Summary:
This is needed for address sanitizer on Emscripten. As everything in
memory starts at the value passed to --global-base, everything before
that can be used as shadow memory.
This symbol is added so that the library for the ASan runtime can know
where the shadow memory ends and real memory begins.
This is split from D63742.
Reviewers: tlively, aheejin, sbc100
Subscribers: sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63833
llvm-svn: 364467
This restores r361830 "[ELF] Error on relocations to STT_SECTION symbols if the sections were discarded"
and dependent commits (r362218, r362497) which were reverted by r364321, with a fix of a --gdb-index issue.
.rela.debug_ranges contains relocations of range list entries:
// start address of a range list entry
// old: 0; after r361830: 0
00000000000033a0 R_X86_64_64 .text._ZN2v88internal7Isolate7factoryEv + 0
// end address of a range list entry
// old: 0xe; after r361830: 0
00000000000033a8 R_X86_64_64 .text._ZN2v88internal7Isolate7factoryEv + e
If both start and end addresses of a range list entry resolve to 0,
DWARFDebugRangeList::isEndOfListEntry() will return true, then the
.debug_range decoding loop will terminate prematurely:
while (true) {
decode StartAddress
decode EndAddress
if (Entry.isEndOfListEntry()) // prematurely
break;
Entries.push_back(Entry);
}
In lld/ELF/SyntheticSections.cpp, readAddressAreas() will read
incomplete address ranges and the resulting .gdb_index will be
incomplete. For files that gdb hasn't loaded their debug info, gdb uses
.gdb_index to map addresses to CUs. The absent entries make gdb fail to
symbolize some addresses.
To address this issue, we simply allow relocations to undefined symbols
in DWARF.cpp:findAux() and let RelocationResolver resolve them.
This patch should fix:
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190603/659848.html
[2] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=978067
llvm-svn: 364391
There was another place where handling for this relocation was missing
that was accidentally omitted from rLLD364367, causing the newly added
test to fail on the buildbots.
llvm-svn: 364371
Summary:
Before:
```
wasm-ld: error: Relocations not in offset order
```
After
```
wasm-ld: error: While processing `libjulia.so`: Relocations not in offset order
```
At least this way you get to find out which input file is malformed.
Reviewers: sbc100
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63694
llvm-svn: 364368
Summary:
The list of relocations with addend in lld was missing `R_WASM_MEMORY_ADDR_REL_SLEB`,
causing `wasm-ld` to generate corrupted output. This fixes that problem and while
we're at it pulls the list of such relocations into the Wasm.h header, to avoid
duplicating it in multiple places.
Reviewers: sbc100
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63696
llvm-svn: 364367
This is fairly common with wasm since GNU ar (most likely the system ar)
doesn't support the wasm object format so user who don't override AR
will end up with archives without an index. We don't want to silently
ignore this issue.
In the future we could choose to instead behave like the ELF backend and
read the symbols from each object file in the archive if they are all of
the same type. However, error'ing out seem like a conservative approach
for now.
Fixes: PR42376
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63739
llvm-svn: 364338
(In effect, reverting "[ELF] Error on relocations to STT_SECTION symbols if the sections were discarded".)
It caused debug info problems in LibreOffice [1] and Chromium/V8 [2].
Reverting until those can be fixed.
It also reverts r362497 "STT_SECTION symbol should be defined" on .eh_frame, .debug*, .zdebug* and .gcc_except_table"
which was landed as a follow-up to the above.
> With -r or --emit-relocs, we warn `STT_SECTION symbol should be defined`
> on relocations to discarded section symbol. This was added as an error
> in rLLD319404, but was not so effective before D61583 (it turned the
> error to a warning).
>
> Relocations from .eh_frame .debug* .zdebug* .gcc_except_table to
> discarded .text are very common and somewhat expected. Don't warn/error
> on them. As a reference, ld.bfd has a similar logic in
> _bfd_elf_default_action_discarded() to allow these cases.
