Summary:
This fixes an edge case in the `SpacesInSquareBrackets` option where an initial `&ref` lambda parameter is not padded with an initial space.
`int foo = [&bar ]() {}` is fixed to give `int foo = [ &bar ]() {}`
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay, klimek, sammccall
Reviewed by: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69649
Summary:
The code `throw -1;` is currently formatted by clang-format as
`throw - 1;`. This diff adds a fix for this edge case and a test to check
for this in the future.
For context, I am looking into a related bug in the clang-formatting of
coroutine keywords: `co_yield -1;` is also reformatted in this manner
as `co_yield - 1;`. A later diff will add these changes and tests for the
`co_yield` and `co_return` keywords.
Patch by Jonathan Thomas (jonathoma)!
Reviewers: modocache, sammccall, Quuxplusone
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69144
llvm-svn: 375258
Summary:
r373922 added checks for a few tokens that, following an `)` make it
unlikely that the `)` is the closing paren of a cast expression. The
specific check for `tok::l_square` there introduced a regression for
casts of Obj-C calls, like:
```
(cast)[func arg]
```
From the tests added in r373922, I believe the `tok::l_square` case is added to
capture the case where a non-cast `)` is directly followed by an
attribute specifier, like:
```
int f(int x) [[noreturn]];
```
I've specialized the code to look for such attribute specifier instead
of `tok::l_square` in general. Also, I added a regression test and moved
the test cases added in r373922 to an already existing place documenting
other instances of historically misidentified casts.
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69164
llvm-svn: 375247
Summary:
r373165 fixed an issue where a templated noexcept member function with a
reference qualifier would be indented more than expected:
```
// Formatting produced with LLVM style with AlwaysBreakTemplateDeclarations: Yes
// before r373165:
struct f {
template <class T>
void bar() && noexcept {}
};
// after:
struct f {
template <class T>
void bar() && noexcept {}
};
```
The way this is done is that in the AnnotatingParser in
`lib/FormatTokenAnnotator.cpp` the determination of the usage of a `&` or `&&`
(the line in determineTokenType
```
Current.Type = determineStarAmpUsage(...
```
is not performed in some cases anymore, combining with a few additional related
checks afterwards. The net effect of these checks results in the `&` or `&&`
token to start being classified as `TT_Unknown` in cases where before `r373165`
it would be classified as `TT_UnaryOperator` or `TT_PointerOrReference` by
`determineStarAmpUsage`.
This inadvertently caused 2 classes of regressions I'm aware of:
- The address-of `&` after a function assignment would be classified as
`TT_Unknown`, causing spaces to surround it, disregarding style options:
```
// before r373165:
void (*fun_ptr)(void) = &fun;
// after:
void (*fun_ptr)(void) = & fun;
```
- In cases where there is a function declaration list -- looking macro between
a template line and the start of the function declaration, an `&` as part of
the return type would be classified as `TT_Unknown`, causing spaces to
surround it:
```
// before r373165:
template <class T>
DEPRECATED("lala")
Type& foo();
// after:
template <class T>
DEPRECATED("lala")
Type & foo();
```
In these cases the problems are rooted in the skipping of the classification of
a `&` (and similarly `&&`) by determineStarAmpUsage which effects the formatting
decisions later in the pipeline.
I've looked into the goal of r373165 and noticed that replacing `noexcept` with
`const` in the given example produces no extra indentation with the old code:
```
// before r373165:
struct f {
template <class T>
int foo() & const {}
};
struct f {
template <class T>
int foo() & noexcept {}
};
```
I investigated how clang-format annotated these two examples differently to
determine the places where the processing of both diverges in the pipeline.
There were two places where the processing diverges, causing the extra indent in
the `noexcept` case:
1. The `const` is annotated as a `TT_TrailingAnnotation`, whereas `noexcept`
is annotated as `TT_Unknown`. I've updated the `determineTokenType` function
to account for this by adding a missing `tok:kw_noexcept` to the clause that
marks a token as `TT_TrailingAnnotation`.
2. The `&` in the second example is wrongly identified as `TT_BinaryOperator`
in `determineStarAmpUsage`. This is the reason for the extra indentation --
clang-format gets confused and thinks this is an expression.
