In the default PowerPC assembler syntax, registers are specified simply
by number, so they cannot be distinguished from immediate values (without
looking at the opcode). This means that the default operand matching logic
for the asm parser does not work, and we need to specify custom matchers.
Since those can only be specified with RegisterOperand classes and not
directly on the RegisterClass, all instructions patterns used by the asm
parser need to use a RegisterOperand (instead of a RegisterClass) for
all their register operands.
This patch adds one RegisterOperand for each RegisterClass, using the
same name as the class, just in lower case, and updates all instruction
patterns to use RegisterOperand instead of RegisterClass operands.
llvm-svn: 180611
When testing the asm parser, I noticed wrong encodings for the
above instructions (wrong operand name in rldimi, wrong form
and sub-opcode for rldcl).
Tests will be added together with the asm parser.
llvm-svn: 180606
A couple of recently introduced conditional branch patterns
also need to be marked as isCodeGenOnly since they cannot
be handled by the asm parser.
No change in generated code.
llvm-svn: 179690
Now that the CR spilling issues have been resolved, we can remove the
unmodeled-side-effect attributes from the comparison instructions (and also
mark them as isCompare). By allowing these, by default, to have unmodeled side
effects, we were hiding problems with CR spilling; but everything seems much
happier now.
llvm-svn: 179502
Leaving MFCR has having unmodeled side effects is not enough to prevent
unwanted instruction reordering post-RA. We could probably apply a stronger
barrier attribute, but there is a better way: Add all (not just the first) CR
to be spilled as live-in to the entry block, and add all CRs to the MFCR
instruction as implicitly killed.
Unfortunately, I don't have a small test case.
llvm-svn: 179465
TableGen will not combine nested list 'let' bindings into a single list, and
instead uses only the inner scope. As a result, several instruction definitions
were missing implicit register defs that were in outer scopes. This de-nests
these scopes and makes all instructions have only one let binding which sets
implicit register definitions.
llvm-svn: 179392
This is prep. work for the implementation of optimizeCompare. Many PPC
instructions have 'record' forms (in almost all cases, this means that the RC
bit is set) that cause the result of the instruction to be compared with zero,
and the result of that comparison saved in a predefined condition register. In
order to add the record forms of the instructions without too much
copy-and-paste, the relevant functions have been refactored into multiclasses
which define both the record and normal forms.
Also, two TableGen-generated mapping functions have been added which allow
querying the instruction code for the record form given the normal form (and
vice versa).
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 179356
This adds in-principle support for if-converting the bctr[l] instructions.
These instructions are used for indirect branching. It seems, however, that the
current if converter will never actually predicate these. To do so, it would
need the ability to hoist a few setup insts. out of the conditionally-executed
block. For example, code like this:
void foo(int a, int (*bar)()) { if (a != 0) bar(); }
becomes:
...
beq 0, .LBB0_2
std 2, 40(1)
mr 12, 4
ld 3, 0(4)
ld 11, 16(4)
ld 2, 8(4)
mtctr 3
bctrl
ld 2, 40(1)
.LBB0_2:
...
and it would be safe to do all of this unconditionally with a predicated
beqctrl instruction.
llvm-svn: 179156
This enables us to form predicated branches (which are the same conditional
branches we had before) and also a larger set of predicated returns (including
instructions like bdnzlr which is a conditional return and loop-counter
decrement all in one).
At the moment, if conversion does not capture all possible opportunities. A
simple example is provided in early-ret2.ll, where if conversion forms one
predicated return, and then the PPCEarlyReturn pass picks up the other one. So,
at least for now, we'll keep both mechanisms.
llvm-svn: 179134
The P7 and A2 have additional floating-point conversion instructions which
allow a direct two-instruction sequence (plus load/store) to convert from all
combinations (signed/unsigned i32/i64) <--> (float/double) (on previous cores,
only some combinations were directly available).
llvm-svn: 178480
The popcntw instruction is available whenever the popcntd instruction is
available, and performs a separate popcnt on the lower and upper 32-bits.
