This came out of a recent discussion on llvm-dev
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D38042). Currently the Verifier will strip
the debug info metadata from a module if it finds the dbeug info to be
malformed. This feature is very valuable since it allows us to improve
the Verifier by making it stricter without breaking bcompatibility,
but arguable the Verifier pass should not be modifying the IR. This
patch moves the stripping of broken debug info into AutoUpgrade
(UpgradeDebugInfo to be precise), which is a much better location for
this since the stripping of malformed (i.e., produced by older, buggy
versions of Clang) is a (harsh) form of AutoUpgrade.
This change is mostly NFC in nature, the one big difference is the
behavior when LLVM module passes are introducing malformed debug
info. Prior to this patch, a NoAsserts build would have printed a
warning and stripped the debug info, after this patch the Verifier
will report a fatal error. I believe this behavior is actually more
desirable anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38184
llvm-svn: 314699
Summary:
This operating system type represents the AMDGPU PAL runtime, and will
be required by the AMDGPU backend in order to generate correct code for
this runtime.
Currently it generates the same code as not specifying an OS at all.
That will change in future commits.
Patch from Tim Corringham.
Subscribers: arsenm, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37380
llvm-svn: 314500
/code/llvm-project/llvm/unittests/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayerTest.cpp:260:38: error: lambda capture 'this' is not used [-Werror,-Wunused-lambda-capture]
[this](decltype(ObjLayer)::ObjHandleT,
llvm-svn: 314454
Summary:
This allows sharing the lattice value code between LVI and SCCP (D36656).
It also adds a `satisfiesPredicate` function, used by D36656.
Reviewers: davide, sanjoy, efriedma
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37591
llvm-svn: 314411
Summary:
And now that we no longer have to explicitly free() the Loop instances, we can
(with more ease) use the destructor of LoopBase to do what LoopBase::clear() was
doing.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38201
llvm-svn: 314375
concept.
Add a unit-test to make sure we don't backslide, and tweak the MockBaseLayer
utility to make it easier to test this kind of thing in the future.
llvm-svn: 314374
The tar format originally supported up to 99 byte filename. The two
extensions are proposed later: Ustar or PAX.
In the UStar extension, a pathanme is split at a '/' and its "prefix"
and "suffix" are stored in different locations in the tar header. Since
"prefix" can be up to 155 byte, it can represent up to 254 byte
filename (but exact limit depends on the location of '/' character in
a pathname.)
Our TarWriter first attempt to use UStar extension and then fallback to
PAX extension.
But there's a bug in UStar header creation. "Suffix" part must be a NUL-
terminated string, but we didn't handle it correctly. As a result, if
your filename just 100 characters long, the last character was droppped.
This patch fixes the issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38149
llvm-svn: 314349
Summary:
Sanitizer blacklist entries currently apply to all sanitizers--there
is no way to specify that an entry should only apply to a specific
sanitizer. This is important for Control Flow Integrity since there are
several different CFI modes that can be enabled at once. For maximum
security, CFI blacklist entries should be scoped to only the specific
CFI mode(s) that entry applies to.
Adding section headers to SpecialCaseLists allows users to specify more
information about list entries, like sanitizer names or other metadata,
like so:
[section1]
fun:*fun1*
[section2|section3]
fun:*fun23*
The section headers are regular expressions. For backwards compatbility,
blacklist entries entered before a section header are put into the '[*]'
section so that blacklists without sections retain the same behavior.
SpecialCaseList has been modified to also accept a section name when
matching against the blacklist. It has also been modified so the
follow-up change to clang can define a derived class that allows
matching sections by SectionMask instead of by string.
Reviewers: pcc, kcc, eugenis, vsk
Reviewed By: eugenis, vsk
Subscribers: vitalybuka, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37924
llvm-svn: 314170
Summary:
A SCEV such as:
{%v2,+,((-1 * (trunc i64 (-1 * %v1) to i32)) + (-1 * (trunc i64 %v1 to i32)))}<%loop>
can be folded into, simply, {%v2,+,0}. However, the current code in ::getAddExpr()
will not try to apply the simplification m*trunc(x)+n*trunc(y) -> trunc(trunc(m)*x+trunc(n)*y)
because it only keys off having a non-multiplied trunc as the first term in the simplification.
This patch generalizes this code to try to do a more generic fold of these trunc
expressions.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37888
llvm-svn: 313988
The fix is to avoid invalidating our insertion point in
replaceDbgDeclare:
Builder.insertDeclare(NewAddress, DIVar, DIExpr, Loc, InsertBefore);
+ if (DII == InsertBefore)
+ InsertBefore = &*std::next(InsertBefore->getIterator());
DII->eraseFromParent();
I had to write a unit tests for this instead of a lit test because the
use list order matters in order to trigger the bug.
