This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually use the target, so we might as well move this out of Support.
This allows us to ensure that Support doesn't have includes from MC/*.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111454
- Introduce a skeleton outline for the GOFFAsmParser
- Before instantiating AsmParser/HLASMAsmParser, target specific asm parsers are attempted to be initialized first before proceeding. If it doesn't exist for a particular file type, we report a fatal error.
- This patch allows to properly instantiate the HLASMAsmParser on z/OS, and ensures we can write lit tests and unit tests which will involve the instantiation of asm parsers, without an assert / fatal error.
Reviewed By: uweigand, Kai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110730
- This patch adds in the GOFFMCAsmInfo interfaces for the z/OS target.
- This patch decouples the previously existing SystemZMCAsmInfo interface for the ELF target and the z/OS target.
- This patch also removes a small test in the SystemZAsmLexerTest.cpp. The reason for this is because, the test is set up for the s390x-ibm-linux (SystemZ ELF triple), and the test checks a function which is overridden only for the z/OS target. The reason we can't change the test to use a z/OS triple outright is because there is still missing support which prevents the successful running of a test (assert in AsmParser.cpp due to missing GOFFAsmParser support)
Reviewed By: uweigand, abhina.sreeskantharajan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110077
- Currently, the emitting of labels in the parsePrimaryExpr function is case independent. It just takes the identifier and emits it.
- However, for HLASM the emitting of labels is case independent. We are emitting them in the upper case only, to enforce case independency. So we need to ensure that at the time of parsing the label we are emitting the upper case (in `parseAsHLASMLabel`), but also, when we are processing a PC-relative relocatable expression, we need to ensure we emit it in upper case (in `parsePrimaryExpr`)
- To achieve this a new MCAsmInfo attribute has been introduced which corresponding targets can override if needed.
Reviewed By: abhina.sreeskantharajan, uweigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104715
- Currently, before printing a label in MCSymbol.cpp (MCSymbol::print), the current code "validates" the label that is to be printed.
- If it fails the validation step, then it prints the label within double quotes.
- However, the validation is provided as a virtual function in MCAsmInfo.h (i.e. isAcceptableChar() function). So we can override this for the AD_HLASM dialect in SystemZMCAsmInfo.cpp.
Reviewed By: uweigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103091
This makes it possible for targets to define their own MCObjectFileInfo.
This MCObjectFileInfo is then used to determine things like section alignment.
This is a follow up to D101462 and prepares for the RISCV backend defining the
text section alignment depending on the enabled extensions.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101921
This untangles the MCContext and the MCObjectFileInfo. There is a circular
dependency between MCContext and MCObjectFileInfo. Currently this dependency
also exists during construction: You can't contruct a MOFI without a MCContext
without constructing the MCContext with a dummy version of that MOFI first.
This removes this dependency during construction. In a perfect world,
MCObjectFileInfo wouldn't depend on MCContext at all, but only be stored in the
MCContext, like other MC information. This is future work.
This also shifts/adds more information to the MCContext making it more
available to the different targets. Namely:
- TargetTriple
- ObjectFileType
- SubtargetInfo
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101462
- As per the HLASM support we are providing, i.e. support only for the first parameter of the inline asm block, only pertaining to Z machine instructions defined in LLVM, character literals and string literals are not supported (see Figure 4 - https://www-01.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zOSV2R3sc264940/$file/asmr1023.pdf for more information)
- This patch explicitly rejects the usage of char literals and string literals (for example "abc 'a'") when the relevant field is set
- This is achieved by introducing a field called `LexHLASMStrings` in MCAsmLexer similar to `LexMasmStrings`
Reviewed By: abhina.sreeskantharajan, Kai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101660
- This patch attempts to implement the location counter syntax (*) for the HLASM variant for PC-relative instructions.
- In the HLASM variant, for purely constant relocatable values, we expect a * token preceding it, with special support for " *" which is parsed as "<pc-rel-insn 0>"
- For combinations of absolute values and relocatable values, we don't expect the "*" preceding the token.
