Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sjoerd Meijer 7efabe5c7d [MIR][ARM] MachineOperand comments
This adds infrastructure to print and parse MIR MachineOperand comments.
The motivation for the ARM backend is to print condition code names instead of
magic constants that are difficult to read (for human beings). For example,
instead of this:

  dead renamable $r2, $cpsr = tEOR killed renamable $r2, renamable $r1, 14, $noreg
  t2Bcc %bb.4, 0, killed $cpsr

we now print this:

  dead renamable $r2, $cpsr = tEOR killed renamable $r2, renamable $r1, 14 /* CC::always */, $noreg
  t2Bcc %bb.4, 0 /* CC:eq */, killed $cpsr

This shows that MachineOperand comments are enclosed between /* and */. In this
example, the EOR instruction is not conditionally executed (i.e. it is "always
executed"), which is encoded by the 14 immediate machine operand. Thus, now
this machine operand has /* CC::always */ as a comment. The 0 on the next
conditional branch instruction represents the equal condition code, thus now
this operand has /* CC:eq */ as a comment.

As it is a comment, the MI lexer/parser completely ignores it. The benefit is
that this keeps the change in the lexer extremely minimal and no target
specific parsing needs to be done. The changes on the MIPrinter side are also
minimal, as there is only one target hooks that is used to create the machine
operand comments.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74306
2020-02-24 14:19:21 +00:00
Guillaume Chatelet 48904e9452 [Alignment] Use llvm::Align in MachineFunction and TargetLowering - fixes mir parsing
Summary:
This catches malformed mir files which specify alignment as log2 instead of pow2.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D65945 for reference,

This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

Reviewers: courbet

Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67433

llvm-svn: 371608
2019-09-11 11:16:48 +00:00
Puyan Lotfi 43e94b15ea Followup on Proposal to move MIR physical register namespace to '$' sigil.
Discussed here:

http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html

In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.

llvm-svn: 323922
2018-01-31 22:04:26 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih c71cced0aa [CodeGen] Always use `printReg` to print registers in both MIR and debug
output

As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always use `printReg` to print all kinds of registers.

Updated the tests using '_' instead of '%noreg' until we decide which
one we want to be the default one.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40421

llvm-svn: 319445
2017-11-30 16:12:24 +00:00
Matthias Braun 8940114f61 MIParser/MIRPrinter: Compute block successors if not explicitely specified
- MIParser: If the successor list is not specified successors will be
  added based on basic block operands in the block and possible
  fallthrough.

- MIRPrinter: Adds a new `simplify-mir` option, with that option set:
  Skip printing of block successor lists in cases where the
  parser is guaranteed to reconstruct it. This means we still print the
  list if some successor cannot be determined (happens for example for
  jump tables), if the successor order changes or branch probabilities
  being unequal.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31262

llvm-svn: 302289
2017-05-05 21:09:30 +00:00
Sjoerd Meijer 2db2a947f6 [Thumb] Add support for tMUL in the compare instruction peephole optimizer.
We also want to optimise tests like this: return a*b == 0.  The MULS
instruction is flag setting, so we don't need the CMP instruction but can
instead branch on the result of the MULS. The generated instructions sequence
for this example was: MULS, MOVS, MOVS, CMP. The MOVS instruction load the
boolean values resulting from the select instruction, but these MOVS
instructions are flag setting and were thus preventing this optimisation. Now
we first reorder and move the MULS to before the CMP and generate sequence
MOVS, MOVS, MULS, CMP so that the optimisation could trigger. Reordering of the
MULS and MOVS is safe to do because the subsequent MOVS instructions just set
the CPSR register and don't use it, i.e. the CPSR is dead.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27990

llvm-svn: 292608
2017-01-20 13:10:12 +00:00