This reverts commit r243567, which ultimately reapplies r243563.
The fix here was to use std::enable_if for overload resolution. Thanks to David
Blaikie for lots of help on this, and for the extra tests!
Original commit message follows:
For cases where we needed a foreach loop in reverse over a container,
we had to do something like
for (const GlobalValue *GV : make_range(TypeInfos.rbegin(),
TypeInfos.rend())) {
This provides a convenience method which shortens this to
for (const GlobalValue *GV : reverse(TypeInfos)) {
There are 2 versions of this, with a preference to the rbegin() version.
The first uses rbegin() and rend() to construct an iterator_range.
The second constructs an iterator_range from the begin() and end() methods
wrapped in std::reverse_iterator's.
Reviewed by David Blaikie.
llvm-svn: 243581
This reverts commit r243563.
The GCC buildbots were extremely unhappy about this. Reverting while
we discuss a better way of doing overload resolution.
llvm-svn: 243567
For cases where we needed a foreach loop in reverse over a container,
we had to do something like
for (const GlobalValue *GV : make_range(TypeInfos.rbegin(),
TypeInfos.rend())) {
This provides a convenience method which shortens this to
for (const GlobalValue *GV : reverse(TypeInfos)) {
There are 2 versions of this, with a preference to the rbegin() version.
The first uses rbegin() and rend() to construct an iterator_range.
The second constructs an iterator_range from the begin() and end() methods
wrapped in std::reverse_iterator's.
Reviewed by David Blaikie.
llvm-svn: 243563
Pete Cooper