When you have a " * " what’s accepted is:
```
*<space>.*{.*} -> <pc-rel-insn> 0
*[+|-][constant-value] -> <pc-rel-insn> [+|-]constant-value
```
When you don’t have a " * " what’s accepted is:
```
brasl 1,func is allowed (MCSymbolRef type)
brasl 1,func+4 is allowed (MCBinary type)
brasl 1,4+func is allowed (MCBinary type)
brasl 1,-4+func is allowed (MCBinary type)
brasl 1,func-4 is allowed (MCBinary type)
brasl 1,*func is not allowed (* cannot be used for non-MCConstantExprs)
brasl 1,*+func is not allowed (* cannot be used for non-MCConstantExprs)
brasl 1,*+func+4 is not allowed (* cannot be used for non-MCConstantExprs)
brasl 1,*+4+func is not allowed (* cannot be used for non-MCConstantExprs)
brasl 1,*-4+8+func is not allowed (* cannot be used for non-MCConstantExprs)
```
Reviewed By: Kai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100987
- Currently, the "." (Dot) character, when not identifying an Identifier or a Constant, refers to the current PC (Program Counter)
- However, in z/OS, for the HLASM dialect, it strictly accepts only the "*" as the current PC (Support for this will be put up in a follow-up patch)
- The changes in this patch allow individual platforms to choose whether they would like to use the "." (Dot) character as a marker for the current PC or not.
- It is achieved by introducing a new field in MCAsmInfo.h called `DotIsPC` (similar to `DollarIsPC`)
Reviewed By: abhina.sreeskantharajan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100975
- Previously, https://reviews.llvm.org/D99889 changed the framework in the AsmLexer to treat special tokens, if they occur at the start of the string, as Identifiers.
- These are used by the MASM Parser implementation in LLVM, and we can extend some of the changes made in the previous patch to SystemZ.
- In SystemZ, the special "tokens" referred to here are "_", "$", "@", "#". [_|$|@|#] are already supported as "part" of an Identifier.
- The changes in this patch ensure that these special tokens, when they occur at the start of the Identifier, are treated as Identifiers.
Reviewed By: abhina.sreeskantharajan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100959
- Previously, https://reviews.llvm.org/D72680 introduced a new attribute called `AllowSymbolAtNameStart` (in relation to the MAsmParser changes) in `MCAsmInfo.h` which (according to the comment in the header) allows the following behaviour:
```
/// This is true if the assembler allows $ @ ? characters at the start of
/// symbol names. Defaults to false.
```
- However, the usage of this field in AsmLexer.cpp doesn't seem completely accurate* for a couple of reasons.
```
default:
if (MAI.doesAllowSymbolAtNameStart()) {
// Handle Microsoft-style identifier: [a-zA-Z_$.@?][a-zA-Z0-9_$.@#?]*
if (!isDigit(CurChar) &&
isIdentifierChar(CurChar, MAI.doesAllowAtInName(),
AllowHashInIdentifier))
return LexIdentifier();
}
```
1. The Dollar and At tokens, when occurring at the start of the string, are treated as separate tokens (AsmToken::Dollar and AsmToken::At respectively) and not lexed as an Identifier.
2. I'm not too sure why `MAI.doesAllowAtInName()` is used when `AllowAtInIdentifier` could be used. For X86 platforms, afaict, this shouldn't be an issue, since the `CommentString` attribute isn't "@". (alternatively the call to the setter can be set anywhere else as needed). The `AllowAtInName` does have an additional important meaning, but in the context of AsmLexer, shouldn't mean anything different compared to `AllowAtInIdentifier`
My proposal is the following:
- Introduce 3 new fields called `AllowQuestionTokenAtStartOfString`, `AllowDollarTokenAtStartOfString` and `AllowAtTokenAtStartOfString` in MCAsmInfo.h which will encapsulate the previously documented behaviour of "allowing $, @, ? characters at the start of symbol names")
- Introduce these fields where "$", "@" are lexed, and treat them as identifiers depending on whether `Allow[Dollar|At]TokenAtStartOfString` is set.
- For the sole case of "?", append it to the existing logic for treating a "default" token as an Identifier.
z/OS (HLASM) will also make use of some of these fields in follow up patches.
completely accurate* - This was based on the comments and the intended behaviour the code. I might have completely misinterpreted it, and if that is the case my sincere apologies. We can close this patch if necessary, if there are no changes to be made :)
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D99374
Reviewed By: Jonathan.Crowther
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99889
- Add support for HLASM style integers. These are the decimal integers [0-9].
- HLASM does not support the additional prefixed integers like, `0b`, `0x`, octal integers and Masm style integers.
- To achieve this, a field `LexHLASMStyleIntegers` (similar to the `LexMasmStyleIntegers` field) is introduced in `MCAsmLexer.h` as well as a corresponding setter.
Note: This field could also go into MCAsmInfo.h. I used the previous precedent set by the `LexMasmIntegers` field.