I've updated `determineStarAmpUsage` to check for `tok:kw_noexcept`.
With these two updates in place, the additional parsing introduced by r373165
becomes unnecessary and all added tests pass (with updates, as now clang-format
respects the style configuration for spaces around the `&` in the test
examples).
I've removed these additions and added regression tests for the cases above.
Reviewers: AndWass, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68695
llvm-svn: 374172
Summary:
clang-format is incorrectly thinking the parameter parens are part of a cast operation, this is resulting in there sometimes being not space between the paren and the noexcept (and other keywords like volatile etc..)
```
void operator++(int) noexcept;
void operator++(int &) noexcept;
void operator delete(void *, std::size_t, const std::nothrow_t &)noexcept;
```
Reviewers: klimek, owenpan, mitchell-stellar
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68481
llvm-svn: 373922
Summary:
This patch makes the `SpacesInSquareBrackets` setting also apply to C++ lambdas with parameters.
Looking through the revision history, it appears support for only array brackets was added, and lambda brackets were ignored. Therefore, I am inclined to think it was simply an omission, rather than a deliberate choice.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17887 and https://reviews.llvm.org/D4944.
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay, reuk, owenpan
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Patch by: mitchell-stellar
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68473
llvm-svn: 373821
Summary:
According to the clang-format documentation, "Fundamentally, C++11 braced lists are formatted exactly like function calls would be formatted in their place. If the braced list follows a name (e.g. a type or variable name), clang-format formats as if the `{}` were the parentheses of a function call with that name."
This patch furthers the treatment of C++11 braced list braces as parentheses by respecting the `SpacesInParentheses` setting.
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay, reuk, owenpan
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Patch By: mitchell-stellar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68415
llvm-svn: 373751
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43531
Fix for clang-format incorrectly handles "alternative operators" as described by https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/operator_alternative
compl = ~
not = !
these are unary operators, and clang-format will remove the space between them and a numeric constant
this incorrectly formats the following code
```
int a compl 5;
int a not 5;
```
into:
```
int a compl5;
int a not5;
```
The code adds FIXME unit tests for "alternative token" representations for {} [] and # as defined by the same link, which would require a more detailed change to the FormatTokenLexer
Reviewers: klimek, reuk, owenpan, mitchell-stellar, STL_MSFT
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68332
llvm-svn: 373750
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42417
This revision removes the extra space between the opertor-> and the parens ()
```
class Bug {
auto operator-> () -> int*;
auto operator++(int) -> int;
};
```
Reviewers: klimek, owenpan, byoungyoung, mitchell-stellar
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68242
llvm-svn: 373746
Summary:
When formatting C# there can be issues with a lack of spaces between `using (` , `foreach (` and generic types
The C# code
```
public class Foo
{
Dictionary<string,string> foo;
}
```
will be formatted as
```
public class Foo
{
Dictionary<string, string>foo;
^^^^^ missing a space
}
```
This revision also reverts some of {D66662} in order to make this cleaner and resolve an issues seen by @owenpan that the formatting didn't add a space when not in a code block
This also transforms C# foreach commands to be seen as tok::kw_for commands (to ensure foreach gets the same Brace Wrapping behavior as for without littering the code with `if(Style.isCSharp())`
Reviewers: owenpan, klimek, russellmcc, mitchell-stellar
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67660
llvm-svn: 373709
Summary:
This is a fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43333
This comes with 3 main parts
- C# attributes cause function names on a new line even when AlwaysBreakAfterReturnType is set to None
- Add AlwaysBreakAfterReturnType to None by default in the Microsoft style,
- C# unit tests are not using Microsoft style (which we created to define the default C# style to match a vanilla C# project).
Reviewers: owenpan, klimek, russellmcc, mitchell-stellar
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67629
llvm-svn: 373707
Summary:
Change the BraceWrappingFlags' AfterControlStatement from a bool to an enum with three values:
* "Never": This is the default, and does not do any brace wrapping after control statements.
* "MultiLine": This only wraps braces after multi-line control statements (this really only happens when a ColumnLimit is specified).
