This can come up in Bit Stream abstractions.
The pattern looks big/scary, but it can't be simplified any further.
It only is so simple because a number of my preparatory folds had
happened already (shift amount reassociation / shift amount
reassociation in bit test, sign bit test detection).
Highlights:
* There are two main flavors: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/zWi
The difference is add vs. sub, and left-shift of -1 vs. 1
* Since we only change the shift opcode,
we can preserve the exact-ness: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/4u4
* There can be truncation after high-bit-extraction:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/slHc1 (the main pattern i'm after!)
Which means that we need to ignore zext of shift amounts and of NBits.
* The sign-extending magic can be extended itself (in add pattern
via sext, in sub pattern via zext. not the other way around!)
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/NhG
(or those sext/zext can be sinked into `select`!)
Which again means we should pay attention when matching NBits.
* We can have both truncation of extraction and widening of magic:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/XTw
In other words, i don't believe we need to have any checks on
bitwidths of any of these constructs.
This is worsened in general by the fact that we may have `sext` instead
of `zext` for shift amounts, and we don't yet canonicalize to `zext`,
although we should. I have not done anything about that here.
Also, we really should have something to weed out `sub` like these,
by folding them into `add` variant.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42389
llvm-svn: 373964
True, no test coverage is being added here. But those non-canonical
predicates that are already handled here already have no test coverage
as far as i can tell. I tried to add tests for them, but all the patterns
already get handled elsewhere.
llvm-svn: 373962
Summary:
Currently, we pre-check whether we need to produce a mask or not.
This involves some rather magical constants.
I'd like to extend this fold to also handle the situation
when there's also a `trunc` before outer shift.
That will require another set of magical constants.
It's ugly.
Instead, we can just compute the mask, and check
whether mask is a pass-through (all-ones) or not.
This way we don't need to have any magical numbers.
This change is NFC other than the fact that we now compute
the mask and then check if we need (and can!) apply it.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68470
llvm-svn: 373961
Summary:
When we do `ConstantExpr::getZExt()`, that "extends" `undef` to `0`,
which means that for patterns a/b we'd assume that we must not produce
any bits for that channel, while in reality we simply didn't care
about that channel - i.e. we don't need to mask it.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68239
llvm-svn: 373960
Summary:
Someone wrote SetEffectiveSetEffectiveGroupID instead of SetEffectiveUserID.
After this fix, the android process list can show user names, e.g.
```
PID PARENT USER GROUP EFF USER EFF GROUP TRIPLE ARGUMENTS
====== ====== ========== ========== ========== ========== ============================== ============================
529 1 root 0 root 0 /sbin/ueventd
```
Reviewers: labath,clayborg,aadsm,xiaobai
Subscribers:
llvm-svn: 373953
Summary:
Avoid parsing __pragma into an annotation token when macro arguments are pre-expanded.
This is what clang currently does when parsing _Pragmas.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41128, where clang crashed
when trying to get the length of an annotation token.
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68114
llvm-svn: 373950
That option controls the 'VERSION' attribute of the libc++abi shared
library, which in turn controls the name of the actual dylib being
produced.
llvm-svn: 373949
Start manually writing a table to get the subreg index. TableGen
should probably generate this, but I'm not sure what it looks like in
the arbitrary case where subregisters are allowed to not fully cover
the super-registers.
llvm-svn: 373947
At minimum handle the s64 insert type, which are emitted in real cases
during legalization.
We really need TableGen to emit something to emit something like the
inverse of composeSubRegIndices do determine the subreg index to use.
llvm-svn: 373938
Allows targets to introduce regbankselectable
pseudo-instructions. Currently the closet feature to this is an
intrinsic. However this requires creating a public intrinsic
declaration. This litters the public intrinsic namespace with
operations we don't necessarily want to expose to IR producers, and
would rather leave as private to the backend.
Use a new instruction bit. A previous attempt tried to keep using enum
value ranges, but it turned into a mess.
llvm-svn: 373937
Doing this makes MSVC complain that `empty(someRange)` could refer to
either C++17's std::empty or LLVM's llvm::empty, which previously we
avoided via SFINAE because std::empty is defined in terms of an empty
member rather than begin and end. So, switch callers over to the new
method as it is added.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68439
llvm-svn: 373935
These flags are already set when we create the cxxabi_shared target
using the SOVERSION and VERSION target properties, and the install_name
was already being overriden to '@rpath/libc++abi.1.dylib' by CMake
because no 'CMAKE_INSTALL_NAME_DIR' option was specified. So this is
effectively a removal of dead code with no intended functionality change.
The only think we're losing here is that we used to link against
libSystem.B.dylib instead of libSystem.dylib when building libc++abi
for macOS 10.6 -- however, I strongly suspect nobody's building
libc++abi from source for that target anymore.
llvm-svn: 373934
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
llvm-svn: 373931
Summary:
There was an issue in `releaseToOSMaybe`: one of the criteria to
decide if we should proceed with the release was wrong. Namely:
```
const uptr N = Sci->Stats.PoppedBlocks - Sci->Stats.PushedBlocks;
if (N * BlockSize < PageSize)
return; // No chance to release anything.
