The ability to specify alignment was recently added, and it's an
important property which we should ensure is set as expected by
Clang. (Especially before making further changes to Clang's code in
this area.) But, because it's on the end of the lines, the existing
tests all ignore it.
Therefore, update all the tests to also verify the expected alignment
for atomicrmw and cmpxchg. While I was in there, I also updated uses
of 'load atomic' and 'store atomic', and added the memory ordering,
where that was missing.
When NVPTX TARGET_BUILTIN specifies sm_XX or ptxYY as required feature,
consider those features available if we're compiling for GPU >= sm_XX or have
enabled PTX version >= ptxYY.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45061
llvm-svn: 329829
Summary:
This just seems to have been an oversight. We already supported the f64
atomic add with an explicit scope (e.g. "cta"), but not the scopeless
version.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: jholewinski, sanjoy, cfe-commits, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39638
llvm-svn: 317623
James Y Knight