* "Always": This always wraps braces after control statements.
The first and last options are backwards-compatible with "false" and "true", respectively.
The new "MultiLine" option is useful for when a wrapped control statement's indentation matches the subsequent block's indentation. It makes it easier to see at a glance where the control statement ends and where the block's code begins. For example:
```
if (
foo
&& bar )
{
baz();
}
```
vs.
```
if (
foo
&& bar ) {
baz();
}
```
Short control statements (1 line) do not wrap the brace to the next line, e.g.
```
if (foo) {
bar();
} else {
baz();
}
```
Reviewers: sammccall, owenpan, reuk, MyDeveloperDay, klimek
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, cfe-commits
Patch By: mitchell-stellar
Tags: #clang-format, #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68296
llvm-svn: 373647
Summary:
The historical context:
- clang-format was written when C++11 was current,
and the main language-version concern was >> vs > > template-closers.
An option was added to allow selection of the 03/11 behavior, or auto-detection.
- there was no option to choose simply "latest standard" so anyone who didn't
ever want 03 behavior or auto-detection specified Cpp11.
- In r185149 this option started to affect lexer mode.
- no options were added to cover c++14, as parsing/formatting
didn't change that much. The usage of Cpp11 to mean "latest" became
codified e.g. in r206263
- c++17 added some new constructs. These were mostly backwards-compatible and so
not used in old programs, so having no way to turn them off was OK.
- c++20 added some new constructs and keywords (e.g. co_*) that changed the
meaning of existing programs, and people started to complain that
the c++20 parsing couldn't be turned off.
New plan:
- Default ('Auto') behavior remains unchanged: parse as latest, format
template-closers based on input.
- Add new 'Latest' option that more clearly expresses the intent "use
modern features" that many projects have chosen for their .clang-format files.
- Allow pinning to *any* language version, using the same name as clang -std:
c++03, c++11, c++14 etc. These set precise lexer options, and any
clang-format code depending on these can use a >= check.
- For backwards compatibility, `Cpp11` is an alias for `Latest`, not `c++11`.
This matches the historical documented semantics of this option.
This spelling (and `Cpp03`) are deprecated.
Reviewers: klimek, modocache
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67541
llvm-svn: 373439
Summary:
This is a patch to fix PR43372 (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43372) - clang-format can't format file with includes, ( which really keep providing replacements for already sorted headers.)
A similar issue was addressed by @krasimir in {D60199}, however, this seemingly only prevented the issue when the files being formatted did not contain windows line endings (\r\n)
It's possible this is related to https://twitter.com/StephanTLavavej/status/1176722938243895296 given who @STL_MSFT works for!
As people often used the existence of replacements to determine if a file needs clang-formatting, this is probably pretty important for windows users
There may be a better way of comparing 2 strings and ignoring \r (which appear in both Results and Code), I couldn't choose between this idiom or the copy_if approach, but I'm happy to change it to whatever people consider more performant.
Reviewers: krasimir, klimek, owenpan, ioeric
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits, STL_MSFT, krasimir
Tags: #clang-format, #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68227
llvm-svn: 373388
Summary:
The following code
```
struct f {
template <class T>
void bar() && noexcept {}
};
```
will be formatted to the following with LLVM style, and
`AlwaysBreakTemplateDeclarations: Yes`
```
struct f {
template <class T>
void bar() && noexcept {}
};
```
The indentation of the `void bar()` line is wrong.
Reviewers: klimek, owenpan, krasimir, timwoj, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: klimek, MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, ilya-biryukov, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Patch By: AndWass
Tags: #clang-format, #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68072
llvm-svn: 373165
The following code
```
struct f {
template <class T>
void bar() && noexcept {}
};
```
will be formatted to the following with LLVM style, and
`AlwaysBreakTemplateDeclarations: Yes`
```
struct f {
template <class T>
void bar() && noexcept {}
};
```
The indentation of the `void bar()` line is wrong.
