where either the modification or the other access is unreachable.
This reverts r359984 (which reverted r359962). The bug in clang-tidy's
test suite exposed by the original commit was fixed in r360009.
llvm-svn: 360010
recursively captured.
Under ARC, a block variable is zero-initialized when it is recursively
captured by the block literal initializer.
rdar://problem/11022762
llvm-svn: 359049
Summary:
Similar to D56967, we add the existing diag::note_locked_here to tell
the user where we saw the locking that isn't matched correctly.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59455
llvm-svn: 356427
Summary:
When this was rewritten in D43737, the logic changed to better explore infinite loops. The check for a reachable exit block was deleted which accidentally introduced false positives in case the exit node was unreachable.
We were testing for cases like this, but @steven_wu provided an additional test case that I've included in the regression tests for this patch.
Reviewers: steven_wu, rtrieu
Reviewed By: steven_wu, rtrieu
Subscribers: cfe-commits, steven_wu
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58122
llvm-svn: 353984
Summary:
We use the existing diag::note_locked_here to tell the user where we saw
the first locking.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56967
llvm-svn: 352549
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
This fixes ASTContext's parent map for nodes in such classes (e.g. operator()).
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39949
This also changes the observed shape of the AST for implicit RAVs.
- this includes AST MatchFinder: cxxRecordDecl() now matches lambda classes,
functionDecl() matches the call operator, and the parent chain is body -> call
operator -> lambda class -> lambdaexpr rather than body -> lambdaexpr.
- this appears not to matter for the ASTImporterLookupTable builder
- this doesn't matter for the other RAVs in-tree.
In order to do this, we remove the TraverseLambdaBody hook. The problem is it's
hard/weird to ensure this hook is called when traversing via the implicit class.
There were just two users of this hook in-tree, who use it to skip bodies.
I replaced these with explicitly traversing the captures only. Another approach
would be recording the bodies when the lambda is visited, and then recognizing
them later.
I'd be open to suggestion on how to preserve this hook, instead.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, JonasToth
Subscribers: cfe-commits, rsmith, jdennett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56444
llvm-svn: 351047
It seems the two failing tests can be simply fixed after r348037
Fix 3 cases in Analysis/builtin-functions.cpp
Delete the bad CodeGen/builtin-constant-p.c for now
llvm-svn: 348053
Kept the "indirect_builtin_constant_p" test case in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp
while we are investigating why the following snippet fails:
extern char extern_var;
struct { int a; } a = {__builtin_constant_p(extern_var)};
llvm-svn: 348039
This was reverted in r347656 due to me thinking it caused a miscompile of
Chromium. Turns out it was the Chromium code that was broken.
llvm-svn: 347756
This caused a miscompile in Chrome (see crbug.com/908372) that's
illustrated by this small reduction:
static bool f(int *a, int *b) {
return !__builtin_constant_p(b - a) || (!(b - a));
}
int arr[] = {1,2,3};
bool g() {
return f(arr, arr + 3);
}
$ clang -O2 -S -emit-llvm a.cc -o -
g() should return true, but after r347417 it became false for some reason.
This also reverts the follow-up commits.
r347417:
> Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.
>
> Don't try to emit a scalar expression for a non-scalar argument to
> __builtin_constant_p().
>
> Third time's a charm!
r347446:
> The result of is.constant() is unsigned.
r347480:
> A __builtin_constant_p() returns 0 with a function type.
r347512:
> isEvaluatable() implies a constant context.
>
> Assume that we're in a constant context if we're asking if the expression can
> be compiled into a constant initializer. This fixes the issue where a
> __builtin_constant_p() in a compound literal was diagnosed as not being
> constant, even though it's always possible to convert the builtin into a
> constant.
r347531:
> A "constexpr" is evaluated in a constant context. Make sure this is reflected
> if a __builtin_constant_p() is a part of a constexpr.
llvm-svn: 347656
Looks like the only reason we use a unique_ptr here is so that we can
conditionally construct a LogicalErrorHandler. It's a small type, and
Optional can do the same thing with 100% fewer heap allocations.
llvm-svn: 338962
As documented here: https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/682969 and
https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/523346. cpu_dispatch multiversioning
is an ICC feature that provides for function multiversioning.