Ignoring the high-order count, this can be used for the 32-bit input case
(saving on the explicit zero extension otherwise required to use popcntd).
llvm-svn: 178470
The existing SINT_TO_FP code for i32 -> float/double conversion was disabled
because it relied on broken EXTSW_32/STD_32 instruction definitions. The
original intent had been to enable these 64-bit instructions to be used on CPUs
that support them even in 32-bit mode. Unfortunately, this form of lying to
the infrastructure was buggy (as explained in the FIXME comment) and had
therefore been disabled.
This re-enables this functionality, using regular DAG nodes, but only when
compiling in 64-bit mode. The old STD_32/EXTSW_32 definitions (which were dead)
are removed.
llvm-svn: 178438
These are 64-bit load/store with byte-swap, and available on the P7 and the A2.
Like the similar instructions for 16- and 32-bit words, these are matched in the
target DAG-combine phase against load/store-bswap pairs.
llvm-svn: 178276
PPC ISA 2.06 (P7, A2, etc.) has a popcntd instruction. Add this instruction and
tell TTI about it so that popcount-loop recognition will know about it.
llvm-svn: 178233
The register parameter in these instructions becomes the base register in an
r+i ld instruction (and, thus, cannot be r0).
This is not yet testable because we don't yet allocate r0 (and even then any
test would be very fragile).
llvm-svn: 178121
Like the addi/addis instructions themselves, these pseudo instructions also
cannot have r0 as their register parameter (because it will be interpreted as
the value 0).
This is not yet testable because we don't yet allocate r0 (and even when we do,
any regression test would be very fragile because it would depend on the
register allocator heuristics).
llvm-svn: 178118
There remain a number of patterns that cannot (and should not)
be handled by the asm parser, in particular all the Pseudo patterns.
This commit marks those patterns as isCodeGenOnly.
No change in generated code.
llvm-svn: 178008
The LDrs pattern is a duplicate of LD, except that it accepts memory
addresses where the displacement is a symbolLo64. An operand type
"memrs" is defined for just that purpose.
However, this wouldn't be necessary if the default "memrix" operand
type were to simply accept 64-bit symbolic addresses directly.
The only problem with that is that it uses "symbolLo", which is
hardcoded to 32-bit.
To fix this, this commit changes "memri" and "memrix" to use new
operand types for the memory displacement, which allow iPTR
instead of i32. This will also make address parsing easier to
implment in the asm parser.
No change in generated code.
llvm-svn: 178005
The ADDI/ADDI8 patterns are currently duplicated into ADDIL/ADDI8L,
which describe the same instruction, except that they accept a
symbolLo[64] operand instead of a s16imm[64] operand.
This duplication confuses the asm parser, and it actually not really
needed, since symbolLo[64] already accepts immediate operands anyway.
So this commit removes the duplicate patterns.
No change in generated code.
llvm-svn: 178004
This commit changes the ISEL patterns to use a CCBITRC operand
instead of a "pred" operand. This matches the actual instruction
text more directly, and simplifies use of ISEL with the asm parser.
In addition, this change allows some simplification of handling
the "pred" operand, as this is now only used by BCC.
No change in generated code.
llvm-svn: 178003
In PPCInstr64Bit.td, some branch patterns appear in a different sequence
than the corresponding 32-bit patterns in PPCInstrInfo.td.
To simplify future changes that affect both files, this commit moves
those patterns to rearrange them into a similar sequence.
No effect on generated code.
llvm-svn: 178001
This commit updates the PowerPC back-end (PPCInstrInfo.td and
PPCInstr64Bit.td) to use types instead of register classes in
instruction patterns, along the lines of Jakob Stoklund Olesen's
changes in r177835 for Sparc.
llvm-svn: 177890
This commit updates the PowerPC back-end (PPCInstrInfo.td and
PPCInstr64Bit.td) to use types instead of register classes in
Pat patterns, along the lines of Jakob Stoklund Olesen's
changes in r177829 for Sparc.
llvm-svn: 177889
We currently have a duplicated set of call instruction patterns depending
on the ABI to be followed (Darwin vs. Linux). This is a bit odd; while the
different ABIs will result in different instruction sequences, the actual
instructions themselves ought to be independent of the ABI. And in fact it
turns out that the only nontrivial difference between the two sets of
patterns is that in the PPC64 Linux ABI, the instruction used for indirect
calls is marked to take X11 as extra input register (which is indeed used
only with that ABI to hold an incoming environment pointer for nested
functions). However, this does not need to be hard-coded at the .td
pattern level; instead, the C++ code expanding calls can simply add that
use, just like it adds uses for argument registers anyway.