Patch by Andreas Wass (AndWass)!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68072
llvm-svn: 373056
Summary:
This new Style rule is made as a part of adding support for NetBSD KNF in clang-format. NetBSD have it's own priority of includes which should be followed while formatting NetBSD code. This style sorts the Cpp Includes according to the priorities of NetBSD, as mentioned in the [Style Guide](http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/share/misc/style?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup)
The working of this Style rule shown below:
**Configuration:**
This revision introduces a new field under IncludeCategories named `SortPriority` which defines the priority of ordering the `#includes` and the `Priority` will define the categories for grouping the `#include blocks`.
Reviewers: cfe-commits, mgorny, christos, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, rdwampler, christos, mgorny, krytarowski
Patch By: Manikishan
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64695
llvm-svn: 372919
Summary:
It is annoying that the clang-format tests aren't themselves clang-formatted, if you use a format on save option in VS or vim this file gets massively changed then you have to `git difftool` all the other changes back out, which is risky.
I know people don't like mass clang-format changes but sometimes it becomes unmanageable to not. There are no other changes here other than just the reformat.
clang-format tests all pass.
```
[==========] 691 tests from 21 test cases ran. (55990 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 691 tests.
```
Reviewers: klimek, owenpan, timwoj
Reviewed By: owenpan
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67888
llvm-svn: 372689
Summary:
This patch adds support for the Whitesmiths indentation style to clang-format. It’s an update to a patch submitted in 2015 (D6833), but reworks it to use the newer API.
There are still some issues with this patch, primarily around `switch` and `case` support. The added unit test won’t currently pass because of the remaining issues.
Reviewers: mboehme, MyDeveloperDay, djasper
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: krasimir, MyDeveloperDay, echristo, cfe-commits
Patch By: @timwoj (Tim Wojtulewicz)
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67627
llvm-svn: 372497
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41899
```auto lambda = [&a = a]() { a = 2; };```
is formatted as
```auto lambda = [& a = a]() { a = 2; };```
With an extra space if PointerAlignment is set to Left
> The space "& a" looks strange when there is no type in the lambda's intializer expression. This can be worked around with by setting "PointerAlignment: Right", but ideally "PointerAlignment: Left" would not add a space in this case.
Reviewers: klimek, owenpan, krasimir, timwoj
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67718
llvm-svn: 372249
Summary:
AnnotatedLine has a tree structure, and things like the body of a lambda will be
a child of the lambda expression. For example,
[&]() { foo(a); };
will have an AnnotatedLine with a child:
[&]() {};
'- foo(a);
Currently, when the `Cleaner` class analyzes the affected lines, it does not
cleanup the lines' children nodes, which results in missed cleanup
opportunities, like the lambda body in the example above.
This revision extends the algorithm to visit children, thereby fixing the above problem.
Patch by Eric Li.
Reviewers: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67659
llvm-svn: 372129
This patch makes cases work where the lambda's template list doesn't
contain any of + - ! ~ / % << | || && ^ == != >= <= ? : true false
(see added FIXME).
Ports r359967 to clang-format.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67246
llvm-svn: 371854
Summary:
Addresses https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43100
Formatting using statement in C# with clang-format removes the space between using and paren even when SpaceBeforeParens is !
```
using(FileStream fs = new FileStream(path, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.Read, bufferSize : 1))
```
this change simply overcomes this for when using C# settings in the .clang-format file
```
using (FileStream fs = new FileStream(path, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.Read, bufferSize : 1))
```
All FormatTests pass..
```
[==========] 688 tests from 21 test cases ran. (88508 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 688 tests.
```
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, owenpan
Reviewed By: owenpan
Subscribers: llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66662
llvm-svn: 371720
Summary:
This option determines whether goto labels are indented according to scope. Setting this option to false causes goto labels to be flushed to the left.
This is mostly copied from [[ http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-September/045014.html | this patch ]] submitted by Christian Neukirchen that didn't make its way into trunk.
```
true: false:
int f() { vs. int f() {
if (foo()) { if (foo()) {
label1: label1:
bar(); bar();
} }
label2: label2:
return 1; return 1;
} }
```
Reviewers: klimek, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Patch by: tetsuo-cpp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67037
llvm-svn: 371719
Summary:
TypeScript 3.4 supports casting into a const type using `as const`:
const x = {x: 1} as const;
Previously, clang-format would insert a space after the `const`. With
this patch, no space is inserted after the sequence `as const`.
