now that we have a correct and cached subtarget specific to the
function.
Also, finish providing a cached per-function subtarget in the core
LLVMTargetMachine -- that layer hadn't switched over yet.
The only use of the TargetMachine was to re-lookup a subtarget for
a particular function to work around the fact that TTI was immutable.
Now that it is per-function and we haved a cached subtarget, use it.
This still leaves a few interfaces with real warts on them where we were
passing Function objects through the TTI interface. I'll remove these
and clean their usage up in subsequent commits now that this isn't
necessary.
llvm-svn: 227738
TargetIRAnalysis access path directly rather than implementing getTTI.
This even removes getTTI from the interface. It's more efficient for
each target to just register a precise callback that creates their
specific TTI.
As part of this, all of the targets which are building their subtargets
individually per-function now build their TTI instance with the function
and thus look up the correct subtarget and cache it. NVPTX, R600, and
XCore currently don't leverage this functionality, but its trivial for
them to add it now.
llvm-svn: 227735
base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type
erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine.
This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI
*pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target
communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While
the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make
types available in a header file for use in a different source file
within each target.
I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line
with this move, but let me know if I missed anything.
With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass
manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces
a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine.
Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept
a function argument as well.
llvm-svn: 227685
type erased interface and a single analysis pass rather than an
extremely complex analysis group.
The end result is that the TTI analysis can contain a type erased
implementation that supports the polymorphic TTI interface. We can build
one from a target-specific implementation or from a dummy one in the IR.
I've also factored all of the code into "mix-in"-able base classes,
including CRTP base classes to facilitate calling back up to the most
specialized form when delegating horizontally across the surface. These
aren't as clean as I would like and I'm planning to work on cleaning
some of this up, but I wanted to start by putting into the right form.
There are a number of reasons for this change, and this particular
design. The first and foremost reason is that an analysis group is
complete overkill, and the chaining delegation strategy was so opaque,
confusing, and high overhead that TTI was suffering greatly for it.
Several of the TTI functions had failed to be implemented in all places
because of the chaining-based delegation making there be no checking of
this. A few other functions were implemented with incorrect delegation.
The message to me was very clear working on this -- the delegation and
analysis group structure was too confusing to be useful here.
The other reason of course is that this is *much* more natural fit for
the new pass manager. This will lay the ground work for a type-erased
per-function info object that can look up the correct subtarget and even
cache it.
Yet another benefit is that this will significantly simplify the
interaction of the pass managers and the TargetMachine. See the future
work below.
The downside of this change is that it is very, very verbose. I'm going
to work to improve that, but it is somewhat an implementation necessity
in C++ to do type erasure. =/ I discussed this design really extensively
with Eric and Hal prior to going down this path, and afterward showed
them the result. No one was really thrilled with it, but there doesn't
seem to be a substantially better alternative. Using a base class and
virtual method dispatch would make the code much shorter, but as
discussed in the update to the programmer's manual and elsewhere,
a polymorphic interface feels like the more principled approach even if
this is perhaps the least compelling example of it. ;]
Ultimately, there is still a lot more to be done here, but this was the
huge chunk that I couldn't really split things out of because this was
the interface change to TTI. I've tried to minimize all the other parts
of this. The follow up work should include at least:
1) Improving the TargetMachine interface by having it directly return
a TTI object. Because we have a non-pass object with value semantics
and an internal type erasure mechanism, we can narrow the interface
of the TargetMachine to *just* do what we need: build and return
a TTI object that we can then insert into the pass pipeline.
2) Make the TTI object be fully specialized for a particular function.
This will include splitting off a minimal form of it which is
sufficient for the inliner and the old pass manager.
3) Add a new pass manager analysis which produces TTI objects from the
target machine for each function. This may actually be done as part
of #2 in order to use the new analysis to implement #2.
4) Work on narrowing the API between TTI and the targets so that it is
easier to understand and less verbose to type erase.
5) Work on narrowing the API between TTI and its clients so that it is
easier to understand and less verbose to forward.