>
> Delete invalid-undef-section-symbol.test because what it intended to
> check is now covered by the updated comdat-discarded-reloc.s
>
> Delete relocatable-eh-frame.s because we allow relocations from
> .eh_frame as a special case now.
And finally it reverts r362218 "[ELF] Replace a dead test in getSymVA() with assert()"
as that also depended on the main change reverted here.
> Symbols relative to discarded comdat sections are Undefined instead of
> Defined now (after D59649 and D61583). The `== &InputSection::Discarded`
> test becomes dead. I cannot find a test related to this behavior.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190603/659848.html
[2] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=978067
llvm-svn: 364321
lld/coff already deduplicated undefined symbols on a TU level: It would
group all references to a symbol from a single TU. This makes it so that
references from all TUs to a single symbol are grouped together.
Since lld/coff almost did what I thought it did already, the patch is
much smaller than the elf version. The only not local change is that
getSymbolLocations() now returns a vector<string> instead of a string,
so that the undefined symbol reporting code can know how many references
to a symbol exist in a given TU.
Fixes PR42260 for lld/coff.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63646
llvm-svn: 364285
r360841 introduced CommonSymbol class. An unintended behavioral change
introduced by that change was that common symbols are not internalized
by LTO under some condition. This patch fixes that issue.
The issue occurred under the following condition:
1. There exists a common symbol
2. At least one DSO is given to lld or -pie is used
If the above conditions are met, Symbol::includeInDynsym() returned a
wrong value for a common symbol.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41978
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63752
llvm-svn: 364273
Similar to R_AARCH64_ABS32, R_PPC64_ADDR32 can represent either a signed
value or unsigned value, thus we should use `[-2**(n-1), 2**n)` instead of
`[-2**(n-1), 2**(n-1))` to check overflows.
The issue manifests as a bogus linker error when linking the powerpc64le Linux kernel.
The new behavior is compatible with ld.bfd's complain_overflow_bitfield.
The upper bound of the error message is not correct. Fix it as well.
The changes to R_PPC_ADDR16, R_PPC64_ADDR16, R_X86_64_8 and R_X86_64_16 are similar.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63690
llvm-svn: 364164
Summary:
Our rule to create R_*_RELATIVE for absolute relocation types were
loose. D63121 made it stricter but it failed to create R_*_RELATIVE for
R_ARM_TARGET1 and R_PPC64_TOC. rLLD363236 worked around that by
reinstating the original behavior for ARM and PPC64.
This patch is an attempt to simplify the logic.
Note, in ld.bfd, R_ARM_TARGET2 --target2=abs also creates
R_ARM_RELATIVE. This seems a very uncommon scenario (moreover,
--target2=got-rel is the default), so I do not implement any logic
related to it.
Also, delete R_AARCH64_ABS32 from AArch64::getDynRel. We don't have
working ILP32 support yet. Allowing it would create an incorrect
R_AARCH64_RELATIVE.
For MIPS, the (if SymbolRel, then RelativeRel) code is to keep its
behavior unchanged.
Note, in ppc64-abs64-dyn.s, R_PPC64_TOC gets an incorrect addend because
computeAddend() doesn't compute the correct address. We seem to have the
wrong behavior for a long time. The important thing seems that a dynamic
relocation R_PPC64_TOC should not be created as the dynamic loader will
error R_PPC64_TOC is not supported.
Reviewers: atanasyan, grimar, peter.smith, ruiu, sfertile, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63383
llvm-svn: 363928
ARM and RISC-V do not support TLS relaxations. However, for General
Dynamic and Local Dynamic models, if we are producing an executable and
the symbol is non-preemptable, we know it must be defined and the
R_ARM_TLS_DTPMOD32/R_RISCV_TLS_DTPMOD{32,64} dynamic relocation can be
omitted because it is always 1. This may be necessary for static linking
as DTPMOD may not be expected at load time.