This feature is implemented with two attributes: First, cpu_specific,
which specifies the individual function versions. Second, cpu_dispatch,
which specifies the location of the resolver function and the list of
resolvable functions.
This is valuable since it provides a mechanism where the resolver's TU
can be specified in one location, and the individual implementions
each in their own translation units.
The goal of this patch is to be source-compatible with ICC, so this
implementation diverges from the ICC implementation in a few ways:
1- Linux x86/64 only: This implementation uses ifuncs in order to
properly dispatch functions. This is is a valuable performance benefit
over the ICC implementation. A future patch will be provided to enable
this feature on Windows, but it will obviously more closely fit ICC's
implementation.
2- CPU Identification functions: ICC uses a set of custom functions to identify
the feature list of the host processor. This patch uses the cpu_supports
functionality in order to better align with 'target' multiversioning.
1- cpu_dispatch function def/decl: ICC's cpu_dispatch requires that the function
marked cpu_dispatch be an empty definition. This patch supports that as well,
however declarations are also permitted, since the linker will solve the
issue of multiple emissions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47474
llvm-svn: 337552
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
FunctionProtoType.
We previously re-evaluated the expression each time we wanted to know whether
the type is noexcept or not. We now evaluate the expression exactly once.
This is not quite "no functional change": it fixes a crasher bug during AST
deserialization where we would try to evaluate the noexcept specification in a
situation where we have not deserialized sufficient portions of the AST to
permit such evaluation.
llvm-svn: 331428
The diagnostic system for Clang can already handle many AST nodes. Instead
of converting them to strings first, just hand the AST node directly to
the diagnostic system and let it handle the output. Minor changes in some
diagnostic output.
llvm-svn: 328688
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before
sorting. This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined
sorting order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of
std::sort.
llvm-svn: 328636
Summary: Rewrites -Winfinite-recursion to remove the state dictionary and explore paths in loops - especially infinite loops. The new check now detects recursion in loop bodies dominated by a recursive call.
Reviewers: rsmith, rtrieu
Reviewed By: rtrieu
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43737
llvm-svn: 328173
This relands r326965.
There was a null dereference in typo correction that was triggered in
Sema/diagnose_if.c. We are not always in a function scope when doing
typo correction. The fix is to add a null check.
LLVM's optimizer made it hard to find this bug. I wrote it up in a
not-very-well-editted blog post here:
http://qinsb.blogspot.com/2018/03/ub-will-delete-your-null-checks.html
llvm-svn: 327334
This reverts r326965. It seems to have caused repeating test failures in
clang/test/Sema/diagnose_if.c on some buildbots.
I cannot reproduce the problem, and it's not immediately obvious what
the problem is, so let's revert to green.
llvm-svn: 326974
Summary:
Before this patch, Sema pre-allocated a FunctionScopeInfo and kept it in
the first, always present element of the FunctionScopes stack. This
meant that Sema::getCurFunction would return a pointer to this
pre-allocated object when parsing code outside a function body. This is
pretty much always a bug, so this patch moves the pre-allocated object
into a separate unique_ptr. This should make bugs like PR36536 a lot
more obvious.
As you can see from this patch, there were a number of places that
unconditionally assumed they were always called inside a function.
However, there are also many places that null checked the result of
getCurFunction(), so I think this is a reasonable direction.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44039
llvm-svn: 326965
Reimplement the "noexcept function actually throws" warning to properly handle
nested try-blocks. In passing, change 'throw;' handling to treat any enclosing
try block as being sufficient to suppress the warning rather than requiring a
'catch (...)'; the warning is intended to be conservatively-correct.
llvm-svn: 325545
While here, fix up the myriad other ways in which Sema's two "can this handler
catch that exception?" implementations get things wrong and unify them.
llvm-svn: 322431
This saves some cycles when compiling with "-w".
(Also fix a potential crash on invalid code for tools that tries to recover from some
errors, because analysis might compute the CFG which crashes if the code contains
invalid declaration. This does not happen normally with because we also don't perform
these analysis if there was an error.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40242
llvm-svn: 318900
I ran across an instance where the value was being loaded
out via back, then immediately popped. Since pop_back_val
is more efficient at this (it moves out), replace this
instance.
llvm-svn: 316015
Discovered that 'nothrow' (which is supposed to be an alias for noexcept)
was not warning with a throw inside of it. This patch corrects the behavior
previously created to add 'nothrow' to this list.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38203
llvm-svn: 314229
The implementation is in AnalysisDeclContext.cpp and the class is called
AnalysisDeclContext.