Reviewers: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66736
llvm-svn: 369916
Summary:
This (invalid) fragment is crashing clang-format:
```
#if 1
int x;
#elif
int y;
#endif
```
The reason being that the parser expects a token after `#elif`, and the
subsequent parsing of the next line does not check if `CurrentToken` is null.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65940
llvm-svn: 368280
This is like r305666 (which added support for `if constexpr`) except
that it allows a macro name after the if.
This is slightly tricky for two reasons:
1. r305666 didn't add test coverage for all cases where it added a
kw_constexpr, so I had to figure out what all the added cases were
for. I now added tests for all `if constexpr` bits that didn't have
tests. (This took a while, see e.g. https://reviews.llvm.org/D65223)
2. Parsing `if <ident> (` as an if means that `#if defined(` and
`#if __has_include(` parse as ifs too. Add some special-case code
to prevent this from happening where it's incorrect.
Fixes PR39248.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65227
llvm-svn: 367167
Summary:
Previously, clang-format detected something like the following as a C++11 attribute specifier.
@[[NSArray class]]
instead of an array with an Objective-C method call inside. In general, when the attribute specifier checking runs, if it sees 2 identifiers in a row, it decides that the square brackets represent an Objective-C method call. However, here, `class` is tokenized as a keyword instead of an identifier, so this check fails.
To fix this, the attribute specifier first checks whether the first square bracket has an "@" before it. If it does, then that square bracket is not the start of a attribute specifier because it is an Objective-C array literal. (The assumption is that @[[.*]] is not valid C/C++.)
Contributed by rkgibson2.
Reviewers: benhamilton
Reviewed By: benhamilton
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64632
llvm-svn: 366267
This option behaves similarly to AlignConsecutiveDeclarations and
AlignConsecutiveAssignments, aligning the assignment of C/C++
preprocessor macros on consecutive lines.
I've worked in many projects (embedded, mostly) where header files full
of large, well-aligned "#define" blocks are a common pattern. We
normally avoid using clang-format on these files, since it ruins any
existing alignment in said blocks. This style option will align "simple"
PP macros (no parameters) and PP macros with parameter lists on
consecutive lines.
Related Bugzilla entry (thanks mcuddie):
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20637
Patch by Nick Renieris (VelocityRa)!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28462
llvm-svn: 364938
Summary:
Other macros are used to declare namespaces, and should thus be handled
similarly. This is the case for crpcut's TESTSUITE macro, or for
unittest-cpp's SUITE macro:
TESTSUITE(Foo) {
TEST(MyFirstTest) {
assert(0);
}
} // TESTSUITE(Foo)
This patch deals with this cases by introducing a new option to specify
lists of namespace macros. Internally, it re-uses the system already in
place for foreach and statement macros, to ensure there is no impact on
performance.
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: acoomans, cfe-commits, klimek
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37813
llvm-svn: 362740
Summary:
Adds a `TypenameMacros` configuration option that causes certain identifiers to be handled in a way similar to `typeof()`.
This is enough to:
- Prevent misinterpreting declarations of pointers to such types as expressions (`STACK_OF(int) * foo` -> `STACK_OF(int) *foo`),
- Avoid surprising line breaks in variable/struct field declarations (`STACK_OF(int)\nfoo;` -> `STACK_OF(int) foo;`, see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30353).
Reviewers: Typz, krasimir, djasper
Reviewed By: Typz
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57184
llvm-svn: 361986
As pointed out in https://reviews.llvm.org/D37813#inline-555026, the
code which is formatted does not match LLVM formatting style.
Technically this is not a problem since these tests bypass most of the
formatter, but it can be misleading.
llvm-svn: 361984
Summary:
Top-level "package" and "import" statements should generally be kept on
one line, for all languages.
----
This reverts commit rL356912.
The regression from rL356835 was fixed via rC358275.
Reviewers: krasimir, sammccall, MyDeveloperDay, xinz, dchai, klimek
Reviewed By: krasimir, xinz, dchai
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60661
llvm-svn: 360411
Mitchell Balan