Narrower vectors will be widened to 128 bits without changing the element size. And generic type legalization can already handle widening mulhu/mulhs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54513
llvm-svn: 346879
Summary:
The result of subprocess.check_output() is bytes in python3 which we need
to convert to str(). Simplify this by using the executeCommand() helper.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54522
llvm-svn: 346878
On PowerPC64, when a function call offset is too large to encode in a call
instruction the address is stored in a table in the data segment. A thunk is
used to load the branch target address from the table relative to the
TOC-pointer and indirectly branch to the callee. When linking position-dependent
code the addresses are stored directly in the table, for position-independent
code the table is allocated and filled in at load time by the dynamic linker.
For position-independent code the branch targets could have gone in the .got.plt
but using the .branch_lt section for both position dependent and position
independent binaries keeps it consitent and helps keep this PPC64 specific logic
seperated from the target-independent code handling the .got.plt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53408
llvm-svn: 346877
Summary:
These asserts are based on the assumption that the order of true/false operands in a select and those in the compare would always be the same.
This fixes PR39595.
Reviewers: craig.topper, spatel, dmgreen
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54359
llvm-svn: 346874
This fixes two compilation failures:
1) Designated initializers are C++20. We can't use them in LLVM.
2) thread_result_t is not a pointer type on all platforms, so
returning nullptr is an error.
llvm-svn: 346873
Regenerate this test using update_test_checks.py in preparation for an
upcomming commit, to make it not depend on the names of instructions.
llvm-svn: 346869
The DataExtractor class itself was moved to Utility some time ago, but
it seems this was not reflected in the location of the test code. Fix
that.
llvm-svn: 346867
Summary:
GCC already catches these situations so we should handle it too.
GCC warns in C++ mode only (does anybody know why?). I think it is useful in C mode too.
Reviewers: rsmith, erichkeane, aaron.ballman, efriedma, xbolva00
Reviewed By: xbolva00
Subscribers: efriedma, craig.topper, scanon, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52835
llvm-svn: 346865
Reorder the bit-field classes and the members of the anonymous union
so that they both match the order in StmtNodes.td.
There is already a fair amount of them, and this is not going to
improve. Therefore lets try to keep some order here.
Strictly NFC.
llvm-svn: 346864
The R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 relocation type is given the R_PAGE_PC
RelExpr. This can be transformed to R_PLT_PAGE_PC via toPlt().
Unfortunately the resolution is identical to R_PAGE_PC so instead of
getting the address of the PLT entry we get the address of the symbol
which may not be correct in the case of static ifuncs. The fix is to
handle the cases separately and use getPltVA() + A with R_PLT_PAGE_PC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54474
llvm-svn: 346863
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
Test cases were updated to not use the local compilation dir which
is different between development pc and build bots.
Original commit message:
[LLDB] - Support the single file split DWARF.
DWARF5 spec describes a single file split dwarf case
(when .dwo sections are in the .o files).
Problem is that LLDB does not work correctly in that case.
The issue is that, for example, both .debug_info and .debug_info.dwo
has the same type: eSectionTypeDWARFDebugInfo. And when code searches
section by type it might find the regular debug section
and not the .dwo one.
The patch fixes that. With it, LLDB is able to work with
output compiled with -gsplit-dwarf=single flag correctly.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52403
llvm-svn: 346855
Add support for the expansion of funnelshift/rotates to getIntrinsicInstrCost.
This also required us to move the X86 fshl/fshr costs to the same place as the rotates to avoid expansion and get correct scalarization vs vectorization costs.
llvm-svn: 346854
Summary:
This would save us 8 bytes per ref, and buy us ~40MB in total
for llvm index (from ~300MB to ~260 MB).
The char pointer must be null-terminated, and llvm::StringSaver
guarantees it.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53427
llvm-svn: 346852
This patch removes the last use of the constant pool shuffle decode helper and consistently uses the 'getTargetShuffleMaskIndices' versions instead. The constant pool versions are now purely used for assembly comments.
The avx512vbmi intrinsic upgrades had to be altered as they were being decoded as broadcasts, similar to what I fixed in rL346032. I don't think the change is critical - although its annoying that we lose the {k}{z} instruction test coverage as they are tricky to generate....
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54083
llvm-svn: 346850
Summary:
While parsing a childless compile unit DIE we could crash if the DIE was
followed by any extra data (such as a superfluous end-of-children
marker). This happened because the break-on-depth=0 check was performed
only when parsing the null DIE, which was not correct because with a
childless root DIE, we could reach the end of the unit without ever
encountering the null DIE.
If the compile unit contribution ended directly after the CU DIE,
everything would be fine as we would terminate parsing due to reaching
EOF. However, if the contribution contained extra data (perhaps a
superfluous end-of-children marker), we would crash because we would
treat that data as the begging of another compile unit.
This fixes the crash by moving the depth=0 check to a more generic
place, and also adds a regression test.
Reviewers: clayborg, jankratochvil, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54417
llvm-svn: 346849
DWARF5 spec describes a single file split dwarf case
(when .dwo sections are in the .o files).
