As all store merges checks are based on the memory operation
performed, allow use of truncated stores and extended loads as valid
input candidates for merging.
Relanding after fixing selection between truncated and normal store.
llvm-svn: 305701
In preparation for doing storemerge post-legalization, reorder
visitSTORE passes to move pre/post-index combining after store
merge. Reordered passes other than store merge are unaffected.
llvm-svn: 305473
As all store merges checks are based on the memory operation
performed, allow use of truncated stores and extended loads as valid
input candidates for merging.
llvm-svn: 305468
This step is just intended to reduce code duplication rather than change any functionality.
A follow-up would be to replace PPCTargetLowering::spliceIntoChain() usage with this new helper.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33649
llvm-svn: 305192
Summary: UADDO has 2 result, and one must check the result no before doing any kind of combine. Without it, the transform is invalid.
Reviewers: joerg
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34088
llvm-svn: 305162
When considering merging stores values are the results of loads only
consider stores whose values come from loads from the same base.
This fixes much of the longer compile times in PR33330.
llvm-svn: 304934
Other calls to DAGCombiner::*PromoteOperand check the result, but here it could cause an assertion in getNode.
Falling back to any extend in this case instead of failing outright seems correct to me.
No test case because:
The failure was triggered by an out of tree backend. In order to trigger it, a backend would need to overload
TargetLowering::IsDesirableToPromoteOp to return true for a type for which ISD::SIGN_EXTEND_INREG is marked
illegal. In tree, only X86 overloads and sometimes returns true for MVT::i16 yet it marks
setOperationAction(ISD::SIGN_EXTEND_INREG, MVT::i16 , Legal);.
Patch by Jacob Young!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33633
llvm-svn: 304723
Summary:
This is a problem uncovered by stage2 testing. ADDCARRY end up being generated on target that do not support it.
The patch that introduced the problem has other patches layed on top of it, so we want to fix the issue rather than revert it to avoid creating a lor of churn.
A regression test will be added shortly, but this is committed as this in order to get the build back to green promptly.
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33770
llvm-svn: 304409
Summary:
This is a continuation of the work started in D29872 . Passing the carry down as a value rather than as a glue allows for further optimizations. Introducing setcccarry makes the use of addc/subc unecessary and we can start the removal process.
This patch only introduce the optimization strictly required to get the same level of optimization as was available before nothing more.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33374
llvm-svn: 304404
Summary: This pattern is no very useful per se, but it exposes optimization for toehr patterns that wouldn't kick in otherwize. It's very common and worth optimizing for.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32756
llvm-svn: 304402
Correct references to alignment of store which may be deleted in a
previous iteration of merge. Instead use first store that would be
merged.
Corrects pr33172's use-after-poison caught by ASan.
Reviewers: spatel, hfinkel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: thegameg, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33686
llvm-svn: 304299
The extending load possibility was missed in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL304072
We might want to handle this cases as a follow-up, but bailing out for now
to avoid miscompiling.
llvm-svn: 304153
If we have (extract_subvector(load wide vector)) with no other users,
that can just be (load narrow vector). This is intentionally conservative.
Follow-ups may loosen the one-use constraint to account for the extract cost
or just remove the one-use check.
The memop chain updating is based on code that already exists multiple times
in x86 lowering, so that should be pulled into a helper function as a follow-up.
Background: this is a potential improvement noticed via regressions caused by
making x86's peekThroughBitcasts() not loop on consecutive bitcasts (see
comments in D33137).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33578
llvm-svn: 304072
In the best case:
extract (binop (concat X1, X2), (concat Y1, Y2)), N --> binop XN, YN
...we kill all of the extract/concat and just have narrow binops remaining.
If only one of the binop operands is amenable, this transform is still
worthwhile because we kill some of the extract/concat.
Optional bitcasting makes the code more complicated, but there doesn't
seem to be a way to avoid that.
The TODO about extending to more than bitwise logic is there because we really
will regress several x86 tests including madd, psad, and even a plain
integer-multiply-by-2 or shift-left-by-1. I don't think there's anything
fundamentally wrong with this patch that would cause those regressions; those
folds are just missing or brittle.
If we extend to more binops, I found that this patch will fire on at least one
non-x86 regression test. There's an ARM NEON test in
test/CodeGen/ARM/coalesce-subregs.ll with a pattern like:
t5: v2f32 = vector_shuffle<0,3> t2, t4
t6: v1i64 = bitcast t5
t8: v1i64 = BUILD_VECTOR Constant:i64<0>
t9: v2i64 = concat_vectors t6, t8
t10: v4f32 = bitcast t9
t12: v4f32 = fmul t11, t10
t13: v2i64 = bitcast t12
t16: v1i64 = extract_subvector t13, Constant:i32<0>
There was no functional change in the codegen from this transform from what I
could see though.
