Commit Graph

734 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alexey Bataev 3167b3035e [CUDA]Delayed diagnostics for the asm instructions.
Adapted targetDiag for the CUDA and used for the delayed diagnostics in
asm constructs. Works for both host and device compilation sides.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58463

llvm-svn: 354671
2019-02-22 14:42:48 +00:00
Alexey Bataev 12a21e4b69 Revert "[CUDA]Delayed diagnostics for the asm instructions."
This reverts commit r354593 to fix the problem with the crash on
windows.

llvm-svn: 354596
2019-02-21 16:40:21 +00:00
Alexey Bataev 16d3e1a4d2 [CUDA]Delayed diagnostics for the asm instructions.
Summary:
Adapted targetDiag for the CUDA and used for the delayed diagnostics in
asm constructs. Works for both host and device compilation sides.

Reviewers: tra, jlebar

Subscribers: jdoerfert, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58463

llvm-svn: 354593
2019-02-21 15:51:30 +00:00
Alexey Bataev 7feae05858 [OPENMP] Use targetDiag for diagnostics of unsupported exceptions, NFC.
llvm-svn: 354509
2019-02-20 19:37:17 +00:00
Richard Smith a6e8d5e554 PR40642: Fix determination of whether the final statement of a statement
expression is a discarded-value expression.

Summary:
We used to get this wrong in three ways:

1) During parsing, an expression-statement followed by the }) ending a
   statement expression was always treated as producing the value of the
   statement expression. That's wrong for ({ if (1) expr; })
2) During template instantiation, various kinds of statement (most
   statements not appearing directly in a compound-statement) were not
   treated as discarded-value expressions, resulting in missing volatile
   loads (etc).
3) In all contexts, an expression-statement with attributes was not
   treated as producing the value of the statement expression, eg
   ({ [[attr]] expr; }).

Also fix incorrect enforcement of OpenMP rule that directives can "only
be placed in the program at a position where ignoring or deleting the
directive would result in a program with correct syntax". In particular,
a label (be it goto, case, or default) should not affect whether
directives are permitted.

Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rjmccall

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57984

llvm-svn: 354090
2019-02-15 00:27:53 +00:00
Alexey Bataev c416e64731 [OPENMP]Delay emission of the error messages for the exceptions.
Fixed diagnostic emission for the exceptions support in case of the
compilation of OpenMP code for the devices. From now on, it uses delayed
diagnostics mechanism, previously used for CUDA only. It allow to
diagnose not allowed used of exceptions only in functions that are going
to be codegen'ed.

llvm-svn: 353542
2019-02-08 18:02:25 +00:00
Alexey Bataev 346fb4bbcd Revert "[OPENMP]Initial support for the delayed diagnostics."
This reverts commit r353540. Erroneously committed, need to fix the
message and description.

llvm-svn: 353541
2019-02-08 17:42:00 +00:00
Alexey Bataev 5e62adad0d [OPENMP]Initial support for the delayed diagnostics.
It is important to delay the emission of the diagnostic messages for the
functions unless it is proved that the function is going to be used on
the device side. It is required to support compilation with some of the
target-specific system headers.

llvm-svn: 353540
2019-02-08 17:38:09 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 2946cd7010 Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636
2019-01-19 08:50:56 +00:00
Aaron Ballman fb6deeb984 Refactor the way we handle diagnosing unused expression results.
Rather than sprinkle calls to DiagnoseUnusedExprResult() around in places where we want diagnostics, we now diagnose unused expression statements and full expressions in a more generic way when acting on the final expression statement. This results in more appropriate diagnostics for [[nodiscard]] where we were previously lacking them, such as when the body of a for loop is not a compound statement.

This patch fixes PR39837.

llvm-svn: 350404
2019-01-04 16:58:14 +00:00
Aaron Ballman d23e9bc5af Diagnose an unused result from a call through a function pointer whose return type is marked [[nodiscard]].
When a function returns a type and that type was declared [[nodiscard]], we diagnose any unused results from that call as though the function were marked nodiscard. The same behavior should apply to calls through a function pointer.

