The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
Because we create a new kind of debug instruction, DBG_LABEL, we need to
check all passes which use isDebugValue() to check MachineInstr is debug
instruction or not. When expelling debug instructions, we should expel
both DBG_VALUE and DBG_LABEL. So, I create a new function,
isDebugInstr(), in MachineInstr to check whether the MachineInstr is
debug instruction or not.
This patch has no new test case. I have run regression test and there is
no difference in regression test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45342
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331844
This patch adds functions to allow MachineLICM to hoist invariant stores.
Currently, MachineLICM does not hoist any store instructions, however
when storing the same value to a constant spot on the stack, the store
instruction should be considered invariant and be hoisted. The function
isInvariantStore iterates each operand of the store instruction and checks
that each register operand satisfies isCallerPreservedPhysReg. The store
may be fed by a copy, which is hoisted by isCopyFeedingInvariantStore.
This patch also adds the PowerPC changes needed to consider the stack
register as caller preserved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40196
llvm-svn: 328326
This patch adds functions to allow MachineLICM to hoist invariant stores.
Currently, MachineLICM does not hoist any store instructions, however
when storing the same value to a constant spot on the stack, the store
instruction should be considered invariant and be hoisted. The function
isInvariantStore iterates each operand of the store instruction and checks
that each register operand satisfies isCallerPreservedPhysReg. The store
may be fed by a copy, which is hoisted by isCopyFeedingInvariantStore.
This patch also adds the PowerPC changes needed to consider the stack
register as caller preserved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40196
llvm-svn: 327856
Revision 320791 introduced a pass that transforms reg+reg instructions to
reg+imm if they're fed by "load immediate". However, it didn't
handle out-of-range shifts correctly as reported in PR35688.
This patch fixes that and therefore the PR.
Furthermore, there was undefined behaviour in the patch where the RHS of an
initialization expression was 32 bits and constant `1` was shifted left 32
bits. This was fixed by ensuring the RHS is 64 bits just like the LHS.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41369
llvm-svn: 321551
This patch fixes a bug in the redundant compare elimination reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL320786 and re-enables the optimization.
The redundant compare elimination assumes that we can replace signed comparison with unsigned comparison for the equality check. But due to the difference in the sign extension behavior we cannot change the opcode if the comparison is against an immediate and the most significant bit of the immediate is one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41385
llvm-svn: 321147
This patch adds the necessary infrastructure to convert instructions that
take two register operands to those that take a register and immediate if
the necessary operand is produced by a load-immediate. Furthermore, it uses
this infrastructure to perform such conversions twice - first at MachineSSA
and then pre-emit.
There are a number of reasons we may end up with opportunities for this
transformation, including but not limited to:
- X-Form instructions chosen since the exact offset isn't available at ISEL time
- Atomic instructions with constant operands (we will add patterns for this
in the future)
- Tail duplication may duplicate code where one block contains this redundancy
- When emitting compare-free code in PPCDAGToDAGISel, we don't handle constant
comparands specially
Furthermore, this patch moves the initialization of PPCMIPeepholePass so that
it can be used for MIR tests.
llvm-svn: 320791
The compare elimination peephole introduced in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL312514
causes a miscompile in AMDGPUInstrInfo.cpp which in turn causes some AMDGPU
test case failures in stage2 bootstrap testing. This miscompile didn't cause any
test case failures until https://reviews.llvm.org/rL320614, so it appeared as if
that patch caused these failures.
Disabling this transformation for now to bring the build bots back to green and
the author of the patch will investigate the miscompile.
llvm-svn: 320786
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.
The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422
llvm-svn: 319665
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, avoid
printing "vreg" for virtual registers (which is one of the current MIR
possibilities).
Basically:
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E "s/%vreg([0-9]+)/%\1/g"
* grep -nr '%vreg' . and fix if needed
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E "s/ vreg([0-9]+)/ %\1/g"
* grep -nr 'vreg[0-9]\+' . and fix if needed
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40420
llvm-svn: 319427
This patch adds a peep hole optimization to remove any redundant toc save
instructions added as part of the call sequence for indirect calls. It removes
any toc saves within a function that are dominated by another toc save.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39736
llvm-svn: 319087
Revert r316478.
A test case has failed.
Will recommit this change once we find and fix the failure.
This reverts commit 7c330fabaedaba3d02c58bc3cc1198896c895f34.
llvm-svn: 316952
If we have the situation where a Swap feeds a Splat we can sometimes change the
index on the Splat and then remove the Swap instruction.
Fixed the test case that was failing and recommit after pulling the original
commit.
Original revision is here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39009
llvm-svn: 316478
If we have the situation where a Swap feeds a Splat we can sometimes change the
index on the Splat and then remove the Swap instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39009
llvm-svn: 316366
The commit at https://reviews.llvm.org/rL315888 is causing some failures
with internal testing. Disabling this code until we can resolve the issues.
llvm-svn: 316199
This patch enables redundant sign- and zero-extension elimination in PowerPC MI Peephole pass.
If the input value of a sign- or zero-extension is known to be already sign- or zero-extended, the operation is redundant and can be eliminated.