Merge handleARMTlsRelocation() into handleTlsRelocation(). This requires
more logic to R_TLSGD_PC and R_TLSLD_PC. Because we use SymbolicRel to
resolve the relocation at link time, R_ARM_TLS_DTPMOD32 can be deleted
from relocateOne(). It cannot be used as a static relocation type.
As a bonus, the additional logic in R_TLSGD_PC code can be shared by the
TLS support for RISC-V (D63220).
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63333
llvm-svn: 363927
Some versions of the Visual C++ 2015 runtime have line tables with the
subsection kind of 0x800000F2. In cvinfo.h, 0x80000000 is documented to
be DEBUG_S_IGNORE. This appears to implement the intended behavior.
llvm-svn: 363724
Use -fsave-optimization-record=<format> to specify a different format
than the default, which is YAML.
For now, only YAML is supported.
llvm-svn: 363573
This matches how it is done for .xdata and .pdata already.
On i386, the symbol name in the section name suffix does not contain
the extra underscore prefix.
This is one part of a fix for PR42217.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63350
llvm-svn: 363456
In processRelocAux(), our handling of 1) link-time constant and 2) weak
undef is the same, so put them together to simplify the logic.
This moves the weak undef code around. The result is that: in a writable
section (or -z notext), we will no longer emit dynamic relocations for
weak undefined symbols.
The new behavior seems to match GNU linkers, and improves consistency
with the case of a readonly section.
The condition `!Config->Shared` was there probably because it is common
for a -shared link not to specify full dependencies. Keep it now but we
may revisit the decision in the future.
gABI says:
> The behavior of weak symbols in areas not specified by this document is
> implementation defined. Weak symbols are intended primarily for use in
> system software. Applications using weak symbols are unreliable since
> changes in the runtime environment might cause the execution to fail.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63003
llvm-svn: 363399
This patch adds new command line option `--undefined-glob` to lld.
That option is a variant of `--undefined` but accepts wildcard
patterns so that all symbols that match with a given pattern are
handled as if they were given by `-u`.
`-u foo` is to force resolve symbol foo if foo is not a defined symbol
and there's a static archive that contains a definition of symbol foo.
Now, you can specify a wildcard pattern as an argument for `--undefined-glob`.
So, if you want to include all JNI symbols (which start with "Java_"), you
can do that by passing `--undefined-glob "Java_*"` to the linker, for example.
In this patch, I use the same glob pattern matcher as the version script
processor is using, so it does not only support `*` but also `?` and `[...]`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63244
llvm-svn: 363396
If .sdata is absent, linker synthesized __global_pointer$ gets a section index of SHN_ABS.
(ld.bfd has a similar issue: binutils PR24678)
Scrt1.o may use `lla gp, __global_pointer$` to reference the symbol PC
relatively. In -pie/-shared mode, lld complains if a PC relative
relocation references an absolute symbol (SHN_ABS) but ld.bfd doesn't:
ld.lld: error: relocation R_RISCV_PCREL_HI20 cannot refer to lute symbol: __global_pointer$
Let the reference of __global_pointer$ to force creation of .sdata to
fix the problem. This is similar to _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_, which forces
creation of .got or .got.plt .
Also, change the visibility from STV_HIDDEN to STV_DEFAULT and don't
define the symbol for -shared. This matches ld.bfd, though I don't
understand why it uses STV_DEFAULT.
Reviewed By: ruiu, jrtc27
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63132
llvm-svn: 363351
PDBs may not necessarily contain an IPI stream. Handle this case
gracefully.
The test case was verified to work with MS link.exe.
Patch by Vladimir Panteleev, with a small simplification
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63178
llvm-svn: 363213
An unrecognized signature (magic) at the beginning of a debug section
should not be a fatal error; it only means that the debug information
is in a format that is not supported by LLD. This can be due to it
being in CodeView versions 3 or earlier. These can occur in old import
libraries from legacy SDKs.
The test case was verified to work with MS link.exe.
Patch by Vladimir Panteleev!
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63177
llvm-svn: 363212
r363016 let lld-link and llvm-lib share the /machine: parsing code.
This lets llvm-cvtres share it as well.
