Add two options to the code coverage artifact prep script:
* --use-existing-profdata: Use an existing indexed profile instead of
merging the same profiles again.
* --restrict: Restrict the coverage reporting to the given list of
source directories.
With this in place, we can teach the coverage bot how to prepare
separate reports for each of the llvm tools.
llvm-svn: 282204
In practice, it's way too noisy.
It's also a maintenance burden, since we apparently can't add tests for
it without breaking some Windows setups (see: D22692).
llvm-svn: 281871
descriptions now tag add instructions, and the Hexagon backend is using this to
identify loop induction statements.
Patch by Sam Parker and Sjoerd Meijer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23601
llvm-svn: 281304
Previously, gtest/gtest_main were not exported via cmake. The intention here was
to ensure that users whom are linking against the LLVM install tree would not
get the gtest/gtest_main targets. This prevents downstream projects that link
against the LLVM build tree (i.e. Swift) from getting this dependency
information in their cmake builds. Without such dependency information, linker
issues can result on linux due to LLVMSupport being put before gtest on the
linker command line.
This commit preserves behavior that we want for the install tree, while adding
support for the build tree by:
1. The special casing for gtest/gtest_main in the add_llvm_library code is
removed in favor of a flag called "BUILDTREE_ONLY". If this is set, then the
library is communicating that it is only meant to be exported into the build
tree and is not meant to be installed or exported via the install tree. This
part is just a tweak to remove the special case, the underlying code is the
same.
2. The cmake code that exports cmake targets for the build tree has special code
to import an additional targets file called
LLVMBuildTreeOnlyExports.cmake. Additionally the extra targets are added to the
LLVMConfig.cmake's LLVM_EXPORTED_TARGETS variable. In contrast, the
"installation" cmake file uses the normal LLVM_EXPORTS_TARGETS as before and
does not include the extra exports file. This is implemented by
defining/undefining variables when performing a configure of the build/install
tree LLVMConfig.cmake files.
llvm-svn: 281085
Summary:
This allows specifying instructions that are available only in specific assembler variant. If AsmVariantName is specified then instruction will be presented only in MatchTable for this variant. If not specified then assembler variants will be determined based on AsmString.
Also this allows splitting assembler match tables in same way as it is done in dissasembler.
Reviewers: ab, tstellarAMD, craig.topper, vpykhtin
Subscribers: wdng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24249
llvm-svn: 280952
Lots of unittests started failing under asan after r280455. It seems
they've been failing for a long time, but lit silently ignored them.
Downgrade the error so we can figure out what is going on.
Filed http://llvm.org/PR30285.
llvm-svn: 280674
Summary:
This is a follow up to r280455, where a check for the process exit code
was introduced. Some ASAN bots throw this error now, but it's impossible
to understand what's wrong with them, and the issue is not reproducible.
Reviewers: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24210
llvm-svn: 280550
Do this by creating a temp directory in the normal system temp
directory, and cleaning it up on exit.
It is still possible for this temp directory to leak if Python exits
abnormally, but this is probably good enough for now.
Fixes PR18335
llvm-svn: 280501
googletest formatted tests are discovered by running the test executable.
Previously testing would silently succeed if the test executable crashed
during the discovery process. Now testing fails with "error: unable to
discover google-tests ..." if the test executable exits with a non-zero status.
llvm-svn: 280455
Apparently nobody evaluated multiprocessing on Windows since Daniel
enabled multiprocessing on Unix in r193279. It works so far as I can
tell.
Today this is worth about an 8x speedup (631.29s to 73.25s) on my 24
core Windows machine. Hopefully this will improve Windows buildbot cycle
time, where currently it takes more time to run check-all than it does
to self-host with assertions enabled:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86-windows-msvc2015/builds/20
build stage 2 ninja all ( 28 mins, 22 secs )
ninja check 2 stage 2 ( 37 mins, 38 secs )
llvm-svn: 280382
This mapping is between pointers, which DenseMap is particularly good
at. Most targets aren't really affected, but if there's a lot of
subregister composition this can shave off a good chunk of time from
generating registers.
llvm-svn: 279875
1. Add the "explicit" specifier to the single-argument constructor of Pattern
2. Reorder the fields to remove excessive padding (8 bytes).
Patch by Alexander Shaposhnikov!
llvm-svn: 279832
This tries to keep all the ModRM memory and register forms in their own regions of the encodings. Hoping to make it simple on some of the switch statements that operate on these encodings.
llvm-svn: 279422
Summary:
This is one possible solution to the problem of ignoring constraints that Simon
raised in D21473 but it's a bit of a hack.
The integrated assembler currently ignores violations of the tied register
constraints when the operands involved in a tie are both present in the AsmText.