No change in generated code expected.
llvm-svn: 177735
Currently, the sub-operand of a memrr address that corresponds to what
hardware considers the base register is called "offreg", while the
sub-operand that corresponds to the offset is called "ptrreg".
To avoid confusion, this patch simply swaps the named of those two
sub-operands and updates all uses. No functional change is intended.
llvm-svn: 177734
PPCTargetLowering::getPreIndexedAddressParts currently provides
the base part of a memory address in the offset result, and the
offset part in the base result. That swap is then undone again
when an MI instruction is generated (in PPCDAGToDAGISel::Select
for loads, and using .md Pat patterns for stores).
This patch reverts this double swap, to make common code and
back-end be in sync as to which part of the address is base
and which is offset.
To avoid performance regressions in certain cases, target code
now checks whether the choice of base register would be rejected
for pre-inc accesses by common code, and attempts to swap base
and offset again in such cases. (Overall, this means that now
pre-ice accesses are generated *more* frequently than before.)
llvm-svn: 177733
The xaddroff pattern is currently (mistakenly) used to recognize
the *base* register in pre-inc store patterns. This patch replaces
those uses by ptr_rc_nor0 (as is elsewhere done to match the base
register of an address), and removes the now unused ComplexPattern.
llvm-svn: 177731
Thanks to Jakob for isolating the underlying problem from the
test case in r177423. The original commit had introduced
asymmetric copy operations, but these turned out to be a work-around
to the real problem (the use of == instead of hasSubClassEq in PPCCTRLoops).
llvm-svn: 177679
This implements SJLJ lowering on PPC, making the Clang functions
__builtin_{setjmp/longjmp} functional on PPC platforms. The implementation
strategy is similar to that on X86, with the exception that a branch-and-link
variant is used to get the right jump address. Credit goes to Bill Schmidt for
suggesting the use of the unconditional bcl form (instead of the regular bl
instruction) to limit return-address-cache pollution.
Benchmarking the speed at -O3 of:
static jmp_buf env_sigill;
void foo() {
__builtin_longjmp(env_sigill,1);
}
main() {
...
for (int i = 0; i < c; ++i) {
if (__builtin_setjmp(env_sigill)) {
goto done;
} else {
foo();
}
done:;
}
...
}
vs. the same code using the libc setjmp/longjmp functions on a P7 shows that
this builtin implementation is ~4x faster with Altivec enabled and ~7.25x
faster with Altivec disabled. This comparison is somewhat unfair because the
libc version must also save/restore the VSX registers which we don't yet
support.
llvm-svn: 177666
All pre-increment load patterns need to set the mayLoad flag (since
they don't provide a DAG pattern).
This was missing for LHAUX8 and LWAUX, which is added by this patch.
llvm-svn: 177431
As opposed to to pre-increment store patterns, the pre-increment
load patterns were already using standard memory operands, with
the sole exception of LHAU8.
As there's no real reason why LHAU8 should be different here,
this patch simply rewrites the pattern to also use a memri
operand, just like all the other patterns.
llvm-svn: 177430
Currently, pre-increment store patterns are written to use two separate
operands to represent address base and displacement:
stwu $rS, $ptroff($ptrreg)
This causes problems when implementing the assembler parser, so this
commit changes the patterns to use standard (complex) memory operands
like in all other memory access instruction patterns:
stwu $rS, $dst
To still match those instructions against the appropriate pre_store
SelectionDAG nodes, the patch uses the new feature that allows a Pat
to match multiple DAG operands against a single (complex) instruction
operand.
