According to OpenMP 5.0 standard, 2.11.4 allocate Clause, Restrictions,
For any list item that is specified in the allocate clause on a
directive, a data-sharing attribute clause that may create a private
copy of that list item must be specified on the same directive. Patch
adds the checks for this restriction.
llvm-svn: 357390
This change adds hierarchical "time trace" profiling blocks that can be visualized in Chrome, in a "flame chart" style. Each profiling block can have a "detail" string that for example indicates the file being processed, template name being instantiated, function being optimized etc.
This is taken from GitHub PR: https://github.com/aras-p/llvm-project-20170507/pull/2
Patch by Aras Pranckevičius.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58675
llvm-svn: 357340
Fixes the assertion
> no Attr* for AttributedType*
> UNREACHABLE executed at llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp:298!
In `TypeProcessingState::getAttributedType` we put into `AttrsForTypes`
types with `auto` but later in
`TypeProcessingState::takeAttrForAttributedType` we use transformed
types and that's why cannot find `Attr` corresponding to
`AttributedType`.
Fix by keeping `AttrsForTypes` up to date after replacing `AutoType`.
rdar://problem/47689465
Reviewers: rsmith, arphaman, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58659
llvm-svn: 357298
Summary:
- If a parameter is used, nonnull checking needs function prototype to
retrieve the corresponding parameter's attributes. However, at the
prototype substitution phase when a template is being instantiated,
expression may be created and checked without a fully specialized
prototype. Under such a scenario, skip nonnull checking on that
argument.
Reviewers: rjmccall, tra, yaxunl
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59900
llvm-svn: 357236
target and task-based directives.
According to OpenMP 5.0, 2.11.4 allocate Clause, Restrictions, For task,
taskloop or target directives, allocation requests to memory allocators
with the trait access set to thread result in unspecified behavior.
Patch introduces a check for omp_thread_mem_alloc predefined allocator
on target- and trask-based directives.
llvm-svn: 357205
This fixes a false positive on the following, where st is configured to have
different sizes based on some preprocessor logic:
if (sizeof(buf) == sizeof(*st))
memcpy(&buf, st, sizeof(*st));
llvm-svn: 357041
MarkVarDeclODRUsed indirectly calls captureInBlock, which creates a copy
expression. The copy expression is insulated in it's own
ExpressionEvaluationContext, so it saves, mutates, and restores MaybeODRUseExprs
as CleanupVarDeclMarking is iterating through it, leading to a crash. Fix this
by iterating through a local copy of MaybeODRUseExprs.
rdar://47493525
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59670
llvm-svn: 357040
FileManager constructs a VFS in its constructor if it isn't passed one,
and there's no way to reset it. Make that contract clear by returning a
reference from its accessor.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59388
llvm-svn: 357038
The intention is to add metadata to direct call sites of functions
marked with __declspec(allocator), which will ultimately result in some
S_HEAPALLOCSITE debug info records when emitting codeview.
This is a piece of PR38491
llvm-svn: 356964
Bail-out of CheckArrayAccess when the types of the base expression before
and after eventual casts are dependent. We will get another chance to check
for array bounds during instantiation. Fixes PR41087.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59776
Reviewed By: efriedma
llvm-svn: 356957
The various CorrectionCandidateCallbacks are currently heap-allocated
unconditionally. This was needed because of delayed typo correction.
However these allocations represent currently 15.4% of all allocations
(number of allocations) when parsing all of Boost (!), mostly because
of ParseCastExpression, ParseStatementOrDeclarationAfterAttrtibutes
and isCXXDeclarationSpecifier. Note that all of these callback objects
are small. Let's not do this.
Instead initially allocate the callback on the stack, and only do a
heap allocation if we are going to do some typo correction. Do this by:
1. Adding a clone function to each callback, which will do a polymorphic
clone of the callback. This clone function is required to be implemented
by every callback (of which there is a fair amount). Make sure this is
the case by making it pure virtual.