6) Try to improve the CRTP-based delegation. I feel like this code is
just a bit messy and exacerbating the complexity of implementing
the TTI in each target.
Many thanks to Eric and Hal for their help here. I ended up blocked on
this somewhat more abruptly than I expected, and so I appreciate getting
it sorted out very quickly.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7293
llvm-svn: 227669
Summary:
This is needed by the .cprestore assembler directive.
This directive needs to be able to insert an LW instruction after every JALR replacement of a JAL pseudo-instruction
(and never after a JALR which has NOT been a result of a pseudo-instruction replacement).
The problem with using InstAlias for these is that after it replaces the pseudo-instruction, we can't find out if the resulting JALR instruction
was generated by an InstAlias or not, so we don't know whether or not to insert our LW instruction.
By replacing it manually, we know when the pseudo-instruction replacement happens and we can insert the LW instruction correctly.
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: emaste, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5601
llvm-svn: 227568
calls that don't take a Function argument from Mips. Notable
exceptions: the AsmPrinter and MipsTargetObjectFile. The
latter needs to be fixed, and the former will be fixed when the
general AsmPrinter changes happen.
llvm-svn: 227512
Any code creating an MCSectionELF knows ELF and already provides the flags.
SectionKind is an abstraction used by common code that uses a plain
MCSection.
Use the flags to compute the SectionKind. This removes a lot of
guessing and boilerplate from the MCSectionELF construction.
llvm-svn: 227476
derived classes.
Since global data alignment, layout, and mangling is often based on the
DataLayout, move it to the TargetMachine. This ensures that global
data is going to be layed out and mangled consistently if the subtarget
changes on a per function basis. Prior to this all targets(*) have
had subtarget dependent code moved out and onto the TargetMachine.
*One target hasn't been migrated as part of this change: R600. The
R600 port has, as a subtarget feature, the size of pointers and
this affects global data layout. I've currently hacked in a FIXME
to enable progress, but the port needs to be updated to either pass
the 64-bitness to the TargetMachine, or fix the DataLayout to
avoid subtarget dependent features.
llvm-svn: 227113
than on MipsSubtargetInfo.
This required a bit of massaging in the MC level to handle this since
MC is a) largely a collection of disparate classes with no hierarchy,
and b) there's no overarching equivalent to the TargetMachine, instead
only the subtarget via MCSubtargetInfo (which is the base class of
TargetSubtargetInfo).
We're now storing the ABI in both the TargetMachine level and in the
MC level because the AsmParser and the TargetStreamer both need to
know what ABI we have to parse assembly and emit objects. The target
streamer has a pointer to the one in the asm parser and is updated
when the asm parser is created. This is fragile as the FIXME comment
notes, but shouldn't be a problem in practice since we always
create an asm parser before attempting to emit object code via the
assembler. The TargetMachine now contains the ABI so that the DataLayout
can be constructed dependent upon ABI.
All testcases have been updated to use the -target-abi command line
flag so that we can set the ABI without using a subtarget feature.
Should be no change visible externally here.
llvm-svn: 227102
Summary:
This patch adds support for some operations that were missing from
128-bit integer types (add/sub/mul/sdiv/udiv... etc.). With these
changes we can support the __int128_t and __uint128_t data types
from C/C++.
Depends on D7125
Reviewers: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7143
llvm-svn: 227089
This reverts commit r227003. Support for addition/subtraction and
various other operations for the i128 data type will be added in a
future commit based on the review D7143.
llvm-svn: 227082
Summary:
At the moment, address calculation is taking the debug line info from the
address node (e.g. TargetGlobalAddress). When a function is called multiple
times, this results in output of the form:
.loc $first_call_location
.. address calculation ..
.. function call ..
.. address calculation ..
.loc $second_call_location
.. function call ..
.loc $first_call_location
.. address calculation ..
.loc $third_call_location
.. function call ..