Making llvm-cvtres depend on llvm-lib seemed a bit strange (it doesn't
need llvm-lib's dependencies on BinaryFormat and BitReader) and I
couldn't find a good place to put this code. Since it's just a few
lines, put it in lib/Object for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63120
llvm-svn: 363144
R_RISCV_{ADD,SET,SUB}* are used for local label computation.
Add a new RelExpr member R_RISCV_ADD to represent them.
R_RISCV_ADD is treated as a link-time constant because otherwise
R_RISCV_{ADD,SET,SUB}* are not allowed in -pie/-shared mode.
In glibc Scrt1.o, .rela.eh_frame contains such relocations.
Because .eh_frame is not writable, we get this error:
ld.lld: error: can't create dynamic relocation R_RISCV_ADD32 against symbol: .L0 in readonly segment; recompil object files with -fPIC or pass '-Wl,-z,notext' to allow text relocations in the output
>>> defined in ..../riscv64-linux-gnu/lib/Scrt1.o
With D63076 and this patch, I can run -pie/-shared programs linked against glibc.
Note llvm-mc cannot currently produce R_RISCV_SET* so they are not tested.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63183
llvm-svn: 363128
Summary:
clang (as of 2019-06-12) / gcc (as of 8.2.1) PPC64 may emit a .rela.toc
which references an embedded switch table in a discarded .rodata/.text
section. The .toc and the .rela.toc are incorrectly not placed in the
comdat.
Technically a relocation from outside the group is not allowed by the ELF spec:
> A symbol table entry with STB_LOCAL binding that is defined relative
> to one of a group's sections, and that is contained in a symbol table
> section that is not part of the group, must be discarded if the group
> members are discarded. References to this symbol table entry from
> outside the group are not allowed.
Don't report errors to work around the bug.
This should fix the ppc64le-lld-multistage-test bot while linking llvm-tblgen:
ld.lld: error: relocation refers to a discarded section: .rodata._ZNK4llvm3MVT13getSizeInBitsEv
>>> defined in utils/TableGen/CMakeFiles/llvm-tblgen.dir/CodeGenRegisters.cpp.o
>>> referenced by CodeGenRegisters.cpp
>>> utils/TableGen/CMakeFiles/llvm-tblgen.dir/CodeGenRegisters.cpp.o:(.toc+0x0)
Some other PPC specific sections may have similar problems. We can blacklist more
section names when problems occur.
// A simple program that reproduces the bug.
// Note .rela.toc (outside the group) references a section symbol (STB_LOCAL) in a group.
void puts(const char *);
struct A {
void foo(int a) {
switch (a) {
case 0: puts("0"); break;
case 1: puts("1"); puts("1"); break;
case 2: puts("2"); break;
case 3: puts("3"); puts("4"); break;
case 4: puts("4"); break;
case 5: puts("5"); puts("5"); break;
case 6: puts("6"); break;
}
}
int a;
};
void foo(A x) { x.foo(x.a); }
Reviewers: ruiu, sfertile, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: emaste, nemanjai, arichardson, kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63182
llvm-svn: 363126
This reverts commit r363060 and restores r362867.
r362867 is innocent. The ppc64le-lld-multistage-test bot failure was due to a clang/gcc .toc bug:
ld.lld: error: relocation refers to a discarded section: .rodata._ZNK4llvm3MVT13getSizeInBitsEv
>>> defined in utils/TableGen/CMakeFiles/llvm-tblgen.dir/CodeGenRegisters.cpp.o
>>> referenced by CodeGenRegisters.cpp
>>> utils/TableGen/CMakeFiles/llvm-tblgen.dir/CodeGenRegisters.cpp.o:(.toc+0x0)
It will be worked around by D63182.
llvm-svn: 363124
Summary: Deduplicate S_CONSTANTS when linking, if they have the same value.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63151
llvm-svn: 363089
Users are exepcted to pass all .res files to the linker, which then
merges all the resource in all .res files into a tree structure and then
converts the final tree structure to a .obj file with .rsrc$01 and
.rsrc$02 sections and then links that.
