When processing the command line options march, mcpu and mfpu, we store
the implied target features on a vector. The change D62998 introduced a
temporary vector, where the processed features get accumulated. When
calling DecodeARMFeaturesFromCPU, which sets the default features for
the specified CPU, we certainly don't want to override the features
that have been explicitly specified on the command line. Therefore, the
default features should appear first in the final vector. This problem
became evident once I added the missing (unhandled) target features in
ARM::getExtensionFeatures.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63936
llvm-svn: 366027
Removes a vector reference that was added by D62998, since the
preexisting function parameter is sufficient.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64044
llvm-svn: 364895
Change D60691 caused some knock-on failures that weren't caught by the
existing tests. Firstly, selecting a CPU that should have had a
restricted FPU (e.g. `-mcpu=cortex-m4`, which should have 16 d-regs
and no double precision) could give the unrestricted version, because
`ARM::getFPUFeatures` returned a list of features including subtracted
ones (here `-fp64`,`-d32`), but `ARMTargetInfo::initFeatureMap` threw
away all the ones that didn't start with `+`. Secondly, the
preprocessor macros didn't reliably match the actual compilation
settings: for example, `-mfpu=softvfp` could still set `__ARM_FP` as
if hardware FP was available, because the list of features on the cc1
command line would include things like `+vfp4`,`-vfp4d16` and clang
didn't realise that one of those cancelled out the other.
I've fixed both of these issues by rewriting `ARM::getFPUFeatures` so
that it returns a list that enables every FP-related feature
compatible with the selected FPU and disables every feature not
compatible, which is more verbose but means clang doesn't have to
understand the dependency relationships between the backend features.
Meanwhile, `ARMTargetInfo::handleTargetFeatures` is testing for all
the various forms of the FP feature names, so that it won't miss cases
where it should have set `HW_FP` to feed into feature test macros.
That in turn caused an ordering problem when handling `-mcpu=foo+bar`
together with `-mfpu=something_that_turns_off_bar`. To fix that, I've
arranged that the `+bar` suffixes on the end of `-mcpu` and `-march`
cause feature names to be put into a separate vector which is
concatenated after the output of `getFPUFeatures`.
Another side effect of all this is to fix a bug where `clang -target
armv8-eabi` by itself would fail to set `__ARM_FEATURE_FMA`, even
though `armv8` (aka Arm v8-A) implies FP-Armv8 which has FMA. That was
because `HW_FP` was being set to a value including only the `FPARMV8`
bit, but that feature test macro was testing only the `VFP4FPU` bit.
Now `HW_FP` ends up with all the bits set, so it gives the right
answer.
Changes to tests included in this patch:
* `arm-target-features.c`: I had to change basically all the expected
results. (The Cortex-M4 test in there should function as a
regression test for the accidental double-precision bug.)
* `arm-mfpu.c`, `armv8.1m.main.c`: switched to using `CHECK-DAG`
everywhere so that those tests are no longer sensitive to the order
of cc1 feature options on the command line.
* `arm-acle-6.5.c`: been updated to expect the right answer to that
FMA test.
* `Preprocessor/arm-target-features.c`: added a regression test for
the `mfpu=softvfp` issue.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, dmgreen, ostannard, samparker, JamesNagurne
Reviewed By: ostannard
Subscribers: srhines, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62998
llvm-svn: 362791
Now, when clang processes an argument of the form "-march=foo+x+y+z",
then instead of calling getArchExtFeature() for each of the extension
names "x", "y", "z" and appending the returned string to its list of
low-level subtarget features, it will call appendArchExtFeatures()
which does the appending itself.
The difference is that appendArchExtFeatures can add _more_ than one
low-level feature name to the output feature list if it has to, and
also, it gets told some information about what base architecture and
CPU the extension is going to go with, which means that "+fp" can now
mean something different for different CPUs. Namely, "+fp" now selects
whatever the _default_ FPU is for the selected CPU and/or
architecture, as defined in the ARM_ARCH or ARM_CPU_NAME macros in
ARMTargetParser.def.
On the clang side, I adjust DecodeARMFeatures to call the new
appendArchExtFeatures function in place of getArchExtFeature. This
means DecodeARMFeatures needs to be passed a CPU name and an ArchKind,
which meant changing its call sites to make those available, and also
sawing getLLVMArchSuffixForARM in half so that you can get an ArchKind
enum value out of it instead of a string.
Also, I add support here for the extension name "+fp.dp", which will
automatically look through the FPU list for something that looks just
like the default FPU except for also supporting double precision.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60697
llvm-svn: 362601
The recent change D60691 introduced a bug in clang when handling
option combinations such as `-mcpu=cortex-m4 -mfpu=none`. Those
options together should select Cortex-M4 but disable all use of
hardware FP, but in fact, now hardware FP instructions can still be
generated in that mode.
The reason is because the handling of FPUVersion::NONE disables all
the same feature names it used to, of which the base one is `vfp2`.