The reduced C test case for this was:
void useit(int*);
static inline void inlineme() {
int x[2];
useit(x);
}
void f() {
inlineme();
inlineme();
}
llvm-svn: 313905
Summary:
See comment for why I think this is a good idea.
This change also:
- Removes an SCEV test case. The SCEV test was not testing anything useful (most of it was `#if 0` ed out) and it would need to be updated to deal with a private ~Loop::Loop.
- Updates the loop pass manager test case to deal with a private ~Loop::Loop.
- Renames markAsRemoved to markAsErased to contrast with removeLoop, via the usual remove vs. erase idiom we already have for instructions and basic blocks.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37996
llvm-svn: 313695
This patch makes the `.eh_frame` extension an alias for `.debug_frame`.
Up till now it was only possible to dump the section using objdump, but
not with dwarfdump. Since the two are essentially interchangeable, we
dump whichever of the two is present.
As a workaround, this patch also adds parsing for 3 currently
unimplemented CFA instructions: `DW_CFA_def_cfa_expression`,
`DW_CFA_expression`, and `DW_CFA_val_expression`. Because I lack the
required knowledge, I just parse the fields without actually creating
the instructions.
Finally, this also fixes the typo in the `.debug_frame` section name
which incorrectly contained a trailing `s`.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37852
llvm-svn: 313530
This reverts commit 6389e7aa724ea7671d096f4770f016c3d86b0d54.
There is a bug in this implementation where the string value of the
checksum is outputted, instead of the actual hex bytes. Therefore the
checksum is incorrect, and this prevent pdbs from being loaded by visual
studio. Revert this until the checksum is emitted correctly.
llvm-svn: 313431
Previously the 'Padding' argument was the number of padding
bytes to add. However most callers that use 'Padding' know
how many overall bytes they need to write. With the previous
code this would mean encoding the LEB once to find out how
many bytes it would occupy and then using this to calulate
the 'Padding' value.
See: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36595
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37494
llvm-svn: 313393
Summary:
The checksums had already been placed in the IR, this patch allows
MCCodeView to actually write it out to an MCStreamer.
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37157
llvm-svn: 313374
This patch started as an attempt to rebase Greg's differential (D32821).
The result is both quite similar and different at the same time. It adds
the following checks:
- Verify that all address ranges in a DIE are valid.
- Verify that no ranges within the DIE overlap.
- Verify that no ranges overlap with the ranges of a sibling.
- Verify that children are completely contained in its (direct)
parent's address range. (unless both are subprograms)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37696
llvm-svn: 313255
This patch started as an attempt to rebase Greg's differential (D32821).
The result is both quite similar and different at the same time. It adds
the following checks:
- Verify that all address ranges in a DIE are valid.
- Verify that no ranges within the DIE overlap.
- Verify that no ranges overlap with the ranges of a sibling.
- Verify that children are completely contained in its (direct)
parent's address range. (unless both are subprograms)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37696
llvm-svn: 313250
This returns "cortex-a73" for second-generation Kryo; not precisely
correct, but close enough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37724
llvm-svn: 313200
Summary:
Change the type of the Redirects parameter of llvm::sys::ExecuteAndWait,
ExecuteNoWait and other APIs that wrap them from `const StringRef **` to
`ArrayRef<Optional<StringRef>>`, which is safer and simplifies the use of these
APIs (no more local StringRef variables just to get a pointer to).
Corresponding clang changes will be posted as a separate patch.
Reviewers: bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: vsk, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37563
llvm-svn: 313155
A coverage segment contains a starting line and column, an execution
count, and some other metadata. Clients of the coverage library use
segments to prepare line-oriented reports.
Users of the coverage library depend on segments being unique and sorted
in source order. Currently this is not guaranteed (this is why the clang
change which introduced deferred regions was reverted).
This commit documents the "unique and sorted" condition and asserts that
it holds. It also fixes the SegmentBuilder so that it produces correct
output in some edge cases.
Testing: I've added unit tests for some edge cases. I've also checked
that the new SegmentBuilder implementation is fully covered. Apart from
running check-profile and the llvm-cov tests, I've successfully used a
stage1 llvm-cov to prepare a coverage report for an instrumented clang
binary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36813
llvm-svn: 312817
This patch adds prologue verification, which is already present in
Apple's dwarfdump. It checks for invalid directory indices and warns
about duplicate file paths.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37511
llvm-svn: 312782
This will allow async handlers to be added that return void or Error::success().
Such handlers are expected to be common, since one of the primary uses of
addAsyncHandler is to run the body of the handler in a detached thread, in which
case the main handler returns immediately and does not need to provide an Error
value.
llvm-svn: 312746
The existing code created a JITSymbol with an invalid materializer instead,
guaranteeing a 'missing symbol' error when someone tried to materialize the
symbol.
llvm-svn: 312584
Summary:
When constructing the predicate P1 in ScalarEvolution::createAddRecFromPHIWithCastsImpl() it is possible
for the PHISCEV from which the predicate is constructed to be a SCEVConstant instead of a SCEVAddRec. If
this happens, then the cast<SCEVAddRec>(PHISCEV) in the code will assert.
