FILE or INDIRECT)
contains incorrect negative value in its m_type data-member.
This code actually needs a ClangASTContext but instead takes a
clang::ASTContext and then retrieves the original ClangASTContext
via the global map of ClangASTContexts. Let's change it so
that it takes a ClangASTContext which is simpler and faster.
Building the sanitizers for watchOS currently fails with
sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:9656:8: error: thread-local storage is not supported for the current target
static THREADLOCAL SIZE_T qsort_size;
I've also speculatively disabled QSORT interception for tvOS to unblock
failing builds. I'll ask someone with more sanitizer knowledge to check
after the holidays.
GetASTContext is really expensive to call as it makes use of the global
mapping from ASTContext to ClangASTContext. This replaces all calls where
we already have the ClangASTContext around and don't need to call
GetASTContext again.
that 'and' with constant
More patches will be committed later to exploit more about 'and' with
constant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71693
Summary:
If we didn't set the value for hasSideEffects bit in our td file, `llvm-tblgen`
will set it as true for those instructions which has no match pattern.
The instructions `MTLR` and `MFLR` don't set the hasSideEffects flag and don't
have match pattern, so their hasSideEffects flag will be set true by
`llvm-tblgen`.
But in fact, we can use `[LR]` to model the two instructions, so they should not
have SideEffects.
This patch is to modify the hasSideEffects of MTLR and MFLR from 1 to 0.
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71390
This patch combines the `emitParallel` logic prototyped in D61953 with
the OpenMPIRBuilder (D69785) and introduces `CreateParallel`.
Reviewed By: fghanim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70109
Summary: The specific number of records loaded depends on the number of kinds, but the difference between the lazy and not lazy cases does not.
Reviewers: modocache
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71730
As a permanent and generic solution to the problem of variable
finalization (destructors, lastprivate, ...), this patch introduces the
finalization stack. The objects on the stack describe (1) the
(structured) regions the OpenMP-IR-Builder is currently constructing,
(2) if these are cancellable, and (3) the callback that will perform the
finalization (=cleanup) when necessary.
As the finalization can be necessary multiple times, at different source
locations, the callback takes the position at which code is currently
generated. This position will also encode the destination of the "region
exit" block *iff* the finalization call was issues for a region
generated by the OpenMPIRBuilder. For regions generated through the old
Clang OpenMP code geneneration, the "region exit" is determined by Clang
inside the finalization call instead (see getOMPCancelDestination).
As a first user, the parallel + cancel barrier interaction is changed.
In contrast to the temporary solution before, the barrier generation in
Clang does not need to be aware of the "CancelDestination" block.
Instead, the finalization callback is and, as described above, later
even that one does not need to be.
D70109 will be updated to use this scheme.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70258
In the worst case, this requires a 128-bit move instruction to
implicitly zero the upper bits. In the common case, we should
recognize the producing instruction already zeroed the upper bits.
Summary:
We're already scanning forward through the basic block. Might as
well just remember eflags defs instead of doing a bounded search
backwards later.
Based on a comment in D71841.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, uweigand
Reviewed By: uweigand
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71865
This cleans up and merges `gnu-symbols.test` to `symbols.test`.
Initially `gnu-symbols.test` tested the following things:
1) How symbols are printed in GNU style.
It does not make sense to have a separate file for such tests.
2) It tried to test proc-specific symbol indexes. The test was incomplete and
also we already have `symbol-shndx.test` for that, so this part was removed.
3) It tested `--dyn-symbols` and `--symbols` correlation. All following
cases were moved to `symbols.test`:
a) That `--dyn-symbols` does not trigger showing regular symbols..
b) That `--symbols` triggers `--dyn-symbols` implicitly.
c) That `--dyn-symbols` and `--symbols` works fine together.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71697
Summary:
As discussed in D71799, we have found that it is more useful to reach an optimistic fixpoint in AAValueSimpify when the value is constant or undef.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: baziotis, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71852
Summary:
Follow-up on: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71435
We basically use `checkForAllInstructions` to loop through all the instructions in a function that access memory through a pointer: load, store, atomicrmw, atomiccmpxchg
Note that we can now use the `getPointerOperand()` that gets us the pointer operand for an instruction that belongs to the aforementioned set.
Question: This function returns `nullptr` if the instruction is `volatile`. Why?
Guess: Because if it is volatile, we don't want to do any transformation to it.
Another subtle point is that I had to add AtomicRMW, AtomicCmpXchg to `initializeInformationCache()`. Following `checkAllInstructions()` path, that
seemed the most reasonable place to add it and correct the fact that these instructions were ignored (they were not in `OpcodeInstMap` etc.). Is that ok?
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Subscribers: hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71787
_Eventually_, this attribute will be assigned to a function if it
contains undefined behavior. As a first small step, I tried to make it
loop through the load instructions in a function (eventually, the plan
is to check if a load instructions causes undefined behavior, because
e.g. dereferences a null pointer - Also eventually, this won't happen in
initialize() but in updateImpl()).
Patch By: Stefanos Baziotis (@baziotis)
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71435
All of
"no-frame-pointer-elim-non-leaf"
"no-frame-pointer-elim-non-leaf"="true"
"no-frame-pointer-elim-non-leaf"="false"
mean "frame-pointer"="non-leaf", which is quite counter-intuitive.
llvmorg-10-init-16046-ga36ddf0aa9d accidentally broke it.
This fixes the -DLLVM_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_CHECKS=On test:
```
*** Bad machine code: Non-flag-setting Thumb1 mov is v6-only ***
- function: pass_C
- basic block: %bb.0 entry (0x1fc9bf0)
- instruction: $r0 = tMOVr killed $r6, 14, $noreg
```
Summary:
Fix the behavior of StringRef::count(StringRef) to not count overlapping occurrences, as is stated in the documentation.
Fixes bug https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44072
I added Krzysztof Parzyszek to review this change because a use of this function in HexagonInstrInfo::getInlineAsmLength might depend on the overlapping-behavior. I don't have enough domain knowledge to tell if this change could break anything there.
All other uses of this method in LLVM (besides the unit tests) only use single-character search strings. In those cases, search occurrences can not overlap anyway.
Patch by Benno (@Bensge)
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70585
Craig Topper