This addresses PR31526.

llvm-svn: 350317
2019-01-03 14:24:31 +00:00
Aaron Ballman d914174d9b Switch from static_cast<> to cast<>, update identifier for coding conventions; NFC.
llvm-svn: 349955
2018-12-21 21:11:36 +00:00
Fangrui Song 407659ab0a Revert "Revert r347417 "Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.""
It seems the two failing tests can be simply fixed after r348037

Fix 3 cases in Analysis/builtin-functions.cpp
Delete the bad CodeGen/builtin-constant-p.c for now

llvm-svn: 348053
2018-11-30 23:41:18 +00:00
Fangrui Song f5d3335d75 Revert r347417 "Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures."
Kept the "indirect_builtin_constant_p" test case in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp
while we are investigating why the following snippet fails:

  extern char extern_var;
  struct { int a; } a = {__builtin_constant_p(extern_var)};

llvm-svn: 348039
2018-11-30 21:26:09 +00:00
Hans Wennborg 48ee4ad325 Re-commit r347417 "Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures."
This was reverted in r347656 due to me thinking it caused a miscompile of
Chromium. Turns out it was the Chromium code that was broken.

llvm-svn: 347756
2018-11-28 14:04:12 +00:00
Hans Wennborg 8c79706e89 Revert r347417 "Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures."
This caused a miscompile in Chrome (see crbug.com/908372) that's
illustrated by this small reduction:

  static bool f(int *a, int *b) {
    return !__builtin_constant_p(b - a) || (!(b - a));
  }

  int arr[] = {1,2,3};

  bool g() {
    return f(arr, arr + 3);
  }

  $ clang -O2 -S -emit-llvm a.cc -o -

g() should return true, but after r347417 it became false for some reason.

This also reverts the follow-up commits.

r347417:
> Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.
>
> Don't try to emit a scalar expression for a non-scalar argument to
> __builtin_constant_p().
>
> Third time's a charm!

r347446:
> The result of is.constant() is unsigned.

r347480:
> A __builtin_constant_p() returns 0 with a function type.

r347512:
> isEvaluatable() implies a constant context.
>
> Assume that we're in a constant context if we're asking if the expression can
> be compiled into a constant initializer. This fixes the issue where a
> __builtin_constant_p() in a compound literal was diagnosed as not being
> constant, even though it's always possible to convert the builtin into a
> constant.

r347531:
> A "constexpr" is evaluated in a constant context. Make sure this is reflected
> if a __builtin_constant_p() is a part of a constexpr.

llvm-svn: 347656
2018-11-27 14:01:40 +00:00
Bill Wendling 6ff1751f7d Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.
Don't try to emit a scalar expression for a non-scalar argument to
__builtin_constant_p().

Third time's a charm!

llvm-svn: 347417
2018-11-21 20:44:18 +00:00
Nico Weber 9f0246d473 Revert r347364 again, the fix was incomplete.
llvm-svn: 347389
2018-11-21 12:47:43 +00:00
Bill Wendling 91549ed15f Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.
EvaluateAsInt() is sometimes called in a constant context. When that's the
case, we need to specify it as so.

llvm-svn: 347364
2018-11-20 23:24:16 +00:00
Bill Wendling 7c44da279e Create ConstantExpr class
A ConstantExpr class represents a full expression that's in a context where a
constant expression is required. This class reflects the path the evaluator
took to reach the expression rather than the syntactic context in which the
expression occurs.

In the future, the class will be expanded to cache the result of the evaluated
expression so that it's not needlessly re-evaluated

Reviewed By: rsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53475

llvm-svn: 345692
2018-10-31 03:48:47 +00:00
Bruno Ricci 023b1d19f3 [AST] Only store data for the NRVO candidate in ReturnStmt if needed
Only store the NRVO candidate if needed in ReturnStmt.
A good chuck of all of the ReturnStmt have no NRVO candidate
(more than half when parsing all of Boost). For all of them
this saves one pointer. This has no impact on children().

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53716

Reviewed By: rsmith

llvm-svn: 345605
2018-10-30 14:40:49 +00:00
Bruno Ricci bacf751add [AST] Only store the needed data in WhileStmt
Don't store the data for the condition variable if not needed.
This cuts the size of WhileStmt by up to a pointer.
The order of the children is kept the same.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53715

Reviewed By: rjmccall

llvm-svn: 345597
2018-10-30 13:42:41 +00:00
Bruno Ricci e2806f857b [AST] Only store the needed data in SwitchStmt
Don't store the data for the init statement and condition variable
if not needed. This cuts the size of SwitchStmt by up to 2 pointers.
The order of the children is intentionally kept the same.