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D99286
Reviewed By: epastor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99374
- Currently, MCAsmInfo provides a CommentString attribute, that various targets can set, so that the AsmLexer can appropriately lex a string as a comment based on the set value of the attribute.
- However, AsmLexer also supports a few additional comment syntaxes, in addition to what's specified as a CommentString attribute. This includes regular C-style block comments (/* ... */), regular C-style line comments (// .... ) and #. While I'm not sure as to why this behaviour exists, I am assuming it does to maintain backward compatibility with GNU AS (see https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/as/Comments.html#Comments for reference)
For example:
Consider a target which sets the CommentString attribute to '*'.
The following strings are all lexed as comments.
```
"# abc" -> comment
"// abc" -> comment
"/* abc */ -> comment
"* abc" -> comment
```
- In HLASM however, only "*" is accepted as a comment string, and nothing else.
- To achieve this, an additional attribute (`AllowAdditionalComments`) has been added to MCAsmInfo. If this attribute is set to false, then only the string specified by the CommentString attribute is used as a possible comment string to be lexed by the AsmLexer. The regular C-style block comments, line comments and "#" are disabled. As a final note, "#" will still be treated as a comment, if the CommentString attribute is set to "#".
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D99277
Reviewed By: abhina.sreeskantharajan, myiwanch
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99286
- This patch adds in support to accept the "#" character as part of an Identifier.
- This support is needed especially for the HLASM dialect since "#" is treated as part of the valid "Alphabet" range
- The way this is done is by making use of the previous precedent set by the `AllowAtInIdentifier` field in `MCAsmLexer.h`. A new field called `AllowHashInIdentifier` is introduced.
- The static function `IsIdentifierChar` is also updated to accept the `#` character if the `AllowHashInIdentifier` field is set to true.
Note: The field introduced in `MCAsmLexer.h` could very well be moved to `MCAsmInfo.h`. I'm not opposed to it. I decided to put it in `MCAsmLexer` since there seems to be some sort of precedent already with `AllowAtInIdentifier`.
Reviewed By: abhina.sreeskantharajan, nickdesaulniers, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99277
- https://reviews.llvm.org/rGb605cfb336989705f391d255b7628062d3dfe9c3 was reverted due to sanitizer bugs in the introduced unit-test (specifically in the Address sanitizer https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/5697)
- This patch attempts to rectify that, as well as re-factor parts of the test
- The issue was previously, within the `setupCallToAsmParser` function in the unit-test, `SrcMgr` was declared as a local variable. `SrcMgr` owns a unique pointer. Since the variable goes out of scope at the end of the function, the unique pointer is released.
- This patch, moves the declaration of the `SrcMgr` variable to a class field, since the scope will remain until the class's destructor is invoked (which in this case is at the end of the unit test)
- Furthermore, this patch also moves the `MCContext Ctx` declaration from a local variable instance inside a function, to a unique pointer class field. This ensures the instantiation of the MCContext remains until the tear down of the test.
Reviewed By: abhina.sreeskantharajan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99004
- Previously, https://reviews.llvm.org/D97703 was [[ https://reviews.llvm.org/D98543 | reverted ]] as it broke when building the unit tests when shared libs on.
- This patch reverts the "revert" and makes two minor changes
- The first is it also links in the MCParser lib when building the unittest. This should resolve the issue when building with with shared libs on and off
- The second renames the name of the unit test from `SystemZAsmLexer` to `SystemZAsmLexerTests` since the convention for unittest binaries is to suffix the name of the unit test with "Tests"
Reviewed By: Kai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98666
- This patch adds in support for the ordinary HLASM comment syntax asm
statements (Reference - Chapter 7, Comment Statements, Ordinary Comment
Statements)
- In brief, the ordinary comment syntax if used, must begin with the "*"
character
- To achieve this, this patch makes use of the CommentString attribute
provided in the base MCAsmInfo class
- In the SystemZMCAsmInfo class, the CommentString attribute was set to
"*" based on the assembler dialect
- Furthermore, a new attribute RestrictCommentString, is provided to only
treat a string as a comment if it appears at the start of the asm
statement. Example: "jo *-4" is valid in HLASM (jump back 4 bytes from
current point - similar to jo -4 in gnu asm) and we don't want "*-4" to
be treated as a comment.
- RFC for HLASM Parser support implementation: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-January/147686.html
Reviewed By: scott.linder, Kai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97703
Reid Kleckner