If the user instead passes several .obj files containing such resources,
the correct thing to do would be to have custom code to merge the trees
in the resource sections instead of doing normal section merging -- but
link.exe rejects if multiple resource obj files are passed in with
LNK4078, so let lld-link do that too instead of silently writing broken
.rsrc sections in that case.
The only real way to run into this is if users manually convert .res
files to .obj files by running cvtres and then handing the resulting
.obj files to lld-link instead, which in practice likely never happens.
(lld-link is slightly stricter than link.exe now: If link.exe is passed
one .obj file created by cvtres, and a .res file, for some reason it
just emits a warning instead of an error and outputs strange looking
data. lld-link now errors out on mixed input like this.)
One way users could accidentally run into this is the following
scenario: If a .res file is passed to lib.exe, then lib.exe calls
cvtres.exe on the .res file before putting it in the output .lib.
(llvm-lib currently doesn't do this.)
link.exe's /wholearchive seems to only add obj files referenced from the
static library index, but lld-link current really adds all files in the
archive. So if lld-link /wholearchive is used with .lib files produced
by lib.exe and .res files were among the files handed to lib.exe, we
previously silently produced invalid output, but now we error out.
link.exe's /wholearchive semantics on the other hand mean that it
wouldn't load the resource object files from the .lib file at all.
Since this scenario is probably still an unlikely corner case,
the difference in behavior here seems fine -- and lld-link might have to
change to use link.exe's /wholearchive semantics in the future anyways.
Vaguely related to PR42180.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63109
llvm-svn: 363078
So that R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_[IS] are considered as link-time constants in
-pie mode, otherwise there are bogus errors:
ld.lld: error: can't create dynamic relocation R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I against symbol: .L0 in readonly segment; recompile object files with -fPIC or pass '-Wl,-z,notext' to allow text relocations in the output
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63123
llvm-svn: 363064
The current rule is loose: `!Sym.IsPreemptible || Expr == R_GOT`.
When the symbol is non-preemptable, this allows absolute relocation
types with smaller numbers of bits, e.g. R_X86_64_{8,16,32}. They are
disallowed by ld.bfd and gold, e.g.
ld.bfd: a.o: relocation R_X86_64_8 against `.text' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
This patch:
a) Add TargetInfo::SymbolicRel to represent relocation types that resolve to a
symbol value (e.g. R_AARCH_ABS64, R_386_32, R_X86_64_64).
As a side benefit, we currently (ab)use GotRel (R_*_GLOB_DAT) to resolve
GOT slots that are link-time constants. Since we now use Target->SymbolRel
to do the job, we can remove R_*_GLOB_DAT from relocateOne() for all targets.
R_*_GLOB_DAT cannot be used as static relocation types.
b) Change the condition to `!Sym.IsPreemptible && Type != Target->SymbolicRel || Expr == R_GOT`.
Some tests are caught by the improved error checking (ld.bfd/gold also
issue errors on them). Many misuse .long where .quad should be used
instead.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63121
llvm-svn: 363059
For lld, pass in Config->Timestamp (which is set based on lld's
/timestamp: and /Brepro flags). Since the writeWindowsResourceCOFF()
data is only used in-memory by LLD and the obj's timestamp isn't used
for anything in the output, this doesn't change behavior.
For llvm-cvtres, add an optional /timestamp: parameter, and use the
current behavior of calling time() if the parameter is not passed in.
This doesn't really change observable behavior (unless someone passes
/timestamp: to llvm-cvtres, which wasn't possible before), but it
removes the last unqualified call to time() from llvm/lib, which seems
like a good thing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63116
llvm-svn: 363050
Otherwise the getPartition() accessor may return an OOB pointer. Found
using _GLIBCXX_DEBUG.
The error is benign (we never dereference the pointer for the end marker)
so this wasn't caught by e.g. the sanitizer bots.
llvm-svn: 363026
George Rimar