This patch makes address calculations for function calls take the debug line
info for the call node and results in output of the form:
.loc $first_call_location
.. address calculation ..
.. function call ..
.loc $second_call_location
.. address calculation ..
.. function call ..
.loc $third_call_location
.. address calculation ..
.. function call ..
All other address calculations continue to use the address node.
Test Plan: Fixes test/DebugInfo/multiline.ll on a mips host.
Subscribers: dblaikie, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7050
llvm-svn: 227005
Summary:
In addition to the included tests, this fixes
test/CodeGen/Generic/i128-addsub.ll on a mips64 host.
Reviewers: atanasyan, sagar, vmedic
Reviewed By: vmedic
Subscribers: sdkie, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6610
llvm-svn: 227003
Summary:
We used to silently ignore any empty .module's and we used to give an error saying that we found
an "unexpected token at start of statement" when the value of the option wasn't an identifier (e.g. if it was a number).
We now give an error saying that we "expected .module option identifier" in both of those cases.
I also fixed the other tests in mips-abi-bad.s, which all seemed to be broken.
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7095
llvm-svn: 226905
Implement microMIPS 16-bit unconditional branch instruction B.
Implemented 16-bit microMIPS unconditional instruction has real name B16, and
B is an alias which expands to either B16 or BEQ according to the rules:
b 256 --> b16 256 # R_MICROMIPS_PC10_S1
b 12256 --> beq $zero, $zero, 12256 # R_MICROMIPS_PC16_S1
b label --> beq $zero, $zero, label # R_MICROMIPS_PC16_S1
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3514
llvm-svn: 226657
Implement microMIPS 16-bit unconditional branch instruction B.
Implemented 16-bit microMIPS unconditional instruction has real name B16, and
B is an alias which expands to either B16 or BEQ according to the rules:
b 256 --> b16 256 # R_MICROMIPS_PC10_S1
b 12256 --> beq $zero, $zero, 12256 # R_MICROMIPS_PC16_S1
b label --> beq $zero, $zero, label # R_MICROMIPS_PC16_S1
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3514
llvm-svn: 226577
This commits adds the octeon branch instructions bbit0/bbit032/bbit1/bbit132.
It also includes patterns for instruction selection and test cases.
Reviewed by D. Sanders
llvm-svn: 226573
While the term "Target" is in the name, it doesn't really have to do
with the LLVM Target library -- this isn't an abstraction which LLVM
targets generally need to implement or extend. It has much more to do
with modeling the various runtime libraries on different OSes and with
different runtime environments. The "target" in this sense is the more
general sense of a target of cross compilation.
This is in preparation for porting this analysis to the new pass
manager.
No functionality changed, and updates inbound for Clang and Polly.
llvm-svn: 226078
utils/sort_includes.py.
I clearly haven't done this in a while, so more changed than usual. This
even uncovered a missing include from the InstrProf library that I've
added. No functionality changed here, just mechanical cleanup of the
include order.
llvm-svn: 225974
This commit refines the pattern for the octeon seq/seqi/sne/snei instructions.
The target register is set to 0 or 1 according to the result of the comparison.
In C, this is something like
rd = (unsigned long)(rs == rt)
This commit adds a zext to bring the result to i64. With this change the
instruction is selected for this type of code. (gcc produces the same code for
the above C code.)
llvm-svn: 225968
16 bit instructions are not allowed in jr delay slot. Same stands for
PseudoIndirectBranch and PseudoReturn.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6815
llvm-svn: 225798
Summary:
Mips Linux uses $gp to hold a pointer to thread info structure and accesses it
with a named register. This makes this work for LLVM.
The N32 ABI doesn't quite work yet since the frontend generates incorrect IR
for this case. It neglects to truncate the 64-bit GPR to a 32-bit value before
converting to a pointer. Given correct IR (as in the testcase in this patch),
it works correctly.
Reviewers: sstankovic, vmedic, atanasyan
Reviewed By: atanasyan
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6893
llvm-svn: 225529
Zoran Jovanovic