expression (a * b + c) that can be implemented as a fused multiply-add (fma)
if the target determines that this will be more efficient. This intrinsic
will be used to implement FP_CONTRACT support and an aggressive FMA formation
mode.
If your target has a fast FMA instruction you should override the
isFMAFasterThanMulAndAdd method in TargetLowering to return true.
llvm-svn: 158014
IntegersSubsetGeneric, IntegersSubsetMapping: added IntTy template parameter, that allows use either APInt or IntItem. This change allows to write unittest for these classes.
llvm-svn: 157880
IntegersSubset devided into IntegersSubsetGeneric and into IntegersSubset itself. The first has no references to ConstantInt and works with IntItem only.
IntegersSubsetMapping also made generic. Here added second template parameter "IntegersSubsetTy" that allows to use on of two IntegersSubset types described below.
llvm-svn: 157815
Implemented IntItem - the wrapper around APInt. Why not to use APInt item directly right now?
1. It will very difficult to implement case ranges as series of small patches. We got several large and heavy patches. Each patch will about 90-120 kb. If you replace ConstantInt with APInt in SwitchInst you will need to changes at the same time all Readers,Writers and absolutely all passes that uses SwitchInst.
2. We can implement APInt pool inside and save memory space. E.g. we use several switches that works with 256 bit items (switch on signatures, or strings). We can avoid value duplicates in this case.
3. IntItem can be easyly easily replaced with APInt.
4. Currenly we can interpret IntItem both as ConstantInt and as APInt. It allows to provide SwitchInst methods that works with ConstantInt for non-updated passes.
Why I need it right now? Currently I need to update SimplifyCFG pass (EqualityComparisons). I need to work with APInts directly a lot, so peaces of code
ConstantInt *V = ...;
if (V->getValue().ugt(AnotherV->getValue()) {
...
}
will look awful. Much more better this way:
IntItem V = ConstantIntVal->getValue();
if (AnotherV < V) {
}
Of course any reviews are welcome.
P.S.: I'm also going to rename ConstantRangesSet to IntegersSubset, and CRSBuilder to IntegersSubsetMapping (allows to map individual subsets of integers to the BasicBlocks).
Since in future these classes will founded on APInt, it will possible to use them in more generic ways.
llvm-svn: 157576
SimplifyCFG tends to form a lot of 2-3 case switches when merging branches. Move
the most likely condition to the front so it is checked first and the others can
be skipped. This is currently not as effective as it could be because SimplifyCFG
destroys profiling metadata when merging branches and switches. Merging branch
weight metadata is tricky though.
This code touches at most 3 cases so I didn't use a proper sorting algorithm.
llvm-svn: 157521
to pass around a struct instead of a large set of individual values. This
cleans up the interface and allows more information to be added to the struct
for future targets without requiring changes to each and every target.
NV_CONTRIB
llvm-svn: 157479
SelectionDAGBuilder::Clusterify : main functinality was replaced with CRSBuilder::optimize, so big part of Clusterify's code was reduced.
llvm-svn: 157046
This is the CodeGen equivalent of r153747. I tested that there is not noticeable
performance difference with any combination of -O0/-O2 /-g when compiling
gcc as a single compilation unit.
llvm-svn: 153817
Renamed methods caseBegin, caseEnd and caseDefault with case_begin, case_end, and case_default.
Added some notes relative to case iterators.
llvm-svn: 152532
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120130/136146.html
Implemented CaseIterator and it solves almost all described issues: we don't need to mix operand/case/successor indexing anymore. Base iterator class is implemented as a template since it may be initialized either from "const SwitchInst*" or from "SwitchInst*".
ConstCaseIt is just a read-only iterator.
CaseIt is read-write iterator; it allows to change case successor and case value.
Usage of iterator allows totally remove resolveXXXX methods. All indexing convertions done automatically inside the iterator's getters.
Main way of iterator usage looks like this:
SwitchInst *SI = ... // intialize it somehow
for (SwitchInst::CaseIt i = SI->caseBegin(), e = SI->caseEnd(); i != e; ++i) {
BasicBlock *BB = i.getCaseSuccessor();
ConstantInt *V = i.getCaseValue();
// Do something.
}
If you want to convert case number to TerminatorInst successor index, just use getSuccessorIndex iterator's method.
If you want initialize iterator from TerminatorInst successor index, use CaseIt::fromSuccessorIndex(...) method.
There are also related changes in llvm-clients: klee and clang.
llvm-svn: 152297
When the GEP index is a vector of pointers, the code that calculated the size
of the element started from the vector type, and not the contained pointer type.
As a result, instead of looking at the data element pointed by the vector, this
code used the size of the vector. This works for 32bit members (on 32bit
systems), but not for other types. Added code to peel the vector type and
added a test.
llvm-svn: 151626
the processor keeps a return addresses stack (RAS) which stores the address
and the instruction execution state of the instruction after a function-call
type branch instruction.
Calling a "noreturn" function with normal call instructions (e.g. bl) can
corrupt RAS and causes 100% return misprediction so LLVM should use a
unconditional branch instead. i.e.
mov lr, pc
b _foo
The "mov lr, pc" is issued in order to get proper backtrace.
rdar://8979299
llvm-svn: 151623
variable declaration as an argument because we want that address
anyhow for our debug information.
This seems to fix rdar://9965111, at least we have more debug
information than before and from reading the assembly it appears
to be the correct location.
llvm-svn: 151335
Lang Hames