Such a PHISCEV is possible if either the start value or the accumulator value is a constant value
that not equal to its truncated value, and if the truncated value is zero.
This patch adds tests that demonstrate the cast<> assertion, and fixes this problem by checking
whether the PHISCEV is a constant before constructing the P1 predicate; if it is, then P1 is
equivalent to one of P2 or P3. Additionally, if we know that the start value or accumulator
value are constants then we check whether the P2 and/or P3 predicates are known false at compile
time; if either is, then we bail out of constructing the AddRec.
Reviewers: sanjoy, mkazantsev, silviu.baranga
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Subscribers: mkazantsev, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37265
llvm-svn: 312568
This patch introduces RemoteObjectClientLayer and RemoteObjectServerLayer,
which can be used to forward ORC object-layer operations from a JIT stack in
the client to a JIT stack (consisting only of object-layers) in the server.
This is a new way to support remote-JITing in LLVM. The previous approach
(supported by OrcRemoteTargetClient and OrcRemoteTargetServer) used a
remote-mapping memory manager that sat "beneath" the JIT stack and sent
fully-relocated binary blobs to the server. The main advantage of the new
approach is that relocatable objects can be cached on the server and re-used
(if the code that they represent hasn't changed), whereas fully-relocated blobs
can not (since the addresses they have been permanently bound to will change
from run to run).
llvm-svn: 312511
Calling grow may result in an error if, for example, this is a callback
manager for a remote target. We need to be able to return this error to the
callee.
llvm-svn: 312429
Now that we print DIExpressions inline everywhere, we don't need to
print them once as an operand and again as a value. This is only really
visible when calling dump() or print() directly on a DIExpression during
debugging.
llvm-svn: 312168
cantFail is the moral equivalent of an assertion that the wrapped call must
return a success value. This patch allows clients to include an associated
error message (the same way they would for an assertion for llvm_unreachable).
If the error message is not specified it will default to: "Failure value
returned from cantFail wrapped call".
llvm-svn: 312066
Add abstract virtual method setDefault() to class Option and implement it in its inheritors in order to be able to set all the options to its default values in user's code without actually knowing all these options. For instance:
for (auto &OM : cl::getRegisteredOptions(*cl::TopLevelSubCommand)) {
cl::Option *O = OM.second;
O->setDefault();
}
Reviewed by: rampitec, Eugene.Zelenko, kasaurov
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D36877
llvm-svn: 311887
handleExpected is similar to handleErrors, but takes an Expected<T> as its first
input value and a fallback functor as its second, followed by an arbitary list
of error handlers (equivalent to the handler list of handleErrors). If the first
input value is a success value then it is returned from handleErrors
unmodified. Otherwise the contained error(s) are passed to handleErrors, along
with the handlers. If handleErrors returns success (indicating that all errors
have been handled) then handleExpected runs the fallback functor and returns its
result. If handleErrors returns a failure value then the failure value is
returned and the fallback functor is never run.
This simplifies the process of re-trying operations that return Expected values.
Without this utility such retry logic is cumbersome as the internal Error must
be explicitly extracted from the Expected value, inspected to see if its
handleable and then consumed:
enum FooStrategy { Aggressive, Conservative };
Expected<Foo> tryFoo(FooStrategy S);
Expected<Foo> Result;
(void)!!Result; // "Check" Result so that it can be safely overwritten.
if (auto ValOrErr = tryFoo(Aggressive))
Result = std::move(ValOrErr);
else {
auto Err = ValOrErr.takeError();
if (Err.isA<HandleableError>()) {
consumeError(std::move(Err));
Result = tryFoo(Conservative);
} else
return std::move(Err);
}
with handleExpected, this can be re-written as:
auto Result =
handleExpected(
tryFoo(Aggressive),
[]() { return tryFoo(Conservative); },
[](HandleableError&) { /* discard to handle */ });
llvm-svn: 311870
Summary: The expected order of pointer-like keys is hash-function-dependent which in turn depends on the platform/environment. Need to come up with a better way to test reverse iteration of containers with pointer-like keys.
Reviewers: dblaikie, mehdi_amini, efriedma, mgrang
Reviewed By: mgrang
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37128
llvm-svn: 311741
Summary:
If assertions are disabled, but LLVM_ABI_BREAKING_CHANGES is enabled,
this will cause an issue with an unchecked Success. Switching to
consumeError() is the correct way to bypass the check. This patch also
includes disabling 2 tests that can't work without assertions enabled,
since llvm_unreachable() with NDEBUG won't crash.
Reviewers: llvm-commits, lhames
Reviewed By: lhames
Subscribers: lhames, pirama
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36729
llvm-svn: 311739
Adrian Prantl