Approved by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 177429
The tocentry operand class refers to 64-bit values (it is only used in 64-bit,
where iPTR is a 64-bit type), but its sole suboperand is designated as 32-bit
type. This causes a mismatch to be detected at compile-time with the TableGen
patch I'll check in shortly.
To fix this, this commit changes the suboperand to a 64-bit type as well.
llvm-svn: 177427
Currently the PPC r0 register is unconditionally reserved. There are two reasons
for this:
1. r0 is treated specially (as the constant 0) by certain instructions, and so
cannot be used with those instructions as a regular register.
2. r0 is used as a temporary register in the CR-register spilling process
(where, under some circumstances, we require two GPRs).
This change addresses the first reason by introducing a restricted register
class (without r0) for use by those instructions that treat r0 specially. These
register classes have a new pseudo-register, ZERO, which represents the r0-as-0
use. This has the side benefit of making the existing target code simpler (and
easier to understand), and will make it clear to the register allocator that
uses of r0 as 0 don't conflict will real uses of the r0 register.
Once the CR spilling code is improved, we'll be able to allocate r0.
Adding these extra register classes, for some reason unclear to me, causes
requests to the target to copy 32-bit registers to 64-bit registers. The
resulting code seems correct (and causes no test-suite failures), and the new
test case covers this new kind of asymmetric copy.
As r0 is still reserved, no functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 177423
Remove an accidentally-added instruction definition and add a comment in the
test case. This is in response to a post-commit review by Bill Schmidt.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 177404
PPC64 supports unaligned loads and stores of 64-bit values, but
in order to use the r+i forms, the offset must be a multiple of 4.
Unfortunately, this cannot always be determined by examining the
immediate itself because it might be available only via a TOC entry.
In order to get around this issue, we additionally predicate the
selection of the r+i form on the alignment of the load or store
(forcing it to be at least 4 in order to select the r+i form).
llvm-svn: 177338
Large code model is identical to medium code model except that the
addis/addi sequence for "local" accesses is never used. All accesses
use the addis/ld sequence.
The coding changes are straightforward; most of the patch is taken up
with creating variants of the medium model tests for large model.
llvm-svn: 175767
for a wider range of GOT entries that can hold thread-relative offsets.
This matches the behavior of GCC, which was not documented in the PPC64 TLS
ABI. The ABI will be updated with the new code sequence.
Former sequence:
ld 9,x@got@tprel(2)
add 9,9,x@tls
New sequence:
addis 9,2,x@got@tprel@ha
ld 9,x@got@tprel@l(9)
add 9,9,x@tls
Note that a linker optimization exists to transform the new sequence into
the shorter sequence when appropriate, by replacing the addis with a nop
and modifying the base register and relocation type of the ld.
llvm-svn: 170209
some hackery in place that hid my poor use of TblGen, which I've now sorted
out and cleaned up. No change in observable behavior, so no new test cases.
llvm-svn: 170149
PowerPC target. This is the last of the four models, so we now have
full TLS support.
This is mostly a straightforward extension of the general dynamic model.
I had to use an additional Chain operand to tie ADDIS_DTPREL_HA to the
register copy following ADDI_TLSLD_L; otherwise everything above the
ADDIS_DTPREL_HA appeared dead and was removed.
As before, there are new test cases to test the assembly generation, and
the relocations output during integrated assembly. The expected code
gen sequence can be read in test/CodeGen/PowerPC/tls-ld.ll.
There are a couple of things I think can be done more efficiently in the
overall TLS code, so there will likely be a clean-up patch forthcoming;
but for now I want to be sure the functionality is in place.
