to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Also make certain Thunk methods non-const as this will be required for
an upcoming change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44961
llvm-svn: 328732
Now that DefinedRegular is the only remaining derived class of
Defined, we can merge the two classes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39667
llvm-svn: 317448
Now that we have only SymbolBody as the symbol class. So, "SymbolBody"
is a bit strange name now. This is a mechanical change generated by
perl -i -pe s/SymbolBody/Symbol/g $(git grep -l SymbolBody lld/ELF lld/COFF)
nd clang-format-diff.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39459
llvm-svn: 317370
This change allows Thunks to be added on multiple passes. To do this we must
merge only the thunks added in each pass, and deal with thunks that have
drifted out of range of their callers.
A thunk may end out of range of its caller if enough thunks are added in
between the caller and the thunk. To handle this we create another thunk.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34692
llvm-svn: 316754
We were using uint32_t as the type of relocation kind. It has a
readability issue because what Type really means in `uint32_t Type`
is not obvious. It could be a section type, a symbol type or a
relocation type.
Since we do not do any arithemetic operations on relocation types
(e.g. adding one to R_X86_64_PC32 doesn't make sense), it would be
more natural if they are represented as enums. Unfortunately, that
is not doable because relocation type definitions are spread into
multiple header files.
So I decided to use typedef. This still should be better than the
plain uint32_t because the intended type is now obvious.
llvm-svn: 315525
On ARM the interworking thunks are only produced for branch instructions
that can't be changed into a blx instruction so only Thumb callers would
call Thumb thunks and only ARM callers would call ARM thunks. With range
extension thunks branch and link instructions may need a Thunk. These
instructions can be rewritten as a blx and can use either ARM or Thumb
thunks.
We introduce an isCompatibleWith() function so that a caller can check if
an existing Thunk is compatible before reusing it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34035
llvm-svn: 307132
Nothing special here, just detemplates code that became possible
to detemplate after recent commits in a straghtforward way.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33234
llvm-svn: 303237
With the current design an InputSection is basically anything that
goes directly in a OutputSection. That includes plain input section
but also synthetic sections, so this should probably not be a
template.
llvm-svn: 295993
Thunks are now implemented by redirecting the relocation to the
symbol S, to a symbol TS in a Thunk. The Thunk will transfer control
to S. This has the following implications:
- All the side-effects of Thunks happen within createThunks()
- Thunks are no longer stored in InputSections and Symbols no longer
need to hold a pointer to a Thunk
- The synthetic Thunk sections need to be merged into OutputSections
This implementation is almost a direct conversion of the existing
Thunks with the following exceptions:
- Mips LA25 Thunks are placed before the InputSection that defines
the symbol that needs a Thunk.
- All ARM Thunks are placed at the end of the OutputSection of the
first caller to the Thunk.
Range extension Thunks are not supported yet so it is optimistically
assumed that all Thunks can be reused.
This is a recommit of r293283 with a fixed comparison predicate as
std::merge requires a strict weak ordering.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29327
llvm-svn: 293757
Thunks are now implemented by redirecting the relocation to the
symbol S, to a symbol TS in a Thunk. The Thunk will transfer control
to S. This has the following implications:
- All the side-effects of Thunks happen within createThunks()
- Thunks are no longer stored in InputSections and Symbols no longer
need to hold a pointer to a Thunk
- The synthetic Thunk sections need to be merged into OutputSections
This implementation is almost a direct conversion of the existing
Thunks with the following exceptions:
- Mips LA25 Thunks are placed before the InputSection that defines
the symbol that needs a Thunk.
- All ARM Thunks are placed at the end of the OutputSection of the
first caller to the Thunk.
Range extension Thunks are not supported yet so it is optimistically
assumed that all Thunks can be reused.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29129
llvm-svn: 293283
Although they are in the same .cpp file, the way they were written
were slightly different, so they looked more different than they were.
This patch makes their styles consistent.
llvm-svn: 274996
The TinyPtrVector of const Thunk<ELFT>* in InputSections.h can cause
build failures on certain compiler/library combinations when Thunk<ELFT>
is not a complete type or is an abstract class. Fixed by making Thunk<ELFT>
non Abstract.
type or is an abstract class
llvm-svn: 274863
Generalise the Mips LA25 Thunk code and implement ARM and Thumb
interworking Thunks.
- Introduce a new module Thunks.cpp to store the Target Specific Thunk
implementations.
- DefinedRegular and Shared have a ThunkData field to record Thunk.
- A Target can have more than one type of Thunk.
- Support PC-relative calls to Thunks.
- Support Thunks to PLT entries.
- Existing Mips LA25 Thunk code integrated.
- Support for ARMv7A interworking Thunks.
Limitations:
- Only one Thunk per SymbolBody, this is sufficient for all currently
implemented Thunks.
- ARM thunks assume presence of V6T2 MOVT and MOVW instructions.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21891
llvm-svn: 274836
Chandler Carruth