Follow the same custom legalisation strategy as used in D57085 for
variable-length shifts (see that patch summary for more discussion). Although
we may lose out on some late-stage DAG combines, I think this custom
legalisation strategy is ultimately easier to reason about.
There are some codegen changes in rv64m-exhaustive-w-insts.ll but they are all
neutral in terms of the number of instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57096
llvm-svn: 352171
As discussed on llvm-dev
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-December/128497.html>, we have
to be careful when trying to select the *w RV64M instructions. i32 is not a
legal type for RV64 in the RISC-V backend, so operations have been promoted by
the time they reach instruction selection. Information about whether the
operation was originally a 32-bit operations has been lost, and it's easy to
write incorrect patterns.
Similarly to the variable 32-bit shifts, a DAG combine on ANY_EXTEND will
produce a SIGN_EXTEND if this is likely to result in sdiv/udiv/urem being
selected (and so save instructions to sext/zext the input operands).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53230
llvm-svn: 350993
Alex Bradbury