Reapplying the patch after modifying the test case.
Inlining the destructor caused the compiler to generate bad IR which failed the Verifier in the backend.
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30341
This patch disables alias to available_externally definitions.
Reviewers: eugenis, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24682
llvm-svn: 283063
When emitting the fundamental type information constants, inherit the
DLLExportAttr from `__fundamental_type_info`. We would previously not
honor the `__declspec(dllexport)` on the type information.
llvm-svn: 282980
Instead of ignoring the evaluation order rule, ignore the "destroy parameters
in reverse construction order" rule for the small number of problematic cases.
This only causes incorrect behavior in the rare case where both parameters to
an overloaded operator <<, >>, ->*, &&, ||, or comma are of class type with
non-trivial destructor, and the program is depending on those parameters being
destroyed in reverse construction order.
We could do a little better here by reversing the order of parameter
destruction for those functions (and reversing the argument evaluation order
for all direct calls, not just those with operator syntax), but that is not a
complete solution to the problem, as the same situation can be reached by an
indirect function call.
Approach reviewed off-line by rnk.
llvm-svn: 282777
Inlining the destructor caused the compiler to generate bad IR which failed the Verifier in the backend.
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30341
This patch disables alias to available_externally definitions.
Reviewers: eugenis, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24682
llvm-svn: 282679
function correctly when targeting MS ABIs (this appears to have never mattered
prior to this change).
Update test case to always cover both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows ABIs, since
they behave somewhat differently from each other here.
Update test case to also cover operators , && and ||, which it appears are also
affected by P0145R3 (they're not explicitly called out by the design document,
but this is the emergent behavior of the existing wording).
Original commit message:
P0145R3 (C++17 evaluation order tweaks): evaluate the right-hand side of
assignment and compound-assignment operators before the left-hand side. (Even
if it's an overloaded operator.)
This completes the implementation of P0145R3 + P0400R0 for all targets except
Windows, where the evaluation order guarantees for <<, >>, and ->* are
unimplementable as the ABI requires the function arguments are evaluated from
right to left (because parameter destructors are run from left to right in the
callee).
llvm-svn: 282619
assignment and compound-assignment operators before the left-hand side. (Even
if it's an overloaded operator.)
This completes the implementation of P0145R3 + P0400R0 for all targets except
Windows, where the evaluation order guarantees for <<, >>, and ->* are
unimplementable as the ABI requires the function arguments are evaluated from
right to left (because parameter destructors are run from left to right in the
callee).
llvm-svn: 282556
* recurse through intermediate LabelStmts and AttributedStmts when checking
whether a statement inside a switch declares a variable
* if the end of a compound statement is reachable from the chosen case label,
and the compound statement contains a variable declaration, it's not valid
to just emit the contents of the compound statement -- we must emit the
statement itself or we lose the scope (and thus end lifetimes at the wrong
point)
llvm-svn: 281797
virtual table offset in a member function pointer.
We are reserving this space for future ABI use relating to alternative
v-table configurations. In the meantime, continue to zero-initialize
this space when actually emitting a member pointer literal.
This will successfully interoperate with existing compilers.
Future versions of the compiler may place additional data in
this location, and at that point, code emitted by compilers
prior to this patch will fail if exposed to such a member pointer.
This is therefore a somewhat hard ABI break. However, because
it is limited to an uncommon case of an uncommon language feature,
and especially because interoperation with the standard library
does not depend on member pointers, we believe that with a
sufficiently advance compiler change the impact of this break
will be minimal in practice.
llvm-svn: 281693
r235815 changed CGRecordLowering::accumulateBases to ignore non-virtual
bases of size 0, which prevented adding those non-virtual bases to
CGRecordLayout's NonVirtualBases. This caused clang to assert when
CGRecordLayout::getNonVirtualBaseLLVMFieldNo was called in
EmitNullConstant. This commit fixes the bug by ignoring zero-sized
non-virtual bases in EmitNullConstant.
rdar://problem/28100139
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24312
llvm-svn: 281405
In r246338, code was added to check for this, but it failed to take into
account implicit destructor invocations because those are not reflected
in the AST. This adds a separate check for them.
llvm-svn: 281395
We should be doing the same checks when a type is completed as we do
when a complete type is used during emission. Previously, we duplicated
the logic, and it got out of sync. This could be observed with
dllimported classes.