2. Use this clone function when we are going to try to correct a typo.
This additionally cut the time of -fsyntax-only on all of Boost by 0.5%
(not that much, but still something). No functional changes intended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58827
Reviewed By: rnk
llvm-svn: 356925
Summary:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59076 added a new coroutine error that
prevented users from using 'co_await' or 'co_yield' within a exception
handler. However, it was reverted in https://reviews.llvm.org/rC356774
because it caused a regression in nested scopes in C++ catch statements,
as documented by https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41171.
The issue was due to an incorrect use of a `clang::ParseScope`. To fix:
1. Add a regression test for catch statement parsing that mimics the bug
report from https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41171.
2. Re-apply the coroutines error patch from
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59076, but this time with the correct
ParseScope behavior.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, tks2103, rsmith, riccibruno, jbulow
Reviewed By: riccibruno
Subscribers: EricWF, jdoerfert, lewissbaker, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59752
llvm-svn: 356865
dynamic_allocators.
According to the OpenMP 5.0, 2.11.3 allocate Directive, Restrictions,
allocate directives that appear in a target region must specify an
allocator clause unless a requires directive with the dynamic_allocators
clause is present in the same compilation unit. Patch adds a check for a
presence of the requires directive with the dynamic_allocators clause.
llvm-svn: 356758
clause in target region.
According to the OpenMP 5.0, 2.11.3 allocate Directive, Restrictions,
allocate directives that appear in a target region must specify an
allocator clause unless a requires directive with the dynamic_allocators
clause is present in the same compilation unit.
llvm-svn: 356752
Previously implemented check required the reevaluation of the already
evaluated predefined allocator kind for the global variables. Patch
simplifies this evaluation and removes extra code.
llvm-svn: 356699
After https://reviews.llvm.org/rL355317 we noticed that quite a decent
amount of code redeclares builtins (memcpy in particular, I believe
reduced from an MSVC header) with a calling convention specified.
This gets particularly troublesome when the user specifies a new
'default' calling convention on the command line.
When looking to add a diagnostic for this case, it was noticed that we
had 3 other diagnostics that differed only slightly. This patch ALSO
unifies those under a 'select'. Unfortunately, the order of words in
ONE of these diagnostics was reversed ("'thiscall' calling convention"
vs "calling convention 'thiscall'"), so this patch also standardizes on
the former.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59560
Change-Id: I79f99fe7c2301640755ffdd774b46eb44526bb22
llvm-svn: 356663
allocators.
It is better to deduce omp_allocator_handle_t type from the predefined
allocators, because omp.h header might not define it explicitly. Plus,
it allows to identify the predefined allocators correctly when trying to
build the allcoator for the global variables.
llvm-svn: 356607
Before this commit, we emit unavailable errors for calls to functions during
overload resolution, and for references to all other declarations in
DiagnoseUseOfDecl. The early checks during overload resolution aren't as good as
the DiagnoseAvailabilityOfDecl based checks, as they error on the code from
PR40991. This commit fixes this by removing the early checking.
llvm.org/PR40991
rdar://48564179
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59394
llvm-svn: 356599
This diff previously exposed a bug in LLVM's IRLinker, breaking
buildbots that tried to self-host LLVM with monolithic LTO.
The bug is now in LLVM by D59552
Original commit message:
As PR17480 describes, clang does not support the used attribute
for member functions of class templates. This means that if the member
function is not used, its definition is never instantiated. This patch
changes clang to emit the definition if it has the used attribute.
Test Plan: Added a testcase
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56928
llvm-svn: 356598
Summary:
https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/OpenMP-API-Specification-5.0.pdf, page 3:
```
structured block
For C/C++, an executable statement, possibly compound, with a single entry at the
top and a single exit at the bottom, or an OpenMP construct.
COMMENT: See Section 2.1 on page 38 for restrictions on structured
blocks.
