The idea of partial unswitching is to take a *part* of a branch's
condition that is loop invariant and just unswitching that part. This
primarily makes sense with i1 conditions of branches as opposed to
switches. When dealing with i1 conditions, we can easily extract loop
invariant inputs to a a branch and unswitch them to test them entirely
outside the loop.
As part of this, we now create much more significant cruft in the loop
body, so this relies on adding cleanup passes to the loop pipeline and
revisiting unswitched loops to do that cleanup before continuing to
process them.
This already appears to be more powerful at unswitching than the old
loop unswitch pass, and so I'd appreciate pretty careful review in case
I'm just missing some correctness checks. The `LIV-loop-condition` test
case is not unswitched by the old unswitch pass, but is with this pass.
Thanks to Sanjoy and Fedor for the review!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46706
llvm-svn: 335156
These instructions were renamed in version 2.2 of the user-level ISA spec, but
the old name should also be accepted by standard tools.
llvm-svn: 335154
The outliner emits debug info. Add a test that outlines a function
and uses llvm-dwarfdump to check the emitted DWARF for correctness.
llvm-svn: 335153
Using OrderedInstructions::dominates as comparator for instructions in
BBs without dominance relation can cause a non-deterministic order
between such instructions. That in turn can cause us to materialize
copies in a non-deterministic order. While this does not effect
correctness, it causes some minor non-determinism in the final generated
code, because values have slightly different labels.
Without this patch, running -print-predicateinfo on a reasonably large
module produces slightly different output on each run.
This patch uses the dominator trees DFSInNum to order instruction from
different BBs, which should enforce a deterministic ordering and
guarantee that dominated instructions come after the instructions that
dominate them.
Reviewers: dberlin, efriedma, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48230
llvm-svn: 335150
Summary:
Due to uniqueing of DICompositeTypes, it's possible for a type from one
module to be loaded into another earlier module without being renamed.
Then when the defining module is being IRMoved, the type can be used as
a Mapping destination before being loaded, such that when it's requested
using TypeMapTy::get() it will fail with an assertion that the type is a
source type when it's actually a type in both the source and
destination modules. Correctly handle that case by allowing a non-opaque
non-literal struct type be present in both modules.
Fix for PR37684.
Reviewers: pcc, tejohnson
Reviewed By: pcc, tejohnson
Subscribers: tobiasvk, mehdi_amini, steven_wu, llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47898
llvm-svn: 335145
Summary:
Found some regressions (infinite loop in DAGTypeLegalizer::RemapId)
after r334880. This patch makes sure that we do map a TableId to
itself.
Reviewers: niravd
Reviewed By: niravd
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48364
llvm-svn: 335141
D47985 saw the old SK_Alternate 'alternating' shuffle mask replaced with the SK_Select mask which accepts either input operand for each lane, equivalent to a vector select with a constant condition operand.
This patch updates SLPVectorizer to make full use of this SK_Select shuffle pattern by removing the 'isOdd()' limitation.
The AArch64 regression will be fixed by D48172.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48174
llvm-svn: 335130
For both operands are unsigned, the following optimizations are valid, and missing:
1. X > Y && X != 0 --> X > Y
2. X > Y || X != 0 --> X != 0
3. X <= Y || X != 0 --> true
4. X <= Y || X == 0 --> X <= Y
5. X > Y && X == 0 --> false
unsigned foo(unsigned x, unsigned y) { return x > y && x != 0; }
should fold to x > y, but I found we haven't done it right now.
besides, unsigned foo(unsigned x, unsigned y) { return x < y && y != 0; }
Has been folded to x < y, so there may be a bug.
Patch by: Li Jia He!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47922
llvm-svn: 335129
These are the baseline tests for the functional change in D47922.