Also reduce a test case for this slightly.
Implementing review feedback from David Blaikie on r281057.
llvm-svn: 281278
MSVC emits /include directives in the .drective section for the
__dyn_tls_init function (decorated as ___dyn_tls_init@12 for 32-bit).
This fixes PR30347.
llvm-svn: 281189
The logic for upgrading a class from a forward decl to a complete type
was not checking the debug info emission level before applying the
vtable optimization. This meant we ended up without debug info for a
class which was required to be complete. I noticed it because it
triggered an assertion during CodeView emission, but that's a separate
issue.
llvm-svn: 281057
If a dynamic class contains a dllimport method, then assume the class
may not be constructed in this DLL, and therefore the vtable will live
in a different PDB.
This heuristic is still incomplete, and will miss things like abstract
base classes that are only constructed on one side of the DLL interface.
That said, this heuristic does detect some cases that are currently
problematic, and may be useful to other projects that don't use many
DLLs.
llvm-svn: 281053
Summary:
C++1z 6.4.1/p2:
If the if statement is of the form if constexpr, the value of the
condition shall be a contextually converted constant expression of type
bool [...]
C++1z 5.20/p4:
[...] A contextually converted constant expression of type bool is an
expression, contextually converted to bool (Clause4), where the
converted expression is a constant expression and the conversion
sequence contains only the conversions above. [...]
Contextually converting result of an expression `e` to a Boolean value
requires `bool t(e)` to be well-formed.
An explicit conversion function is only considered as a user-defined
conversion for direct-initialization, which is essentially what
//contextually converted to bool// requires.
Also, fixes PR28470.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24158
llvm-svn: 280838
Move the logic for doing this from the ABI argument lowering into
EmitParmDecl, which runs for all parameters. Our codegen is slightly
suboptimal in this case, as we may leave behind a dead store after
optimization, but it's 32-bit inalloca, and this fixes the bug in a
robust way.
Fixes PR30293
llvm-svn: 280836
If the virtual method comes from a secondary vtable, then the type of
the 'this' parameter should be i8*, and not a pointer to the complete
class. In the MS ABI, the 'this' parameter on entry points to the vptr
containing the virtual method that was called, so we use i8* instead of
the normal type. We had a mismatch where the CGFunctionInfo of the call
didn't match the CGFunctionInfo of the declaration, and this resulted in
some assertions, but now both sides agree the type of 'this' is i8*.
Fixes one issue raised in PR30293
llvm-svn: 280815
copy-initialization. We previously got this wrong in a couple of ways:
- we only looked for copy / move constructors and constructor templates for
this copy, and thus would fail to copy in cases where doing so should use
some other constructor (but see core issue 670),
- we mishandled the special case for disabling user-defined conversions that
blocks infinite recursion through repeated application of a copy constructor
(applying it in slightly too many cases) -- though as far as I can tell,
this does not ever actually affect the result of overload resolution, and
- we misapplied the special-case rules for constructors taking a parameter
whose type is a (reference to) the same class type by incorrectly assuming
that only happens for copy/move constructors (it also happens for
constructors instantiated from templates and those inherited from base
classes).
These changes should only affect strange corner cases (for instance, where the
copy constructor exists but has a non-const-qualified parameter type), so for
the most part it only causes us to produce more 'candidate' notes, but see the
test changes for other cases whose behavior is affected.
llvm-svn: 280776
Some Windows SDK classes, for example
Windows::Storage::Streams::IBufferByteAccess, use the ATL way of spelling
attributes:
[uuid("....")] class IBufferByteAccess {};
To be able to use __uuidof() to grab the uuid off these types, clang needs to
support uuid as a Microsoft attribute. There was already code to skip Microsoft
attributes, extend that to look for uuid and parse it. Use the new "Microsoft"
attribute type added in r280575 (and r280574, r280576) for this.
