In preparation for a patch that will enforce new rules for the usage of
the strictfp attribute, this patch introduces auto-upgrade behavior that
will replace the strictfp attribute on callsites with nobuiltin if the
enclosing function declaration doesn't also have the strictfp attribute.
This auto-upgrade isn't being performed on .ll files because that would
prevent us from writing a test for the forthcoming verifier behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70096
Summary:
In D62801, new function attribute `willreturn` was introduced. In short, a function with `willreturn` is guaranteed to come back to the call site(more precise definition is in LangRef).
In this patch, willreturn is annotated for LLVM intrinsics.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: jvesely, nhaehnle, sstefan1, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64904
llvm-svn: 367184
When we switch to opaque pointer types we will need some way to describe
how many bytes a 'byval' parameter should occupy on the stack. This adds
a (for now) optional extra type parameter.
If present, the type must match the pointee type of the argument.
The original commit did not remap byval types when linking modules, which broke
LTO. This version fixes that.
Note to front-end maintainers: if this causes test failures, it's probably
because the "byval" attribute is printed after attributes without any parameter
after this change.
llvm-svn: 362128
When we switch to opaque pointer types we will need some way to describe
how many bytes a 'byval' parameter should occupy on the stack. This adds
a (for now) optional extra type parameter.
If present, the type must match the pointee type of the argument.
Note to front-end maintainers: if this causes test failures, it's probably
because the "byval" attribute is printed after attributes without any parameter
after this change.
llvm-svn: 362012
Summary: The discussion and as per need, each vendor needs a way to keep the old fast flags and the new fast flags in the auto upgrade path of the IR upgrader. This revision addresses that issue.
Patched by Michael Berg
Reviewers: qcolombet, hans, steven_wu
Reviewed By: qcolombet, steven_wu
Subscribers: dexonsmith, vsk, mehdi_amini, andrewrk, MatzeB, wristow, spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43253
llvm-svn: 325525
As discussed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-November/107104.html
and again more recently:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118118.html
...this is a step in cleaning up our fast-math-flags implementation in IR to better match
the capabilities of both clang's user-visible flags and the backend's flags for SDNode.
As proposed in the above threads, we're replacing the 'UnsafeAlgebra' bit (which had the
'umbrella' meaning that all flags are set) with a new bit that only applies to algebraic
reassociation - 'AllowReassoc'.
We're also adding a bit to allow approximations for library functions called 'ApproxFunc'
(this was initially proposed as 'libm' or similar).
...and we're out of bits. 7 bits ought to be enough for anyone, right? :) FWIW, I did
look at getting this out of SubclassOptionalData via SubclassData (spacious 16-bits),
but that's apparently already used for other purposes. Also, I don't think we can just
add a field to FPMathOperator because Operator is not intended to be instantiated.
We'll defer movement of FMF to another day.
We keep the 'fast' keyword. I thought about removing that, but seeing IR like this:
%f.fast = fadd reassoc nnan ninf nsz arcp contract afn float %op1, %op2
...made me think we want to keep the shortcut synonym.
Finally, this change is binary incompatible with existing IR as seen in the
compatibility tests. This statement:
"Newer releases can ignore features from older releases, but they cannot miscompile
them. For example, if nsw is ever replaced with something else, dropping it would be
a valid way to upgrade the IR."
( http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#ir-backwards-compatibility )
...provides the flexibility we want to make this change without requiring a new IR
version. Ie, we're not loosening the FP strictness of existing IR. At worst, we will
fail to optimize some previously 'fast' code because it's no longer recognized as
'fast'. This should get fixed as we audit/squash all of the uses of 'isFast()'.
Note: an inter-dependent clang commit to use the new API name should closely follow
commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39304
llvm-svn: 317488
Kevin P. Neal