```
```
2.1 Directive Format
Some executable directives include a structured block. A structured block:
• may contain infinite loops where the point of exit is never reached;
• may halt due to an IEEE exception;
• may contain calls to exit(), _Exit(), quick_exit(), abort() or functions with a
_Noreturn specifier (in C) or a noreturn attribute (in C/C++);
• may be an expression statement, iteration statement, selection statement, or try block, provided
that the corresponding compound statement obtained by enclosing it in { and } would be a
structured block; and
Restrictions
Restrictions to structured blocks are as follows:
• Entry to a structured block must not be the result of a branch.
• The point of exit cannot be a branch out of the structured block.
C / C++
• The point of entry to a structured block must not be a call to setjmp().
• longjmp() and throw() must not violate the entry/exit criteria.
```
Of particular note here is the fact that OpenMP structured blocks are as-if `noexcept`,
in the same sense as with the normal `noexcept` functions in C++.
I.e. if throw happens, and it attempts to travel out of the `noexcept` function
(here: out of the current structured-block), then the program terminates.
Now, one of course can say that since it is explicitly prohibited by the Specification,
then any and all programs that violate this Specification contain undefined behavior,
and are unspecified, and thus no one should care about them. Just don't write broken code /s
But i'm not sure this is a reasonable approach.
I have personally had oss-fuzz issues of this origin - exception thrown inside
of an OpenMP structured-block that is not caught, thus causing program termination.
This issue isn't all that hard to catch, it's not any particularly different from
diagnosing the same situation with the normal `noexcept` function.
Now, clang static analyzer does not presently model exceptions.
But clang-tidy has a simplisic [[ https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-exception-escape.html | bugprone-exception-escape ]] check,
and it is even refactored as a `ExceptionAnalyzer` class for reuse.
So it would be trivial to use that analyzer to check for
exceptions escaping out of OpenMP structured blocks. (D59466)
All that sounds too great to be true. Indeed, there is a caveat.
Presently, it's practically impossible to do. To check a OpenMP structured block
you need to somehow 'get' the OpenMP structured block, and you can't because
it's simply not modelled in AST. `CapturedStmt`/`CapturedDecl` is not it's representation.
Now, it is of course possible to write e.g. some AST matcher that would e.g.
match every OpenMP executable directive, and then return the whatever `Stmt` is
the structured block of said executable directive, if any.
But i said //practically//. This isn't practical for the following reasons:
1. This **will** bitrot. That matcher will need to be kept up-to-date,
and refreshed with every new OpenMP spec version.
2. Every single piece of code that would want that knowledge would need to
have such matcher. Well, okay, if it is an AST matcher, it could be shared.
But then you still have `RecursiveASTVisitor` and friends.
`2 > 1`, so now you have code duplication.
So it would be reasonable (and is fully within clang AST spirit) to not
force every single consumer to do that work, but instead store that knowledge
in the correct, and appropriate place - AST, class structure.
Now, there is another hoop we need to get through.
It isn't fully obvious //how// to model this.
The best solution would of course be to simply add a `OMPStructuredBlock` transparent
node. It would be optimal, it would give us two properties:
* Given this `OMPExecutableDirective`, what's it OpenMP structured block?
* It is trivial to check whether the `Stmt*` is a OpenMP structured block (`isa<OMPStructuredBlock>(ptr)`)
But OpenMP structured block isn't **necessarily** the first, direct child of `OMP*Directive`.
(even ignoring the clang's `CapturedStmt`/`CapturedDecl` that were inserted inbetween).
So i'm not sure whether or not we could re-create AST statements after they were already created?
There would be other costs to a new AST node: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40563#c12
```
1. You will need to break the representation of loops. The body should be replaced by the "structured block" entity.
2. You will need to support serialization/deserialization.
3. You will need to support template instantiation.
4. You will need to support codegen and take this new construct to account in each OpenMP directive.
```
Instead, there **is** an functionally-equivalent, alternative solution, consisting of two parts.
Part 1:
* Add a member function `isStandaloneDirective()` to the `OMPExecutableDirective` class,
that will tell whether this directive is stand-alone or not, as per the spec.
We need it because we can't just check for the existance of associated statements,
see code comment.