Final part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23895
llvm-svn: 280578
Clang tests for verifying the following syntaxes:
1. 0xNN and NNh are accepted as valid hexadecimal numbers, but 0xNNh is not.
0xNN and NNh may come with optional U or L suffix.
2. NNb is accepted as a valid binary (base-2) number, but 0bNN is not.
NNb may come with optional U or L suffix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22112
llvm-svn: 280556
Classes with no virtual methods or whose virtual methods were all
inherited from virtual bases don't have a vfptr at offset zero. We were
crashing attempting to get the layout of that non-existent vftable.
We don't need any vshape info in this case because the debugger can
infer it from the base class information. The current class may not
introduce any virtual methods if we are in this situation.
llvm-svn: 280287
The shape is really just the number of methods in the vftable, since we
don't support 16 bit far calls. All calls are near. Encode this number
in the size of the artificial __vtbl_ptr_type DIDerivedType that we
generate. For DWARF, this will be a normal pointer, but for codeview
this will be a wide pointer that gets pattern matched into a
VFTableShape record. Insert this type into the element list of all
dynamic classes when emitting CodeView, so that the backend can emit the
shape even if the vptr lives in a primary base class.
Fixes PR28150
llvm-svn: 280255
Otherwise we can't handle secondary base classes at offsets greater than
2**24. This agrees with libstdc++abi.
We could extend this change to other LLP64 platforms, but then we would
want to update libc++abi and it would require additional review.
Fixes PR29116
llvm-svn: 279786
This isn't exactly what MSVC does, unfortunately. MSVC does not pass
objects with destructors but no copy constructors by address. More ARM
expertise is required to really understand what should be done here.
Fixes PR29136.
llvm-svn: 279764
With -debug-info-kind=limited, we omit debug info for dynamic classes that live in other TUs. This reduces duplicate type information. When statically linked, the type information comes together. But if your binary has a class derived from a base in a DLL, the base class info is not available to the debugger.
The decision is made in shouldOmitDefinition (CGDebugInfo.cpp). Per a suggestion from rnk, I've tweaked the decision so that we do include definitions for classes marked as DLL imports. This should be a relatively small number of classes, so we don't pay a large price for duplication of the type info, yet it should cover most cases on Windows.
Essentially this makes debug info for DLLs independent, but we still assume that all TUs within the same DLL will be consistently built with (or without) debug info and the debugger will be able to search across the debug info within that scope to resolve any declarations into definitions, etc.
llvm-svn: 278861
For now just disregard the using declaration in this case. Suboptimal,
but wiring up the ability to have declarations of functions that are
separate from their definition (we currently only do that for member
functions) and have differing return types (we don't have any support
for that) is more work than seems reasonable to at least fix this crash.
llvm-svn: 277852
Summary:
Previously this crashed inside EmitThisParam(). There should be no
prelude for naked functions, so just skip the whole thing.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22715
llvm-svn: 276925
This change depends on the corresponding LLVM change at:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22519
The llvm.invariant.start and llvm.invariant.end intrinsics currently
support specifying invariant memory objects only in the default address
space.
With this LLVM change, these intrinsics are overloaded for any adddress space
for memory objects and we can use these llvm invariant intrinsics in
non-default address spaces.
Example: llvm.invariant.start.p1i8(i64 4, i8 addrspace(1)* %ptr)
This overloaded intrinsic is needed for representing final or invariant
memory in managed languages.
llvm-svn: 276448
Patch broke ModuleDebugInfo test on the build bots (but not locally). Again.
svn revision: r276271
This reverts commit 9da8a1b05362bc96f2855fb32b5588b89407685d.
llvm-svn: 276279
Aditya Kumar