Making those match up has numerous benefits, including:
- Easier jump from header to/from implementation.
- Easily identify filename from class.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37500
llvm-svn: 312671
...as introduced with recent <https://reviews.llvm.org/D33333> "Emit warning
when throw exception in destruct or dealloc functions which has a (possible
implicit) noexcept specifier". (The equivalent of the goodReference case hit
when building LibreOffice.)
(These warnings are apparently only emitted when no errors have yet been
encountered, so it didn't work to add the test code to the end of the existing
clang/test/SemaCXX/exceptions.cpp.)
llvm-svn: 306715
(possible implicit) noexcept specifier
Throwing in the destructor is not good (C++11 change try to not allow see below).
But in reality, those codes are exist.
C++11 [class.dtor]p3:
A declaration of a destructor that does not have an exception-specification is
implicitly considered to have the same exception specification as an implicit
declaration.
With this change, the application worked before may now run into runtime
termination. My goal here is to emit a warning to provide only possible info to
where the code may need to be changed.
First there is no way, in compile time to identify the “throw” really throw out
of the function. Things like the call which throw out… To keep this simple,
when “throw” is seen, checking its enclosing function(only destructor and
dealloc functions) with noexcept(true) specifier emit warning.
Here is implementation detail:
A new member function CheckCXXThrowInNonThrowingFunc is added for class Sema
in Sema.h. It is used in the call to both BuildCXXThrow and
TransformCXXThrowExpr.
The function basic check if the enclosing function with non-throwing noexcept
specifer, if so emit warning for it.
The example of warning message like:
k1.cpp:18:3: warning: ''~dependent_warn'' has a (possible implicit) non-throwing
noexcept specifier. Throwing exception may cause termination.
[-Wthrow-in-dtor]
throw 1;
^
k1.cpp:43:30: note: in instantiation of member function
'dependent_warn<noexcept_fun>::~dependent_warn' requested here
dependent_warn<noexcept_fun> f; // cause warning
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33333
llvm-svn: 306149
Summary:
This patch fixes a number of issues with the analysis warnings emitted when a coroutine may reach the end of the function w/o returning.
* Fix bug where coroutines with `return_value` are incorrectly diagnosed as missing `co_return`'s.
* Rework diagnostic message to no longer say "non-void coroutine", because that implies the coroutine doesn't have a void return type, which it might. In this case a non-void coroutine is one who's promise type does not contain `return_void()`
As a side-effect of this patch, coroutine bodies that contain an invalid coroutine promise objects are marked as invalid.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, rsmith, aaron.ballman, majnemer
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33532
llvm-svn: 303831
Summary:
1. build declaration of the gro local variable that keeps the result of get_return_object.
2. build return statement returning the gro variable
3. emit them during CodeGen
4. sema and CodeGen tests updated
Reviewers: EricWF, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31646
llvm-svn: 303573
We don't know whether some other instantiation of the template might be able to
reach the annotation, so warning on it has a high chance of false positives.
Patch by Ahmed Asadi!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31069
llvm-svn: 298477
the same source range and use the unary operator fixit only when it
actually silences the warning.
rdar://24570531
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28231
llvm-svn: 291757
Summary:
This patch adds semantic checking and building of the fall-through `co_return;` statement as well as the `p.set_exception(std::current_exception())` call for handling uncaught exceptions.
The fall-through statement is built and checked according to:
> [dcl.fct.def.coroutine]/4
> The unqualified-ids return_void and return_value are looked up in the scope of class P. If
> both are found, the program is ill-formed. If the unqualified-id return_void is found, flowing
> off the end of a coroutine is equivalent to a co_return with no operand. Otherwise, flowing off
> the end of a coroutine results in undefined behavior.
Similarly the `set_exception` call is only built when that unqualified-id is found in the scope of class P.
Additionally this patch adds fall-through warnings for non-void returning coroutines. Since it's surprising undefined behavior I thought it would be important to add the warning right away.
Reviewers: majnemer, GorNishanov, rsmith
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25349
llvm-svn: 285271
Richard Smith