references instead.
Similarly, IntervalMap::begin() is almost as expensive as find(), so use find(x)
instead of begin().advanceTo(x);
This makes RegAllocBasic run another 5% faster.
llvm-svn: 121344
particular, the immediate has 20-bits of value instead of 21. And bit 0 is '0'
always. Going through the BL fixup encoding was trashing the "bit 0 is '0'"
invariant.
Attempt to get the encoding at slightly more correct with this.
llvm-svn: 121336
declaration that is a value in ill-formed code. Instead of crashing,
treat this as a dependent typename specifier and suggest that the
using add "typename" into the using declaration. Fixes <rdar://problem/8740998>.
llvm-svn: 121322
Added test to check bl __aeabi_read_tp gets emitted properly for ELF/ASM
as well as ELF/OBJ (including fixup)
Also added support for ELF::R_ARM_TLS_IE32
llvm-svn: 121312
used as the arguments for the inferior program. So for example you can do
% lldb /bin/ls /tmp ~/Documents
And "lldb" will use "/bin/ls" as the program and send arguments "/tmp" and
"~/Documents" as the launch args.
If you specify a file, then all remaining args after option parsing
will be used for program arguments:
% lldb -f /bin/ls /tmp ~/Documents
If you need to pass option values to your inferior program, just terminate
the "lldb" command line driver options with "--":
% lldb -- /bin/ls -AFl /tmp
The arguments are placed into the "settings" variable named
"target.process.run-args". This allows you to just run the program using
"process launch" and, if no args are specified on that command, the
"target.process.run-args" values will be used:
% lldb -- /bin/ls -AFl /tmp
Current executable set to '/bin/ls' (x86_64).
(lldb) settings show target.process.run-args
target.process.run-args (array):
[0]: '-AFl'
[1]: '/tmp'
(lldb)
(lldb) r
Process 56753 launched: '/bin/ls' (x86_64)
lrwxr-xr-x@ 1 root wheel 11 Nov 19 2009 /tmp@ -> private/tmp
llvm-svn: 121295
abstract priority queue interface in subclasses that want to override the
priority calculations.
Subclasses must provide a getPriority() implementation instead.
This approach requires less code as long as priorities are expressable as simple
floats, and it avoids the dangers of defining potentially expensive priority
comparison functions.
It also should speed up priority_queue operations since they no longer have to
chase pointers when comparing registers. This is not measurable, though.
Preferably, we shouldn't use floats to guide code generation. The use of floats
here is derived from the use of floats for spill weights. Spill weights have a
dynamic range that doesn't lend itself easily to a fixpoint implementation.
When someone invents a stable spill weight representation, it can be reused for
allocation priorities.
llvm-svn: 121294
Jim Grosbach