* Add a member function `getStructuredBlock()` to the OMPExecutableDirective` class itself,
that assert that this is not a stand-alone directive, and either return the correct loop body
if this is a loop-like directive, or the captured statement.
This way, given an `OMPExecutableDirective`, we can get it's structured block.
Also, since the knowledge is ingrained into the clang OpenMP implementation,
it will not cause any duplication, and //hopefully// won't bitrot.
Great we achieved 1 of 2 properties of `OMPStructuredBlock` approach.
Thus, there is a second part needed:
* How can we check whether a given `Stmt*` is `OMPStructuredBlock`?
Well, we can't really, in general. I can see this workaround:
```
class FunctionASTVisitor : public RecursiveASTVisitor<FunctionASTVisitor> {
using Base = RecursiveASTVisitor<FunctionASTVisitor>;
public:
bool VisitOMPExecDir(OMPExecDir *D) {
OmpStructuredStmts.emplace_back(D.getStructuredStmt());
}
bool VisitSOMETHINGELSE(???) {
if(InOmpStructuredStmt)
HI!
}
bool TraverseStmt(Stmt *Node) {
if (!Node)
return Base::TraverseStmt(Node);
if (OmpStructuredStmts.back() == Node)
++InOmpStructuredStmt;
Base::TraverseStmt(Node);
if (OmpStructuredStmts.back() == Node) {
OmpStructuredStmts.pop_back();
--InOmpStructuredStmt;
}
return true;
}
std::vector<Stmt*> OmpStructuredStmts;
int InOmpStructuredStmt = 0;
};
```
But i really don't see using it in practice.
It's just too intrusive; and again, requires knowledge duplication.
.. but no. The solution lies right on the ground.
Why don't we simply store this `i'm a openmp structured block` in the bitfield of the `Stmt` itself?
This does not appear to have any impact on the memory footprint of the clang AST,
since it's just a single extra bit in the bitfield. At least the static assertions don't fail.
Thus, indeed, we can achieve both of the properties without a new AST node.
We can cheaply set that bit right in sema, at the end of `Sema::ActOnOpenMPExecutableDirective()`,
by just calling the `getStructuredBlock()` that we just added.
Test coverage that demonstrates all this has been added.
This isn't as great with serialization though. Most of it does not use abbrevs,
so we do end up paying the full price (4 bytes?) instead of a single bit.
That price, of course, can be reclaimed by using abbrevs.
In fact, i suspect that //might// not just reclaim these bytes, but pack these PCH significantly.
I'm not seeing a third solution. If there is one, it would be interesting to hear about it.
("just don't write code that would require `isa<OMPStructuredBlock>(ptr)`" is not a solution.)
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40563 | PR40563 ]].
Reviewers: ABataev, rjmccall, hfinkel, rsmith, riccibruno, gribozavr
Reviewed By: ABataev, gribozavr
Subscribers: mgorny, aaron.ballman, steveire, guansong, jfb, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214
llvm-svn: 356570
The attribute pass_dynamic_object_size(n) behaves exactly like
pass_object_size(n), but instead of evaluating __builtin_object_size on calls,
it evaluates __builtin_dynamic_object_size, which has the potential to produce
runtime code when the object size can't be determined statically.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58757
llvm-svn: 356515
If the allocator was specified for the variable and next one is found
with the different allocator, the warning is emitted, and the allocator
is ignored.
llvm-svn: 356513
According to OpenMP, 2.11.3 allocate Directive, Restrictions, C / C++,
if a list item has a static storage type, the allocator expression in
the allocator clause must be a constant expression that evaluates to
one of the predefined memory allocator values. Added check for this
restriction.
llvm-svn: 356496
When we create overloads for the builtin compound assignment operators
we need to preserve address space for the reference operand taking it
from the argument that is passed in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59367
llvm-svn: 356475
Summary:
This patch refactors several instances of cast<> used in if
conditionals. Since cast<> asserts on failure, the else branch can
never be taken.
In some cases, the fix is to replace cast<> with dyn_cast<>. While
others required the removal of the conditional and some minor
refactoring.