One common case is sign-extensions for a method parameter or for a method return value; they must be sign- or zero-extended as defined in PPC ELF ABI.
For example of the following simple code, two extsw instructions are generated before the invocation of int_func and before the return. With this patch, both extsw are eliminated.
void int_func(int);
void ii_test(int a) {
if (a & 1) return int_func(a);
}
Such redundant sign- or zero-extensions are quite common in many programs; e.g. I observed about 60,000 occurrences of the elimination while compiling the LLVM+CLANG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31319
llvm-svn: 315888
The issue is that we assume operand zero of the input to the add instruction
is a register. In this case, the input comes from inline assembly and
operand zero is not a register thereby causing a crash.
The code will bail anyway if the input instruction doesn't have the right
opcode. So do that check first and let short-circuiting prevent the crash.
llvm-svn: 315285
This is a follow-on of D37211.
D37211 eliminates a compare instruction if two conditional branches can be made based on the one compare instruction, e.g.
if (a == 0) { ... }
else if (a < 0) { ... }
This patch extends this optimization to support partially redundant cases, which often happen in while loops.
For example, one compare instruction is moved from the loop body into the preheader by this optimization in the following example.
do {
if (a == 0) dummy1();
a = func(a);
} while (a > 0);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38236
llvm-svn: 314390
Two blocks prior to the join each perform an li and the the join block has an
add using the initialized register. Optimize each predecessor block to instead
use addi and delete the li's and add.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36734
llvm-svn: 313639
If multiple conditional branches are executed based on the same comparison, we can execute multiple conditional branches based on the result of one comparison on PPC. For example,
if (a == 0) { ... }
else if (a < 0) { ... }
can be executed by one compare and two conditional branches instead of two pairs of a compare and a conditional branch.
This patch identifies a code sequence of the two pairs of a compare and a conditional branch and merge the compares if possible.
To maximize the opportunity, we do canonicalization of code sequence before merging compares.
For the above example, the input for this pass looks like:
cmplwi r3, 0
beq 0, .LBB0_3
cmpwi r3, -1
bgt 0, .LBB0_4
So, before merging two compares, we canonicalize it as
cmpwi r3, 0 ; cmplwi and cmpwi yield same result for beq
beq 0, .LBB0_3
cmpwi r3, 0 ; greather than -1 means greater or equal to 0
bge 0, .LBB0_4
The generated code should be
cmpwi r3, 0
beq 0, .LBB0_3
bge 0, .LBB0_4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37211
llvm-svn: 312514
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
Rename from addOperand to just add, to match the other method that has been
added to MachineInstrBuilder for adding more than just 1 operand.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D28057 for the whole discussion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28556
llvm-svn: 291891
This is the final patch in the series of patches that improves
BUILD_VECTOR handling on PowerPC. This adds a few peephole optimizations
to remove redundant instructions. It also adds a large test case which
encompasses a large set of code patterns that build vectors - this test
case was the motivator for this series of patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26066
llvm-svn: 288800
Summary:
In PPCMIPeephole, when we see two splat instructions, we can't simply do the following transformation:
B = Splat A
C = Splat B
=>
C = Splat A
because B may still be used between these two instructions. Instead, we should make the second Splat a PPC::COPY and let later passes decide whether to remove it or not:
B = Splat A
C = Splat B
=>
B = Splat A
C = COPY B
Fixes PR30663.
Reviewers: echristo, iteratee, kbarton, nemanjai
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25493
llvm-svn: 283961
This patch corresponds to review:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23155
This patch removes the VSHRC register class (based on D20310) and adds
exploitation of the Power9 sub-word integer loads into VSX registers as well
as vector sign extensions.
The new instructions are useful for a few purposes:
Int to Fp conversions of 1 or 2-byte values loaded from memory
Building vectors of 1 or 2-byte integers with values loaded from memory
Storing individual 1 or 2-byte elements from integer vectors
This patch implements all of those uses.
llvm-svn: 283190
This patch adds a pass for doing PowerPC peephole optimizations at the
MI level while the code is still in SSA form. This allows for easy
modifications to the instructions while depending on a subsequent pass
of DCE. Both passes are very fast due to the characteristics of SSA.
At this time, the only peepholes added are for cleaning up various
redundancies involving the XXPERMDI instruction. However, I would
expect this will be a useful place to add more peepholes for
inefficiencies generated during instruction selection. The pass is
placed after VSX swap optimization, as it is best to let that pass
remove unnecessary swaps before performing any remaining clean-ups.
The utility of these clean-ups are demonstrated by changes to four
existing test cases, all of which now have tighter expected code
generation. I've also added Eric Schweiz's bugpoint-reduced test from
PR25157, for which we now generate tight code. One other test started
failing for me, and I've fixed it
(test/Transforms/PlaceSafepoints/finite-loops.ll) as well; this is not
related to my changes, and I'm not sure why it works before and not
after. The problem is that the CHECK-NOT: of "statepoint" from test1
fails because of the "statepoint" in test2, and so forth. Adding a
CHECK-LABEL in between keeps the different occurrences of that string
properly scoped.
llvm-svn: 252651
Fangrui Song