For example, 'dati $rs, $rt, $imm' with the '$rs = $rt' will silently replace
$rt with $rs. So 'dati $2, $3, 1' is processed as if the user provided
'dati $2, $2, 1' without any diagnostic being emitted.
This is difficult to solve properly because there are multiple parts of the
matcher that are silently forcing these constraints to be met. Tied operands are
rendered to instructions by cloning previously rendered operands but this is
unnecessary because the matcher was already instructed to render the operand it
would have cloned. This is also unnecessary because earlier code has already
replaced the MCParsedOperand with the one it was tied to (so the parsed input
is matched as if it were 'dati <RegIdx 2>, <RegIdx 2>, <Imm 1>'). As a result,
it looks like fixing this properly amounts to a rewrite of the tied operand
handling which affects all targets.
This patch however, merely inserts a checking hook just before the
substitution of MCParsedOperands and the Mips target overrides it. It's not
possible to accurately check the registers are the same this early (because
numeric registers haven't been bound to a register class yet) so it cheats a
bit and checks that the tokens that produced the operand are lexically
identical. This works because tied registers need to have the same register
class but it does have a flaw. It will reject 'dati $4, $a0, 1' for violating
the constraint even though $a0 ends up as the same register as $4.
Reviewers: sdardis
Subscribers: dsanders, llvm-commits, sdardis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21994
llvm-svn: 276867
r276409 changed the coverage summary format. Update the script so that
it can parse the new output, and incorporate the new information into
its warnings.
llvm-svn: 276446
They were all auto-incremented from 0 anyway, and I'm getting really annoying
conflicts and runtime failures when different people add more for GlobalISel
(and even when I'm refactoring my own patches).
NFC.
llvm-svn: 276204
This is for a situation where the encoding for a register may be
different depending on the specific operand. For some instructions,
we want to apply additional restrictions beyond the encoding's
constraints.
In AMDGPU some operands are VSrc_32, using the VS_32 pseudo register
class which accept VGPRs, SGPRs, or immediates in the encoding.
Some specific instructions with the same encoding operand do not want
to allow immediates or SGPRs, but the encoding format is different
in this case than a regular VGPR_32 operand.
This allows specifying the encoding should be treated the same
without introducing yet another dummy register class.
llvm-svn: 275929
Instead of extracting raw coverage mappings into an artifact directory,
actually generate useful html reports for a given list of binaries with
symbol demangling turned on.
No tests, but this is actively being used to drive the (still nascent)
coverage bot.
llvm-svn: 275927
This doesn't seem to work with Bash:
$ /work/llvm/utils/release/merge.sh --proj llvm --rev r275870
/work/llvm/utils/release/merge.sh: line 34: ${$1#r}: bad substitution
I get the same error with and without a leading 'r'.
llvm-svn: 275898
This splits out the intrinsic table such that generic intrinsics come
first and target specific intrinsics are grouped by target. From here
we can find out which target an intrinsic is for or differentiate
between generic and target intrinsics.
The motivation here is to make it easier to move target specific
intrinsic handling out of generic code.
llvm-svn: 275575
Summary:
In this patch we implement the following parts of XRay:
- Supporting a function attribute named 'function-instrument' which currently only supports 'xray-always'. We should be able to use this attribute for other instrumentation approaches.
- Supporting a function attribute named 'xray-instruction-threshold' used to determine whether a function is instrumented with a minimum number of instructions (IR instruction counts).
- X86-specific nop sleds as described in the white paper.
- A machine function pass that adds the different instrumentation marker instructions at a very late stage.
- A way of identifying which return opcode is considered "normal" for each architecture.
There are some caveats here:
1) We don't handle PATCHABLE_RET in platforms other than x86_64 yet -- this means if IR used PATCHABLE_RET directly instead of a normal ret, instruction lowering for that platform might do the wrong thing. We think this should be handled at instruction selection time to by default be unpacked for platforms where XRay is not availble yet.
2) The generated section for X86 is different from what is described from the white paper for the sole reason that LLVM allows us to do this neatly. We're taking the opportunity to deviate from the white paper from this perspective to allow us to get richer information from the runtime library.
Reviewers: sanjoy, eugenis, kcc, pcc, echristo, rnk
Subscribers: niravd, majnemer, atrick, rnk, emaste, bmakam, mcrosier, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19904
llvm-svn: 275367
This achieves the same result as previously by using line wrapping. This allows
us to have one keyword per line which makes adding a new keyword significantly
easier, especially if they are inserted in a lexicographical sort order as you
no longer need to reflow the content around it.
This only does the keywords as that is the group which changes more often.
llvm-svn: 275248
Vedant Kumar