A discussion can be seen here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190318/265044.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59529
llvm-svn: 356441
Summary:
Similar to D56967, we add the existing diag::note_locked_here to tell
the user where we saw the locking that isn't matched correctly.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59455
llvm-svn: 356427
These diagnose overflowing calls to subset of fortifiable functions. Some
functions, like sprintf or strcpy aren't supported right not, but we should
probably support these in the future. We previously supported this kind of
functionality with -Wbuiltin-memcpy-chk-size, but that diagnostic doesn't work
with _FORTIFY implementations that use wrapper functions. Also unlike that
diagnostic, we emit these warnings regardless of whether _FORTIFY_SOURCE is
actually enabled, which is nice for programs that don't enable the runtime
checks.
Why not just use diagnose_if, like Bionic does? We can get better diagnostics in
the compiler (i.e. mention the sizes), and we have the potential to diagnose
sprintf and strcpy which is impossible with diagnose_if (at least, in languages
that don't support C++14 constexpr). This approach also saves standard libraries
from having to add diagnose_if.
rdar://48006655
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58797
llvm-svn: 356397
If the doacross lop construct is used and the loop counter is declare
outside of the loop, the compiler might crash trying to get the address
of the loop counter. Patch fixes this problem.
llvm-svn: 356198
We were allocating the implicit attribute in the declarator's attribute pool,
but putting into the declaration specifier's ParsedAttributesView. If there are
multiple declarators, then we'll use the attribute from the declaration
specifier after clearing out the declarators attribute pool. Fix this by
allocating the attribute in the declaration specifier's pool.
rdar://48529718
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59327
llvm-svn: 356187
This adds support for static_assert() (and _Static_assert()) in
@interface/@implementation ivar lists and in @interface method declarations.
It was already supported in @implementation blocks outside of the ivar lists.
The assert AST nodes are added at file scope, matching where other
(non-Objective-C) declarations at @interface / @implementation level go (cf
`allTUVariables`).
Also add a `__has_feature(objc_c_static_assert)` that's true in C11 (and
`__has_extension(objc_c_static_assert)` that's always true) and
`__has_feature(objc_cxx_static_assert)` that's true in C++11 modea fter this
patch, so it's possible to check if this is supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59223
llvm-svn: 356148
This reverts commit r353765. After talking with our c stdlib folks, we decided
to use the existing pass_object_size attribute to implement _FORTIFY_SOURCE
wrappers, like Bionic does (I didn't realize that pass_object_size could be used
for this purpose). Sorry for the flip/flop, and thanks to James Y. Knight for
pointing this out to me.
llvm-svn: 356103
As for OpenCL C, we need to allow using printf and toolchain variadic
functions (prefixed by "__") in C++ mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59219
llvm-svn: 355915
If the declare target link global is used in the target region
indirectly (used in the inner parallel, teams, etc. regions), we may
miss this variable and it leads to incorrect codegen.
llvm-svn: 355858
There is nontrivial bug caused in lld that I need to further
investigate. Meanwhile, I'll revert this.
This reverts commit 8297e93480c636dc90fd14653c5a66406193363f.
llvm-svn: 355721
expression inside the parentheses is a valid UTF-8 string literal.
Previously clang emitted an expression like @("abc") as a message send
to stringWithUTF8String. This commit makes clang emit the boxed
expression as a compile-time constant instead.
This commit also has the effect of silencing the nullable-to-nonnull
conversion warning clang started emitting after r317727, which
originally motivated this commit (see https://oleb.net/2018/@keypath).
rdar://problem/42684601
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58729
llvm-svn: 355662
The patch originally broke code that was incompatible with GCC, but
we want to follow GCC behavior here according to the discussion in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D58216
Original commit message:
As PR17480 describes, clang does not support the used attribute
for member functions of class templates. This means that if the member
function is not used, its definition is never instantiated. This patch
changes clang to emit the definition if it has the used attribute.
Test Plan: Added a testcase
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56928
llvm-svn: 355627
Alexey Bataev