Also use the newly available space in the bit-fields of Stmt
to store the bit representing whether all enums have been covered
instead of using a PointerIntPair.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53714

Reviewed By: rjmccall

llvm-svn: 345510
2018-10-29 16:12:37 +00:00
Bruno Ricci 5b30571753 [AST] Don't store data for GNU range case statement if not needed
Don't store the data for case statements of the form LHS ... RHS if not
needed. This cuts the size of CaseStmt by 1 pointer + 1 SourceLocation in
the common case.

Also use the newly available space in the bit-fields of Stmt to store the
keyword location of SwitchCase and move the small accessor
SwitchCase::getSubStmt to the header.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53609

Reviewed By: rjmccall

llvm-svn: 345472
2018-10-28 12:30:53 +00:00
Bruno Ricci b1cc94b2e5 [AST] Only store the needed data in IfStmt
Only store the needed data in IfStmt. This cuts the size of IfStmt
by up to 3 pointers + 1 SourceLocation. The order of the children
is intentionally kept the same even though it would be more
convenient to put the optional trailing objects last. Additionally
use the newly available space in the bit-fields of Stmt to store
the location of the "if".

The result of this is that for the common case of an
if statement of the form:

if (some_cond)
  some_statement

the size of IfStmt is brought down to 8 bytes + 2 pointers,
instead of 8 bytes + 5 pointers + 2 SourceLocation.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53607

Reviewed By: rjmccall

llvm-svn: 345464
2018-10-27 21:12:20 +00:00
Richard Trieu f371380fc9 [Sema] Fix -Wcomma for C89
There is a small difference in the scope flags for C89 versus the other C/C++
dialects.  This change ensures that the -Wcomma warning won't be duplicated or
issued in the wrong location.  Also, the test case is refactored into C and C++
parts, with the C++ parts guarded by a #ifdef to allow the test to run in both
modes.

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32370

llvm-svn: 345228
2018-10-25 01:08:00 +00:00
Richard Trieu 6b13e89ab8 Make -Wfor-loop-analysis work with C++17
For now, disable the "variable in loop condition not modified" warning to not
be emitted when there is a structured binding variable in the loop condition.

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39285

llvm-svn: 344828
2018-10-20 02:15:58 +00:00
Richard Smith 8baa50013c [cxx2a] P0614R1: Support init-statements in range-based for loops.
We don't yet support this for the case where a range-based for loop is
implicitly rewritten to an ObjC for..in statement.

llvm-svn: 343350
2018-09-28 18:44:09 +00:00
Richard Smith 236ffdeeb2 P0962R1: only use the member form of 'begin' and 'end' in a range-based
for loop if both members exist.

This resolves a DR whereby an errant 'begin' or 'end' member in a base
class could result in a derived class not being usable as a range with
non-member 'begin' and 'end'.

llvm-svn: 342925
2018-09-24 23:17:44 +00:00
Erik Pilkington 3e4e3b17c1 [Sema] Don't warn about omitting unavailable enum constants in a switch
rdar://42717026

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51649

llvm-svn: 341490
2018-09-05 19:13:27 +00:00
Stephen Kelly 1c301dcbc4 Port getLocEnd -> getEndLoc
Reviewers: teemperor!

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50351

llvm-svn: 339386
2018-08-09 21:09:38 +00:00
Stephen Kelly f2ceec4811 Port getLocStart -> getBeginLoc
Reviewers: teemperor!

Subscribers: jholewinski, whisperity, jfb, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50350

llvm-svn: 339385
2018-08-09 21:08:08 +00:00
Stephen Kelly a6e4358f07 Port getStartLoc -> getBeginLoc
Reviewers: teemperor!

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50349

llvm-svn: 339384
2018-08-09 21:05:56 +00:00
Fangrui Song 6907ce2f8f Remove trailing space
sed -Ei 's/[[:space:]]+$//' include/**/*.{def,h,td} lib/**/*.{cpp,h}

llvm-svn: 338291
2018-07-30 19:24:48 +00:00
Richard Smith ef6c43dc0c Refactor checking of switch conditions and case values.
Check each case value in turn while parsing it, performing the
conversion to the switch type within the context of the expression
itself. This will become necessary in order to properly handle cleanups
for temporaries created as part of the case label (in an upcoming
patch). For now it's just good hygiene.

This necessitates moving the checking for the switch condition itself to
earlier, so that the destination type is available when checking the
case labels.

As a nice side-effect, we get slightly improved diagnostic quality and
error recovery by separating the case expression checking from the case
statement checking and from tracking whether there are discarded case
labels.

llvm-svn: 338056
2018-07-26 18:41:30 +00:00
Erich Keane c480f30580 AttributeList de-listifying:
Basically, "AttributeList" loses all list-like mechanisms, ParsedAttributes is
switched to use a TinyPtrVector (and a ParsedAttributesView is created to
have a non-allocating attributes list). DeclaratorChunk gets the later kind,
Declarator/DeclSpec keep ParsedAttributes.