```
I meant to check if the amount of bytes in the free list was lower
than a page, but this actually checks if the amount of **in use** bytes
was lower than a page.
The correct code is:
```
const uptr BytesInFreeList =
Region->AllocatedUser -
(Region->Stats.PoppedBlocks - Region->Stats.PushedBlocks) * BlockSize;
if (BytesInFreeList < PageSize)
return 0; // No chance to release anything.
```
Consequences of the bug:
- if a class size has less than a page worth of in-use bytes (allocated
or in a cache), reclaiming would not occur, whatever the amount of
blocks in the free list; in real world scenarios this is unlikely to
happen and be impactful;
- if a class size had less than a page worth of free bytes (and enough
in-use bytes, etc), then reclaiming would be attempted, with likely
no result. This means the reclaiming was overzealous at times.
I didn't have a good way to test for this, so I changed the prototype
of the function to return the number of bytes released, allowing to
get the information needed. The test added fails with the initial
criteria.
Another issue is that `ReleaseToOsInterval` can actually be 0, meaning
we always try to release (side note: it's terrible for performances).
so change a `> 0` check to `>= 0`.
Additionally, decrease the `CanRelease` threshold to `PageSize / 32`.
I still have to make that configurable but I will do it at another time.
Finally, rename some variables in `printStats`: I feel like "available"
was too ambiguous, so change it to "total".
Reviewers: morehouse, hctim, eugenis, vitalybuka, cferris
Reviewed By: morehouse
Subscribers: delcypher, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68471
llvm-svn: 373930
r369697 changed the behavior of stripPointerCasts to no longer include
aliases. However, the code in CGDeclCXX.cpp's createAtExitStub counted
on the looking through aliases to properly set the calling convention of
a call.
The result of the change was that the calling convention mismatch of the
call would be replaced with a llvm.trap, causing a runtime crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68584
llvm-svn: 373929
Split out the logic to parse structure-like types into a separate
function, in an attempt to reduce the complexity of ParseTypeFromDWARF.
Inspired by discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D68130.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68422
llvm-svn: 373927
Since D68289, a couple of tests on linux started being extremely flaky.
All of them were doing name-based attaching and were failing because
they couldn't find an unambiguous process to attach to.
The patch above changed the process finding logic, so that failure to
find a process name does not constitute an error. This meant that a lot
more transient processes showed up in the process list during the test
suite run. Previously, these processes would not appear as they would be
gone by the time we went to read their executable name, arguments, etc.
Now, this alone should not cause an issue were it not for the fact that
we were considering a process with no name as if it matched by default
(even if we were explicitly searching for a process with a specified
name). This meant that any of the "transient" processes with no name
would make the name match ambiguous. That clearly seems like a bug to me
so I fix that.
llvm-svn: 373925
After changing the remark serialization, we now pass StringRefs to the
serializer. We should use StringRef for StringBlockVal, to avoid
creating temporary objects, which then cause StringBlockVal.Value to
point to invalid memory.
Reviewers: thegameg, anemet
Reviewed By: thegameg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68571
llvm-svn: 373923
Summary:
clang-format is incorrectly thinking the parameter parens are part of a cast operation, this is resulting in there sometimes being not space between the paren and the noexcept (and other keywords like volatile etc..)
```
void operator++(int) noexcept;
void operator++(int &) noexcept;
void operator delete(void *, std::size_t, const std::nothrow_t &)noexcept;
```
Reviewers: klimek, owenpan, mitchell-stellar
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68481
llvm-svn: 373922
Summary:
Before making a proposed change, ensure ClangFormat.cpp is fully clang-formatted,
no functional change just clang-formatting using the in tree .clang-format.
Reviewers: mitchell-stellar
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68551
llvm-svn: 373921
The static analyzer is warning about potential null dereferences, but in these cases we should be able to use castAs<> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 373918
Summary:
`toString` generates a string representation of the stencil.
Patch by Harshal T. Lehri.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68574
llvm-svn: 373916
Previously ExtBinary profile format only supports compression using zlib for
profile symbol list. In this patch, we extend the compression support to any
section. User can select some or all of the sections to compress. In an
experiment, for a 45M profile in ExtBinary format, compressing name table
reduced its size to 24M, and compressing all the sections reduced its size
to 11M.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68253
llvm-svn: 373914
Add a --preserve-names option to tell the script not to replace IR names.
Sometimes tests want those names. For example if a test is looking for a
modification to an existing instruction we'll want to make the names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68081
llvm-svn: 373912
The static analyzer is warning about potential null dereferences, but in these cases we should be able to use castAs<> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 373911
Roman Lebedev