For the x86 test changes:
1. PR32790() is the closest call. We don't reduce the AVX1 instruction count in that case,
but we improve throughput. Also, on a core like Jaguar that double-pumps 256-bit ops,
there's an unseen win because two 128-bit ops have the same cost as the wider 256-bit op.
SSE/AVX2/AXV512 are not affected which is expected because only AVX1 has the extract/concat
ops to match the pattern.
2. do_not_use_256bit_op() is the best case. Everyone wins by avoiding the concat/extract.
Related bug for IR filed as: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33026
3. The SSE diffs in vector-trunc-math.ll are just scheduling/RA, so nothing real AFAICT.
4. The AVX1 diffs in vector-tzcnt-256.ll are all the same pattern: we reduced the instruction
count by one in each case by eliminating two insert/extract while adding one narrower logic op.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32790
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33137
llvm-svn: 303997
Summary:
While this makes some case better and some case worse - so it's unclear if it is a worthy combine just by itself - this is a useful canonicalisation.
As per discussion in D32756 .
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32916
llvm-svn: 303441
Summary:
In SelectionDAG, when a store is immediately chained to another store
to the same address, elide the first store as it has no observable
effects. This is causes small improvements dealing with intrinsics
lowered to stores.
Test notes:
* Many testcases overwrite store addresses multiple times and needed
minor changes, mainly making stores volatile to prevent the
optimization from optimizing the test away.
* Many X86 test cases optimized out instructions associated with
associated with va_start.
* Note that test_splat in CodeGen/AArch64/misched-stp.ll no longer has
dependencies to check and can probably be removed and potentially
replaced with another test.
Reviewers: rnk, john.brawn
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, qcolombet, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33206
llvm-svn: 303198
Summary:
Eli pointed out that it's unsafe to combine the shifts to ISD::SHL etc.,
because those are not defined for b > sizeof(a) * 8, even after some of
the combiners run.
However, PPCISD::SHL defines that behavior (as the instructions themselves).
Move the combination to the backend.
The tests in shift_mask.ll still pass.
Reviewers: echristo, hfinkel, efriedma, iteratee
Subscribers: nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33076
llvm-svn: 302937
This reverts r302712.
The change fails with ASAN enabled:
ERROR: AddressSanitizer: use-after-poison on address ... at ...
READ of size 2 at ... thread T0
#0 ... in llvm::SDNode::getNumValues() const <snip>/include/llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAGNodes.h:855:42
#1 ... in llvm::SDNode::hasAnyUseOfValue(unsigned int) const <snip>/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp:7270:3
#2 ... in llvm::SDValue::use_empty() const <snip> include/llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAGNodes.h:1042:17
#3 ... in (anonymous namespace)::DAGCombiner::MergeConsecutiveStores(llvm::StoreSDNode*) <snip>/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp:12944:7
Reviewers: niravd
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33081
llvm-svn: 302746
Summary:
Allow consecutive stores whose values come from consecutive loads to
merged in the presense of other uses of the loads. Previously this was
disallowed as in general the merged load cannot be shared with the
other uses. Merging N stores into 1 may cause as many as N redundant
loads. However in the context of caching this should have neglible
affect on memory pressure and reduce instruction count making it
almost always a win.
Fixes PR32086.
Reviewers: spatel, jyknight, andreadb, hfinkel, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30471
llvm-svn: 302712
Before r247167, the pass manager builder controlled which AA
implementations were used, exporting them all in the AliasAnalysis
analysis group.
Now, AAResultsWrapperPass always uses BasicAA, but still uses other AA
implementations if made available in the pass pipeline.
But regardless, SDAGISel is required at O0, and really doesn't need to
be doing fancy optimizations based on useful AA results.
Don't require AA at CodeGenOpt::None, and only use it otherwise.
This does have a functional impact (and one testcase is pessimized
because we can't reuse a load). But I think that's desirable no matter
what.
Note that this alone doesn't result in less DT computations: TwoAddress
was previously able to reuse the DT we computed for SDAG. That will be
fixed separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32766
llvm-svn: 302611
Remove an extra canonicalization step if ISD::ABS is going to be used anyway.
Updated x86 abs combine to check that we are lowering from both canonicalizations.
llvm-svn: 302337
Summary: Do the transform when the carry isn't used. It's a pattern exposed when legalizing large integers.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32755
llvm-svn: 302047
Summary:
This is the corresponding llvm change to D28037 to ensure no performance
regression.
Reviewers: bogner, kbarton, hfinkel, iteratee, echristo
Subscribers: nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28329
llvm-svn: 301990
Summary: This is a common pattern that arise when legalizing large integers operations. Only do it when Y + 1 cannot overflow as this would change the carry behavior of uaddo .
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32687
llvm-svn: 301922
Nirav Dave