Iterators are added to the ParsedAttribute types so that for-loops work.

llvm-svn: 336945
2018-07-12 21:09:05 +00:00
Taiju Tsuiki 3be68e162f Revert r335019 "Update NRVO logic to support early return (Attempt 2)"
llvm-svn: 335022
2018-06-19 05:35:30 +00:00
Taiju Tsuiki b000a8860e Update NRVO logic to support early return (Attempt 2)
Summary:
This is the second attempt of r333500 (Update NRVO logic to support early return).
The previous one was reverted for a miscompilation for an incorrect NRVO set up on templates such as:
```
struct Foo {};

template <typename T>
T bar() {
  T t;
  if (false)
    return T();
  return t;
}
```

Where, `t` is marked as non-NRVO variable before its instantiation. However, while its instantiation, it's left an NRVO candidate, turned into an NRVO variable later.

Reviewers: rsmith

Reviewed By: rsmith

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47586

llvm-svn: 335019
2018-06-19 04:39:07 +00:00
Sam McCall 5429bd751c Revert "Update NRVO logic to support early return"
This reverts commit r333500, which causes stage2 compiler crashes.

llvm-svn: 333547
2018-05-30 14:14:58 +00:00
Taiju Tsuiki 44f9c585b9 Update NRVO logic to support early return
Summary:
The previous implementation misses an opportunity to apply NRVO (Named Return Value
Optimization) below. That discourages user to write early return code.

```
struct Foo {};

Foo f(bool b) {
  if (b)
    return Foo();
  Foo oo;
  return oo;
}
```
That is, we can/should apply RVO for a local variable if:
 * It's directly returned by at least one return statement.
 * And, all reachable return statements in its scope returns the variable directly.
While, the previous implementation disables the RVO in a scope if there are multiple return
statements that refers different variables.

On the new algorithm, local variables are in NRVO_Candidate state at first, and a return
statement changes it to NRVO_Disabled for all visible variables but the return statement refers.
Then, at the end of the function AST traversal, NRVO is enabled for variables in NRVO_Candidate
state and refers from at least one return statement.

Reviewers: rsmith

Reviewed By: rsmith

Subscribers: xbolva00, Quuxplusone, arthur.j.odwyer, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47067

llvm-svn: 333500
2018-05-30 03:53:16 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 9fc8faf9e6 Remove \brief commands from doxygen comments.
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.

We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.

Patch produced by

for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320

llvm-svn: 331834
2018-05-09 01:00:01 +00:00
Alexey Bataev 1ab3457319 [OPENMP] Enable c++ exceptions outside of the target constructs iff they are
enabled for the host.

If the compilation for the host enables C++ exceptions, but they are not
supported by the device, we still need to allow the code with the
exception handling constructs outside of the target regions.

llvm-svn: 331372
2018-05-02 16:52:07 +00:00
Malcolm Parsons 321f24ec42 Diagnose cases of "return x" that should be "return std::move(x)" for efficiency
Summary:
This patch adds two new diagnostics, which are off by default:

**-Wreturn-std-move**

This diagnostic is enabled by `-Wreturn-std-move`, `-Wmove`, or `-Wall`.
Diagnose cases of `return x` or `throw x`, where `x` is the name of a local variable or parameter, in which a copy operation is performed when a move operation would have been available. The user probably expected a move, but they're not getting a move, perhaps because the type of "x" is different from the return type of the function.
A place where this comes up in the wild is `stdext::inplace_function<Sig, N>` which implements conversion via a conversion operator rather than a converting constructor; see https://github.com/WG21-SG14/SG14/issues/125#issue-297201412
Another place where this has come up in the wild, but where the fix ended up being different, was

    try { ... } catch (ExceptionType ex) {
        throw ex;
    }

where the appropriate fix in that case was to replace `throw ex;` with `throw;`, and incidentally to catch by reference instead of by value. (But one could contrive a scenario where the slicing was intentional, in which case throw-by-move would have been the appropriate fix after all.)
Another example (intentional slicing to a base class) is dissected in https://github.com/accuBayArea/Slides/blob/master/slides/2018-03-07.pdf

**-Wreturn-std-move-in-c++11**

This diagnostic is enabled only by the exact spelling `-Wreturn-std-move-in-c++11`.
Diagnose cases of "return x;" or "throw x;" which in this version of Clang *do* produce moves, but which prior to Clang 3.9 / GCC 5.1 produced copies instead. This is useful in codebases which care about portability to those older compilers.
The name "-in-c++11" is not technically correct; what caused the version-to-version change in behavior here was actually CWG 1579, not C++14. I think it's likely that codebases that need portability to GCC 4.9-and-earlier may understand "C++11" as a colloquialism for "older compilers." The wording of this diagnostic is based on feedback from @rsmith.