Bill
llvm-svn: 170003
Given a thread-local symbol x with global-dynamic access, the generated
code to obtain x's address is:
Instruction Relocation Symbol
addis ra,r2,x@got@tlsgd@ha R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD16_HA x
addi r3,ra,x@got@tlsgd@l R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD16_L x
bl __tls_get_addr(x@tlsgd) R_PPC64_TLSGD x
R_PPC64_REL24 __tls_get_addr
nop
<use address in r3>
The implementation borrows from the medium code model work for introducing
special forms of ADDIS and ADDI into the DAG representation. This is made
slightly more complicated by having to introduce a call to the external
function __tls_get_addr. Using the full call machinery is overkill and,
more importantly, makes it difficult to add a special relocation. So I've
introduced another opcode GET_TLS_ADDR to represent the function call, and
surrounded it with register copies to set up the parameter and return value.
Most of the code is pretty straightforward. I ran into one peculiarity
when I introduced a new PPC opcode BL8_NOP_ELF_TLSGD, which is just like
BL8_NOP_ELF except that it takes another parameter to represent the symbol
("x" above) that requires a relocation on the call. Something in the
TblGen machinery causes BL8_NOP_ELF and BL8_NOP_ELF_TLSGD to be treated
identically during the emit phase, so this second operand was never
visited to generate relocations. This is the reason for the slightly
messy workaround in PPCMCCodeEmitter.cpp:getDirectBrEncoding().
Two new tests are included to demonstrate correct external assembly and
correct generation of relocations using the integrated assembler.
Comments welcome!
Thanks,
Bill
llvm-svn: 169910
on 64-bit PowerPC ELF.
The patch includes code to handle external assembly and MC output with the
integrated assembler. It intentionally does not support the "old" JIT.
For the initial-exec TLS model, the ABI requires the following to calculate
the address of external thread-local variable x:
Code sequence Relocation Symbol
ld 9,x@got@tprel(2) R_PPC64_GOT_TPREL16_DS x
add 9,9,x@tls R_PPC64_TLS x
The register 9 is arbitrary here. The linker will replace x@got@tprel
with the offset relative to the thread pointer to the generated GOT
entry for symbol x. It will replace x@tls with the thread-pointer
register (13).
The two test cases verify correct assembly output and relocation output
as just described.
PowerPC-specific selection node variants are added for the two
instructions above: LD_GOT_TPREL and ADD_TLS. These are inserted
when an initial-exec global variable is encountered by
PPCTargetLowering::LowerGlobalTLSAddress(), and later lowered to
machine instructions LDgotTPREL and ADD8TLS. LDgotTPREL is a pseudo
that uses the same LDrs support added for medium code model's LDtocL,
with a different relocation type.
The rest of the processing is straightforward.
llvm-svn: 169281
The default for 64-bit PowerPC is small code model, in which TOC entries
must be addressable using a 16-bit offset from the TOC pointer. Additionally,
only TOC entries are addressed via the TOC pointer.
With medium code model, TOC entries and data sections can all be addressed
via the TOC pointer using a 32-bit offset. Cooperation with the linker
allows 16-bit offsets to be used when these are sufficient, reducing the
number of extra instructions that need to be executed. Medium code model
also does not generate explicit TOC entries in ".section toc" for variables
that are wholly internal to the compilation unit.
Consider a load of an external 4-byte integer. With small code model, the
compiler generates:
ld 3, .LC1@toc(2)
lwz 4, 0(3)
.section .toc,"aw",@progbits
.LC1:
.tc ei[TC],ei
With medium model, it instead generates:
addis 3, 2, .LC1@toc@ha
ld 3, .LC1@toc@l(3)
lwz 4, 0(3)
.section .toc,"aw",@progbits
.LC1:
.tc ei[TC],ei
Here .LC1@toc@ha is a relocation requesting the upper 16 bits of the
32-bit offset of ei's TOC entry from the TOC base pointer. Similarly,
.LC1@toc@l is a relocation requesting the lower 16 bits. Note that if
the linker determines that ei's TOC entry is within a 16-bit offset of
the TOC base pointer, it will replace the "addis" with a "nop", and
replace the "ld" with the identical "ld" instruction from the small
code model example.