Problem is that LLDB does not work correctly in that case.
The issue is that, for example, both .debug_info and .debug_info.dwo
has the same type: eSectionTypeDWARFDebugInfo. And when code searches
section by type it might find the regular debug section
and not the .dwo one.
The patch fixes that. With it, LLDB is able to work with
output compiled with -gsplit-dwarf=single flag correctly.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52296
llvm-svn: 346848
Summary:
The goal is to allow analyses such as clang-tidy checks to run on a
subset of the AST, e.g. "only on main-file decls" for interactive tools.
Today, these become "problematically global" by running RecursiveASTVisitors
rooted at the TUDecl, or by navigating up via ASTContext::getParent().
The scope is restricted using a set of top-level-decls that RecursiveASTVisitors
should be rooted at. This also applies to the visitor that populates the
parent map, and so the top-level-decls are considered to have no parents.
This patch makes the traversal scope a mutable property of ASTContext.
The more obvious way to do this is to pass the top-level decls to
relevant functions directly, but this has some problems:
- it's error-prone: accidentally mixing restricted and unrestricted
scopes is a performance trap. Interleaving multiple analyses is
common (many clang-tidy checks run matchers or RAVs from matcher callbacks)
- it doesn't map well to the actual use cases, where we really do want
*all* traversals to be restricted.
- it involves a lot of plumbing in parts of the code that don't care
about traversals.
This approach was tried out in D54259 and D54261, I wanted to like it
but it feels pretty awful in practice.
Caveats: to get scope-limiting behavior of RecursiveASTVisitors, callers
have to call the new TraverseAST(Ctx) function instead of TraverseDecl(TU).
I think this is an improvement to the API regardless.
Reviewers: klimek, ioeric
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54309
llvm-svn: 346847
rL346840 temporarily marked event-section.ll as XFAIL because it was
failing for builds with LLVM_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_CHECKS turned on, but
to make sure it XFAILs even without LLVM_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_CHECKS on we
need this `-verify-machineinstrs` flag, which was missing in the
previous commit.
llvm-svn: 346845
Before this commit, `llc -print-after-all` would print something like:
*** IR Dump After Pre-ISel Intrinsic Lowering ***; ModuleID = ...
Emit a newline such that ModuleID appears on a line by its own.
llvm-svn: 346844
error: implicit conversion from 'double' to 'uint64_t' (aka 'unsigned long') changes value from -0 to 0 [-Werror,-Wliteral-conversion]
llvm-svn: 346841
This test is failing in builds with LLVM_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_CHECKS after
rL346825 not because of the patch but due to a pre-existing codegen
problem. Marking this as XFAIL temporarily until the bug is fixed.
llvm-svn: 346840
The DWARF5 specification says(Appendix F.1):
"The sections that do not require relocation, however, can be
written to the relocatable object (.o) file but ignored by the
linker or they can be written to a separate DWARF object (.dwo)
file that need not be accessed by the linker."
The first part describes a single file split DWARF feature and there
is no way to trigger this behavior atm.
Fortunately, no many changes are required to keep *.dwo sections
in a .o, the patch does that.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52296
llvm-svn: 346837
Summary:
Previously code completion did not work well for Objective-C methods
which contained multiple arguments as clangd did not expect to see
multiple typed-text chunks when handling code completion.
Note that even with this change, we do not consider selector fragments
from previous arguments to be part of the signature (although we
could in the future).
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53934
llvm-svn: 346836
Summary:
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39224 | PR39224 ]]
As discussed, we can't always do the transform automatically due to that array-to-pointer decay of C array.
In order to detect whether we can do said transform, we'd need to be able to see all usages of said array,
which is, i would say, rather impossible if e.g. it is in the header.
Thus right now no fixit exists.
Exceptions: `extern "C"` code.
References:
* [[ https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#es27-use-stdarray-or-stack_array-for-arrays-on-the-stack | CPPCG ES.27: Use std::array or stack_array for arrays on the stack ]]
* [[ https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon1-prefer-using-stl-array-or-vector-instead-of-a-c-array | CPPCG SL.con.1: Prefer using STL array or vector instead of a C array ]]
* HICPP `4.1.1 Ensure that a function argument does not undergo an array-to-pointer conversion`
* MISRA `5-2-12 An identifier with array type passed as a function argument shall not decay to a pointer`
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, JonasToth, alexfh, hokein, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53771
llvm-svn: 346835
I've only added sse2 and sse4.1 variants as I'm only interested in the two v4i16 tests and I don't expect that to different with AVX other than a v prefix.
llvm-svn: 346834
The definition of `pointer_iterator` omits what should be a `iterator_traits::<>::iterator_category` parameter from `iterator_adaptor_base`. As a result, iterators based on `pointer_iterator` always have defaulted value types and the wrong iterator category.
The definition of `pointee_iterator` just a few lines above does this correctly.
This resolves [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39617 | bug 39617 ]].
Patch by Dylan MacKenzie!
Reviewers: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54377
llvm-svn: 346833
Sanjay Patel