Patch by Li Jia He!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48000
llvm-svn: 335128
These are produced by GCC and supported by GAS, but not currently contained in
the pseudoinstruction listing in the RISC-V ISA manual.
llvm-svn: 335127
These are produced by GCC and supported by GAS, but not currently contained in
the pseudoinstruction listing in the RISC-V ISA manual.
llvm-svn: 335120
Thumb has more 16-bit encoding space dedicated to ADD than ORR, allowing both a
3-address encoding and a wider range of immediates. So, particularly when
optimizing for code size (but it doesn't make things worse elsewhere) it's
beneficial to select an OR operation to an ADD if we know overflow won't occur.
This is made even better by LLVM's penchant for putting operations in canonical
form by converting the other way.
llvm-svn: 335119
This patch teaches llvm-mca how to identify register writes that implicitly zero
the upper portion of a super-register.
On X86-64, a general purpose register is implemented in hardware as a 64-bit
register. Quoting the Intel 64 Software Developer's Manual: "an update to the
lower 32 bits of a 64 bit integer register is architecturally defined to zero
extend the upper 32 bits". Also, a write to an XMM register performed by an AVX
instruction implicitly zeroes the upper 128 bits of the aliasing YMM register.
This patch adds a new method named clearsSuperRegisters to the MCInstrAnalysis
interface to help identify instructions that implicitly clear the upper portion
of a super-register. The rest of the patch teaches llvm-mca how to use that new
method to obtain the information, and update the register dependencies
accordingly.
I compared the kernels from tests clear-super-register-1.s and
clear-super-register-2.s against the output from perf on btver2. Previously
there was a large discrepancy between the estimated IPC and the measured IPC.
Now the differences are mostly in the noise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48225
llvm-svn: 335113
Summary:
Related to https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37793, https://reviews.llvm.org/D46760#1127287
We'd like to do this canonicalization https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Gmc
But it is currently restricted by rL155136 / rL155362, which says:
```
// This is a constant shift of a constant shift. Be careful about hiding
// shl instructions behind bit masks. They are used to represent multiplies
// by a constant, and it is important that simple arithmetic expressions
// are still recognizable by scalar evolution.
//
// The transforms applied to shl are very similar to the transforms applied
// to mul by constant. We can be more aggressive about optimizing right
// shifts.
//
// Combinations of right and left shifts will still be optimized in
// DAGCombine where scalar evolution no longer applies.
```
I think these tests show that for *constants*, SCEV has no issues with that canonicalization.
Reviewers: mkazantsev, spatel, efriedma, sanjoy
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Subscribers: sanjoy, javed.absar, llvm-commits, stoklund, bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48229
llvm-svn: 335101
Summary:
First off: i do not have any access to that processor,
so this is purely theoretical, no benchmarks.
I have been looking into b**d**ver2 scheduling profile, and while cross-referencing
the existing b**t**ver2, znver1 profiles, and the reference docs
(`Software Optimization Guide for AMD Family {15,16,17}h Processors`),
i have noticed that only b**t**ver2 scheduling profile specifies these.
Also, there is no mca test coverage.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, courbet, GGanesh, andreadb
Reviewed By: GGanesh
Subscribers: gbedwell, vprasad, ddibyend, shivaram, Ashutosh, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47676
llvm-svn: 335099
Summary:
I ran llvm-exegesis on SKX, SKL, BDW, HSW, SNB.
Atom is from Agner and SLM is a guess.
I've left AMD processors alone.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48079
llvm-svn: 335097
The clang test inadvertently turned a floating point value into a double by having the wrong return type on the test function relative to the intrinsic it was testing.
This resulted in an extra fptosi instruction that propagated into this test when I copied the clang output.
llvm-svn: 335094
Summary:
If we get an error building the SelectionDAG for inline assembly we try to continue and still build the DAG.
But if the return type for the inline assembly is a struct we end up crashing because we try to create an UNDEF node with a struct type which isn't valid.
Instead we need to create an UNDEF for each element of the struct and join them with merge_values.
This patch relies on single operand merge_values being handled gracefully by getMergeValues. If the return type is void there will be no VTs returned by ComputeValueVTs and now we just return instead of calling setValue. Hopefully that's ok, I assumed nothing would need to look up the mapped value for void node.