**Discussion**

Notice that this patch is kind of a negative-space version of Richard Trieu's `-Wpessimizing-move`. That diagnostic warns about cases of `return std::move(x)` that should be `return x` for speed. These diagnostics warn about cases of `return x` that should be `return std::move(x)` for speed. (The two diagnostics' bailiwicks do not overlap: we don't have to worry about a `return` statement flipping between the two states indefinitely.)

I propose to write a paper for San Diego that would relax the implicit-move rules so that in C++2a the user //would// see the moves they expect, and the diagnostic could be re-worded in a later version of Clang to suggest explicit `std::move` only "in C++17 and earlier." But in the meantime (and/or forever if that proposal is not well received), this diagnostic will be useful to detect accidental copy operations.

Reviewers: rtrieu, rsmith

Reviewed By: rsmith

Subscribers: lebedev.ri, Rakete1111, rsmith, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43322

Patch by Arthur O'Dwyer.

llvm-svn: 329914
2018-04-12 14:48:48 +00:00
Alexey Bataev c0f879bcec [OPENMP] Additional attributes for the pointer parameters.
Added attributes for better optimization of the OpenMP code.

llvm-svn: 329751
2018-04-10 20:10:53 +00:00
Alexander Kornienko 2a8c18d991 Fix typos in clang
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:

  archtype
  cas
  classs
  checkk
  compres
  definit
  frome
  iff
  inteval
  ith
  lod
  methode
  nd
  optin
  ot
  pres
  statics
  te
  thru

Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188

llvm-svn: 329399
2018-04-06 15:14:32 +00:00
Akira Hatanaka 673af7a688 Generalize NRVO to cover C structs.
This commit generalizes NRVO to cover C structs (both trivial and
non-trivial structs).

rdar://problem/33599681

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44968

llvm-svn: 328809
2018-03-29 17:56:24 +00:00
Richard Trieu 09c163bb6b Refactoring code around move/copy initialization. NFC.
Use an enum parameter instead of a bool for more control on how the copy elision
functions work.  Extract the move initialization code from the move or copy
initialization block.

Patch by: Arthur O'Dwyer

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43898

llvm-svn: 327598
2018-03-15 03:00:55 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 87a3180343 Re-land "[Sema] Make getCurFunction() return null outside function parsing"
This relands r326965.

There was a null dereference in typo correction that was triggered in
Sema/diagnose_if.c. We are not always in a function scope when doing
typo correction. The fix is to add a null check.

LLVM's optimizer made it hard to find this bug. I wrote it up in a
not-very-well-editted blog post here:
http://qinsb.blogspot.com/2018/03/ub-will-delete-your-null-checks.html

llvm-svn: 327334
2018-03-12 21:43:02 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 8d485b845b Revert "[Sema] Make getCurFunction() return null outside function parsing"
This reverts r326965. It seems to have caused repeating test failures in
clang/test/Sema/diagnose_if.c on some buildbots.

I cannot reproduce the problem, and it's not immediately obvious what
the problem is, so let's revert to green.

llvm-svn: 326974
2018-03-08 01:12:22 +00:00
Reid Kleckner c2fd352963 [Sema] Make getCurFunction() return null outside function parsing
Summary:
Before this patch, Sema pre-allocated a FunctionScopeInfo and kept it in
the first, always present element of the FunctionScopes stack. This
meant that Sema::getCurFunction would return a pointer to this
pre-allocated object when parsing code outside a function body. This is
pretty much always a bug, so this patch moves the pre-allocated object
into a separate unique_ptr. This should make bugs like PR36536 a lot
more obvious.

As you can see from this patch, there were a number of places that
unconditionally assumed they were always called inside a function.
However, there are also many places that null checked the result of
getCurFunction(), so I think this is a reasonable direction.

Reviewers: rsmith

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44039

llvm-svn: 326965
2018-03-08 00:14:34 +00:00