But now there are further features below that, like `vfp2d16fp` and
(following D60694) `fpregs`, which also need to be turned off to
disable hardware FP completely.
Added a tiny test which double-checks that compiling a simple FP
function doesn't access the FP registers.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, dmgreen
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62729
llvm-svn: 362380
Defines macro ARM_FEATURE_CMSE to 1 for v8-M targets and introduces
-mcmse option which for v8-M targets sets ARM_FEATURE_CMSE to 3.
A diagnostic is produced when the option is given on architectures
without support for Security Extensions.
Reviewed By: dmgreen, snidertm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59879
llvm-svn: 361261
Summary:
When using `clang -mcpu=CPUNAME+FEATURELIST`,
the implied features defined by CPUNAME are
not obtained, as the entire string is passed.
This fixes that by spiting the cpuname
string in the first `+`, if any.
For example, when using
```clang -### --target=arm-arm-none-eabi -march=armv7-a -mcpu=cortex-a8+nocrc```
the intrinsic
```"target-feature" "+dsp"```
implied by `cortex-a8` is missing.
Reviewers: keith.walker.arm, DavidSpickett, carwil
Reviewed By: DavidSpickett
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61668
llvm-svn: 360324
Summary:
There are an insignificant number of ARM Android devices that don't
support NEON. Default to using NEON since that will improve
performance on the majority of devices. Users that need to target
non-NEON devices can still explicitly disable NEON.
Reviewers: srhines, pirama, kristof.beyls
Reviewed By: pirama
Subscribers: efriedma, javed.absar, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58153
llvm-svn: 354166
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The big-endian arm32 Linux builds are currently failing when the
-mbig-endian flag is used but the binutils default on the system is little
endian. This also holds when -mlittle-endian is used and the binutils
default is big endian.
The patch always passes through -EL or -BE to the assembler and linker,
taking into account the target and the -mbig-endian and -mlittle-endian
flag.
Fixes pr38770
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52784
llvm-svn: 344597
Summary:
Android mandates that devices have at least vfpv3-d16 until
Marshmallow and NEON after that. Still honor the user's decision, but
raise the defaults for Android targets.
Reviewers: srhines, pirama, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, peter.smith
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Subscribers: peter.smith, rengolin, kristof.beyls, chrib, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53121
llvm-svn: 344367
For AArch64, crypto means:
- sm4 + sha3 + sha2 + aes for Armv8.4-A and up, and
- sha2 + aes for Armv8.3-A and earlier.
For AArch32:
Crypto means sha2 + aes, because the Armv8.2-A crypto instructions
were added to AArch64 only.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50179
llvm-svn: 343758
Armv8.4-A adds a few FP16 instructions that can optionally be implemented
in CPUs of Armv8.2-A and above.
This patch adds a feature to clang to permit selection of these
instructions. This interacts with the +fp16 option as follows:
Prior to Armv8.4-A:
*) +fp16fml implies +fp16
*) +nofp16 implies +nofp16fml
From Armv8.4-A:
*) The above conditions apply, additionally: +fp16 implies +fp16fml
Patch by Bernard Ogden.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50229
llvm-svn: 342862
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
To be compatible with GCC if soft floating point is in effect any FPU
specified is effectively ignored, eg,
-mfloat-abi=soft -fpu=neon
If any floating point features which require FPU hardware are enabled
they must be disable.
There was some support for doing this for NEON, but it did not handle
VFP, nor did it prevent the backend from emitting the build attribute
Tag_FP_arch describing the generated code as using the floating point
hardware if a FPU was specified (even though soft float does not use
the FPU).
Disabling the hardware floating point features for targets which are
compiling for soft float has meant that some tests which were incorrectly
checking for hardware support also needed to be updated. In such cases,
where appropriate the tests have been updated to check compiling for
soft float and a non-soft float variant (usually softfp). This was
usually because the target specified in the test defaulted to soft float.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42569
llvm-svn: 325492
To be compatible with GCC if soft floating point is in effect any FPU
specified is effectively ignored, eg,
-mfloat-abi=soft -fpu=neon
If any floating point features which require FPU hardware are enabled
they must be disable.
There was some support for doing this for NEON, but it did not handle
VFP, nor did it prevent the backend from emitting the build attribute
Tag_FP_arch describing the generated code as using the floating point
hardware if a FPU was specified (even though soft float does not use
the FPU).
Disabling the hardware floating point features for targets which are
compiling for soft float has meant that some tests which were incorrectly
checking for hardware support also needed to be updated. In such cases,
where appropriate the tests have been updated to check compiling for
soft float and a non-soft float variant (usually softfp). This was
usually because the target specified in the test defaulted to soft float.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40256
llvm-svn: 319420
If a struct would end up half in GPRs and half on SP the ABI says it should
actually go entirely on the stack. We were getting this wrong in GlobalISel
before, causing compatibility issues.
llvm-svn: 311137
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
Alexandros Lamprineas