Summary:
By producing the $0 marker in the snippets at the last placeholder.
This produces nicer results in most cases, e.g. for
namespace <#name#> {
<#decls#>
}
we now produce ${0:decls} instead of ${2:decls} and the final cursor
placement is more convenient.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62389
llvm-svn: 361841
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The new guideline is to qualify with 'llvm::' explicitly both in
'.h' and '.cpp' files. This simplifies moving the code between
header and source files and is easier to keep consistent.
llvm-svn: 350531
Summary:
Previously code completion did not work well for Objective-C methods
which contained multiple arguments as clangd did not expect to see
multiple typed-text chunks when handling code completion.
Note that even with this change, we do not consider selector fragments
from previous arguments to be part of the signature (although we
could in the future).
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53934
llvm-svn: 346836
Standardize on the most common namespace setup in our *.cpp files:
using namespace llvm;
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
void foo(StringRef) { ... }
And remove redundant llvm:: qualifiers. (Except for cases like
make_unique where this causes problems with std:: and ADL).
This choice is pretty arbitrary, but some broad consistency is nice.
This is going to conflict with everything. Sorry :-/
Squash the other configurations:
A)
using namespace llvm;
using namespace clang;
using namespace clangd;
void clangd::foo(StringRef);
This is in some of the older files. (It prevents accidentally defining a
new function instead of one in the header file, for what that's worth).
B)
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
void foo(llvm::StringRef) { ... }
This is fine, but in practice the using directive often gets added over time.
C)
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
using namespace llvm; // inside the namespace
This was pretty common, but is a bit misleading: name lookup preferrs
clang::clangd::foo > clang::foo > llvm:: foo (no matter where the using
directive is).
llvm-svn: 344850
Summary:
Previously, clangd was trying to show documentation for the active
parameter instead, which is wrong per LSP specification.
Moreover, the code path that attempts to get parameter comments never
succeds, because no attempt is made to parse function doc comment and
extract parameter-specific parts out of it. So we also remove the code
that claims to fetch parameter comments: it is not used anymore and is
incorrect.
Reviewers: hokein, ioeric, kadircet
Reviewed By: ioeric
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50726
llvm-svn: 340004
Summary:
To avoid wasting time deserializing them on code completion and
further reparses.
We do not use the comments anyway, because we cannot rely on the file
contents staying the same for reparses that reuse the prebuilt
preamble PCH.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48943
llvm-svn: 336540
Summary:
Comments from namespaces that clangd produces are too noisy and often
not useful.
Namespaces have too many redecls and we don't have a good way of
determining which of the comments are relevant and which should be
ignored (e.g. because they come from code generators like the protobuf
compiler).
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48211
llvm-svn: 335718
Summary:
Previously, the strings matched LSP completion pretty closely.
The completion label was a single string, for instance. This made
implementing completion itself easy but makes it hard to use the names
in other way, e.g. pretty-printed name in synthesized
documentation/hover.
It also limits our introspection into completion items, which can only
be as precise as the indexed symbols. This change is a prerequisite to
improvements to overload bundling which need to inspect e.g. signature
structure.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48475
llvm-svn: 335360
Summary:
It's almost always identical to Name, and in fact we never used it (we used name
instead).
The only case where they differ is objc method selectors (foo: vs foo:bar:).
We can live with the latter for both name and filterText, so I've made that
change too.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48375
llvm-svn: 335321
Summary:
Like the following:
// -------
// =======
// *******
It does not cover all the cases, but those are definitely not very
useful.
Reviewers: sammccall, ioeric, hokein
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48171
llvm-svn: 334807
This fix is still quite fragile, the underlying problem is that the
code should not rely on source ranges coming from the preamble to be
correct when reading from the text buffers.
This is probably not possible to achieve in practice, so we would
probably have to keep the contents of old headers around for the
lifetime of the preamble.
llvm-svn: 333369
Summary:
To fix a crash in code completion that occurrs when reading doc
comments from files that were updated after the preamble was
computed. In that case, the files on disk could've been changed and we
can't rely on finding the comment text with the same range anymore.
The current workaround is to not provide comments from the headers at
all and rely on the dynamic index instead.
A more principled solution would be to store contents of the files
read inside the preamble, but it is way harder to implement properly,
given that it would definitely increase the sizes of the preamble.
Together with D47272, this should fix all preamble-related crashes
we're aware of.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47274
llvm-svn: 333189
Summary:
Previous implementation used to extract brief text from doxygen comments.
Brief text parsing slows down completion and is not suited for
non-doxygen comments.
This commit switches to providing comments that mimic the ones
originally written in the source code, doing minimal reindenting and
removing the comments markers to make the output more user-friendly.
It means we lose support for doxygen-specific features, e.g. extracting
brief text, but provide useful results for non-doxygen comments.
Switching the doxygen support back is an option, but I suggest to see
whether the current approach gives more useful results.
Reviewers: sammccall, hokein, ioeric
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45999
llvm-svn: 332459
Ilya Biryukov