Fixes PR37359
Reviewers: rengolin, rovka, echristo, efriedma, bogner
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: craig.topper, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46560
llvm-svn: 335093
This patch covers up a fairly fundemental issue around remat and register allocation which shows up with psuedo instructions with more vreg uses than there are physical registers. This patch essentially just disables remat for STATEPOINTs which are the only case we've seen so far, but long term we need a better fix.
For STATEPOINTs specifically, this is a strict improvement. It unblocks progress towards enabling a currently off-by-default mode which integrates deopt bundle operand lowering with register allocator spilling so that we end up with smaller stack sizes and more optimally placed spills. Assming no other issues turn up during my next round of integration testing - which based on experience so far, is admittedly unlikely - we might finally be able to enable something I've been working towards in small bits and pieces for years now. :)
For psuedo ops in general, there are a couple of ideas for a "proper fix" discussed on the bug, but I'm far enough outside my knowledge area to not be able to see any of them through to a successful conclusion. If anyone wants to help out here, please do.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41098
llvm-svn: 335077
Summary:
This fixes liveness tracking information after `drop` instruction
insertion in ExplicitLocals pass.
When a drop instruction is inserted to drop a dead register operand, the
original operand should be marked not dead anymore because it is now
used by the new drop instruction. And the operand to the new drop
instruction should be marked killed instead. This bug caused some
programs to fail when `llc` is run with `-verify-machineinstrs` option.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48253
llvm-svn: 335074
Summary:
Patch r323922 changed the sigil for physical registers to '$', instead of '%'.
An error message was missed during this change, and reports the wrong sigil.
This patch corrects that diagnostic and the tests that check that error string.
Reviewers: zer0, bjope
Reviewed By: bjope
Subscribers: bjope, thegameg, plotfi, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48086
llvm-svn: 335066
This value is the first vector instruction type in numerical order. The
previous value was incorrect, leaving TypeCVI_GATHER outside of the range
for vector instructions. This caused vector .new instructions to be
incorrectly encoded in the presence of gather.
llvm-svn: 335065
There are no provided instruction definitions for this architecture.
Reviewers: smaksimovic, atanasyan, abeserminji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48320
llvm-svn: 335057
Previously, some aliases were marked as not being available for microMIPS32R6,
but this was overridden at the top level.
Reviewers: atanasyan, abeserminji, smaksimovic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48321
llvm-svn: 335053
This patch replaces calls to X86-specific intrinsics with floor-ceil semantics
with calls to target-independent @llvm.floor.* and @llvm.ceil.* intrinsics. This
doesn't affect the resulting machine code, as those intrinsics are lowered to
the same instructions, but exposes these specific rounding cases to generic
optimizations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48067
llvm-svn: 335039
This patch handles back-end folding of generic patterns created by lowering the
X86 rounding intrinsics to native IR in cases where the instruction isn't a
straightforward packed values rounding operation, but a masked operation or a
scalar operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45203
llvm-svn: 335037
LoopSimplifyCFG, being a loop pass, needs to preserve scalar
evolution. This invalidates SE for the loops altered during
block merging.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48258
llvm-svn: 335036
Summary:
Based on
* [[ https://support.amd.com/TechDocs/43479.pdf | AMD64 Architecture Programmer’s Manual Volume 6: 128-Bit and 256-Bit XOP and FMA4 Instructions ]],
* [[ https://support.amd.com/TechDocs/24594.pdf | AMD64 Architecture Programmer’s Manual Volume 3: General-Purpose and System Instructions]],
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XOP_instruction_set
Appears to be only supported in AMD's 15h generation, so only in b**d**ver[1-4],
for which currently llvm has no scheduling profiles.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, andreadb, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48264
llvm-svn: 335034
and expand it post RA basing on the register pressure. However, we miss to do the add-imm peephole for these pseudo instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47568
Reviewed By: Nemanjai
llvm-svn: 335024
Sanjay Patel