Consider next a load of a function-scope static integer. For small code
model, the compiler generates:
ld 3, .LC1@toc(2)
lwz 4, 0(3)
.section .toc,"aw",@progbits
.LC1:
.tc test_fn_static.si[TC],test_fn_static.si
.type test_fn_static.si,@object
.local test_fn_static.si
.comm test_fn_static.si,4,4
For medium code model, the compiler generates:
addis 3, 2, test_fn_static.si@toc@ha
addi 3, 3, test_fn_static.si@toc@l
lwz 4, 0(3)
.type test_fn_static.si,@object
.local test_fn_static.si
.comm test_fn_static.si,4,4
Again, the linker may replace the "addis" with a "nop", calculating only
a 16-bit offset when this is sufficient.
Note that it would be more efficient for the compiler to generate:
addis 3, 2, test_fn_static.si@toc@ha
lwz 4, test_fn_static.si@toc@l(3)
The current patch does not perform this optimization yet. This will be
addressed as a peephole optimization in a later patch.
For the moment, the default code model for 64-bit PowerPC will remain the
small code model. We plan to eventually change the default to medium code
model, which matches current upstream GCC behavior. Note that the different
code models are ABI-compatible, so code compiled with different models will
be linked and execute correctly.
I've tested the regression suite and the application/benchmark test suite in
two ways: Once with the patch as submitted here, and once with additional
logic to force medium code model as the default. The tests all compile
cleanly, with one exception. The mandel-2 application test fails due to an
unrelated ABI compatibility with passing complex numbers. It just so happens
that small code model was incredibly lucky, in that temporary values in
floating-point registers held the expected values needed by the external
library routine that was called incorrectly. My current thought is to correct
the ABI problems with _Complex before making medium code model the default,
to avoid introducing this "regression."
Here are a few comments on how the patch works, since the selection code
can be difficult to follow:
The existing logic for small code model defines three pseudo-instructions:
LDtoc for most uses, LDtocJTI for jump table addresses, and LDtocCPT for
constant pool addresses. These are expanded by SelectCodeCommon(). The
pseudo-instruction approach doesn't work for medium code model, because
we need to generate two instructions when we match the same pattern.
Instead, new logic in PPCDAGToDAGISel::Select() intercepts the TOC_ENTRY
node for medium code model, and generates an ADDIStocHA followed by either
a LDtocL or an ADDItocL. These new node types correspond naturally to
the sequences described above.
The addis/ld sequence is generated for the following cases:
* Jump table addresses
* Function addresses
* External global variables
* Tentative definitions of global variables (common linkage)
The addis/addi sequence is generated for the following cases:
* Constant pool entries
* File-scope static global variables
* Function-scope static variables
Expanding to the two-instruction sequences at select time exposes the
instructions to subsequent optimization, particularly scheduling.
The rest of the processing occurs at assembly time, in
PPCAsmPrinter::EmitInstruction. Each of the instructions is converted to
a "real" PowerPC instruction. When a TOC entry needs to be created, this
is done here in the same manner as for the existing LDtoc, LDtocJTI, and
LDtocCPT pseudo-instructions (I factored out a new routine to handle this).
I had originally thought that if a TOC entry was needed for LDtocL or
ADDItocL, it would already have been generated for the previous ADDIStocHA.
However, at higher optimization levels, the ADDIStocHA may appear in a
different block, which may be assembled textually following the block
containing the LDtocL or ADDItocL. So it is necessary to include the
possibility of creating a new TOC entry for those two instructions.
Note that for LDtocL, we generate a new form of LD called LDrs. This
allows specifying the @toc@l relocation for the offset field of the LD
instruction (i.e., the offset is replaced by a SymbolLo relocation).
When the peephole optimization described above is added, we will need
to do similar things for all immediate-form load and store operations.
The seven "mcm-n.ll" test cases are kept separate because otherwise the
intermingling of various TOC entries and so forth makes the tests fragile
and hard to understand.
The above assumes use of an external assembler. For use of the
integrated assembler, new relocations are added and used by
PPCELFObjectWriter. Testing is done with "mcm-obj.ll", which tests for
proper generation of the various relocations for the same sequences
tested with the external assembler.
llvm-svn: 168708
Ulrich Weigand