Summary:
Extract the functionality of eliminating unreachable basic blocks
within a function, previously encapsulated within the
-unreachableblockelim pass, and make it available as a function within
BlockUtils.h. No functional change intended other than making the logic
reusable.
Exposing this logic makes it easier to implement
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59068, which fixes coroutines bug
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40979.
Reviewers: mkazantsev, wmi, davidxl, silvas, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59069
llvm-svn: 355846
Summary:
The logic in the -unreachableblockelim pass does the following:
1. It traverses the function it's given in depth-first order and
creates a set of basic blocks that are unreachable from the
function's entry node.
2. It iterates over each of those unreachable blocks and (1) removes any
successors' references to the dead block, and (2) replaces any uses of
instructions from the dead block with null.
The logic in (2) above is identical to what the `llvm::DeleteDeadBlocks`
function from `BasicBlockUtils.h` does. The only difference is that
`llvm::DeleteDeadBlocks` replaces uses of instructions from dead blocks
not with null, but with undef.
Replace the duplicate logic in the -unreachableblockelim pass with a
call to `llvm::DeleteDeadBlocks`. This results in less code but no
functional change (NFC).
Reviewers: mkazantsev, wmi, davidxl, silvas, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59064
llvm-svn: 355634
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This header includes CodeGen headers, and is not, itself, included by
any Target headers, so move it into CodeGen to match the layering of its
implementation.
llvm-svn: 317647
This time invoking llc with "-march=x86-64" in the testcase, so we don't assume
the default target is x86.
Summary:
If we have
%vreg0<def> = PHI %vreg2<undef>, <BB#0>, %vreg3, <BB#2>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg2,%vreg3
%vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32ri8 %vreg0<kill,tied0>, 1, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg0
then we can't just change %vreg0 into %vreg3, since %vreg2 is actually
undef. We would have to also copy the undef flag to be able to change the
register.
Instead we deal with this case like other cases where we can't just
replace the register: we insert a COPY. The code creating the COPY already
copied all flags from the PHI input, so the undef flag will be transferred
as it should.
Reviewers: kparzysz
Reviewed By: kparzysz
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38235
llvm-svn: 314882
Summary:
If we have
%vreg0<def> = PHI %vreg2<undef>, <BB#0>, %vreg3, <BB#2>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg2,%vreg3
%vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32ri8 %vreg0<kill,tied0>, 1, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg0
then we can't just change %vreg0 into %vreg3, since %vreg2 is actually
undef. We would have to also copy the undef flag to be able to change the
register.
Instead we deal with this case like other cases where we can't just
replace the register: we insert a COPY. The code creating the COPY already
copied all flags from the PHI input, so the undef flag will be transferred
as it should.
Reviewers: kparzysz
Reviewed By: kparzysz
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38235
llvm-svn: 314879
Summary:
MachineRegisterInfo::constrainRegClass() can fail if two register classes
don't have a common subclass or if the register class doesn't contain
enough registers. Check the return value before trying to remove Phi nodes,
and if we can't constrain, we output a COPY instead of simply replacing
registers.
Reviewers: kparzysz, david2050, wmi
Reviewed By: kparzysz
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32999
llvm-svn: 302622
When a PHI operand has a subregister, create a COPY instead of simply
replacing the PHI output with the input it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32650
llvm-svn: 301699
Summary: This makes a change to the state used to maintain visited information for depth first iterator. We know assume a method "completed(...)" which is called after all children of a node have been visited. In all existing cases, this method does nothing so this patch has no functional changes. It will however allow a client to distinguish back from cross edges in a DFS tree.
Reviewers: nadav, mehdi_amini, dberlin
Subscribers: MatzeB, mzolotukhin, twoh, freik, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25191
llvm-svn: 283391
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
This patch was generated by a clang tidy checker that is being open sourced.
The documentation of that checker is the following:
/// The emptiness of a container should be checked using the empty method
/// instead of the size method. It is not guaranteed that size is a
/// constant-time function, and it is generally more efficient and also shows
/// clearer intent to use empty. Furthermore some containers may implement the
/// empty method but not implement the size method. Using empty whenever
/// possible makes it easier to switch to another container in the future.
Patch by Gábor Horváth!
llvm-svn: 226161
Summary: This patch introduces two new iterator ranges and updates existing code to use it. No functional change intended.
Test Plan: All tests (make check-all) still pass.
Reviewers: dblaikie
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4481
llvm-svn: 213474
can be used by both the new pass manager and the old.
This removes it from any of the virtual mess of the pass interfaces and
lets it derive cleanly from the DominatorTreeBase<> template. In turn,
tons of boilerplate interface can be nuked and it turns into a very
straightforward extension of the base DominatorTree interface.
The old analysis pass is now a simple wrapper. The names and style of
this split should match the split between CallGraph and
CallGraphWrapperPass. All of the users of DominatorTree have been
updated to match using many of the same tricks as with CallGraph. The
goal is that the common type remains the resulting DominatorTree rather
than the pass. This will make subsequent work toward the new pass
manager significantly easier.
Also in numerous places things became cleaner because I switched from
re-running the pass (!!! mid way through some other passes run!!!) to
directly recomputing the domtree.
llvm-svn: 199104
directory. These passes are already defined in the IR library, and it
doesn't make any sense to have the headers in Analysis.
Long term, I think there is going to be a much better way to divide
these matters. The dominators code should be fully separated into the
abstract graph algorithm and have that put in Support where it becomes
obvious that evn Clang's CFGBlock's can use it. Then the verifier can
manually construct dominance information from the Support-driven
interface while the Analysis library can provide a pass which both
caches, reconstructs, and supports a nice update API.
But those are very long term, and so I don't want to leave the really
confusing structure until that day arrives.
llvm-svn: 199082
infrastructure.
This was essentially work toward PGO based on a design that had several
flaws, partially dating from a time when LLVM had a different
architecture, and with an effort to modernize it abandoned without being
completed. Since then, it has bitrotted for several years further. The
result is nearly unusable, and isn't helping any of the modern PGO
efforts. Instead, it is getting in the way, adding confusion about PGO
in LLVM and distracting everyone with maintenance on essentially dead
code. Removing it paves the way for modern efforts around PGO.
Among other effects, this removes the last of the runtime libraries from
LLVM. Those are being developed in the separate 'compiler-rt' project
now, with somewhat different licensing specifically more approriate for
runtimes.
llvm-svn: 191835
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
they all ready do). This removes two dominator recomputations prior to isel,
which is a 1% improvement in total llc time for 403.gcc.
The only potentially suspect thing is making GCStrategy recompute dominators if
it used a custom lowering strategy.
llvm-svn: 123064
must be called in the pass's constructor. This function uses static dependency declarations to recursively initialize
the pass's dependencies.
Clients that only create passes through the createFooPass() APIs will require no changes. Clients that want to use the
CommandLine options for passes will need to manually call the appropriate initialization functions in PassInitialization.h
before parsing commandline arguments.
I have tested this with all standard configurations of clang and llvm-gcc on Darwin. It is possible that there are problems
with the static dependencies that will only be visible with non-standard options. If you encounter any crash in pass
registration/creation, please send the testcase to me directly.
llvm-svn: 116820
into TargetOpcodes.h. #include the new TargetOpcodes.h
into MachineInstr. Add new inline accessors (like isPHI())
to MachineInstr, and start using them throughout the
codebase.
llvm-svn: 95687
This involves temporarily hard wiring some parts to use the global context. This isn't ideal, but it's
the only way I could figure out to make this process vaguely incremental.
llvm-svn: 75445
Brian Gesiak