It was failing to build with:
clang-tidy\readability\IdentifierNamingCheck.cpp(640):
error C2882: 'format' : illegal use of namespace identifier in expression
llvm-svn: 262257
Summary:
With this change the error reported is on the identifier location
itself. It was declaration location before.
Reviewers: alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15203
llvm-svn: 254766
This diff requires http://reviews.llvm.org/D13079 to be applied first. I wasn't sure about how to make patch series in Phabricator, and I wanted to keep the two separate for clarity.
It looks like that most cases can be supported with this patch. I'm not totally sure about the actual coverage though. I think that the matchers are very generic, but I'm still not totally fluent with the AST.
Patch by Beren Minor!
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13081
llvm-svn: 248996
This is to level the ground a little bit, in preparation for the changes in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13081.
Code factorization replaces all insertions to NamingCheckFailures map with a unique addUsage function that does the job.
There is also no more difference between the declaration and the references to a given identifier, both cases are treated as ranges in the Usage vector. There is also a check to avoid duplicated ranges to be inserted, which sometimes triggered erroneous replacements.
References can now also be added before the declaration of the identifier is actually found; this looks to be the case for example when a templated class uses its parameters to specialize its templated base class.
Patch by Beren Minor!
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13079
llvm-svn: 248700
This check will try to enforce coding guidelines on the identifiers naming.
It supports lower_case, UPPER_CASE, camelBack and CamelCase casing and
tries to convert from one to another if a mismatch is detected.
It also supports a fixed prefix and suffix that will be prepended or appended
to the identifiers, regardless of the casing.
Many configuration options are available, in order to be able to create
different rules for different kind of identifier. In general, the
rules are falling back to a more generic rule if the specific case is not
configured.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10933
Patch by Beren Minor!
llvm-svn: 245429
Hans Wennborg